< Back to IRS

Matthew Sanchez

83(b) Election vs. ISO Stock Options: Which Provides Better Tax Treatment?

I've recently been offered equity as part of a compensation package at a startup that's showing a lot of promise. The management team laid out a few options for me and I'm trying to figure out what makes the most sense tax-wise. What's generally better - receiving ISOs (Incentive Stock Options), filing an 83(b) election, or is there some optimal combination of the two? I'm anticipating the company's valuation will increase substantially over the next few years, so I want to position myself for the best tax outcome. From what I understand, ISOs might have more favorable tax treatment, but they come with longer holding requirements which limits flexibility. I'm also confused about the timing of an 83(b) election - do I need to file it within 30 days of receiving the option grant, or do I have 30 days from when I actually exercise the options? Any insights from folks who've navigated this before would be super helpful. I don't want to miss any filing deadlines or overlook something important that could cost me later.

The 83(b) election and ISOs are actually addressing different situations, so let me clear this up: ISOs (Incentive Stock Options) are a type of stock option that offers potential tax advantages. When you exercise ISOs, you don't pay ordinary income tax at exercise (though it can trigger AMT). If you hold the resulting shares for at least 1 year after exercise AND 2 years after the grant date, any gain is treated as long-term capital gains rather than ordinary income. The 83(b) election applies to restricted stock (not options) that's subject to vesting. It lets you pay tax on the fair market value at the time of grant rather than as it vests. This is beneficial if you expect significant appreciation. For your specific questions: You can't really combine them in the way you're thinking. The 83(b) election must be filed within 30 days of receiving restricted stock (not options), not when exercising options. ISOs don't require an 83(b) election. The big watch-out with ISOs is the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) which can create a tax bill when you exercise, even though you haven't sold the shares yet.

0 coins

Thanks for explaining the difference! So if I'm understanding correctly, 83(b) is for restricted stock units (RSUs), not options? But what if my company is offering me the choice between RSUs with an 83(b) option or straight ISOs? Which typically works out better if I think the company value will 4-5x in the next few years?

0 coins

83(b) elections apply to restricted stock, not RSUs (Restricted Stock Units). There's an important distinction: restricted stock is actual stock granted to you that you own subject to vesting conditions, while RSUs are a promise to deliver shares once vesting occurs. If you're being offered a choice between restricted stock (with the option to file an 83(b)) or ISOs, it largely depends on your financial situation and risk tolerance. With restricted stock and an 83(b) election, you're paying tax upfront on the current fair market value, betting that the company will appreciate significantly. This creates immediate tax consequences but could result in all future appreciation being taxed as long-term capital gains.

0 coins

I went through this exact dilemma last year and found https://taxr.ai incredibly helpful in modeling different scenarios. I uploaded my grant documents and they showed me the tax implications of both options under different growth scenarios. For my situation, I ended up going with ISOs but not exercising immediately. The key insight from taxr.ai was that the AMT implications would've crushed me if I had exercised all at once. Instead, I created a 3-year exercise strategy that minimized my AMT exposure while still positioning me for long-term capital gains treatment. Their analysis also clarified that 83(b) wasn't even applicable to my ISO grants, which saved me from making a filing mistake that would've been useless!

0 coins

How does taxr.ai handle the AMT calculations? My accountant seems confused about projecting this, especially with potentially changing tax laws by the time I'd sell.

0 coins

Did they give you any guidance on early exercise provisions? My company offers the ability to early exercise ISOs and I'm wondering if filing an 83(b) in that scenario makes sense.

0 coins

They use a predictive model that factors in your other income sources to estimate AMT impact. What impressed me was how they ran multiple scenarios - income growth, different exercise timings, and even potential changes in capital gains rates. It was much more comprehensive than what my accountant had been doing, which was basically just using my current tax situation. For early exercise provisions, they actually cover this extensively. If you early exercise ISOs, the shares you receive are typically subject to vesting (essentially restricted stock at that point), and this is precisely when an 83(b) election makes sense. Without the 83(b) in this scenario, you'd potentially face ordinary income tax on the appreciation between your exercise price and the fair market value as the shares vest.

0 coins

Following up on my question about early exercise - I took the plunge and tried taxr.ai and it was legitimately eye-opening! They explained that when you early exercise ISOs, you're essentially converting options into restricted stock that's still subject to vesting. This creates the perfect case for an 83(b) election. In my specific situation, they showed that early exercising my ISOs when the strike price was still equal to the fair market value, then immediately filing an 83(b), would eliminate almost all tax concerns during the vesting period and start my holding period for long-term capital gains treatment immediately. I was skeptical at first because my company's stock plan administrator gave me conflicting information, but taxr.ai provided IRS references that confirmed their approach. Already filed my 83(b) and feeling much more confident about my equity situation!

