IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation where my grandmother wants to help with my graduate program costs. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like the key takeaway is that direct payments to educational institutions for qualified tuition and required fees are completely exempt from gift tax limits, while any money given directly to the student counts toward the annual $20k exclusion. One thing I'm curious about - does anyone know if this exemption applies to graduate school tuition as well, or is it specifically for undergraduate education? My program is quite expensive and my grandmother is concerned about potential tax implications if she helps with multiple semesters. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like the exemption should apply regardless of the level of education, but I want to make sure before she commits to helping. Also, the advice about keeping detailed records and understanding exactly which fees qualify is really valuable. I'll definitely check with my school's financial office to clarify which charges on my bill would be considered "required for enrollment" versus optional services.

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

The gift tax exemption for direct tuition payments applies to all levels of education - undergraduate, graduate, professional school, vocational training, etc. There's no distinction in the tax code between different educational levels, so your grandmother can pay unlimited amounts directly to your graduate school for qualified tuition and fees without any gift tax implications. This is actually one of the most underutilized tax benefits out there! Many families don't realize they can essentially bypass the annual gift limits entirely when it comes to education expenses by making payments directly to institutions. Your grandmother could theoretically pay $100k+ per year in tuition if that's what your program costs, and it wouldn't trigger any gift tax issues as long as the payments go straight to the school. Just make sure to get that clarification from your financial office about which specific fees qualify - graduate programs often have research fees, thesis fees, and other specialized charges that should qualify as long as they're required for enrollment or degree completion.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Thank you all for this incredibly thorough discussion! As someone new to navigating these tax implications, I really appreciate how clearly everyone has explained the distinction between direct tuition payments (unlimited exemption) and regular gifts (subject to annual limits). I've been following along because my aunt recently offered to help with my education expenses, and I was completely unaware of the strategic advantage of having her pay the school directly versus giving me the money to pay myself. The fact that she could potentially cover my entire tuition bill without any gift tax consequences is amazing! A few quick questions based on what I've learned here: Does the timing of these payments matter at all for tax purposes? For example, if my aunt pays for both fall and spring semester tuition in the same calendar year, is that still fully exempt? And does it matter if the payment is made before the semester starts versus during the semester? Also, I noticed someone mentioned keeping documentation - would a simple receipt or confirmation from the school's payment portal be sufficient, or should there be more formal documentation that explicitly states the payment was for qualified tuition and fees? This community has been so helpful in breaking down these complex tax rules into understandable guidance!

0 coins

LunarLegend

•

Great questions! The timing of payments doesn't matter at all for the gift tax exemption - your aunt could pay for multiple semesters in the same calendar year and each payment would still be fully exempt as long as it goes directly to the school. The IRS doesn't put any annual limits on this exemption, so she could theoretically pay $50k in January and another $50k in December for different semesters without any gift tax issues. As for documentation, a receipt or confirmation from the school's payment system is typically sufficient. The key is that it shows: (1) the payment went directly to the educational institution, (2) the date of payment, (3) what it was for (tuition/required fees), and (4) the amount. Most schools provide electronic receipts that include all this information automatically. Your aunt doesn't need any special forms or letters - just keep the payment confirmations with her tax records for that year in case the IRS ever asks questions (which is rare for education payments). The school's records will also show the payment came from her rather than from you, which further supports the exemption if needed. Welcome to the community, and I'm so glad this discussion has been helpful for your situation!

0 coins

Kai Santiago

•

I've been dealing with a similar situation and wanted to share what finally worked after months of back-and-forth with my company. The breakthrough came when I stopped asking for "help with housing costs" and started presenting it as a "project risk mitigation strategy." Here's what I did: I put together a one-page document showing how housing uncertainty was creating performance risks for the project. I included data on how financial stress impacts productivity (there are actual studies on this), calculated the cost of potential project delays, and showed comparable industry practices for temporary assignments. The key was positioning myself as solving THEIR problem rather than asking them to solve mine. I presented it as: "Here are three ways we can eliminate housing-related risks to project delivery" instead of "I need help paying rent." I also found it helpful to research our company's past decisions on similar situations. Turns out they had approved housing support for other long-term assignments, but it wasn't well-documented or consistent. Having those precedents made a huge difference. Bottom line: I got approval for a monthly "assignment completion incentive" that covers most of my housing costs, structured as a project milestone bonus rather than expense reimbursement. Sometimes it's all about the framing and finding the right budget category that works within their existing policies. Don't give up - project managers with your experience level are way too valuable to lose over what amounts to a rounding error in most company budgets!

