What are the two purposes of unemployment relief organizations and how does California EDD fit in?
So I've been doing some reading while dealing with my own California EDD claim situation and I came across references to historical unemployment relief organizations and their stated purposes. This actually got me thinking about how California EDD operates today because there seem to be parallels. From what I've found, the two main purposes historically were: 1) to coordinate and encourage local and state relief efforts rather than create direct federal handouts, and 2) to gather accurate data and statistics about unemployment so that relief could be targeted appropriately. What's interesting is that California EDD still operates on some of these same foundational principles - coordinating benefits while tracking labor market data. But honestly I'm posting this partly because I'm trying to understand my OWN current claim situation too. I've been in adjudication limbo for going on 5 weeks now and every time I try to call EDD I either get a busy signal or get disconnected after waiting 45 minutes. My UI Online account just says 'pending' with zero explanation. Does anyone have insight into both the historical context AND what's happening with these ridiculous adjudication delays right now in 2025?
70 comments

Dmitry Smirnov
The historical context you're referencing is actually about Hoover's Presidential Organization on Unemployment Relief (POUR) from the early 1930s. You nailed the two purposes - coordination of existing relief efforts and data collection to understand the scope of unemployment. But yeah totally different world from California EDD today lol. As for your adjudication situation, 5 weeks is unfortunately pretty common right now. The EDD has been backlogged since early this year. Do you have any indication on your UI Online account about WHY it's in adjudication? Like does it say anything about eligibility issues or is it completely blank?
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorCompletely blank is the frustrating part! Just says pending determination with no issue codes or anything. I feel like I'm in the dark completely.
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
When there are no issue codes showing it usually means it's just a general queue backup and not a specific disqualification issue they're reviewing. That's somewhat reassuring but the wait is still awful.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
Yeah no issue codes is actually a decent sign. Means they probably aren't questioning your eligibility specifically, just haven't gotten to your claim yet in the processing queue.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
ok so the POUR thing had two purposes - coordinate volunteers/charities so nobody was duplicating effort AND collect real numbers on how bad unemployment actually was because nobody really knew the scope of the problem at the time. Kind of wild how relevant that second purpose still is since California EDD still publishes monthly unemployment rate data for the state. anyway for your actual problem have you tried calling right when they open at 8am? That's been the only time I can get through
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
I've tried the 8am thing and honestly it's hit or miss. Sometimes I get through in 20 minutes, other times I'm on hold for 2 hours and then get disconnected. There's no reliable strategy anymore.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorI've tried 8am three times this week. Tuesday I waited 1hr 22min and got disconnected. It's honestly demoralizing at this point.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
For the phone issue specifically - I was in the exact same boat about two months ago, adjudication with no updates and couldn't reach anyone. A friend told me about Claimyr (claimyr.com) which basically navigates the EDD phone system for you and gets you to an actual agent. There's a demo video at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 that explains how it works. I was skeptical at first but it genuinely got me connected to an EDD rep who was able to tell me exactly why my claim was held up. Turned out there was a wage discrepancy from my last employer that I didn't even know about. Once I knew the actual issue I could fix it. Saved me weeks of wondering.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorWait this actually works? I've seen it mentioned a few times but always assumed it was sketchy. You really got through to an actual live EDD agent?