0 coins

For anyone dealing with stock options or equity compensation, I strongly recommend using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to get direct access to IRS specialists. I spent weeks trying to get definitive answers on my 83(b) filing questions and kept getting the IRS automated system with 2+ hour wait times. Claimyr got me connected to an actual IRS agent in under 15 minutes who confirmed exactly what I needed to include with my 83(b) election and where to send it. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent also explained that my company had given me incorrect filing instructions that would have invalidated my election! Given the strict 30-day deadline for 83(b) elections, this literally saved me from a potential tax disaster.

0 coins

How does Claimyr actually work? Is it just bumping you ahead in the phone queue somehow? That seems too good to be true.

0 coins

I'm extremely skeptical. The IRS doesn't offer any service to jump the line, and they certainly don't have specialists just waiting to answer complex equity compensation questions. This sounds like a scam that's just going to take your money and leave you on hold like everyone else.

0 coins

It doesn't bump you ahead in the queue - they use a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent actually picks up, you get a call back to connect with that agent. It's basically outsourcing the hold time so you don't have to waste your day listening to the IRS hold music. The IRS absolutely has agents who handle tax forms and filing procedures - I didn't claim they have "equity compensation specialists." The agent I spoke with was knowledgeable about 83(b) filing requirements because they deal with these forms regularly. There's nothing scammy about it - they're just solving the hold time problem that makes reaching the IRS so frustrating.

0 coins

I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I had questions about documenting my ISO exercises for my taxes this year. It actually worked exactly as advertised. I got a call back in about 20 minutes, and was connected to an IRS representative who walked me through the documentation requirements. They confirmed that I needed to get specific information from my employer about the FMV at time of exercise, and explained how this would appear on my W-2. The representative also cleared up my confusion about form 3921, which my employer needs to provide. This alone was worth it since my HR department had been giving me vague answers for weeks. Not affiliated with them at all, but wanted to correct my previous skepticism. Sometimes solutions that seem too good to be true actually work!

0 coins

Something nobody's mentioned yet - if you're considering an 83(b) election, make sure your company is actually willing to let you early exercise your options! Many startups offer this, but it's not universal. Also, consider your cash situation carefully. With an early exercise + 83(b) strategy, you'll need: 1. Money to exercise the options (potentially significant) 2. Money to pay taxes on any spread between exercise price and FMV 3. Confidence that you'll stay at the company through vesting I made the mistake of early exercising too many options, filing 83(b), then leaving the company 9 months later. Lost a bunch of unvested shares AND had already paid taxes on them. Painful lesson!

0 coins

Did you get any tax benefit from the forfeited shares? Like a capital loss or something?

0 coins

Unfortunately, the tax treatment for forfeited shares after an 83(b) election is pretty terrible. I couldn't claim a capital loss for the full amount I paid. You get a capital loss only for the amount you actually paid for the shares (the exercise price), but not for any taxes you paid via the 83(b) election. The tax code basically punishes you twice - first by making you pay taxes on the shares when you make the 83(b) election, then by limiting your ability to recover those costs when you forfeit the shares. It's definitely something to consider when deciding how many options to early exercise.

0 coins

I'm confused about the AMT implications of ISOs. My company is pre-IPO and the shares aren't liquid. If I exercise ISOs, I'll have to pay AMT on the spread between strike price and current 409A valuation, right? But if the company later fails, do I get that AMT back?

0 coins

You're right about the AMT implications. When you exercise ISOs, the spread (difference between exercise price and fair market value) is considered income for AMT purposes, even though you don't have actual cash from selling the shares. If the company later fails or the stock value drops, you get an AMT credit that can be carried forward and used in future years - but it's not a direct refund. This credit can only offset the difference between your regular tax and AMT in future years, which might take a long time to fully recover.

0 coins

This is a great discussion! I want to add some practical perspective as someone who's been through multiple startup equity situations. One thing that's been really helpful for me is creating a spreadsheet to model different scenarios before making decisions. I track: - Current 409A valuation vs my strike price - Projected company valuation growth - My tax bracket and AMT threshold - Cash requirements for different strategies The key insight I've learned is that there's no universal "best" approach - it really depends on your individual situation. For my first startup, ISOs worked great because I could exercise gradually and manage AMT. But at my current company, I went with early exercise + 83(b) because the strike price equaled FMV at grant time, eliminating immediate tax consequences. Also worth noting: if your company offers both restricted stock and ISOs, you might be able to negotiate a mix. I know folks who've gotten 75% ISOs and 25% restricted stock, which gives flexibility for different tax strategies. Don't forget to factor in state taxes too - some states don't have capital gains taxes, which can significantly impact your decision if you're planning to relocate.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was looking for! The spreadsheet modeling approach makes so much sense - I've been trying to make this decision based on general rules rather than running the actual numbers for my situation. Quick question about the mixed approach you mentioned - when you say 75% ISOs and 25% restricted stock, is that something you negotiated during the initial offer, or did you convert some of your equity later? I'm still in the negotiation phase and wondering if it's worth asking for this kind of flexibility upfront. Also, the state tax point is huge - I'm in California now but considering a move to Texas in the next few years. Sounds like the timing of that move relative to when I exercise/sell could be pretty significant for the overall tax outcome.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,132 users helped today