0 coins

This is such a smart approach! @f14aaa367bcb The "project risk mitigation strategy" framing is genius - it completely shifts the conversation from personal finance to business operations. I love how you backed it up with actual productivity studies too. That kind of data makes it so much harder for them to dismiss the request. Your point about researching past company decisions is really valuable. It's crazy how many companies have informal precedents that aren't well documented. Finding those examples probably made your case feel much more reasonable and consistent with existing practices. The "assignment completion incentive" structure is brilliant too - it ties the benefit to successful project delivery rather than just covering expenses. That probably made it much easier for them to justify internally and might even motivate better performance outcomes. I'm curious - when you were researching those productivity studies, did you find specific data about financial stress and project management performance, or more general workplace productivity research? Having concrete numbers to back up the business case seems like it would be really compelling to management. This whole thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding all the different angles and strategies people can use. It's clear that persistence and the right framing make a huge difference in these negotiations!

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

This thread has been incredibly insightful! As someone who's currently facing a similar situation with a 10-month assignment to Portland, I want to thank everyone for sharing their experiences and strategies. What really stands out to me is how important the framing and approach is. The shift from "I need help with expenses" to "let's mitigate project risks" or "here are tax-efficient business solutions" seems to make all the difference in how these requests are received. I'm planning to combine several of the strategies mentioned here: documenting all the original commitments in writing, researching our company's past precedents for temporary assignments, and presenting multiple solution options rather than just asking for a single form of help. The tax attorney's explanation about temporary assignments and accountable plans was particularly valuable - I had no idea there were legitimate ways for companies to provide tax-free support in these situations. That gives me concrete alternatives to propose that could benefit both sides. For anyone else in similar situations, this thread shows that persistence really pays off and there are way more options available than most people initially realize. The key seems to be doing your homework, presenting professional business cases, and not taking the first "no" as final. Thanks again to everyone who shared their experiences - this kind of real-world advice is so much more helpful than generic online articles!

0 coins

Ryder Greene

•

This has been such an educational thread to follow! @61dd6c8a0694 You're absolutely right about the importance of framing - it's amazing how the same request can be received completely differently depending on how you present it. I'm in a somewhat similar boat (though not as experienced as many of you) and this discussion has given me so many ideas I never would have considered. The distinction between asking for personal help versus presenting business solutions really resonates. It makes total sense that companies would be more receptive to "here's how we solve a business problem" than "please help me with my expenses." The tax attorney's input about accountable plans and temporary assignment rules was eye-opening. I had no idea there were legitimate tax-advantaged ways to structure these arrangements. That kind of expert knowledge seems like it could be a game-changer in negotiations. One thing I'm taking away is the importance of doing thorough research before having these conversations - looking up company precedents, understanding the tax implications, and having multiple solutions ready to present. It sounds like preparation and persistence are just as important as the initial request. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences and expertise here. This is exactly the kind of practical, real-world advice that's so hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Gemma Andrews

•

As someone who's dealt with high property taxes for years, I appreciate everyone sharing legitimate alternatives here. The church scheme definitely sounds too risky after reading all these responses from tax professionals. I'm curious about the agricultural exemption @Sofia Torres mentioned - do you know what the minimum acreage requirements typically are? I have about 2 acres and have been thinking about starting a small farm operation, but wasn't sure if that would be enough to qualify for ag status. Also really interested in the energy efficiency tax breaks @Dylan Wright mentioned. Are those federal programs or do they vary by state/locality? My house is older and could definitely use some energy upgrades, so if I could get tax benefits while improving efficiency, that sounds like a win-win approach compared to questionable schemes.

0 coins

Great questions! For agricultural exemptions, requirements vary significantly by state and county. In my area (Texas), you need at least 5 acres for most ag exemptions, but some counties allow smaller parcels if you can demonstrate sufficient agricultural income. With 2 acres, you might qualify if you can show $1,000+ in agricultural sales annually - things like selling produce, eggs, or honey can count. For energy efficiency programs, it's a mix of federal and local incentives. The federal residential energy credit covers things like solar panels, geothermal systems, and energy-efficient HVAC systems. Many states and utilities also offer rebates for insulation, windows, and efficient appliances. Your local utility company's website usually has a section on energy efficiency programs - that's the best place to start since the programs change frequently. I'd recommend checking with your county agricultural extension office about ag exemptions and your utility company about energy programs. Both are legitimate ways to reduce your tax burden without any of the risks associated with creative ownership schemes!

