Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I'm so deeply sorry for your loss, Fatima. Handling the tax affairs of loved ones while grieving is one of the most difficult things anyone can face, and you're being incredibly strong by taking this on. You're absolutely correct that you can still file Married Filing Jointly for 2024 since both spouses passed away in the same tax year. Here's what you need to know: **Essential steps:** - Write "DECEASED" with each spouse's date of death at the top of Form 1040 - Report all income earned through March for your brother and through November for his wife - You can claim all their usual deductions and credits - those medical expenses from their final months could provide significant relief - You'll need Form 1310 if there's a refund due, and consider Form 56 to formally notify the IRS of your role **Important considerations:** - Any pension or investment income received after November (second death) may need to go on an estate return (Form 1041) rather than their final 1040 - Medical expenses paid within one year after death can still be claimed on the final return - Keep detailed records of what income/expenses occurred before vs. after each death date Given the complexity of two deaths in one year plus retirement accounts, I strongly recommend finding a tax professional who specializes in deceased taxpayer returns. Look for an Enrolled Agent or CPA with estate taxation experience - most general preparers rarely handle these situations. You're doing something incredibly loving for your family during an unimaginably difficult time. Please be gentle with yourself through this process.
Yuki Ito
ā¢Thank you for this detailed response, QuantumQuasar. I'm actually dealing with my first deceased taxpayer situation myself and this breakdown is incredibly helpful. One thing that's been confusing me - you mentioned that medical expenses paid within one year after death can still be claimed on the final return. Does this mean if I pay outstanding medical bills from their estate in early 2025, I can still put those on their 2024 final return? That seems like it could be a huge benefit given how expensive end-of-life care can be. Also, do you happen to know if there are any special rules about claiming the standard deduction versus itemizing for deceased taxpayers? I've heard conflicting information about whether you're locked into whatever method they used in previous years.
Chloe Martin
ā¢Yes, Yuki, you're absolutely right about the medical expenses! Under IRS rules, medical expenses paid by the estate within one year after death can be treated as if they were paid by the deceased in the year of death. This means you can include those 2025 payments on their 2024 final return, which can result in substantial tax savings given how high medical costs typically are in end-of-life situations. Regarding standard deduction vs. itemizing - you're not locked into their previous method at all. For their final return, you should calculate both ways and choose whichever gives the better tax outcome, just like any normal return. Given the medical expenses you mentioned, itemizing will very likely be beneficial since those costs often exceed the standard deduction amount, especially when combined with other deductible expenses from their final year. One additional tip: make sure to keep detailed records and receipts for all medical expenses, as final returns of deceased taxpayers do tend to receive extra scrutiny from the IRS. The documentation will be crucial if there are any questions later. This medical expense rule is one of those lesser-known provisions that can provide real relief during an already difficult time.
I'm so sorry for your tremendous loss, Fatima. Losing both your brother and sister-in-law in the same year while having to navigate their final tax affairs must feel overwhelming beyond words. You're absolutely right that you can file Married Filing Jointly for 2024 since both spouses died within the same tax year. Here are the key steps to help you through this: **Critical requirements:** - Write "DECEASED" along with each spouse's date of death across the top of Form 1040 - Report all income earned up to March for your brother and November for your sister-in-law - You'll need Form 1310 for any refund and should consider Form 56 to notify the IRS you're acting on their behalf - All their usual deductions and credits still apply, including those significant medical expenses **Important timing considerations:** - Any income they earned before death but received after (like final paychecks) goes on their final 1040 - Income received after the second spouse's death in November may need to go on an estate return (Form 1041) - Medical expenses paid by the estate within one year after death can still be claimed on their final return Given the complexity of two deaths plus pensions and investments, I'd strongly recommend finding a tax professional who specializes in deceased taxpayer returns. Look for an Enrolled Agent or CPA with estate taxation experience through the IRS directory or your state's CPA society. You're doing something incredibly loving during an unimaginably difficult time. Please take care of yourself through this process.
Omar Mahmoud
ā¢Declan, thank you for laying this out so clearly. I'm new to this community but going through something very similar with my uncle who passed last month. Your point about medical expenses paid by the estate within one year still being claimable on the final return is something I hadn't heard before - that could make a huge difference given his hospital bills. One thing I'm wondering about - you mentioned that income earned before death but received after still goes on the final 1040. What about things like credit card rewards or bank interest that might have been earned over several months but posted to their account after death? I'm trying to figure out where to draw the line between what belongs on their final return versus potentially opening an estate return. Also, does anyone know if there are any special considerations for Social Security benefits when both spouses die in the same year? I've been getting conflicting information from different sources. This community has been so helpful for navigating these complex situations that most people never have to deal with.
