


Ask the community...
I'm a former banking operations specialist, and there may be some additional factors at play here. Chase, like most large banks, typically processes ACH transfers in batches, usually around 2-3 times per day. If the IRS transmission occurred after the final batch on 3/19, it would likely be processed the following business day. Additionally, there could possibly be a security hold if this is a new account, if the amount is significantly larger than previous deposits, or if there have been recent account changes. These holds are generally 2-3 business days but can extend to 5 business days in some circumstances.
Let me clarify the process when you call Chase about a missing tax refund: 1. Call the direct deposit department (not general customer service) 2. Provide your mother-in-law's account information 3. Ask specifically about pending ACH transfers from the Treasury 4. Request information about any security holds 5. If it's been more than 3 business days, request escalation to a supervisor 6. Document the call with representative name, time, and case number if provided
@Lucy Taylor how does one get in touch with direct deposit dept
I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now! My DDD was 3/19 with Chase and I'm still waiting too. After reading all these responses, I called Chase this morning using the advice from @Lucy Taylor about calling the direct deposit department specifically. The rep told me they can see a "processing deposit" from the Treasury that should post within 24-48 hours. She said it's been in their system since 3/20 but got flagged for their standard tax refund verification process. Apparently this is happening to a lot of Chase customers with DDDs from 3/19. Really frustrating that they don't show these as pending in online banking! I'll update once it hits my account.
This is really helpful information! Thanks for actually calling and sharing what you found out. It's so frustrating that Chase doesn't show these "processing deposits" in online banking - makes us all think something went wrong when really they're just holding it for their verification process. I'm in the same boat with a 3/19 DDD and Chase, so I'm going to call them today using the same approach you did. Really appreciate you taking the time to update us with what the rep told you. Hopefully we'll all see our refunds hit within the next day or two!
@Ethan Brown what s'the direct deposit dept #
Your dad's situation is definitely fixable, but time is critical here. I agree with the advice to apply for Social Security immediately - don't wait for the tax situation to be resolved first. The SSA can work with his earnings record that employers have been reporting all these years. For the tax side, start by requesting wage and income transcripts from the IRS for all the unfiled years. You can do this online at irs.gov or by calling them (though as others mentioned, getting through can be challenging). These transcripts will show what income was reported by his employers and any taxes withheld. Since he had taxes withheld from his paychecks, he likely doesn't owe anything and may even be due refunds for some years. The key is getting those last 6 years filed to bring him into compliance. Given the complexity and the urgency with his health situation, I'd strongly recommend working with a tax professional who has experience with unfiled returns - they can streamline the process and help avoid costly mistakes. The most important thing is to take action now rather than letting this drag on any longer. Both his Social Security benefits and potential tax refunds are time-sensitive.
This is excellent comprehensive advice! I just want to emphasize one point about the wage and income transcripts - when you request these from the IRS, make sure to get them for ALL the unfiled years, not just the recent ones. Even though your dad may only need to file the last 6 years to be current, having the full picture of his income history will help identify any years where he might be owed refunds. Also, when working with a tax professional, look for someone who specifically advertises experience with "unfiled returns" or "delinquent taxes" rather than just general tax prep. These specialists understand the IRS procedures for catching up on multiple years and can often negotiate better outcomes if any issues arise. The urgency around Social Security cannot be overstated - every month that passes is potentially money lost forever due to the retroactive limits.
I went through almost the exact same situation with my father-in-law two years ago. He hadn't filed in about 18 years and was panicking about Social Security eligibility. Here's what we learned that might help: First, definitely start the Social Security application ASAP as others have mentioned - the earnings record from employers is what matters most for benefits, not tax filings. We were amazed to discover his full work history was already in their system from employer reporting. For the IRS side, we found out that since taxes were withheld from his paychecks the whole time, he actually qualified for what's called "substitute for return" status for many years where the IRS basically filed simplified returns on his behalf. This meant he wasn't in as much trouble as we feared. The real breakthrough came when we got his wage and income transcripts for all the missing years. It showed that for 4 of the years, he was actually owed refunds totaling over $3,200 (though we could only claim the ones from the last 3 years). We ended up only needing to file the last 6 years to get him current, and the whole process took about 3 months working with a tax professional who specialized in unfiled returns. The key was getting started immediately - don't let fear of the IRS paralyze you into waiting longer. Your dad's health situation makes this urgent, but it's absolutely manageable. The government actually wants people to get caught up and claim their benefits!