0 coins

Liv Park

•

CPA here with 15+ years experience in tax planning. I want to emphasize what others have said - the church scheme you're describing would almost certainly be classified as tax evasion, not tax avoidance. The IRS has very specific "hobby loss" and "economic substance" tests that would easily catch this arrangement. However, I'm seeing some great legitimate suggestions in this thread. One strategy not mentioned yet is looking into conservation easements if you have significant land. If you can permanently protect part of your property from development (wetlands, forests, farmland), you may qualify for substantial tax deductions while still living on and using the property. Also, many homeowners don't realize they can request an informal review of their property assessment before filing a formal appeal. I've helped clients save thousands just by pointing out assessment errors like incorrect square footage, outdated comparable sales, or failure to account for property damage/depreciation. The key is working within the system rather than trying to game it. The potential savings from legitimate strategies, while maybe not as dramatic as your church idea, come without the risk of penalties, interest, and possible criminal charges.

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

Thanks for the comprehensive breakdown! As someone new to property tax planning, I'm really interested in the conservation easement option you mentioned. How much land typically needs to be involved for this to be worthwhile? And does it have to be pristine wilderness, or could something like a small wooded area or even a large garden qualify? I'm also wondering about the timeline for these legitimate strategies - do most of them require waiting until the next tax assessment cycle to see benefits, or are there some that can provide more immediate relief? The $7,000 annual tax burden the OP mentioned is pretty significant, so I imagine timing matters a lot for planning purposes. The informal assessment review sounds like a great first step that doesn't cost anything to try. Do you typically recommend homeowners attempt this themselves first, or is it worth bringing in a professional right away if the potential savings are substantial enough?

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This is really helpful information everyone! I'm dealing with a similar situation but also have sales through Amazon's European marketplaces (UK, Germany, France). Should I be converting all of these different currencies to USD using the same methodology? And does anyone know if there are any special considerations for VAT that gets collected by Amazon on European sales - do I need to account for that differently on my Schedule C since it's not really "my" income?

0 coins

Zara Perez

•

Yes, you should convert all foreign currencies to USD using the same consistent methodology - either transaction-by-transaction conversion or the yearly average exchange rate method. The IRS requires consistency in your approach across all currencies. For VAT collected by Amazon in Europe, you're correct that this isn't your income - it's tax collected on behalf of the European tax authorities. Amazon should be reporting the VAT separately from your actual sales proceeds. Your Schedule C should only include the net amount you actually received after VAT was deducted. Make sure to review your Amazon settlement reports carefully to distinguish between your gross sales, VAT collected, and your net proceeds that you actually received. Keep detailed records of how you're handling each currency conversion and VAT calculation, especially given what @Ryan Vasquez mentioned about audit documentation requirements.

0 coins

Great question about the European marketplaces! I've been selling on Amazon EU for about 18 months now and can share what I've learned. You're absolutely right that VAT collected by Amazon shouldn't be included in your gross receipts - that money never actually comes to you since Amazon remits it directly to the respective EU tax authorities. For currency conversion, yes, stick with the same methodology across all currencies. I use the yearly average exchange rate method for consistency, but you could also do transaction-by-transaction if you prefer more precision (though that's a lot more work). The key is being consistent across USD, CAD, EUR, GBP, etc. One thing to watch out for with European sales is that Amazon's settlement reports can be confusing because they show gross sales, then subtract VAT, fees, and other deductions. Make sure you're only reporting the net amount that actually hit your bank account as your gross receipts on Schedule C. I keep a spreadsheet tracking the conversion rates I use for each currency so I have documentation ready if needed. Also remember that if you're selling in multiple EU countries, each one may have slightly different VAT rates, but Amazon handles all that complexity - you just need to report your net proceeds in USD.

0 coins

Ella Cofer

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was hoping for! The distinction between gross sales and net proceeds is crucial - I was getting confused looking at my Amazon reports because the numbers seemed so different from what actually showed up in my bank account. Your point about keeping a conversion rate spreadsheet is smart too, especially after hearing about @Ryan Vasquez s'audit experience. Quick follow-up: when you say net "amount that actually hit your bank account, do" you mean after Amazon fees are also deducted, or just after VAT? I want to make sure I m'thinking about this correctly for my Schedule C reporting.

