


Ask the community...
Make sure you're keeping track of your Form 8606 information year to year! This bit me hard last year. If you've been doing backdoor Roth conversions for multiple years, you need to have the previous year's Form 8606 values for line 14 (your basis). TaxAct won't automatically pull this information from your previous returns, even if you used TaxAct last year. Messed this up once and almost paid tax twice on $12,000!
That's a great point - I've been doing backdoor Roth for 3 years now. Is there a way to check if I've been doing this correctly in previous years? I'm worried now that I might have paid tax twice without realizing it. Can I go back and amend returns if I find a mistake?
Yes, you can definitely amend previous returns if you find mistakes! You'd file Form 1040X for each year that needs correction. To check if you did it right previously, look at your old Form 8606s - specifically line 14 should show your cumulative basis (total non-deductible contributions you've made over the years that haven't been converted yet). If you find you paid tax twice on backdoor Roth conversions, you can amend those returns to get refunds. You generally have 3 years from the original filing deadline to amend. I'd suggest pulling your old tax returns and looking at the Form 8606 line by line, or consider having a tax pro review them if the amounts are significant.
I went through this exact same nightmare with TaxAct last year! The software's handling of backdoor Roth conversions is definitely not intuitive. Here's what finally worked for me: 1. Don't enter your 1099-R first - that just confuses the software 2. Go to Federal > Income > IRA, Pensions and Annuities and find the Form 8606 section 3. Answer "yes" to making nondeductible contributions to a traditional IRA 4. Enter your basis (the amount you contributed with after-tax dollars) 5. THEN enter your 1099-R information The key insight is that TaxAct needs to know about your nondeductible contributions before it processes the conversion. Once you do this correctly, only the small amount of earnings (like that $3 of interest you mentioned) should be taxable. Also, keep really good records of your Form 8606 from year to year - you'll need the basis information for future conversions. I learned this the hard way when I almost paid tax twice on a $6,000 conversion because I didn't carry forward my basis correctly. Hope this helps save you from the hours of frustration I went through!
This is incredibly helpful! I've been struggling with the exact same issue and your step-by-step approach makes so much sense. I think I've been doing it backwards - entering the 1099-R first and then trying to fix it afterwards. Quick question: when you say "enter your basis" in step 4, do you mean just the current year's contribution amount, or the cumulative total of all non-deductible contributions you've ever made? I've done backdoor Roth conversions for two years now and want to make sure I'm not missing something from previous years. Also, totally agree about keeping good records of Form 8606! I learned that lesson when I couldn't find my previous year's form and had to dig through old tax returns.
Just a heads up - if you do decide to report this income next year instead of this year, be aware that the company might issue a 1099 for the current year even though you earned the money in 2022. If that happens, you'll need to explain the situation if the IRS questions the discrepancy. Generally, it's best to report income in the year you receive it if you're a cash-basis taxpayer (which most individuals are).
That's a good point I hadn't considered. So there's a chance the company will issue a 1099 for tax year 2023 or whenever I actually get paid, even though the work was done in 2022?
Exactly. Companies issue 1099s for the calendar year in which they made the payment, not when the work was performed. So if you get paid in 2023, you'll get a 1099 for tax year 2023, even though you did the work in 2022. This actually works in your favor in terms of timing, since you want to handle this separately from your parents' filing. Just be aware that from the IRS perspective, you report the income in the year you receive it (assuming you're a cash-basis taxpayer, which almost all individuals are).
As someone who's dealt with similar timing issues on contractor income, I'd recommend keeping detailed records of when you actually performed the work versus when you receive payment. The IRS generally follows the cash method for individuals, so you'll report the income when you actually receive it, not when you earned it. One thing to consider - since you're making $95k at your regular job, this additional $850 will be taxed at your marginal rate (likely 22% federal) plus the 15.3% self-employment tax, so set aside roughly $300-350 to cover the tax liability when you do receive the payment. Also, don't forget that you'll need to make quarterly estimated tax payments if this pushes your total tax liability over $1,000 for the year you receive it. The IRS gets grumpy about underpayment penalties, even on relatively small amounts.
Omg yes checking the mailbox every day like a š¤”
I work for a regional bank and can confirm what @Giovanni said is exactly right. We get the ACH file from the IRS with pending deposits, and some banks choose to advance those funds immediately while others wait for settlement. The IRS batch processes refunds and sends them out the same time for everyone - usually Tuesday nights for Wednesday posting. The "early" part is just your bank's policy on when to release pending ACH credits. Pro tip: if you have direct deposit set up correctly and no issues with your return, you can usually expect your refund within 21 days of e-filing regardless of which bank you use.
Y'all are forgetting the biggest one - citizenship renunciation. Billionaires like Eduardo Saverin (Facebook co-founder) have literally given up US citizenship to avoid capital gains taxes. The US is one of the only countries that taxes citizens on worldwide income regardless of where they live.
But don't they hit you with a massive exit tax when you renounce? I thought there was a one-time tax on all your assets as if you sold everything the day you renounce.
Yes, there is an exit tax, but for billionaires it can still be worth it in the long run. The exit tax treats you as if you sold all your assets on the day before expatriation, so you pay capital gains on unrealized appreciation. However, if you're young and expect decades more of wealth growth, paying that one-time tax can save massive amounts compared to lifetime US tax obligations. Plus, some wealthy individuals structure their affairs so that much of their future wealth appreciation happens through entities established after expatriation, potentially minimizing what's subject to the exit tax. It's incredibly complex and requires years of planning, but for those with hundreds of millions or billions, the math can work out favorably.
