IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Caesar Grant

•

This has been such an educational thread! As someone who's been running a small consulting business as a sole proprietorship but considering the S-Corp election, reading through all these experiences has really highlighted how important it is to understand the fiscal year implications upfront. Emma, I'm glad you got everything sorted out! The confusion you described is exactly what I'd be worried about facing. It sounds like the key takeaways are: 1) file for the tax year when your fiscal year ends, 2) don't forget about the different quarterly payment schedules, 3) check state requirements separately, and 4) keep good records/calendars to track all the deadlines. One question for the group - for those of you who switched from sole proprietorship to S-Corp, did you find that having a fiscal year (vs. calendar year) actually provided meaningful business benefits? I'm trying to weigh whether the added complexity is worth it for the potential tax planning advantages, or if I should just stick with a calendar year S-Corp to keep things simpler. The resources mentioned here (Publication 538, the IRS Business Tax Calendar) are definitely going on my reading list before I make any decisions. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences!

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

Great question about the business benefits of fiscal years vs. calendar years! As someone who made the switch to S-Corp with a fiscal year end, I can share my experience. The main advantage I found was better tax planning - since my business has seasonal revenue (heavy in Q4), having a fiscal year ending in Q1 gives me much better visibility into my annual income before I have to make estimated tax payments. This helped me avoid some of the cash flow issues I used to have with quarterly estimates. However, the complexity is real. Between the different filing deadlines, estimated payment schedules, and having to explain the timing to vendors and lenders, there's definitely more administrative overhead. My accountant also charges a bit more for fiscal year returns since they're less routine. For your consulting business, I'd really think about whether your revenue has strong seasonal patterns or if there are other business reasons that would benefit from a non-calendar year. If your income is relatively steady throughout the year, the calendar year S-Corp route is probably simpler without giving up much in terms of tax benefits. The IRS is pretty strict about needing a valid business purpose for fiscal years, so make sure you can justify it if you go that route!

0 coins

As someone who just went through this exact situation with my small architecture firm, I can definitely relate to the confusion! The fiscal year vs. tax year terminology really throws people off at first. One thing that helped me understand it better was thinking of it this way: the IRS doesn't care when your fiscal year *started* - they only care when it *ended*. So your June 30, 2024 fiscal year end means you're filing a "2024" return, even though that fiscal year actually began on July 1, 2023. The tricky part I ran into was making sure all my depreciation schedules and business deductions aligned properly with the fiscal year dates. I'd definitely recommend double-checking that your accounting software is set to your fiscal year dates rather than calendar year, especially for things like equipment purchases and business expenses that need to be allocated correctly. Also, since you mentioned this is only your second year with this setup, make sure you're keeping good documentation of when you adopted the fiscal year. The IRS sometimes asks for this information during audits, and having clean records from the beginning makes everything much smoother down the road.

0 coins

This is such a helpful way to think about it! The "IRS only cares when it ended" explanation really clicks for me. I'm dealing with a similar situation with my small marketing agency - we have a September 30th fiscal year end, and I kept getting confused about whether expenses from October through December should go on the "previous" or "current" year return. Your point about making sure accounting software is set to fiscal year dates is spot on. I made that mistake in my first year and had to manually adjust a bunch of reports when it came time to file. Now everything automatically aligns with my September 30th year end, which makes quarterly reviews so much easier. Quick question - when you mention keeping documentation about when you adopted the fiscal year, what specific documents should we be holding onto? I have my initial election forms, but I'm wondering if there's other paperwork the IRS might want to see if they ever audit the fiscal year choice.

0 coins

Melody Miles

•

Just to add a quick data point - we're a local bakery and donated desserts for a charity gala last year. Our CPA classified it under 170(e)(3) and we were able to deduct our cost plus half the difference between our cost and retail price (limited to twice our cost basis). Made a nice deduction! Just make sure you document EVERYTHING - we took photos, kept all correspondence, got a formal acknowledgment letter, etc.

0 coins

Did your company name appear in the event program or signage? Our restaurant is donating food for a similar event and I'm trying to figure out if that changes how we should classify the deduction.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

Yes, our bakery name was listed in the program as a "dessert sponsor" but our CPA said that didn't disqualify us from the 170(e)(3) treatment as long as the primary purpose was charitable and any recognition was incidental. The key test is whether you received substantial return benefits - just having your name mentioned usually doesn't rise to that level. However, if you're getting prominent logo placement, booth space, or other marketing benefits that have real commercial value, then part of it might need to be treated as a business expense under Section 162 instead. Document what recognition you're receiving so your tax preparer can make the right call!