0 coins

Leo McDonald

•

Tax attorney with 3 years experience here, and I wanted to offer a fresh perspective as someone who's relatively new to the field but made the switch for similar reasons to what you're considering. I transitioned from insurance defense litigation to tax law 2 years ago specifically because I wanted more predictable hours with a 1-year-old at home. The transition has been largely positive, but there were some surprises I wish I'd known about beforehand. The good: Tax work really is more plannable than litigation. I can schedule family events in summer with confidence they won't get canceled. During busy season I work about 55-60 hours, but the rest of the year is a manageable 42-45 hours. I'm home for dinner most nights and actually present on weekends outside of January-April. The reality check: The learning curve was steeper than I expected, even coming from another legal specialty. Tax law has its own language and logic that takes time to master. I felt like a first-year associate again for several months, which was humbling but ultimately worth it. Currently making $115k at a regional firm in a smaller market, which is about 15% less than I was making in litigation but the quality of life improvement has been dramatic. I actually use my vacation days now and haven't had to cancel a family weekend in over a year. My advice: If you do make the switch, be prepared for the intellectual adjustment period and maybe take a tax course before transitioning. But if family time is your priority and you can handle the seasonal intensity, it's been a great decision for me.

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

This is really helpful to hear from someone who made the transition recently! Your point about feeling like a first-year associate again during the learning curve is something I hadn't fully considered, but it's better to go in with realistic expectations rather than be caught off guard. The quality of life improvements you describe - using vacation days, not canceling family weekends, being home for dinner most nights - sound exactly like what I'm hoping to achieve. Even with the 15% salary reduction, it sounds like you're getting so much more value in terms of actual time with your family. I'm curious about the tax course you mentioned - did you take it while still practicing litigation, or after you'd already made the switch? I'm trying to figure out the best timing for preparation versus just diving in and learning on the job. Also, when you mention the seasonal intensity (55-60 hours during busy season), how did your family adapt to that rhythm? With a young child, I imagine the predictability helps with planning childcare and managing expectations, but I'm wondering if there were any unexpected challenges during your first tax season after the transition. Thanks for sharing such an honest perspective about both the benefits and the reality checks - it's exactly what I need to make an informed decision!

0 coins

Liam Brown

•

Current IRS tax attorney here with 8 years experience, and I wanted to offer the government perspective since several people mentioned it but didn't go into much detail. I made the switch from private practice (Big 4 accounting firm) to the IRS Office of Chief Counsel 5 years ago, and it's been exactly what you're looking for in terms of work-life balance. I work a true 40-hour week year-round - no busy season overtime, no weekend work, no late nights unless there's a genuine emergency (which happens maybe twice a year). The salary is lower than private practice - I'm at $125k after 8 years total experience, which would probably be $160-180k in private practice. But when you factor in the federal benefits (excellent health insurance, pension, 4+ weeks vacation that you actually use, 13 sick days annually), the total compensation package is competitive. More importantly for your situation with two kids: I've never missed a school event, I coach little league, and I genuinely disconnect when I leave the office at 5:30 PM. The work is intellectually challenging - tax litigation, regulatory guidance, and advisory work - but the culture truly respects work-life boundaries. The hiring process can be slow and bureaucratic, but if you're serious about prioritizing family time over maximum salary, government tax work might be exactly what you're looking for. Happy to answer specific questions about the application process or day-to-day work if you're interested in this path.

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

This government perspective is incredibly valuable and honestly sounds like it might be exactly what I'm looking for! A true 40-hour week with no busy season overtime, never missing school events, and genuinely disconnecting at 5:30 PM sounds almost too good to be true compared to what I'm experiencing in environmental law right now. The salary difference ($125k vs $160-180k in private practice) is definitely something to consider, but when you factor in the federal benefits package and - more importantly - actually being present for my kids' lives, it seems like it could be the right trade-off. The fact that you coach little league really drives home how much life balance is possible in this role. I'm definitely interested in learning more about the application process. Is this something where they typically hire attorneys from other practice areas, or do they prefer candidates with existing tax experience? Also, are there specific offices or divisions within the IRS Office of Chief Counsel that tend to have better work cultures or more interesting work? I had mentioned earlier that someone suggested using a service to get through to IRS hiring managers since their phone lines are notoriously difficult - did you find the application process straightforward, or were there particular strategies that helped you navigate the government hiring bureaucracy? This might be the path that actually gives me the family-focused career I'm really looking for rather than just a "better" version of the demanding legal lifestyle.

0 coins

Prev1...14741475147614771478...5644Next