The strategies mentioned here are all accurate, but there's one more layer that's often overlooked - the timing and coordination of these techniques. The ultra-wealthy don't just use one strategy; they orchestrate multiple approaches simultaneously. For example, they might establish a GRAT (as mentioned) while also taking out loans against appreciated assets, using the loan proceeds to fund the GRAT. This creates a cascading effect where unrealized gains are transferred to heirs without triggering current taxes, while the original assets continue appreciating in their portfolio. Another key point: they have teams of specialists - tax attorneys, wealth managers, and accountants - working year-round on optimization, not just during tax season. Regular taxpayers might spend a few hours on taxes annually, while billionaires have professionals dedicating thousands of hours to minimize their tax burden legally. The real advantage isn't just access to these strategies, but having the resources to implement them perfectly and the cash flow flexibility to make moves based on tax implications rather than immediate liquidity needs. When you can afford to hold assets for decades without selling, the entire tax game changes.
This is exactly what I was wondering about! It sounds like being ultra-wealthy isn't just about having more money to invest, but having access to a whole different system of financial planning that regular people can't even see. The coordination aspect you mentioned is fascinating - it's like they're playing chess while the rest of us are playing checkers. I'm curious though - with all these legal strategies available to the wealthy, why do we keep hearing politicians talk about "tax loopholes" like they're some kind of abuse? If these methods are all legal and built into the tax code, aren't they just... the tax code working as designed? It seems like the real issue might be that the system itself creates different rules for different wealth levels, rather than people "cheating" the system.
Benjamin Johnson
I just went through this exact situation a few months ago! You're absolutely right that you only need ONE response since you filed jointly - the IRS system automatically generates separate CP30 notices for each spouse but treats your tax account as a single entity. Here's what I recommend based on my experience: Write a clear cover letter that starts with "This response addresses both CP30 notices [list both notice numbers] for our 2024 joint tax return." Then attach a single Form 2210 using the annualized income installment method - this is perfect for your situation with uneven income throughout the year. The key is being very specific about your quarterly income pattern. Create a simple table showing something like: Q1 income: $X, Q2 income: $Y, Q3 income: $Z (spouse's commission), Q4 income: $W, along with your corresponding estimated payments. This visual documentation makes it crystal clear to the IRS agent that your payments were reasonable based on what you knew at each quarterly deadline. Make sure to include both of your Social Security numbers on all forms and send everything certified mail to the address listed on the CP30 notice (not a generic IRS address). Keep copies of everything! With your spouse's Q3 commission and sporadic freelance income pattern, you have a strong case for penalty removal. This type of uneven income situation is exactly what the annualized method is designed to handle. Don't stress about the $1,750 - this is totally fixable with proper documentation!
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
ā¢This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! Thank you for breaking down the process so clearly. I'm feeling much more confident about handling this now. One thing I'm still a bit unclear on - when you mention creating that quarterly income table, should I include supporting documentation like copies of invoices or 1099s to back up those numbers, or is just stating the amounts in the table sufficient? I have all my freelance payment records organized by quarter, so I could easily include copies if that would strengthen the case. Also, did you happen to calculate roughly how long the whole process took from when you mailed your response to when you got the final resolution letters? I know everyone mentioned 6-8 weeks, but I'm trying to plan around the timeline since we're getting close to the end of the year.
0 coins
Javier Morales
ā¢@Benjamin Johnson Absolutely include supporting documentation! I attached copies of all my 1099s and freelance payment records organized by quarter. It really strengthens your case when the IRS can see the actual documentation backing up your quarterly income table. I organized it like this: cover letter, Form 2210, quarterly income summary table, then copies of 1099s/payment records arranged by quarter with tabs. The more clear documentation you provide, the faster they can process your case. Timeline-wise, I mailed my response in early September and got my resolution letters in mid-November, so about 10 weeks total. The process might be a bit slower now with year-end volume, but getting your response in promptly is what matters most for meeting the deadline. The IRS stops collection activity once they receive your timely response, even while they re'processing it.
0 coins
Amina Toure
I just dealt with this same situation a few weeks ago! You definitely only need ONE response since you filed jointly. The IRS automatically sends separate CP30 notices to both spouses, but your joint return means you're treated as a single taxpayer. Here's exactly what I did: I wrote a cover letter stating "This response addresses both CP30 notices [listed both notice numbers] for our 2024 joint tax return" and attached a single Form 2210 using the annualized income installment method. Since you had uneven income with your spouse's Q3 commission and sporadic freelance work, this method is perfect for your situation. The key is documenting your quarterly income pattern clearly. I created a simple table showing actual amounts by quarter (Q1: $X, Q2: $Y, Q3: $Z including commission, Q4: $W) along with corresponding estimated payments. This visual proof shows the IRS that your payments were reasonable based on actual income timing. Don't forget to include both SSNs on all forms and send everything certified mail to the address on the CP30 notice. I also attached copies of 1099s and payment records organized by quarter to support the income table. It took about 8 weeks, but both penalties were completely removed. Your situation with the uneven income distribution is exactly what the annualized method is designed to handle - don't stress about that $1,750, this is totally fixable with proper documentation!
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
ā¢This is incredibly helpful! As someone who's completely new to dealing with IRS penalty notices, I really appreciate how clearly you've laid out the process. The idea of creating a visual table showing quarterly income alongside estimated payments makes so much sense - it tells the story much better than just trying to explain it in writing. I'm curious about one thing though - when you say you attached copies of 1099s organized by quarter, did you include ALL of your tax documents or just the ones that specifically showed the uneven income pattern? I have a mix of W-2 income (which was steady) and 1099 freelance income (which was all over the place), and I'm wondering if I should focus just on documenting the variable income sources or provide the complete picture. Also, did you have any backup plan in case the annualized income installment method didn't work? I'm wondering if there are other options to explore if for some reason that approach gets rejected.
0 coins