IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Illinois state refunds are subject to additional verification procedures this year due to increased fraud prevention measures. The IL Department of Revenue implemented enhanced identity verification protocols that can add 7-14 business days to normal processing times. Additionally, returns claiming certain credits like the Earned Income Credit or Education Credit undergo mandatory review regardless of filing method. The "received being processed" status typically persists until all verification steps are complete, at which point it changes to "processed" approximately 3-5 business days before direct deposit occurs.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

I remember last year they had similar verification procedures. Do you know if they send any notification if they need additional verification, or do they just silently hold the return until they're satisfied?

0 coins

Luca Conti

•

Are you a first-time filer in Illinois? I've noticed new residents often face longer processing times than people who've filed in the state before.

0 coins

QuantumLeap

•

First-time filers in Illinois often go through an additional verification layer. Their system compares your information against other state databases to confirm residency. This typically adds about 10-14 days to processing but is a one-time thing. Next year should be faster assuming you use the same name/address/SSN.

0 coins

Logan Chiang

•

@ShadowHunter Since you're a first-time Illinois filer coming from abroad, make sure your address exactly matches what's on file with the Social Security Administration and your employer's W-2. Any discrepancies can trigger additional manual review. Also, if you claimed the standard deduction, that's usually processed faster than itemized returns for new filers. The good news is once you're in their system this year, future filings should be much smoother!

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

Has anyone noticed that tax software handles the Foreign Tax Credit Simplified Limitation for AMT differently? I used TurboTax last year and H&R Block this year, and they gave me completely different results for basically identical situations. TurboTax recommended filing Form 1116 while H&R Block said to take the simplified election.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

I've noticed this too! I tried running the same numbers through both TaxAct and FreeTaxUSA, and got different recommendations. I think some tax software just defaults to the simplified method if you're eligible, while others actually calculate which method would be more beneficial. For the AMT limitation specifically, I found TaxAct handled it better.

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact situation for the past three years and wanted to share what I've learned through trial and error. The Foreign Tax Credit Simplified Limitation for AMT is one of those areas where the IRS instructions are particularly unclear. Here's what I wish someone had told me earlier: even though you qualify for the simplified election (under $300), it's worth calculating both methods if you're subject to AMT. The reason is that AMT has different income calculations, and sometimes the foreign source income limitation works out differently. For your specific situation with $290 in foreign taxes and $4,200 in dividend income, I'd recommend running the numbers both ways. The simplified election is definitely easier, but if you're already close to AMT territory, filing Form 1116 might give you a better result. The key is that Form 1116 lets you use the actual foreign source income calculations, which can be more favorable than the simplified approach when AMT is involved. One practical tip: if you decide to file Form 1116, make sure you elect the simplified limitation on Form 6251 line 6. This saves you from having to do separate AMT foreign source income calculations, which is where things get really complicated. Also, keep good records of your foreign taxes paid - even if you take the simplified election this year, you might want to switch to Form 1116 next year if your foreign investments grow.

0 coins

Ethan Brown

•

Kinda in the minority here, but I've always just estimated. Been running my freelance business for 8 years, and I usually claim 80% business use for my laptop. I keep good records of all my client work and business activities, and I'm confident that 80% is actually conservative for me. I think the IRS is looking for reasonable estimates backed by some form of documentation, not scientific precision. They understand that small business owners don't have elaborate tracking systems.

0 coins

Isn't that risky though? What if you get audited and they ask how you arrived at exactly 80%?

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

I've been dealing with this exact issue as a freelance graphic designer. What worked for me was creating a simple business usage log for one month early in the tax year, then spot-checking it quarterly to make sure my patterns hadn't changed significantly. I track three categories: pure business (client work, invoicing, business emails), pure personal (social media scrolling, online shopping, personal emails), and mixed use (research that could benefit both business and personal projects). For mixed use, I assign 50% to business unless it's clearly more one way or the other. One tip that my CPA gave me: if you're legitimately using your laptop primarily for business, don't stress too much about the occasional personal email check or quick social media browse during work hours. The IRS understands that modern work isn't conducted in a vacuum. As long as your overall calculation is reasonable and you can support it with some documentation, you should be fine. My laptop ended up being 72% business use, which easily qualifies for Section 179. The peace of mind from having actual data to back up my claim was worth the small effort of tracking for a few weeks.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

This happened to me last month. I waited until my regular refund came through before paying what I owed on the amendment. Just make sure to pay before the tax deadline to avoid any penalties. The systems are completely separate.

0 coins

Did you get any kind of notice or bill from the IRS for the amended amount, or did you just send the payment based on what your amended return calculated you owed?

0 coins

Just want to add another perspective here - I went through this exact situation two years ago and made the mistake of panicking and paying the amendment amount immediately out of pocket. Turned out I didn't need to rush at all since I had filed before the deadline. The key thing to remember is that when you file Form 1040-X, you're not getting a separate bill - the form itself calculates what you owe. As long as you pay by the original tax deadline (April 15th in most cases), you won't face penalties. The IRS systems really are separate, so your original refund will process normally while your amendment goes through their much slower review process. My advice: wait for that $890 refund, set aside the $271 immediately when it arrives, and then pay the amendment amount. You'll save yourself the cash flow hassle and still be completely compliant with IRS requirements.

0 coins

Partnership tax might be complex, but I'd argue consolidated corporate returns under 1502 are equally nightmarish. The intercompany transaction rules, stock basis adjustments, and unified loss rules make my head spin even after years of practice. International tax under Subchapter N with all the GILTI, FDII, and Subpart F provisions is another contender for most difficult. Then there's the estate and gift tax with complex valuation issues... Maybe the real answer is that tax law is just complicated in general, and each specialty area has its own flavor of complexity!

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

That's interesting! Do you think having a solid understanding of partnership tax makes it easier to grasp those other complex areas, or are they completely different skill sets?

0 coins

I think there's definitely some transferable understanding between complex tax areas. Once you've mastered partnership tax concepts like deferred tax accounting for book/tax differences, it makes similar concepts in consolidated returns more approachable. But each area also has its own unique frameworks and terminologies. Partnership tax forces you to think in terms of pass-through entities and flexible allocations, while consolidated returns require a corporate mindset focused on single-entity principles. International tax adds a whole layer of jurisdictional complexity. My advice would be to get really solid in one complex area first, then branch out. The analytical skills and research approaches you develop will help, even if the technical rules are different.

0 coins

Pro tip for handling partnership tax: Grab the McKee, Nelson and Whitmire book "Federal Taxation of Partnerships & Partners." It's literally the bible for Subchapter K. I keep a copy permanently on my desk. Also, don't try to understand everything at once - break it down into digestible concepts like formation, operations, transactions with partners, and liquidations.

0 coins

That book is great but super expensive. Would you recommend any alternatives for someone just starting out who can't drop $500 on a reference book?

0 coins

For budget-friendly alternatives, check if your library has access to the BNA Tax Management portfolios on partnerships - they're usually available through most university libraries. Also, the IRS Partnership Audit Technique Guide is free and surprisingly comprehensive for understanding how the IRS views common partnership issues. CCH and RIA both have decent partnership tax guides that are much cheaper than McKee Nelson. You might also find older editions of the McKee book used online for a fraction of the cost - the core concepts haven't changed that much.

0 coins

Prev1...11981199120012011202...5645Next