Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Has anyone noticed that sometimes the numbers don't add up perfectly? My gross pay minus the non-taxable items doesn't exactly match Box 1. There's like a $230 difference I can't figure out.
That could be pre-tax deductions that aren't itemized separately. Things like FSA contributions, certain work expenses, or union dues sometimes cause small discrepancies. I had a similar issue and found out it was my parking pass being deducted pre-tax but not listed separately.
Thanks for the explanation! That makes sense - I do have a dependent care FSA that's probably causing the difference. Completely forgot about that deduction since it comes out automatically. At least I know nothing's wrong with my W-2 now.
Just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact same confusion last year! The key thing that helped me understand it was realizing that your employer has already done the math for you. When you see "non-taxable compensation" on your W-2, those are benefits you received that don't count as taxable income. Think of it this way: if your employer pays $200/month for your health insurance, that's $2,400 in value you received during the year, but you don't have to pay taxes on it. It's like getting a $2,400 raise that's tax-free! The same goes for retirement contributions, transit benefits, etc. The most important number for filing your taxes is Box 1 (Wages, tips, other compensation) - that's your actual taxable income that you'll report on your tax return. Everything else has already been properly categorized by your employer's payroll system. Don't overthink it - just use the Box 1 amount and you'll be all set!
Join the conversation
Has anyone here used Form 982 when dealing with S-corp debt issues? I've been reading that canceled S-corp debt can sometimes be excluded from income under certain circumstances, and Form 982 might apply. Seems related to this basis discussion but I'm not clear on how it all fits together.
Form 982 is for debt cancellation, which is different from what's being discussed here. This thread is about basis calculations when the shareholder has loaned money to their S-corp and how those loans affect loss limitations. Form 982 comes into play when debt is forgiven or canceled. For example, if your S-corp owed money to a bank that later forgave that debt, Form 982 might allow you to exclude that canceled debt from income if you meet certain requirements like insolvency. They're related concepts but used in different scenarios. The basis rules here are about tracking your investment in the company (both equity and loans) to determine how much S-corp loss you can personally deduct.
This is exactly the kind of S-corp basis question that keeps me up at night! I've been dealing with a similar situation where my client has multiple years of suspended losses and we're trying to figure out the optimal timing for debt basis restoration. From everything I've researched and discussed with other practitioners, the consensus seems to be that Isaac Wright is correct - the "net increase" calculation under Reg §1.1367-2(c) looks only at current year items before considering carryforward losses. The restoration happens first, then suspended losses are applied against the restored basis. What's been tricky for me is documenting this properly on the returns. I've started creating detailed basis tracking schedules that show the step-by-step calculation: current year income/loss, net increase determination, debt basis restoration, stock basis restoration, then application of suspended losses. It helps clients understand why their tax liability might be different from what they expected. One thing I'd add to this discussion - make sure you're also considering the impact of distributions during years when you have suspended losses. The ordering rules get even more complex when you layer in distributions alongside the basis restoration calculations.
Thank you for bringing up the distribution ordering rules - that's another layer of complexity I hadn't fully considered! You're absolutely right that distributions can really complicate the basis restoration calculations, especially when they occur in the same year as income that could restore basis. From what I understand, distributions reduce basis before the year-end basis adjustments for income/loss items, which means timing becomes crucial. If a shareholder takes a distribution early in the year before the S-corp generates income, it could trigger gain recognition even if there would have been sufficient basis to cover the distribution by year-end after considering the restoration rules. Do you have any specific approaches for advising clients on distribution timing when they have suspended losses and potential debt basis restoration? I'm thinking it might be worth having quarterly basis calculations to help them make informed decisions about when to take distributions versus waiting for basis restoration. Also, do you use any particular software or tools for those detailed basis tracking schedules you mentioned? I've been doing them manually in Excel but I'm wondering if there's a better approach for complex multi-year situations.
Join the conversation
This has been an incredibly thorough discussion! As someone who's been considering the QJV route with my spouse, I really appreciate all the real-world experiences shared here. One aspect I haven't seen mentioned yet is how this affects business credit and banking relationships. Currently, all our business accounts and credit lines are under my husband's SSN as the sole proprietor. When we switch to a QJV, do we need to notify our business bank and credit card companies? I'm wondering if adding me as an equal owner might actually help us qualify for better business credit terms, or if it could complicate our existing relationships. Also, for those who have made the switch - how did you handle the transition with existing business contracts and vendor agreements? Did you need to update contracts to reflect both spouses as business owners, or were you able to continue operating under the original business name and structure for contractual purposes? The tax and operational benefits everyone's discussed definitely make this seem worthwhile, but I want to make sure I'm not overlooking any potential complications with our existing business relationships and financial accounts.
Great questions about the banking and contract side of things! From what I've experienced and researched, you'll definitely want to contact your business bank to add your spouse as an authorized user or co-owner on the accounts. Most banks will require some documentation of the ownership change, but since you're keeping the same EIN (as mentioned earlier in the thread), it's usually just a matter of updating the account information rather than opening entirely new accounts. For business credit, adding your spouse could potentially help your credit profile since you're essentially adding another person's credit history to the mix. However, some lenders might view it as a change in business structure and want to review your credit terms. I'd suggest reaching out to your current credit providers proactively to let them know about the change - transparency usually works better than surprises. Regarding contracts, in most cases you can continue operating under your existing business name and DBA without needing to update every single contract, since you're not changing your legal business entity (you're still an unincorporated business, just with different tax treatment). However, for new major contracts going forward, you might want to ensure both spouses are listed as the business owners if that's relevant to the agreement. The key is being proactive about communicating these changes to your financial partners rather than waiting for them to discover it during routine reviews.