Liam McGuire
ā¢Omar, great questions! For credit card rewards and bank interest, the key is when they were "earned" rather than when they posted. If the interest was accruing during the months your uncle was alive, it would typically go on his final return even if it posted after death. Credit card rewards are a bit trickier - if they were earned from purchases made before death, they'd usually go on the final return. Regarding Social Security benefits when both spouses die in the same year - any benefits they received while alive go on their final joint return. However, there may be survivor benefits or final payments that need to be handled differently. The Social Security Administration typically requires returning any payments received after the death date, which can complicate things. One important thing I learned from my own situation: the Social Security Administration and the IRS don't always communicate effectively about these timing issues, so you may need to contact both agencies separately to ensure everything is handled correctly. The estate return threshold is $600 of gross income, but many families can avoid Form 1041 complexity if post-death amounts are minimal and distributed quickly to beneficiaries. Given the specialized nature of these rules, definitely consider that tax professional consultation - it's worth it for peace of mind during an already difficult time.
Join the conversation
One important consideration that hasn't been fully addressed is the timing and allocation method for mixed-use properties. Since you mentioned your rental properties are also used for your photography/video business, you'll need to be very careful about how you allocate the tree removal costs. The IRS generally requires you to allocate expenses based on actual usage rather than just claiming it under whichever category gives you the better deduction. For your rental/production properties, you might need to split the $4,800 cost based on the percentage of time used for rental vs. business vs. personal use throughout the year. Also, keep in mind that for rental properties, tree removal is typically treated as a current-year deductible expense (maintenance), but if the removal is part of a larger landscaping improvement project, portions might need to be capitalized and depreciated over time instead. For your home office situation, the Section 199A deduction (20% pass-through deduction) might also come into play depending on your total business income, which could affect the overall tax benefit of claiming the tree removal as a business expense. I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional who can look at your specific numbers and usage patterns before filing, especially given the complexity of the mixed-use scenarios you're dealing with.
This is really helpful clarification on the allocation requirements! I hadn't considered how complex the mixed-use scenarios could get from a tax perspective. When you mention allocating based on "actual usage," do you mean I need to track exactly how many days each property was used for rental vs. business vs. personal throughout the year? That seems like it could get quite detailed to document properly. Also, regarding the Section 199A deduction interaction - would claiming more business expenses potentially reduce my qualified business income and therefore reduce that 20% deduction benefit? Trying to understand if there's a point where it might actually be better tax-wise to claim less business deductions.
Yes, you're absolutely right that the allocation can get quite detailed! For mixed-use properties, the IRS expects you to maintain records showing the actual days or percentage of time used for each purpose. A simple calendar or log tracking rental bookings, business shoots, and personal use is usually sufficient documentation. Regarding Section 199A, you've identified a key tax planning consideration. The 20% deduction is based on qualified business income (QBI), so increasing business expenses does reduce your QBI and potentially your 199A deduction. However, this doesn't necessarily mean you should claim fewer deductions - it depends on your total income levels and whether you're subject to the wage/property limitations. For example, if you're below the taxable income thresholds ($182,050 single/$364,100 married filing jointly for 2023), the 199A deduction is simply 20% of your QBI, so reducing expenses by $1,000 might save you $1,000 in taxes but cost you $200 in lost 199A benefits - still a net positive. Above those thresholds, the calculation gets more complex with wage and property basis limitations that could actually make business deductions more valuable, not less. This is exactly why getting professional tax advice is crucial for your situation - the optimal strategy depends on your total income picture and which limitations apply to you.
KylieRose
I've been through a similar situation with tree removal on both my home office and rental properties. One thing I learned that might help you is to make sure you understand the difference between "ordinary and necessary" business expenses versus capital improvements when it comes to tree removal. For your home office situation with the wildfire risk, the key is documenting that the tree removal was necessary to protect your business operations, not just general property improvement. Since you're in a designated high-risk zone, get documentation from your county fire department about their defensible space requirements - this can really strengthen your case for the business portion of the deduction. For the insurance company situation, keep that letter! Even though they didn't explicitly threaten cancellation, having written documentation from your insurer about safety concerns is valuable evidence that the removal was necessary rather than elective. One mistake I made initially was not properly tracking my rental property usage when I also used it for business. Make sure you keep detailed records of when each property is used for what purpose - the IRS can get pretty specific about allocation requirements if you're audited. Also, don't forget to check if any of your properties are in areas that have been declared disaster zones in recent years. Sometimes tree removal related to storm damage or disaster recovery has different, more favorable tax treatment. The documentation everyone mentioned is crucial - I'd add that getting multiple estimates not only shows you're being cost-conscious but also provides more professional opinions about why the removal was necessary.
