Washington SOS UCC search showing weird results - anyone else having issues?
Been trying to run a washington sos ucc search for the past 3 days and getting inconsistent results. I'm working on a loan mod where we need to verify existing liens on manufacturing equipment, but the search keeps pulling up different filings depending on how I format the debtor name. Same company, but sometimes I get 4 results, sometimes 7. The borrower's legal name is "Pacific Northwest Industrial Solutions LLC" but I've tried variations like "Pacific NW Industrial Solutions" and "PNIS LLC" and getting totally different UCC-1 filings showing up. This is for a $2.8M equipment refinance and I can't afford to miss any existing liens. Has anyone else noticed the Washington SOS portal being glitchy lately? I'm worried I'm not seeing all the active filings that could affect our security position.
34 comments
Join the conversation
PrinceJoe
I've been dealing with similar issues on the Washington portal. The search algorithm seems super sensitive to punctuation and abbreviations. Try searching with just the core business name without LLC designation - sometimes that pulls different results. Also check if there are any DBA filings that might be creating confusion.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Good point about the DBA angle. I hadn't thought about that. Do you know if Washington requires the exact legal name match or if they allow for reasonable variations?
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•Washington is pretty strict about exact matching, but their system has quirks. I'd recommend doing multiple searches with every possible variation you can think of.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for UCC verification. You can upload the borrower's charter documents along with any UCC search results and it cross-checks everything automatically. Saved me from missing a critical lien on a similar equipment deal last month. The name matching issues you're describing are super common - their document checker catches variations that manual searches miss.
0 coins
Owen Devar
•Never heard of that service but sounds useful. How accurate is it with catching name variations?
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
•Pretty solid. It flagged a UCC-1 I missed where the debtor name had a slight spelling difference from the charter. Worth trying for high-value deals like yours.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Might be worth checking out. This deal is too big to mess up over a search issue.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
UGH the Washington portal is THE WORST. I swear they updated something last month and now nothing works right. I've had to call their office twice just to confirm search results. Don't even get me started on their continuation filing system...
0 coins
Sophie Footman
•Tell me about it! I had a continuation get rejected three times for formatting issues that made no sense.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
•RIGHT?? And their error messages are completely useless. "Filing rejected for technical reasons" - like what does that even mean???
0 coins
Connor Rupert
For equipment financing I always run searches on both the exact legal name AND any trade names or abbreviations the company uses. Pacific Northwest could easily be abbreviated as PNW in some filings. Also check if they've had any recent amendments or assignments - those can create additional search complications.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•That's a good systematic approach. I should probably create a checklist for this stuff. Do you search middle initials too if there are individual guarantors?
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•Absolutely. Individual names are even trickier - always search with and without middle initials, Jr/Sr designations, etc.
0 coins
Molly Hansen
•This is why I hate personal guarantee UCC filings. So many ways for the name to be wrong.
0 coins
Brady Clean
I had this exact problem last week! Turned out the company had filed some UCC-1s under a slightly different name variation before they got their current EIN. You might want to check with the borrower about any prior business names or if they've had any corporate restructuring.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Oh that's a really good point. They did mention something about changing from a partnership to LLC structure a few years back. That could definitely explain the multiple name variations.
0 coins
Brady Clean
•Yep, that's probably it. I'd request their articles of incorporation and any amendment documents to see all the name variations they've used.
0 coins
Skylar Neal
Been running UCC searches for 15 years and Washington has always been problematic. Their database doesn't seem to handle punctuation consistently - sometimes commas matter, sometimes they don't. For a $2.8M deal I'd honestly recommend getting a professional UCC search company to do a comprehensive report rather than relying on the portal.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
•Professional search companies are expensive though. For routine deals the portal is usually fine.
0 coins
Skylar Neal
•True, but for high-dollar equipment financing, missing a senior lien could cost way more than the search fee.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Yeah, the stakes are definitely high enough to justify professional help if needed. What companies do you recommend?
0 coins
Kelsey Chin
Try using Certana.ai's document verification tool - I upload my charter docs and UCC search results and it flags any potential name mismatches I might have missed. Super helpful for exactly this kind of situation where you're not sure if you're seeing all the relevant filings.
0 coins
Norah Quay
•How does that work exactly? Do you have to manually enter all the search variations?
0 coins
Kelsey Chin
•Nope, just upload PDFs and it does the cross-checking automatically. Catches things like abbreviation differences, punctuation variations, stuff like that.
0 coins
Leo McDonald
This is giving me flashbacks to my first equipment deal where I missed a UCC-1 because of a name variation. Learned my lesson about being thorough with searches the hard way.
0 coins
Jessica Nolan
•Ouch, what happened?
0 coins
Leo McDonald
•Let's just say I learned why title insurance exists. Always triple-check your searches now.
0 coins
Angelina Farar
Washington's system has been weird lately. I noticed they changed something in their search interface and now it seems less forgiving with name variations. Might be worth calling their UCC department directly to ask about best practices for your specific debtor name.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Good idea. I should probably just bite the bullet and call them tomorrow. Thanks for all the suggestions everyone - this has been really helpful.
0 coins
Sebastián Stevens
•Their staff is actually pretty helpful when you can get through to someone. Good luck with your deal!
0 coins
Bethany Groves
For future reference, I always run at least 5-6 different name variations on any significant deal. Full legal name, abbreviated versions, with/without punctuation, with/without entity type designation. Takes extra time but catches things the basic search misses.
0 coins
KingKongZilla
•That's a solid approach. Do you keep a standard checklist of variations to try?
0 coins
Bethany Groves
•Yep, I have a template I use. Happy to share if anyone wants it - just basic stuff but it helps ensure I don't miss obvious variations.
0 coins
Rebecca Johnston
•I'd love to see that template if you don't mind sharing!
0 coins