This entire thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding QJVs! As someone who's been researching this option with my spouse for months, I really appreciate all the practical insights everyone has shared. One question I haven't seen addressed yet - for those who have made the QJV switch, how do you handle business expenses that one spouse pays for but both need to deduct? For example, if I pay for business supplies with my personal credit card, do I need to reimburse myself from the business and then split that expense between our Schedule Cs? Or can we each just deduct our respective portions directly based on our ownership percentages? Also, I'm curious about the mechanics of splitting income when payments come in irregularly. We do project-based work where we might get a large payment in one month and nothing the next. Do you split each payment as it comes in, or do you reconcile everything at year-end based on your agreed percentages? Thanks again to everyone who's shared their experiences - this has been way more informative than anything I've found in the official IRS publications!
Great questions about the practical day-to-day mechanics! For business expenses paid personally, the cleanest approach is to have one spouse pay the expense, then reimburse themselves from the business account, and finally split that expense between your two Schedule Cs based on your ownership percentages. This creates a clear paper trail that the IRS can easily follow if needed. However, some couples I know just track who paid what throughout the year and then allocate the deductions proportionally at tax time without doing the reimbursement dance. Either way works, but the reimbursement method is more audit-friendly since it keeps personal and business finances clearly separated. For irregular income, I'd recommend splitting each payment as it comes in based on your agreed percentages - this makes your bookkeeping much cleaner throughout the year. You can set up a simple spreadsheet to track each spouse's share of income and expenses as they occur. Waiting until year-end to reconcile everything can get messy, especially if you have a lot of transactions or if your business grows significantly during the year. The key is consistency - whatever method you choose for handling expenses and income splitting, stick with it throughout the tax year so your records tell a coherent story.
Join the conversation
Has anyone here actually gone through with a large Roth conversion in a low income year? I'm considering doing about $35k conversion but I'm worried I'll regret it when tax time comes.
I did a $42k conversion last year when my income dropped to about $35k after changing jobs. Best financial decision I've made! Yes, the tax bill was around $5k, but now that money is growing tax-free forever. Stock market has been up since then, so that $42k is already worth about $48k and I'll never pay taxes on those gains or any future ones. Just make sure you have cash set aside to pay the tax bill.
This is exactly the kind of situation where proper tax planning can save you thousands! With your $41k income and massive capital losses, you're actually in a unique position. While those losses can't directly offset Roth conversion income (as others mentioned), your low current income means you're in a great tax bracket for conversions. I'd strongly recommend running the numbers on converting enough to fill up your 12% tax bracket - probably around $8k based on your current income. Even though you'll pay taxes on the conversion, you're essentially "prepaying" taxes at today's lower rates rather than potentially higher rates in retirement. The key insight here is that your capital losses will carry forward for years, giving you ongoing $3k annual deductions against ordinary income. This means your effective tax rate might be even lower than the bracket suggests. Don't let the losses go to waste - use this low-income year strategically for tax-advantaged growth!
This is really helpful advice! I'm new to this community but dealing with a similar situation - lost about $85k in crypto this year and my income dropped to $38k. I never realized that capital losses could carry forward for multiple years giving me that $3k annual deduction. That actually makes the math on Roth conversions much more attractive than I thought. One question though - when you say "fill up the 12% bracket," how do I calculate exactly where that cutoff is? Is it just the bracket limit minus my current income, or are there other deductions I should factor in first? I want to make sure I don't accidentally push myself into the 22% bracket by converting too much.
Javier Garcia
Has anyone actually filed an amended return for something like this? I'm in a similar situation (paid $450 more using H&R Block vs what Credit Karma showed) but I'm worried that filing an amendment will trigger an audit or something. Is it worth the hassle?
0 coins
Emma Taylor
•I filed an amended return last year for a similar issue. It didn't trigger an audit. Just make sure you clearly explain the reason for the amendment. Mine took about 16 weeks to process, but I got my refund with interest!
0 coins
Harmony Love
This is exactly why I always recommend doing a quick cross-check with a second tax program before filing, especially if the amount owed seems unexpectedly high. The $850+ difference you experienced is unfortunately not uncommon. One thing that often causes these discrepancies is how different software handles the same inputs. For example, if you have multiple W-2s, investment income, or took any deductions, each program might guide you through entering that information slightly differently, leading to different calculations even with identical source documents. Since you've already filed and paid, definitely consider filing Form 1040-X (amended return) if you can verify that FreeTaxUSA's calculation was correct. You'll get the overpaid amount back with interest. Before doing that though, I'd suggest trying one more tax program (maybe even the IRS Free File options) to see which calculation is actually correct. Also, keep all your documentation from both programs showing the different calculations - this will help if you need to explain the discrepancy to the IRS.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•This is really helpful advice! I'm new to filing taxes myself and had no idea that different tax software could give such wildly different results. The idea of cross-checking with a second program before filing is smart - wish I had known that earlier this year. Quick question though - when you mention trying the IRS Free File options as a third check, are those typically more accurate than the commercial software? Or are they just another data point to help figure out which calculation is right? I'm wondering if the IRS's own tools would be considered the "gold standard" for accuracy.
0 coins