IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



We'll call your mobile. Keep browsing.

Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Maya Lewis

•

The verification backlog right now is worse than any time since 2021. Most people are waiting 3-4 weeks compared to the normal 7-10 days. If you need your refund urgently, you should consider contacting your local Taxpayer Advocate Service office - they can flag your verification for expedited processing if you can demonstrate financial hardship (like pending eviction, utility shutoff, medical bills). The verification queue is processed in batches every Tuesday and Thursday, so check your transcript on Wednesday and Friday mornings for the best chance of seeing updates.

0 coins

I'm going through this exact same situation right now! Filed in early April and did the identity verification on 4/12, just one day after you. I've been calling that verification line every morning at 7am for the past week and getting the same "high call volume" message. It's incredibly frustrating when you just need a simple status update. What I've learned from researching this is that the IRS verification system is completely overwhelmed right now - they're processing about 15,000 verifications per day but receiving over 25,000 new ones. The phone system automatically plays that busy message when call volume exceeds capacity, which happens within minutes of opening each day. I've started checking my online IRS account transcript daily instead. Look for any new transaction codes that appear - specifically TC 971 with Action Code 123 means your verification was accepted. I haven't seen this code yet on mine, but at least it's something concrete to monitor rather than that useless phone message. Has anyone had luck with the local Taxpayer Advocate Service offices for verification issues? I'm considering reaching out to them if I don't see movement by next week.

0 coins

I'm in almost the exact same boat - submitted verification on 4/10, so just a day before both of you! Been getting that same automated runaround for over a week now. It's maddening when you just want to know if they even received your documents properly. I tried calling at different times thinking maybe early morning or late afternoon would be better, but no luck. That TC 971 with Action Code 123 tip is really helpful - I've been staring at my transcript not knowing what any of those codes meant. Going to start checking for that specific combination. The Taxpayer Advocate Service route sounds promising if we're all still stuck next week. At least we know we're not alone in this verification limbo! Thanks for sharing the processing numbers - knowing they're that backlogged actually makes me feel a bit better about the wait.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

I've been using UltraTax CS for my family trust returns for the past 3 years and it's been solid. It's definitely more expensive than consumer software (around $500-600 annually), but the reliability has been worth it after dealing with similar issues you described with H&R Block. What I really appreciate is how it handles the flow-through calculations from the 1041 to the K-1s automatically, and it has excellent error checking that catches common trust return mistakes before you file. The interface takes some getting used to if you're coming from consumer software, but their support team actually knows trust taxation rules, which has been helpful when I've had questions about distribution deduction calculations. One thing to note - they require you to maintain the subscription annually even if you only file during tax season, so factor that into your cost comparison. But given your bad experience with H&R Block's reliability issues, it might be worth the peace of mind to use something designed for professional preparers.

0 coins

PrinceJoe

•

Thanks for the detailed review of UltraTax CS! The automatic flow-through calculations sound really appealing - that's exactly the kind of feature I need to avoid the manual errors I've been making with my current setup. Quick question about the subscription model you mentioned - do they offer any kind of trial period or demo version? I'd hate to commit to a full year subscription without being able to test how well it handles my specific trust situations first. Also, when you say their support team knows trust taxation, have you actually had to contact them about complex distribution scenarios? The price point is definitely higher than I was hoping, but if it prevents the kind of last-minute software crashes I dealt with last year, it might be worth the investment.

0 coins

I went through a similar software nightmare with trust returns a few years ago and ended up switching to ProSeries. It's been rock solid for Form 1041 preparation and handles all the K-1 complexities without any of the freezing issues you experienced with H&R Block. What really sold me on ProSeries was how it handles the trust-specific calculations automatically - things like the distribution deduction, DNI calculations, and the proper allocation of different income types to beneficiaries. The software walks you through each step and has built-in checks to catch common trust return errors before filing. The price is reasonable (around $400-450 annually) and includes unlimited e-filing, so both your trusts would be covered. Their customer support actually understands trust taxation, which was a huge relief after dealing with consumer software support that clearly had no clue about fiduciary returns. One feature I particularly love is that it saves your work automatically every few minutes, so even if something did crash (which hasn't happened to me), you wouldn't lose hours of work like you did with H&R Block. Given your focus on reliability over price, I think ProSeries would be a great fit for your situation.

