< Back to UCC Document Community

Saanvi Krishnaswami

UCC9 Form Confusion - Need Help with Proper Filing

I'm completely lost here and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. My attorney mentioned something about a UCC9 form for our loan modification, but when I contacted our state filing office, they said they don't have any UCC9 forms. I've been searching online and I'm getting mixed information. Some sites mention UCC9 as a termination form, others say it doesn't exist. We have an existing UCC-1 on file from 2019 that needs to be addressed as part of our refinancing. The lender is asking for documentation but I'm not sure what form we actually need. Has anyone dealt with UCC9 forms before? Are they state-specific or am I missing something obvious here? This is holding up our entire loan process and I'm getting frustrated with the conflicting information.

Demi Lagos

•

I think there might be some confusion with terminology here. There's no standard UCC9 form in the uniform filing system. You're probably looking for either a UCC-3 amendment/termination form or possibly a UCC-11 information request form. Can you clarify what your attorney specifically said you needed to accomplish? If you're trying to terminate an existing UCC-1 from 2019, that would definitely be a UCC-3 termination statement.

0 coins

That makes more sense! The attorney said we needed to 'clear the lien' from the 2019 filing. So that would be a UCC-3 termination then? I was so confused because I kept seeing UCC9 references online.

0 coins

Demi Lagos

•

Exactly - UCC-3 termination is what you need to clear the lien. Those UCC9 references you're seeing online are probably outdated or referring to non-standard forms. Stick with the official UCC-3 for terminations.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

•

ugh this same thing happened to me last month!! spent hours looking for some mysterious UCC9 form that doesn't exist. turns out my loan officer was using old terminology from like 20 years ago. it's definitely UCC-3 you need for terminations. the whole system is confusing enough without people using made-up form numbers

0 coins

Thank you! That's exactly what's happening here. I was starting to think I was going crazy searching for something that didn't exist.

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

•

This happens more than you'd think. Some attorneys and loan officers still reference old form numbers or create their own shorthand. Always verify with the actual SOS filing requirements.

0 coins

Jake Sinclair

•

I actually ran into this exact situation about 6 months ago when I was dealing with multiple UCC filings for a client. After spending way too much time trying to match up document references with actual forms, I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your existing UCC-1 and any termination paperwork, and it instantly cross-checks everything to make sure you're filing the right forms with consistent information. Really saved me from filing the wrong documentation.

0 coins

Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. Did it help catch any mistakes you would have missed?

0 coins

Jake Sinclair

•

Yeah, it caught a debtor name discrepancy between my original UCC-1 and the termination I was preparing. Would have caused a rejection for sure.

0 coins

That sounds exactly like what I need. I'm paranoid about making mistakes with these forms since they're so particular about exact matches.

0 coins

Honorah King

•

Just to add some clarity - the UCC-3 is your multi-purpose amendment form. You use it for continuations, amendments, assignments, AND terminations. The key is marking the right box and providing the correct information. For a termination, you'll need the original filing number, exact debtor name, and secured party information.

0 coins

Good to know about the multi-purpose aspect. I have the original filing number, so that should help.

0 coins

Oliver Brown

•

Make sure that debtor name matches EXACTLY. Even small differences like Inc vs Incorporated can cause problems.

0 coins

Mary Bates

•

This is why I hate dealing with UCC filings. Everyone uses different terminology and half the professionals don't even know the correct form numbers. The system is needlessly complicated and then you have people making up form names that don't exist.

0 coins

Demi Lagos

•

I understand the frustration, but once you learn the basic forms (UCC-1 for initial filings, UCC-3 for changes/terminations, UCC-11 for searches), it's pretty straightforward.

0 coins

Mary Bates

•

Straightforward until you get a rejection because of some tiny formatting issue or the debtor name is off by one character.

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

•

That's exactly why double-checking everything is so important. One small mistake can delay the whole process.

0 coins

wait so UCC9 isn't a real form? I swear I've seen that referenced somewhere before

0 coins

Demi Lagos

•

Not in the standard UCC filing system. You might have seen it in some old documentation or state-specific materials, but it's not part of the uniform system.

0 coins

ok that explains why I couldn't find it when I was helping my brother with his business loan

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

•

For anyone else reading this thread - always verify form requirements directly with your state's Secretary of State office or their online filing system. Don't rely on third-party references or old documentation. The UCC forms are standardized: UCC-1 for initial filings, UCC-3 for amendments/continuations/terminations, UCC-11 for information requests. That's the core set you need to know.

0 coins

Thank you everyone. I feel much more confident now about what I need to file. UCC-3 termination it is.

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

This thread should be pinned somewhere. The UCC9 confusion comes up all the time.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai mention earlier - I tried it after reading this thread and it's actually pretty helpful. uploaded my UCC-1 and the termination form I was preparing and it flagged that I had the wrong debtor entity type. saved me from a guaranteed rejection

0 coins

That's great to hear! I'm definitely going to check that out before I submit anything.

0 coins

How much does something like that cost? Seems like it could be worth it to avoid filing mistakes.

0 coins

It's pretty reasonable for what it does. Much cheaper than having to refile after a rejection.

0 coins

Kai Santiago

•

I work in commercial lending and see this UCC9 confusion constantly. It usually comes from attorneys who practiced in the 80s and 90s when some states had different numbering systems. The current uniform system has been in place for decades now, but old habits die hard. Always use UCC-3 for terminations.

0 coins

That explains where my attorney got the UCC9 reference from. Thank you for the historical context.

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

Yeah I've noticed older attorneys sometimes use outdated form references. It's always best to double-check with current filing requirements.

0 coins

Dananyl Lear

•

Quick tip for anyone filing UCC-3 terminations - make sure you have the original secured party's authorization. If the original lender sold the loan or there's been an assignment, you might need additional documentation. Also, some states require notarization for terminations.

0 coins

Good point about authorization. I need to check if our original lender is still the secured party or if it was assigned.

0 coins

Demi Lagos

•

Definitely verify the current secured party information. That's a common source of termination rejections.

0 coins

And check your state's specific requirements. Some want original signatures, others accept electronic filings.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today