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

Based on all the great advice here, I wanted to share what I ended up finding for anyone else dealing with this situation. The key code sections are: **IRC Section 170(e)(3)** - This is the enhanced deduction for food inventory donations that everyone mentioned. It allows businesses to deduct cost basis plus half the difference between cost and fair market value (capped at twice the cost basis) when donating food to qualifying organizations. **IRC Section 162** - Ordinary and necessary business expenses, which applies if you received substantial marketing benefits in return. The IRS also has specific guidance in **Publication 526** (Charitable Contributions) and **Regulation 1.170A-4A** that covers the documentation requirements for food donations. What really helped me was realizing that the classification depends on your primary intent and what you received in return. If it was purely charitable with minimal recognition, go with 170(e)(3). If you got significant marketing value, you might need to split it between charitable contribution and business expense. My boss was impressed when I presented both the code sections AND the documentation requirements. Thanks everyone for pointing me in the right direction - this community is amazing!

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This is such a helpful summary! As someone new to navigating business tax deductions, I really appreciate how you broke down the different scenarios and code sections. The distinction between charitable intent vs. marketing benefits seems like it could be a gray area - do you know if there are any specific thresholds or guidelines the IRS uses to determine when recognition becomes "substantial"? Also, did you end up getting the proper written acknowledgment from the charity that @417e3acad7e5 mentioned? I'm curious how that process went since I might be in a similar situation soon with our company's upcoming charity sponsorship.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

The key distinction here is that you're not just adding some business activities to a personal trip - you're being forced to change your entire travel method specifically because of business equipment requirements. This creates a stronger case for deducting the incremental costs. I'd recommend documenting everything thoroughly: get quotes for what flights would have cost, keep all driving-related receipts (gas, hotels, meals during travel), and most importantly, document why the equipment was essential and couldn't be shipped or transported any other way. Client emails or contracts showing the equipment requirements would be valuable supporting evidence. One thing to consider is whether you could potentially ship the equipment separately and still fly yourself. If shipping isn't viable due to timing, fragility, or cost, make sure to document why. This helps establish that driving was truly the only reasonable business option, not just a preference. The IRS generally allows deductions for additional costs incurred solely due to business necessity, but they'll want to see clear evidence that the extra expense was unavoidable for legitimate business reasons.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! The documentation angle makes a lot of sense. I'm curious though - if the equipment is something that could theoretically be rented at the destination, does that weaken the case for driving being the only option? Like if there's a rental company 200 miles from the wedding location that has similar equipment, would the IRS expect you to explore that instead of hauling your own gear?

0 coins

NeonNova

•

I've been through similar situations with mixed personal/business travel, and the documentation is absolutely critical. One thing I learned the hard way is to also keep contemporaneous records - don't try to recreate the business justification months later when you're doing taxes. For your specific situation with the equipment transport, I'd suggest taking photos of the bulky equipment and documenting its dimensions/weight to show why flying wasn't practical. Also get written confirmation from the airline about their baggage restrictions and any special shipping requirements that would apply. The IRS Publication 463 has specific guidance on travel expenses, and it does allow for deducting additional costs when the method of transportation is dictated by business needs rather than personal preference. The key is proving that driving wasn't a choice but a necessity. One more tip: if you're doing any actual work during the drive (like client calls during stops), log those too. It helps establish that the travel time itself had business components, not just the destination work.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

Great point about contemporaneous records! I'm actually dealing with something similar right now - I have a client project that requires specialized audio equipment for a job that happens to be in the same city as my cousin's graduation. The equipment is way too sensitive for checked baggage and too large for carry-on. Your suggestion about photographing the equipment dimensions is smart - I hadn't thought of that. I was planning to just keep receipts, but visual documentation of why flying wasn't viable makes total sense. Do you think it's worth getting a written quote from a shipping company too, showing that expedited shipping would cost more than the extra driving expenses? Also, regarding the client calls during travel - do you track those in any specific way, or just note the times and topics in a regular journal?