This is really comprehensive advice - thank you for sharing your experience! I'm curious about the county fire department documentation you mentioned. Did you have to specifically request something in writing from them, or do they typically have standard documents about defensible space requirements that property owners can obtain? I want to make sure I'm getting the right type of documentation to support the business expense claim for my wildfire zone situation. Also, when you mention tracking rental property usage, did you use any specific software or system to log the different types of use, or is a simple spreadsheet sufficient? I'm trying to figure out the best way to maintain those detailed records without it becoming too burdensome.
Join the conversation
Great question about structured settlements! Yes, you do have to wait to receive the full amount, but there are some considerations beyond just the tax savings. The main downsides are: 1) You lose investment opportunity on the delayed payments - if you could invest a lump sum and earn more than the tax savings, that might be better financially, 2) Inflation reduces the real value of future payments, and 3) You're essentially lending money to the defendant with no guarantee they'll remain solvent. However, the upsides can be significant: Beyond the tax bracket management I mentioned, structured settlements also provide guaranteed income streams and remove the temptation to spend a large lump sum unwisely. In my case, the tax savings of $38k over 3 years made it worthwhile, especially since the payments were guaranteed by an annuity company rather than relying on the defendant's future financial stability. For your situation with potential $750k settlement, definitely run the numbers both ways. The tax bracket smoothing could be substantial, but factor in what you could potentially earn by investing a lump sum versus the guaranteed tax savings from spreading the income.
This is really valuable information about structured settlements that I hadn't considered. Given that our case involves both me and a co-plaintiff, would we each have the option to structure our portions differently? For instance, could I choose a structured settlement while the other plaintiff takes a lump sum? Also, when you mention the payments being guaranteed by an annuity company rather than the defendant - is that something that gets negotiated as part of the settlement, or is it a standard practice? I want to make sure I understand all the protections in place before committing to delayed payments.
Yes, absolutely! Each plaintiff can structure their settlement portion differently. In multi-plaintiff cases like yours, the settlement agreement typically allows individual choices about payment structure. So you could opt for a structured settlement while your co-plaintiff takes a lump sum, or vice versa. Regarding the annuity guarantee, this is definitely something to negotiate as part of the settlement terms. Standard practice is for the defendant (or their insurance company) to purchase a qualified structured settlement annuity from a highly-rated life insurance company. The annuity company then becomes responsible for the payments, not the original defendant. This provides much better security than relying on the defendant's long-term financial stability. Make sure your settlement agreement specifies: 1) The annuity must be purchased from an A-rated or higher insurance company, 2) The annuity is non-assignable (protects you from creditors), and 3) Clear payment schedules with no acceleration clauses that could trigger immediate taxation. Your attorney should be familiar with structuring these arrangements, but it's worth discussing early in negotiations since it affects how the settlement documents are drafted.
One important consideration that hasn't been fully addressed is the timing of when you'll actually receive the various tax forms. In my experience with a similar discrimination settlement, the W-2s for wage components came from the employer in January like normal, but the 1099s for other damages came from the defendant's attorney or insurance company - sometimes much later in the tax season. This created some complications because I needed to file my return but was still waiting for the 1099s. Make sure your settlement agreement specifies deadlines for when all tax documents must be provided to you, ideally by January 31st so you're not stuck waiting to file your taxes. Also, keep detailed records of all medical expenses, therapy costs, and other damages you incurred due to the discrimination. Even if those aren't directly part of the settlement, they may be deductible medical expenses on your return. The emotional distress from workplace discrimination often leads to legitimate medical costs that people forget to track and deduct. Finally, consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in lawsuit settlements before finalizing the agreement. The few hundred dollars spent on expert advice could save you thousands in taxes and prevent headaches during filing season.
This is excellent advice about the timing of tax documents! I hadn't thought about the potential delays in receiving 1099s from different parties. Given that our settlement involves multiple components and parties, should we also request that the settlement agreement specify exactly which entity (employer, defendant's attorney, insurance company) is responsible for issuing each type of tax form? Also, regarding the medical expense deduction you mentioned - do therapy and counseling costs related to workplace discrimination qualify even if they occurred before the settlement was finalized? I've been seeing a therapist since this whole ordeal began, and those costs have been substantial.
