IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This is a great thread with lots of practical advice! I've been lurking here as a small business owner who made this exact mistake last year. After reading through all the responses, I ended up going with the approach Sofia Martinez suggested - filing Schedule C with the "Owner wages (non-deductible)" line item and attaching an explanatory statement. Just wanted to share that it worked smoothly - no questions from the IRS, no audit triggers, and I was able to move forward cleanly this year with proper owner draws instead of wages. The key really was the clear documentation showing I understood the mistake and was correcting it going forward. For anyone else dealing with this, don't panic - it's more common than you think and the IRS seems to understand that small business owners sometimes get confused about entity structures, especially when working with accountants who don't properly advise on elections. The transparency approach definitely beats trying to hide the issue or over-complicate the fix. Thanks to everyone who contributed advice here - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these tricky tax situations!

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

Thanks for sharing your real-world experience with this approach! It's really reassuring to hear that the transparency method worked without triggering any IRS issues. As someone new to handling these types of business structure mistakes, I was worried about potential audit flags, but your outcome gives me confidence in recommending this path to clients. One follow-up question - did you end up making an S-Corp election for this year, or did you decide to stay with Schedule C? I'm curious how you evaluated whether the administrative burden was worth it for your specific situation. Also appreciate you mentioning that this mistake is more common than people think. It definitely makes me feel better about advising clients through similar situations knowing that the IRS has reasonable expectations about small business owner confusion around entity elections.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

I decided to stick with Schedule C for this year since my business only nets around $45,000 annually. After running the numbers, the S-Corp election wouldn't save enough in self-employment taxes to justify the additional payroll processing costs and complexity of filing a separate business return. I may revisit the S-Corp option if my business grows significantly, but for now the Schedule C structure is much simpler to manage. The key lesson I learned is to get proper advice upfront about entity elections rather than assuming what structure I have - would have saved me a lot of headache! And you're absolutely right about this being more common than expected. My new accountant mentioned she sees this mistake at least 3-4 times per year with small business clients who either self-prepared returns or worked with preparers who didn't properly explain the election requirements.

0 coins

Sofia Hernandez

•

As someone who handles a lot of small business tax issues, I'd like to add another perspective on this situation. While the "non-deductible owner wages" approach that Sofia Martinez outlined is definitely the cleanest, there's one more consideration that hasn't been fully addressed - the timing of when this mistake was discovered. If you're still within the current tax year and haven't filed yet, you have more flexibility to clean things up. But if this spans multiple years or returns have already been filed, you need to be extra careful about consistency across all affected periods. Also worth noting - make sure to check if your state has any additional requirements or complications with this type of correction. Some states are more strict about payroll tax corrections than the federal IRS, and you don't want to solve the federal issue only to create a state problem. One practical tip: if the client has been making quarterly estimated tax payments based on the incorrect W-2 setup, you'll need to recalculate what they actually owe for the year since self-employment tax calculations are different from regular income tax withholding. This could affect their final payment or refund significantly. Has anyone dealt with the state-level complications of this type of correction? I'd be curious to hear experiences from different states.

0 coins

Sofia Peña

•

Great point about the state-level complications! I'm in California and ran into this exact issue with a client last year. CA was much more aggressive about the payroll tax discrepancies than the IRS was. The Employment Development Department (EDD) sent multiple notices questioning why Schedule C income didn't match the reported payroll wages, and we had to submit detailed explanations and documentation. Unlike the federal side where the transparency approach worked smoothly, CA required us to actually amend some of the quarterly DE-9 forms to properly reflect that the "wages" should have been reported differently. Each state definitely has its own quirks with this. I'd recommend checking with your state's employment/labor department early in the process rather than assuming they'll be as understanding as the federal IRS. The penalties and interest at the state level can sometimes be more severe than federal. Also seconding your point about recalculating estimated taxes - we had one client who ended up owing an additional $3,000 because the self-employment tax was higher than what had been withheld through the incorrect W-2 process.

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

Quick question for anyone who knows - does the dependent care FSA have the same $610 rollover option that the healthcare FSA has for 2023? I'm in a similar situation with about $300 left unspent.