This is incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who's been through the exact same situation! The "substitute for return" status is something I hadn't heard of before - that could be a huge relief for my dad's situation. Can you tell me more about how you found the tax professional who specialized in unfiled returns? Did you just search online or get a referral? And roughly what did the whole process cost? I'm trying to budget for this since we need to move quickly but also want to make sure we're working with someone reputable. Also, when you say it took 3 months total, was that 3 months of active work or mostly waiting for the IRS to process things? I'm trying to set realistic expectations for my dad about the timeline.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I've been struggling with this exact issue for my tax preparation. I have three rental properties that I actively manage (tenant screening, minor repairs, property showings) and was completely confused about whether this "active" management meant I should use Schedule C. Based on the discussion here, it's clear that Schedule E is the right choice for my situation since I'm managing my own investments, not providing services to other property owners. The clarification about avoiding self-employment tax while still being able to deduct all legitimate expenses is huge - I had no idea I was potentially overpaying taxes by considering Schedule C. One follow-up question: I sometimes hire contractors for bigger repairs on my properties. Should I be issuing 1099s to contractors who do work on my Schedule E rental properties, or is that only required for Schedule C business activities? I paid my handyman about $3,200 last year and want to make sure I'm handling the reporting correctly. Also, @Emily Parker, your point about QBI deduction eligibility is something I hadn't considered at all. I'll definitely need to look into whether my rental income qualifies - that 20% deduction could be substantial on my rental profits.
Yes, you absolutely need to issue 1099-NEC forms to contractors who performed work on your rental properties if you paid them $600 or more during the tax year. This requirement applies to Schedule E rental activities, not just Schedule C businesses. Since you paid your handyman $3,200, you should have issued a 1099-NEC by January 31st (the deadline just passed). The IRS requires 1099s for any non-employee compensation, including contractors working on rental properties. Make sure you have their W-9 form on file with their correct SSN or EIN. If you haven't issued it yet, you should do so immediately and may face penalties, though they're usually minimal for first-time late filings. For the QBI deduction that @Emily Parker mentioned - rental activities can qualify, but there are specific requirements. Your rental activity needs to rise to the level of a trade "or business under" Section 162, which generally means regular and continuous activity. Since you re'actively managing three properties with tenant screening and repairs, you might qualify. The deduction can be up to 20% of your qualified business income, subject to income limitations and other complex rules.
This is exactly the kind of confusion I had when I first started with rental properties! The key distinction that helped me understand it was thinking about WHO you're providing services to. If you're managing your own rental properties (even very actively with repairs, tenant screening, marketing vacancies, etc.), you're managing your own investments - that's Schedule E. The income isn't subject to self-employment tax, and you can deduct all ordinary and necessary rental expenses. Schedule C would only come into play if you were providing property management services to OTHER people's properties as a business, or if you were a real estate dealer (buying/selling frequently rather than holding for rental income). One thing I learned the hard way - make sure you're tracking your expenses properly on Schedule E. You can deduct a lot more than you might think: advertising for tenants, legal fees, travel to properties, even a portion of your home office if you use it exclusively for managing your rentals. Just keep good records and receipts for everything. The material participation rules that you mentioned are more about passive activity loss limitations - they don't change whether you use Schedule C vs E. Even if you don't materially participate, rental income still goes on Schedule E (it just might be subject to different loss limitation rules).
This is such a clear way to think about it - the "who are you providing services to" distinction really helps! I was getting caught up in thinking that because I spend so much time on property management tasks, it must be a "business" activity. But you're right, managing my own investments is fundamentally different from managing other people's properties as a service. Your point about tracking expenses is really important too. I've probably been missing out on deductions because I wasn't sure what was legitimate on Schedule E. The home office deduction is particularly interesting - I do use part of my spare bedroom exclusively for rental property paperwork and tenant communications. Do you know if there are specific requirements for claiming that, like it has to be used ONLY for rental activities? Also, thanks for clarifying the material participation rules. I kept seeing that term thrown around and thought it determined which form to use, but now I understand it's more about loss limitations. That takes away a lot of the confusion I was having!
I'm fairly new to business ownership myself and this whole discussion has been incredibly helpful! I had a similar misconception about using loans to reduce taxable income - it seemed like such an obvious strategy that I was surprised more people weren't talking about it. Now I understand why - because it doesn't actually work that way! The distinction between loan proceeds (not taxable) and loan payments (not deductible) versus actual business expenses (potentially deductible) is really important. What's been most valuable for me is learning about the legitimate ways to use financing strategically. The Section 179 deduction for equipment purchases sounds like something I should definitely research more. I've been bootstrapping everything so far, but it sounds like there might be real advantages to financing certain business investments rather than paying cash, especially if it helps with cash flow while still providing tax benefits. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences with the various tax services and tools too. As someone who's been trying to handle everything myself, it's clear I probably need some professional guidance to make sure I'm not missing opportunities or making costly mistakes.
You're absolutely right about the Section 179 deduction being worth researching! I made the same mistake early on of trying to pay cash for everything thinking it was "smarter," but strategic financing can actually be better for both cash flow and taxes. One thing I wish I'd understood sooner is that Section 179 lets you deduct the full cost of qualifying equipment in the year you purchase it (up to certain limits), rather than depreciating it over several years. So if you buy a $20k piece of equipment, you can potentially deduct the entire amount this year instead of spreading it out. That can make a huge difference in your current tax bill. The key is making sure you're buying things your business actually needs, not just spending money for tax purposes. But if you were planning those purchases anyway, the timing can really matter for maximizing your deductions. Definitely worth getting professional advice to make sure you understand all the rules and limits!