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
100% real agent. Not a bot, not a recording. An actual EDD employee who could see my claim details and tell me what was going on. I know it sounds too good to be true given how impossible EDD phones normally are but it worked for me.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
I've heard of this too. Multiple people in my building were laid off around the same time last year and at least two of them used it and said it worked. The key thing is it actually connects you to EDD directly, it's not like a third party that deals with EDD on your behalf.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
Going back to your historical question for a sec because it's actually interesting context - the POUR was specifically designed to AVOID direct federal relief payments which Hoover philosophically opposed. So purpose one was really about keeping relief at the local/state/charity level through coordination, and purpose two was creating legitimate unemployment statistics because at the time there was literally no reliable national data on how many people were actually unemployed. It's kind of ironic that California EDD today is basically the opposite - it IS the direct government payment mechanism that Hoover was trying to avoid needing. History is funny like that.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorThat's actually a really interesting point I hadn't thought about. The philosophy has completely flipped over 90 years.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
Yeah and honestly the data collection purpose is the one that survived and evolved. California EDD is a major source of labor market information now. The coordination-instead-of-direct-payment philosophy obviously did not survive lol
0 coins
Ava Johnson
lol yeah direct payments are kind of the whole point now
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
For practical advice on your adjudication situation - here's what actually moves things along in my experience with California EDD. First, check your UI Online inbox daily because sometimes they upload notices that don't trigger email alerts. Second, if you haven't already, make sure your weekly certifications are still being submitted even during adjudication - those payments will release once the adjudication clears and you don't want to miss any. Third, check if your base period employers have all reported your wages correctly through the employer portal because wage discrepancies are one of the top causes of unexplained adjudication holds.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorOh this is really useful - I've been continuing to certify weekly but was worried those were going to waste. Good to know they'll pay out retroactively once it clears.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
This is correct. Continuing to certify is CRUCIAL. I made the mistake of stopping during a long adjudication once thinking it didn't matter and then had to go back and request backdating which is a whole other headache.
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
Exactly. Keep certifying no matter what. The worst case is you certified and don't end up qualifying, but stopping and then needing backdating is a nightmare process.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
wait does this mean if edd takes 2 months to process and you certified every week you get all 2 months of back payments at once?? asking for a friend lol
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
Yes that's exactly what happens assuming you're approved. The system holds the payments during adjudication and releases them all once a determination is made in your favor. It can be a significant amount depending on your benefit amount.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
FIVE WEEKS and counting for me too and I want to SCREAM. No issue codes, no explanation, no one answering phones. I submitted a UI Online message three weeks ago asking for an update and got an automated response saying allow 10 business days for a reply. It's now been 21 business days. This system is absolutely broken and nobody at EDD seems to care that people have bills to pay while they sit on claims with no explanation whatsoever.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
The message system is basically useless for getting actual information. It's fine for submitting documents but don't expect a real reply. Phone is really the only way to get actual claim-specific info from a live person. Have you tried Claimyr? It's what finally got me through after weeks of the same runaround you're describing.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
At this point I'll try anything. I've been living off savings and my roommate has been covering my share of rent out of the goodness of their heart. This is not sustainable.
0 coins
Amina Sy
I feel this so much. The emotional toll of not knowing is almost worse than getting a denial would be. At least a denial tells you something and gives you appeal options.
0 coins
Amina Sy
Slightly off topic but your post got me looking up POUR stuff and I found that it ran from 1931 to 1932 and was considered largely a failure because voluntary coordination couldn't scale to meet the actual scope of the Depression-era unemployment crisis. Which is why FDR eventually created more direct federal relief programs. So ironically the two purposes you mentioned (coordinate and measure) were both kind of undermined by the fact that the problem was too big for that approach. Relevant to your current situation: California EDD is still sometimes too understaffed for the scope of claims they receive which is why you get 5 week waits.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorThat historical parallel is oddly comforting in a dark humor kind of way. The problem of unemployment administration being overwhelmed by actual unemployment is apparently timeless.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
Well said. The lesson of the 1930s was that you need direct government infrastructure for unemployment support, not voluntary coordination. California EDD IS that infrastructure, it's just chronically underfunded relative to demand.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
practical question - when your adjudication finally clears and you get approved, does California EDD notify you by mail or email or through UI Online? I'm in a similar situation and worried I'll miss the notification and then miss some deadline to do something
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
Usually you'll get a Notice of Determination mailed to your address on file AND it'll show up in your UI Online inbox. The UI Online notification typically appears first. After approval, your certified weeks that were held should release to payment within a few business days.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
Thank you! I've been checking UI Online obsessively but wasn't sure if I also needed to watch for mail.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorI'm watching both obsessively at this point. UI Online multiple times a day and checking the mailbox the second the mail carrier comes lol
0 coins
Natasha Ivanova
For what it's worth I work adjacent to the labor/HR space (not at EDD, just in HR consulting) and the current adjudication backlog is largely because of increased fraud screening that went into place after some high-profile identity theft issues with unemployment claims. Completely legitimate claims are getting caught in the screening process. If you have any documents that verify your identity and employment separation that you haven't already uploaded - do it proactively through UI Online document upload. Sometimes having additional documentation on file can speed up the fraud screening phase.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorI uploaded my separation letter from my employer when I first filed. Should I upload anything else proactively?