0 coins

Avery Flores

•

Unfortunately no. Dependent care FSAs generally don't have the rollover option that healthcare FSAs have. Some plans might offer a grace period (usually 2.5 months after the plan year ends) to use leftover funds, but that's plan-specific. The $610 rollover limit only applies to healthcare FSAs, not dependent care FSAs. Dependent care accounts are strictly "use it or lose it" unless your specific plan has a grace period. Check your plan documents or ask your benefits administrator if you have a grace period to spend the remaining funds.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

This is such a frustrating situation and unfortunately very common! I went through something similar last year. The key thing to understand is that FSAs can only reimburse up to what was actually contributed through payroll deductions, not what you originally elected. It sounds like there was a discrepancy between your $4,100 election and what was actually withheld from your paychecks. This can happen due to payroll errors, timing issues, or contribution limits on individual paychecks. Here's what I'd recommend: 1. Get your final paystub from last year and check the YTD dependent care FSA amount 2. Contact your company's benefits coordinator (not just the FSA administrator) with documentation of the payroll discrepancy 3. If the money truly can't be recovered through the FSA, make sure to claim those unreimbursed $500 in childcare expenses on your tax return using Form 2441 for the dependent care credit While the tax credit isn't as valuable as the pre-tax FSA benefit, it's better than losing the money entirely. Don't give up - sometimes HR can work with the FSA provider to resolve legitimate payroll errors, especially if you have good documentation.

0 coins

NightOwl42

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with a similar FSA issue right now and didn't realize that payroll errors could cause this kind of discrepancy. Quick question - when you mention claiming the unreimbursed expenses on Form 2441, is there a limit to how much you can claim for the dependent care credit? I have about $800 in unreimbursed childcare expenses from last year that I couldn't get through my FSA due to contribution issues.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

What box on the 1099-MISC is the settlement amount in? This makes a HUGE difference! If it's in Box 3 (Other Income), then it's just regular income - taxable but NOT subject to self-employment tax. If it's in Box 7 (Nonemployee Compensation), that's normally for independent contractor work, which is why TurboTax is treating it as self-employment income subject to additional 15.3% self-employment tax. For tax years 2020 and later, Box 7 income should actually be reported on Form 1099-NEC instead of 1099-MISC, but some companies haven't updated their practices.

0 coins

StarSailor}

•

I had a similar situation and mine was in Box 7. I spoke with a tax professional who told me that even though it's in Box 7, settlement income isn't self-employment income. You need to override TurboTax's default handling of Box 7 amounts.

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

I went through almost the exact same situation last year with a class action settlement from a data breach case. Got the 1099-MISC and TurboTax immediately started calculating self-employment tax which had me panicking. The key thing that saved me was realizing that settlement payments are NOT self-employment income, even if they're reported in Box 7 of the 1099-MISC. When you're entering it in TurboTax, you need to specifically tell the software that this is NOT business income. Here's what worked for me: When TurboTax asks "Is this payment for work you did as an independent contractor?" select NO. Then when it asks what type of payment it was, look for "Legal settlement" or "Other income not related to business." This prevents TurboTax from applying the 15.3% self-employment tax. The settlement amount is still taxable as regular income (unless it was for physical injuries), but you won't owe the additional self-employment taxes. This distinction saved me about $1,300 in taxes I didn't actually owe. Double-check which box your amount is in on the 1099-MISC - that will help you navigate the TurboTax screens more effectively.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

This is really helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now with a settlement from an employment discrimination case. When I got my 1099-MISC, it showed the amount in Box 3, but I'm still confused about whether discrimination settlements are fully taxable or if some portion might be excluded. Did your data breach settlement include any punitive damages or was it all considered compensatory? I'm trying to figure out if the emotional distress portion of my settlement might qualify for different tax treatment. The settlement agreement wasn't very clear about how the total amount was allocated between different types of damages.

0 coins

Lia Quinn

•

I've been using FreeTaxUSA for my quarterly payments for about 2 years now and wanted to share my experience. The software does a great job calculating your estimated payments, but like others mentioned, you need to handle the actual payment process separately. I started with Direct Pay but switched to EFTPS after missing a payment deadline (cost me about $65 in penalties). The EFTPS registration process is a bit old-school - you do have to wait for them to mail you a PIN - but once you're set up, it's incredibly convenient to schedule all four payments at once. One tip that might help: when FreeTaxUSA calculates your quarterly amounts, print out that summary page and keep it with your tax records. I reference it throughout the year when I'm tracking my business income to make sure I'm still on track. Also, don't forget that if your income changes significantly during the year, you might need to adjust your remaining quarterly payments. EFTPS makes it easy to modify future scheduled payments if needed.