0 coins

ProSeries sounds like exactly what I need! The automatic saving feature alone would have saved me so much stress last year when H&R Block kept crashing. I'm particularly interested in how it handles the DNI calculations since that's always been one of the more confusing aspects for me. Quick question - does ProSeries have good documentation or help resources for someone transitioning from consumer software? I'm comfortable with trust concepts but sometimes struggle with where to input certain items in professional-grade software. Also, do you know if they offer any kind of demo or trial period so I can test it out before committing to the full subscription? The price point seems very reasonable compared to the headache and potential penalties from filing late due to software issues. Thanks for the detailed recommendation!

0 coins

Quick question - how would this even show up on a paystub? Would it be obvious if an employer was making you pay both halves of FICA? My paystubs are confusing and just show a bunch of different deductions.

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

•

On your paystub, you should see Social Security and Medicare taxes being withheld at 6.2% and 1.45% of your gross wages, respectively. If you're paying both halves, you'd see approximately 12.4% for Social Security and 2.9% for Medicare being withheld. An easy way to check: multiply your gross pay by 0.0765 (7.65%). That's roughly what should be withheld for FICA in total. If the amount on your paystub is significantly higher (close to 15.3%), your employer may be wrongfully making you pay their portion.

0 coins

I went through something similar at my previous job and want to share what I learned. Your employer's request is definitely illegal, but I'd also recommend checking if they've already started doing this without telling you properly. Look at your most recent paystub and calculate what your FICA withholding should be: multiply your gross pay by 0.0765 (that's 7.65% total for employee portion). If the actual withholding is close to double that amount (around 15.3%), they may have already started making you pay both portions. Also, keep in mind that if your employer does this, you'll essentially be overpaying your taxes. When you file your tax return, you should get a refund for the overpaid amount, but that doesn't make what your employer is doing legal. You shouldn't have to wait until tax season to get back money that was illegally withheld from your paychecks. Document everything - the conversation with your boss, your current and future paystubs, and any written communication about this policy. This documentation will be crucial whether you decide to confront your employer or report them to the IRS.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

This is really helpful advice about checking paystubs! I never thought about calculating it myself. Quick question though - what if the employer tries to get around this by calling it something else on the paystub, like a "business support fee" or "operational contribution"? Would that make it any less illegal, or is it still the same violation regardless of what they call it?

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

Just wanted to add one more important point that hasn't been mentioned yet - the timing of when you receive your W-2G matters for tax purposes. If you win big late in December, you might not receive the W-2G until January of the following year, but you're still required to report that income on the tax return for the year you actually won the money. So if you hit a big parlay on December 28th, 2024, that income goes on your 2024 tax return even if DraftKings doesn't mail you the W-2G until January 2025. This is different from some other tax documents that follow when you receive the form rather than when the activity occurred. I've seen people get confused about this and accidentally report gambling winnings in the wrong tax year, which can cause issues with the IRS since they'll have the W-2G showing up in their system for the correct year. Also worth noting - if you're a professional gambler (rare, but it happens), the tax treatment is completely different and these W-2G thresholds don't apply the same way. But for casual bettors, the info everyone else shared is spot on.

0 coins

This is really helpful timing info! I had no idea about the December/January timing issue. Quick follow-up question - if I have losses throughout 2024 but then hit a big win in late December that puts me net positive for the year, do I still need to report all the individual winning sessions from earlier in the year as income? Or can I just report the net amount? I'm trying to figure out if I need to go back and reconstruct every single bet I made this year or if the year-end summary from DraftKings is sufficient for tax purposes.

0 coins

Unfortunately, you need to report ALL gambling winnings as income, not just your net amount. Each winning session/bet is considered separate taxable income, even if you had losses on other days that offset those wins. So yes, you'd technically need to report all those individual winning sessions from throughout the year as income on your tax return. The good news is that if you itemize deductions, you can then deduct your gambling losses up to the amount of your winnings on Schedule A. The year-end summary from DraftKings is helpful for your records, but for tax purposes you're supposed to report the gross winnings amount. Many people do use the summary as a reasonable approximation, but technically the IRS wants you to track each winning session. This is why keeping detailed records throughout the year (or using something like those tax tools others mentioned) can be really valuable. It's one of those areas where the tax code is pretty strict in theory, but enforcement varies in practice for casual recreational bettors.