0 coins
Natasha Ivanova
If you have it: ID documents (driver's license, passport), last few pay stubs, and if your separation was a layoff, any layoff notice or RIF documentation. Basically anything that proves you're a real person who actually worked at that employer.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
This is solid advice. I'd also add that if EDD ever sends you a message asking for ID verification through ID.me, do that IMMEDIATELY. People miss those notices and it extends adjudication significantly.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
wait so what exactly happens when youre in adjudication? does that mean youre disqualified or just that theyre still deciding? i just filed last week and my status also says pending and im freaking out
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
Adjudication just means they're actively evaluating your eligibility - it doesn't mean you're disqualified. Think of it like your claim is in review rather than automatically approved. Many people come out of adjudication approved. The wait is stressful but pending/adjudication is NOT a denial.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
oh thank god i thought i was rejected already. this whole process is so confusing when youre doing it for the first time
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
You're definitely not alone in that confusion. The California EDD terminology is really not designed for people who haven't dealt with it before. Adjudication = under review. Determination = decision made. Disqualification = denied. Very different things even though they all sound scary.
0 coins
Amina Sy
I was equally confused my first time. The lack of plain-language explanation from EDD doesn't help at all.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
One thing nobody mentioned yet - if you're past 6 weeks in adjudication without any determination, you can contact your state assembly member's or state senator's constituent services office. Elected officials have direct lines to EDD that regular claimants don't have access to. Their constituent services staff can often flag a claim for priority review. It sounds like overkill but when you're weeks in with no movement it's a legitimate option that actually works.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorI had no idea this was a thing. Do I just call their general office number and explain the situation?
0 coins
PixelPioneer
Exactly. Call their district office (not DC office for federal reps - you want your state assembly member or state senator), explain you have an unemployment claim stuck in adjudication for X weeks with no movement, and ask if constituent services can help. Have your claim number ready. They deal with EDD issues regularly.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
Using this RIGHT NOW. I'm at 5.5 weeks and this is the first actually actionable advice I've seen. Thank you.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
I had a similarly stuck claim earlier this year and the combination of things that finally resolved it was: 1) Got through to an actual EDD agent via Claimyr (claimyr.com) who told me there was a flag on my account from an employer who submitted incorrect separation info, 2) Uploaded a detailed written statement through UI Online explaining the actual circumstances of my separation, 3) Waited about 10 more days after that. The agent I spoke to specifically said having a written statement directly addressing the separation reason can help move things along. The video at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 shows how Claimyr works if you're curious - honestly I was skeptical too but getting actual information from a real agent was the turning point for me.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorSo the agent you spoke to could actually see specifics about your claim and tell you what was holding it up? That's exactly what I need - just INFORMATION about what's actually happening.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
Yes, they had my full claim details in front of them. They could see every employer submission, every flag, every note on the account. It was a completely different experience than the automated phone tree that tells you nothing.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
The employer-submitted-wrong-info situation is more common than people realize. Employers sometimes accidentally (or deliberately in bad-faith situations) mischaracterize the separation reason which creates an automatic adjudication hold while EDD tries to reconcile the claimant's and employer's different stories.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
Adding some context on the historical piece since it came up - the two purposes of POUR are genuinely a common question in American history courses covering the Hoover administration's response to the Depression. The first purpose was to stimulate and coordinate private and community charitable relief efforts, and the second was to gather and publicize accurate data about unemployment conditions nationally. Hoover genuinely believed voluntary community action was the right approach and POUR was his attempt to make that work at scale. Whether it actually worked is... debatable (it mostly didn't). Not directly California EDD related but figured I'd give the clearest answer to your original question since it was buried in the discussion.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorThank you for this - you summarized it more cleanly than I found it anywhere online. Stimulate/coordinate private relief AND gather accurate unemployment data. Got it.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
Yeah that's the textbook two purposes. Coordinate the voluntary sector and provide data infrastructure. Both important for understanding Hoover's philosophy that government's role was to facilitate not to directly intervene.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
Jumping back to practical stuff - make absolutely sure you're completing your job search activities every week and logging them properly. Even during adjudication you're supposed to be doing your required job searches (currently 3 employer contacts per week unless you have an approved standby status). EDD can and does ask for your job search records retroactively going back to your claim start date when they process your adjudication. I've seen people get approved for their initial eligibility only to then get dinged for inadequate job search activities during the waiting period.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
wait you have to be doing job searches WHILE in adjudication?? nobody told me this when i filed
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
Yes absolutely. The job search requirement runs from your claim start date regardless of whether you're in adjudication. Keep a log with dates, employer names, contact method, and position applied for. California EDD can ask for that documentation at any point.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
This just gave me mild anxiety - I've been doing job searches but didn't know I needed to log them formally. Going back through my email application confirmations right now to reconstruct a proper log.