0 coins

LordCommander

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about adjusting payments mid-year - how do you know when your income has changed enough to warrant updating your quarterly amounts? Is there a general rule of thumb, like if you're off by more than 10% or a certain dollar amount? I'm worried about either overpaying significantly or underpaying and getting hit with penalties.

0 coins

Zara Malik

•

I went through this exact same situation last year when I started freelancing! Here's what worked for me: I ended up going with EFTPS after initially trying Direct Pay. Yes, the registration process feels antiquated (waiting for a PIN in the mail in 2025!), but once you're set up, it's so much better for quarterly payments. You can schedule all four payments at once and then basically forget about it. One thing that really helped me was setting up a separate savings account just for quarterly taxes. Every time I get paid, I immediately transfer 25-30% to that account. That way when the quarterly payments come out, I'm not scrambling to find the money. Also, FreeTaxUSA's quarterly calculation is pretty accurate, but I'd recommend being slightly conservative and rounding up your payments by $50-100 per quarter. Better to get a small refund than owe penalties. The IRS underpayment penalties aren't huge, but they're annoying enough that you want to avoid them. If you're really worried about getting it right the first year, consider making your first quarter payment a bit higher than calculated - you can always adjust the remaining quarters down if needed.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

I'm facing the exact same situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! Just received a K-1 from a publicly traded partnership showing all zeros after a brief investment period, and I was really anxious about whether I needed to amend my already-filed return. What's been most reassuring is seeing the consistent experiences from multiple people who actually went through this without any issues. The explanation about these zero K-1s being administrative compliance requirements rather than actual tax events really clarifies things. It makes sense that the IRS matching system focuses on catching unreported income, not missing forms that show no taxable activity. I was initially inclined to amend just to be absolutely certain, but after reading about the potential complications that could introduce versus the minimal risk when there's genuinely nothing to report, I'm convinced the consensus approach is correct. I'll be keeping my K-1 with my tax records but not amending my return. This community discussion has been so much more valuable than trying to interpret IRS guidance alone - real experiences from people who've been through the exact situation provide the kind of practical insight you just can't get elsewhere. Thanks to everyone for sharing!

0 coins

Brandon Parker

•

@Amun-Ra Azra I just want to add my voice to this chorus of relief! I m'literally dealing with this exact scenario right now - received my zero K-1 today from a partnership I had a very brief position in. I ve'been refreshing IRS websites and tax forums all day trying to figure out what to do. This thread has been such a godsend. Seeing so many people who actually lived through this situation with the same outcome is incredibly reassuring. What really clinched it for me was the repeated point about how these are essentially just paperwork compliance requirements that partnerships have to fulfill, not actual tax reporting events that affect your liability. The practical risk assessment everyone s'shared makes total sense - why potentially introduce errors or delays through amending when there s'literally nothing taxable to add to your return? I m'definitely going to follow the consensus here and keep my K-1 with my tax documents without amending. Thank you to everyone who took the time to share their real experiences - it s'exactly what people in our situation need to hear!

0 coins

I just want to thank everyone in this thread for sharing their real-world experiences! I'm dealing with this exact same situation - received a K-1 from a publicly traded partnership showing all zeros after selling my shares early in the year, and I was really stressed about whether to amend my already-filed return. Reading through all these consistent experiences has been incredibly reassuring. The explanation about these zero K-1s being administrative compliance documents rather than actual tax events makes perfect sense, especially when you consider that the IRS matching system is designed to catch unreported income, not missing forms that show no income. What really convinced me was seeing multiple people who went through this without any issues by just keeping their K-1s with their tax records. The risk-benefit analysis is clear - the potential complications from amending (introducing errors, processing delays) outweigh the minimal risk when there's genuinely nothing taxable to report. I'll be following the consensus here and keeping my K-1 with my tax documents without amending my return. This community has been so much more helpful than trying to parse through IRS publications alone - there's nothing like hearing from people who've actually been through the same situation!

0 coins

Prev1...12531254125512561257...5643Next