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the detailed explanations! This has been incredibly helpful. I'm dealing with a similar situation and want to make sure I understand the process correctly. From what I'm gathering, the key is to first determine whether the partnership has already applied the 163(j) limitation at their level. If they have, then the Box 13k amount is already limited and can be deducted directly on Schedule E without filing Form 8990. But if the partnership is exempt and passed through the full amount, then I need to evaluate whether my individual client qualifies for the small business exemption. One follow-up question: if my client does need to file Form 8990, does the Box 13k amount get entered on line 1a as "business interest expense" or does it go somewhere else on the form since it's coming from a pass-through entity? I want to make sure I'm not double-counting or missing anything in the calculation. Also, for the gross receipts test, when you say "businesses under common control" - does this include if my client owns rental properties through separate LLCs? The aggregation rules can get pretty complex.

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

Great questions! For Form 8990, the Box 13k amount would actually go on line 1a as "business interest expense" - it's treated just like any other business interest expense for purposes of the limitation calculation. The form doesn't distinguish between direct business interest and pass-through interest. Regarding the aggregation rules, yes, rental properties held through separate LLCs would typically be aggregated if they're under common control. The general rule is that entities with more than 50% common ownership get aggregated for the gross receipts test. So if your client owns multiple LLCs, you'd need to combine their gross receipts to determine if they exceed the $27 million threshold. One thing to watch out for - make sure to check if there are any other pass-through entities involved. Sometimes clients have interest from multiple K-1s, and you'll need to aggregate all of that business interest expense on Form 8990 if they don't qualify for the small business exemption.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of complex partnership issue that trips up so many practitioners! I've been dealing with similar K-1 Box 13k situations lately, and the key insight that helped me was realizing that the partnership's treatment determines your next steps. Here's my practical approach: First, look for any statement or attachment that came with the K-1 - partnerships are supposed to indicate whether they've applied the 163(j) limitation. If they have, you're done - just deduct the $92,300 on Schedule E. If there's no clear indication, I'd recommend calling the partnership's preparer directly rather than guessing. For the gross receipts test, remember it's a 3-year average of ALL businesses under common control. So if your client has multiple entities or rental properties, you'll need to aggregate everything. The $27 million threshold applies to the combined total. One red flag I've learned to watch for: sometimes partnerships will put a note in Box 20 with code AE indicating they're exempt, but that doesn't mean your individual client is automatically exempt too. You still need to run the gross receipts test at the individual level. The good news is that once you work through this process a few times, the pattern becomes much clearer. Don't hesitate to reach out to the partnership if you need clarification - they should have this information readily available since other partners are probably asking the same questions!

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

This is really helpful guidance! I'm new to handling these partnership situations and appreciate the step-by-step approach. One thing I'm still unclear on - when you mention calling the partnership's preparer, what specific information should I be asking for? Should I request a copy of their Form 8990 if they filed one, or is there a standard statement they should provide? I want to make sure I'm asking the right questions so I don't seem completely lost when I call them. Also, you mentioned the 3-year average for gross receipts - is that based on the tax years or calendar years? My client has some seasonal rental income that varies significantly year to year, so I want to make sure I'm calculating this correctly.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

Anyone know if there's a fee for setting up direct debit with the IRS? I'm using FreeTaxUSA too and I owe about $3,800. Really confused about the whole process.

0 coins

Yes, there's a setup fee, but it's lower if you choose direct debit vs. other payment methods. I think it's around $31 for direct debit if you set it up online. Regular installment agreements have higher fees (like $149). If your income is below a certain threshold, you might qualify for a reduced fee or fee waiver. Check out Form 13844 for fee reductions based on income.

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

I just went through this exact same process with FreeTaxUSA last week! You're right that it can be confusing at first. Here's what worked for me: 1. Complete your entire tax return in FreeTaxUSA first 2. When you get to the payment section, don't worry about finding a "direct debit installment agreement" option - FreeTaxUSA doesn't handle that part 3. Select "I cannot pay the full amount now" or similar wording 4. Finish filing your return through FreeTaxUSA 5. After your return is accepted, go directly to irs.gov/payments 6. Click "Online Payment Agreement" 7. Choose "Direct Debit Installment Agreement" from the IRS menu The key thing I learned is that FreeTaxUSA just gets your return filed - the actual payment plan setup happens directly with the IRS afterward. Don't stress about not seeing the direct debit option in FreeTaxUSA itself. Once you're on the IRS site, you'll have full control over your monthly payment amount, withdrawal date, and all the other terms. Hope this helps! The whole process took me about 20 minutes once I knew where to go.

0 coins

Prev1...13741375137613771378...5645Next