< Back to UCC Document Community

Rhett Bowman

UCC 9 form confusion - is this even a real filing type?

I'm dealing with a commercial loan situation and my bank's paralegal mentioned something about needing a "UCC 9 form" but I can't find anything about this anywhere in the filing system. I've been working with UCC-1 initial filings and UCC-3 amendments for years but never heard of a UCC 9 form. The collateral involves restaurant equipment and fixtures worth about $180k. Is this some kind of specialized form I'm missing or did someone get their wires crossed? The loan closes next week and I don't want to miss a critical filing requirement. Has anyone encountered this before or know what they might actually be referring to?

Abigail Patel

•

I think there might be some confusion here. In the UCC filing system, we typically work with UCC-1 (initial financing statement), UCC-3 (amendment/continuation/termination), and sometimes UCC-5 (information statement). I've never come across a "UCC 9 form" in any state's filing system. Could they possibly mean Article 9 of the UCC (which governs secured transactions) rather than an actual form number?

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

That makes more sense! They probably meant Article 9 requirements generally. I was starting to panic thinking I'd missed some obscure form type.

0 coins

Daniel White

•

Yeah this happens more than you'd think. Legal assistants sometimes use shorthand that doesn't translate well to actual filing procedures.

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

Definitely sounds like crossed wires. For restaurant equipment and fixtures, you'll want to make sure your UCC-1 properly describes the collateral and consider whether any of the equipment qualifies as fixtures (which might need special fixture filing language). The key forms are still just UCC-1 for the initial filing and UCC-3 for any future changes.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Good point about fixtures. Some of the kitchen equipment is permanently attached. Should I be worried about the collateral description being too broad or too narrow?

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

For commercial kitchen stuff, I usually go with something like "all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired and located at [address]." Covers your bases without being overly specific.

0 coins

Natalia Stone

•

Just make sure you're clear about what's fixtures vs equipment. Fixtures have different perfection rules in some states.

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

I ran into document confusion like this on a recent filing where the lender's paperwork referenced forms that didn't exist. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - I uploaded the loan docs and UCC-1 draft and it immediately flagged inconsistencies in the references. Really helped me catch that the "UCC 9" mention was actually just referring to Article 9 compliance generally, not a specific form.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

That sounds useful. Did it help with other document consistency issues too?

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

Yeah, it caught a debtor name mismatch between the loan agreement and my UCC-1 that would've caused a rejection. Just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.

0 coins

ugh why do people make up form numbers?? this kind of confusion drives me nuts. there's already enough complexity in UCC filings without adding fake forms to the mix

0 coins

Seriously! And then you spend hours searching for something that doesn't exist.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

At least I asked here before panicking too much. Could've been worse.

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

For your restaurant equipment situation, just focus on getting a solid UCC-1 filed with accurate debtor information and comprehensive collateral description. Make sure you're filing in the right state (where the debtor is organized, not where the equipment is located unless it's fixtures). The $180k value suggests this is significant enough that you want everything perfect.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Debtor is an LLC organized in Delaware but restaurant is in Texas. So I file in Delaware, right?

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

Correct - Delaware for the main UCC-1. But if any equipment qualifies as fixtures, you might need a fixture filing in Texas too.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

This is exactly why I always double-check the debtor's state of organization before filing. Saved me from expensive mistakes.

0 coins

Natalia Stone

•

Just to add - when you do file your UCC-1, make sure the debtor name exactly matches what's on the Delaware Secretary of State records. Even small variations can cause problems down the line.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Good reminder. I'll pull the current certificate before finalizing anything.

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

This is another thing Certana.ai helped me with - it verified that my debtor name matched the charter documents exactly. Really streamlined the whole process.

0 coins

Daniel White

•

Had something similar happen last year where a title company kept asking about "UCC-7 forms" for a real estate transaction. Turned out they meant UCC-3 termination statements. Sometimes people just get their numbers mixed up.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

That's reassuring. Sounds like this kind of confusion is pretty common.

0 coins

Way too common. I keep a cheat sheet of actual UCC forms now to avoid this exact situation.

0 coins

smart move. maybe we should all start doing that

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

Bottom line - stick with the standard forms (UCC-1 for initial filing, UCC-3 for amendments/continuations/terminations) and you'll be fine. There's no such thing as a UCC-9 form in any jurisdiction I'm aware of. Your bank's paralegal probably just misspoke or was using internal shorthand.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Thanks everyone. I feel much better about this now. Going to proceed with a standard UCC-1 and clarify with the bank what they actually meant.

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

Good plan. Always better to ask questions than assume. Hope your filing goes smoothly.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

I've been filing UCCs for 15 years and have never encountered a UCC-9 form. The numbering system is pretty straightforward - UCC-1 through UCC-5 covers all the standard forms. Anything beyond that would be state-specific addendums or instructions, not actual forms.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

That's what I was thinking but wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious.

0 coins

Natalia Stone

•

15 years of experience definitely counts for something here. If you haven't seen it, it probably doesn't exist.

0 coins

This thread is exactly why I love this forum. Saved me from a wild goose chase since I was about to ask the same question after hearing something similar from a lender.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Glad it helped! Always worth checking with people who actually do this stuff regularly.

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

Definitely. And tools like Certana.ai can help verify what forms you actually need when the paperwork gets confusing.

0 coins

Daniel White

•

The community knowledge here is invaluable for catching these kinds of mix-ups before they become problems.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today