0 coins

KhalilStar

•

Just to clarify something that might be causing confusion - the $600 AND 300x rule applies to each individual winning bet/session, not your cumulative activity for the year. So if you win $800 on a $5 bet (160x), no W-2G. But if you win $1,500 on a $5 bet (300x), you'd get a W-2G. However, DraftKings and other platforms are also required to issue a 1099-MISC if your total net winnings for the year exceed $600, regardless of whether any single bet triggered a W-2G. This is separate from the W-2G requirement. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is that different states may have their own reporting requirements too. Some states require platforms to report gambling winnings at lower thresholds than federal requirements. So depending on where you live, you might receive state tax forms even if you don't hit the federal W-2G threshold. Also, make sure you understand the difference between "net winnings" and "gross winnings" on your tax forms - it can be confusing when you're trying to reconcile everything at tax time.

0 coins

This is super helpful clarification! I think the distinction between individual bet thresholds vs annual cumulative reporting is what was confusing me the most. So just to make sure I understand correctly - even if none of my individual bets trigger a W-2G, I could still get a 1099-MISC at year-end if my total profits exceed $600? And regarding state requirements, do you know if there's an easy way to find out what my specific state's thresholds are? I'm in Illinois and wondering if they have different rules since they legalized sports betting relatively recently.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

•

I really appreciate everyone's detailed responses here! This is exactly the kind of guidance I needed. It sounds like my main mistakes were: 1. Both my wife and I claiming our child on our separate W-4s (should only be one of us) 2. Not completing Step 4c with the additional withholding amount from the Multiple Jobs Worksheet @Freya Larsen - your explanation about the child tax credit being claimed twice makes perfect sense now. No wonder we're underwithholding! I think I'll start with the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator that @QuantumQuest and @CyberNinja mentioned since it's free and seems to handle the complexity of dual-income situations automatically. If that doesn't work out or I run into issues, I might consider some of the other services mentioned. One follow-up question: when I update our W-4s, should I submit the changes right away or wait until the start of the next payroll period? I want to make sure we start withholding correctly ASAP but don't want to mess up any current payroll processing. Thanks again everyone - this community is incredibly helpful!

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

You should definitely submit the updated W-4s as soon as possible! Most payroll systems can handle mid-cycle changes, and the sooner you get the correct withholding started, the less you'll potentially owe next year. Just make sure to coordinate with your wife so you're both submitting your updated forms around the same time - you don't want a situation where one spouse is withholding correctly while the other is still using the old (incorrect) withholding amounts for several pay periods. Most HR departments are pretty quick about processing W-4 updates since it's such a common request. The changes typically take effect with the next full pay period after submission. Good luck getting this sorted out!

0 coins

Jenna Sloan

•

Great advice from everyone here! I went through this exact same situation a couple years ago and learned some hard lessons. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned much - if you're making these W-4 corrections mid-year (like now in April), you might want to consider having a bit more withheld than the calculators suggest since you've already been underwithholding for several months. The IRS estimator and other tools assume you're starting fresh at the beginning of the year. Since you've potentially been underwithholding since January, you might need to "catch up" with slightly higher withholding for the remaining pay periods. Also, don't forget that if you end up owing more than $1,000 when you file next year, you could face underpayment penalties even if you fix your W-4 now. The IRS generally wants you to pay at least 90% of your current year tax liability or 100% of last year's liability (whichever is smaller) through withholding and estimated payments. Keep good records of when you made the W-4 changes - this documentation can be helpful if you need to explain any underpayment situations to the IRS later.

0 coins

This is such an important point about the mid-year corrections! I hadn't thought about the "catch up" withholding needed when you're making changes partway through the year. @Jenna Sloan - when you say to withhold a bit more than the calculators suggest, do you have a rule of thumb for how much extra? Like should I add an extra $50-100 per paycheck, or is there a more systematic way to calculate the catch-up amount? Also, your point about the underpayment penalties is really concerning. Since we ve'been underwithholding since January, we re'probably already behind on our 2025 tax obligations. Would it make sense to also make a quarterly estimated payment for Q1 to cover the shortfall from the first few months, or just rely on increased withholding for the rest of the year? I really wish someone had explained all these nuances when I first started filling out W-4s. The form makes it seem so straightforward but there are so many ways to mess it up!

0 coins

Prev1...11011102110311041105...5645Next