This is such a great discussion! As someone who made similar mistakes early in my business journey, I wanted to add a few practical points that might help other newcomers. The loan repayment vs. business expense distinction really clicked for me when my accountant explained it this way: imagine you had $65k in cash sitting in your business account from profits. Whether you use that cash to pay off a loan, buy a car, or invest in equipment doesn't change the fact that you earned $65k in taxable profit. The IRS taxes the earning of income, not how you choose to spend it afterward. What's been game-changing for my business is learning to plan major purchases around tax strategy. Instead of buying equipment when I "feel like I have extra money," I now time purchases strategically - sometimes using financing even when I could pay cash, specifically to preserve working capital while still getting the immediate tax deductions. One mistake I see a lot of new business owners make is thinking they need to spend money at year-end just for tax purposes. But the best approach is identifying what your business actually needs over the next 1-2 years, then timing those purchases and financing decisions to optimize both cash flow and tax benefits. The resources others have mentioned in this thread sound really helpful - it's clear that having good guidance makes a huge difference in avoiding costly misunderstandings about business taxes!
Aisha Rahman
As someone who just went through setting up health insurance for my small marketing agency, I can confirm everything that's been said here is correct. The full premium amount is deductible as a business expense, even including the employee pretax portions. One thing I'd add is to make sure you're keeping really good records of all this. I set up separate accounting codes for my portion vs. employee contributions just to make it crystal clear during tax time. My bookkeeper recommended tracking the total premium payments to the insurance company in one account, and then showing the employee pretax deductions as a separate line item that offsets payroll expenses. Also, don't forget that if you're using payroll software like QuickBooks or ADP, most of them will automatically handle the pretax calculations and generate the right reports for your tax preparer. Just make sure the pretax deduction is set up correctly in the system from the start - much easier than trying to fix it retroactively! The tax savings really do add up. Between my business deduction and my employees saving on their income and payroll taxes, we're probably saving around $4,000 collectively per year compared to if everyone just bought individual policies. Definitely worth the administrative hassle!
0 coins
QuantumQueen
ā¢This is really helpful advice about the record-keeping! I'm just starting to research health insurance options for my small consulting firm and the administrative side seems overwhelming. Can you share more details about how you set up those separate accounting codes? I use QuickBooks Online and want to make sure I structure this correctly from day one. Also, did you run into any issues with your payroll software calculating the pretax deductions accurately, or was it pretty straightforward once you had it configured? The $4,000 in collective savings you mentioned really drives home how valuable this benefit can be - definitely motivating me to move forward with offering coverage!
0 coins
Liam Brown
ā¢@QuantumQueen Happy to share more details! In QuickBooks Online, I set up the accounting this way: I created an expense account called "Employee Health Insurance - Total Premiums" where I record the full monthly payment to the insurance company. Then I created a payroll liability account called "Employee Health Contributions - Pretax" that tracks what employees contribute through payroll deductions. The setup in QBO payroll was actually pretty straightforward once I figured out the right deduction type. You want to make sure you select "Health Insurance (pretax)" as the deduction category, not just a regular after-tax deduction. This automatically handles the tax calculations and ensures it reduces their taxable wages properly. The only hiccup I ran into was during the first month - I accidentally set up the deduction as post-tax initially and had to run a payroll correction. But once it's configured correctly, it runs like clockwork. The system generates all the right reports for tax time and even handles the year-end W-2 adjustments automatically. Pro tip: Set up the health insurance as a "company contribution" item too, even though employees are paying part of it. This makes it easier to track your total benefit costs and ensures everything flows to the right tax forms. The time investment upfront is definitely worth it for the ongoing automation!
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation with my small accounting practice - just added health insurance for my 6 employees with a 60/40 split (I pay 60%, they pay 40% pretax). I was getting conflicting advice from different sources about the deductibility, but reading through all these explanations really clarifies things. The key insight that clicked for me is thinking about it as two separate transactions: my business expense to the insurance company for the full premium, and then the employee salary reduction arrangement that reimburses me for part of that expense. One question I still have - when I'm calculating my quarterly estimated taxes, should I be factoring in the tax savings from the full premium deduction or just my portion? I want to make sure I'm not underpaying throughout the year. My total monthly premiums are about $3,200 and employees contribute $1,280 of that pretax, so the additional deduction beyond my direct contribution is pretty significant for my tax planning. Also really appreciate everyone mentioning the record-keeping best practices and payroll software setup tips. Going to review my QuickBooks configuration this week to make sure everything is categorized correctly!
0 coins
Royal_GM_Mark
ā¢Great question about quarterly estimated taxes! You should definitely factor in the tax savings from the FULL premium deduction ($3,200/month), not just your 60% portion. Since you're getting to deduct the entire amount as a business expense, that's $38,400 annually that reduces your taxable income. At your tax bracket, this could mean significant quarterly payment adjustments - probably worth running the numbers with your tax software or calling your accountant to recalculate your estimated payments. Better to adjust now than deal with underpayment penalties later, especially since that extra $15,360 in annual deductions ($1,280 x 12 months) beyond your direct contribution is pretty substantial for a small practice. Your 60/40 split sounds like a great benefit for your employees too! The pretax savings on their end probably makes the health insurance much more affordable than if they were buying individual coverage.
0 coins