Join the conversation
I'm in the exact same boat - submitted my Form 8802 in early February and it's been over 5 months now with absolutely nothing from the IRS. I need my Form 6166 for a business partnership in France and the complete silence has been maddening. This thread has been incredibly helpful for my sanity though. Knowing that 4-5 months is unfortunately the new reality rather than my form being lost somewhere makes a huge difference psychologically. The consistency of everyone's experiences gives me confidence it's just working through their massive backlog. I finally called 267-941-1000 yesterday after reading all the recommendations here. Waited 2 hours and 45 minutes on hold (brutal but manageable with Netflix), but got through to an actual agent who confirmed my form is in processing. She said February submissions are currently being worked on and I should expect my certification within 2-3 weeks! For anyone still debating whether to call - absolutely do it once you hit 4+ months. Yes, the hold time is painful, but getting that confirmation and realistic timeline makes all the difference. The agent was actually very understanding about the delays and helpful with providing a status update. Hang in there everyone - sounds like those February/March submissions should start coming through very soon based on what I learned!
I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now! Just submitted my Form 8802 in early May and I'm about 2.5 months in. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly eye-opening - I had no idea the processing times had gotten this extended. The complete lack of any acknowledgment from the IRS really is the most frustrating part. You spend so much time making sure you fill out the form correctly, include the right payment, and send it to the proper fax number, only to hear absolutely nothing back. It's like throwing your documents into a black hole. Based on all the consistent timelines people are sharing here, it sounds like I should mentally prepare for another 2-3 months of waiting. I'm already bookmarking that 267-941-1000 number for when I hit the 4-month mark. Even though a 2+ hour hold sounds awful, getting confirmation that my form actually made it into their system seems worth every minute of waiting. It's somewhat reassuring to hear that February and March submissions are currently being processed - at least the system is moving, just very slowly. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences and creating this invaluable resource. It really helps to know we're all going through the same bureaucratic nightmare together! For anyone else just starting this process - set your expectations for 4-5 months and try not to panic when you hear nothing for months. Based on everyone's stories here, the forms do eventually come through!
Edward McBride
I'm a tax professional and can add some additional context to what everyone has already shared here. The reason address discrepancies on 1099s don't matter for filing is that the IRS uses what's called the "Information Returns Master File" (IRMF) system to match third-party reporting documents like 1099s with your tax return. This system primarily looks for three key data points: your Social Security Number, the type of income (in your case, non-employee compensation), and the dollar amount. The address field on the 1099 is used by the issuing company for their own records and mailing purposes, but it's not part of the IRS matching algorithm. When you e-file your return, the system will automatically update your address of record with the IRS to whatever current address you enter in your tax software. So even though your 1099 shows the old address, your tax return will establish your current address in their system. One thing I didn't see mentioned yet - make sure when you enter this income in your tax software that you select it as "1099-NEC" or "1099-MISC" income (depending on which form you received) rather than just typing in $4,250 as "other income." This ensures proper matching with what the company reported to the IRS on your behalf. You're absolutely safe to file with the form as-is. The consensus here is correct!
0 coins
Amina Diallo
ā¢This is incredibly helpful information! As someone who's new to receiving 1099s, I really appreciate you explaining the technical side of how the IRS matching system actually works. The Information Returns Master File system details give me much more confidence in understanding why the address discrepancy isn't a problem. Your point about making sure to categorize the income correctly in tax software is something I hadn't considered - I definitely want to make sure it shows up as 1099-NEC income rather than just generic "other income" so it matches properly with what the company reported. That seems like it could be an easy mistake to make that might cause unnecessary complications. It's reassuring to hear from a tax professional that the consensus in this thread is accurate. Between all the personal experiences people have shared and the professional insights, I feel like I have a really comprehensive understanding of this issue now. Thanks for taking the time to explain the behind-the-scenes process!
0 coins
Finnegan Gunn
I can confirm what everyone here is saying - the address discrepancy on your 1099 won't cause any filing issues. I had a similar situation two years ago where my 1099-NEC had my old address from before I moved, and I was worried it might create problems with the IRS. After doing some research and consulting with a tax preparer, I learned that the IRS matching system focuses on your SSN and the income amount, not the address. When you file your return, you'll use your current address, and that's what matters for their records. I filed electronically with my current address while the 1099 still showed my old one, and everything processed smoothly - no delays, no additional correspondence, nothing. Just make sure you report that exact $4,250 amount on your return. Definitely reach out to the company to update your address for next year's forms though. It only takes a few minutes and saves you from having this same concern again. But for this year's filing, you're all set to proceed!
0 coins
Jamal Carter
ā¢This is really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same situation! I was getting a bit anxious about potentially causing issues with my tax filing, but seeing so many people confirm that the address discrepancy doesn't matter for the IRS matching system puts my mind at ease. It sounds like the key thing is just making sure I report that $4,250 exactly as it appears on the 1099, and file with my current address. The electronic filing system will handle everything else automatically. I'll definitely contact the company to update my address too - seems like a small step now that could prevent this same worry next year. Thanks for sharing your experience! It's really helpful to know that your filing went through smoothly without any complications or delays despite the address mismatch.
0 coins