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
The informal documentation (email confirmations, LinkedIn applications, etc.) can all serve as your log. You don't need a special form, just organized records showing the required contacts each week.
0 coins
Javier Garcia
ok genuinely asking because i don't understand - if you have a job offer while in adjudication do you have to report it or just... not mention it until your claim resolves? my friend told me to not say anything until i know if i'm approved but that feels wrong
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
This is really important to answer correctly: YES you absolutely must report any job offer you accept (and any earnings from work) on your weekly certification regardless of where your claim is in the process. Failing to report is fraud, full stop. If you get a job offer while in adjudication, you'd report the start date and earnings once you begin working. Your friend's advice is bad advice that could result in an overpayment and potential fraud investigation.
0 coins
Javier Garcia
ok yeah that makes sense. my friend definitely steered me wrong on that one, glad i asked here first
0 coins
PixelPioneer
The weekly certification question about work and earnings is not optional. Even if your claim is pending adjudication, those questions must be answered honestly every week. EDD cross-references employer wage reports.
0 coins
Amina Sy
For anyone in a long adjudication who hasn't tried it yet - the California EDD website has an Ask EDD messaging system where you can submit specific questions. It's not fast but if you ask specifically about what's causing the delay in your adjudication rather than just asking for a status update you sometimes get a more useful response. Frame it as 'I want to understand if there's additional documentation I can provide to assist with my adjudication review' rather than just 'what's the status.' That framing sometimes triggers a more substantive response.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorThat's a smart framing approach. I just sent the equivalent of 'uh hello is anyone there' messages so far. Will try the more specific documentation-focused framing.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
Tried Ask EDD for weeks and genuinely never got a substantive reply. Phoning is better if you can get through. The Claimyr thing others mentioned in this thread worked for me finally - got through today, agent said there's an identity verification step that somehow didn't trigger properly when I initially filed. At least now I know what I'm dealing with.
0 coins
Emma Taylor
small thing but make sure your mailing address in UI Online matches your physical address exactly as it appears with USPS. EDD mails notices and sometimes people miss critical adjudication documents because they moved and didn't update or because there's a minor address discrepancy. Go into your profile settings and verify everything matches.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorJust checked mine and the address was slightly off - I had moved last year and apparently didn't update it when I first created the account. Fixed it now. Thank you for this tip!
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
Same - I had my old apartment number still listed. These small things can apparently cause notice delivery failures which then create more delays.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
Wrapping back to the original historical question one more time because I find this genuinely interesting context for understanding unemployment administration: what's notable is that the POUR's data collection purpose (purpose #2) actually succeeded more than the coordination purpose. The unemployment data gathered during that era helped inform the more robust New Deal programs that followed. So in a way, California EDD's existence as a functioning data infrastructure and direct payment system owes something to the lessons learned from POUR's partial failure. The coordination approach couldn't scale, but the data infrastructure approach laid groundwork for what came after.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
That's a really insightful observation about which of the two purposes had the longer legacy. The measurement infrastructure survived even when the coordination philosophy was abandoned.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
AuthorI appreciate everyone engaging with both parts of my post - the history question AND the practical claims situation. This thread genuinely helped me on both fronts. I'm going to try Claimyr this week and also contact my assembly member's office. Will update when something finally moves.
0 coins