UCC warehouseman's lien priority over existing security interest - help needed
Running into a messy situation with a warehouse lien that's creating headaches for our equipment financing deal. We had a UCC-1 filed perfectly on manufacturing equipment back in March, but now the borrower's storage facility is claiming a warehouseman's lien for unpaid storage fees that apparently takes priority over our security interest. The warehouse operator filed some kind of UCC notice last month and is threatening to sell the equipment to cover $18,000 in storage costs. Our loan balance is obviously much higher at $340,000. I thought our perfected security interest from the original UCC-1 filing would give us priority, but the warehouse is citing some statutory lien provisions that supposedly trump perfected security interests. Has anyone dealt with warehouseman's lien situations where they're claiming priority over existing UCC filings? The equipment has been in their facility for about 4 months while the borrower was relocating operations. Not sure if we missed something in our original collateral description or if this is just how warehouse liens work in this state. Any guidance on how these priority disputes typically get resolved would be hugely appreciated.
44 comments
Join the conversation
Edison Estevez
This is actually a common issue in equipment finance. Warehouseman's liens often do have statutory priority over perfected security interests, even properly filed UCC-1s. The key is usually whether the warehouse operator follows the proper statutory procedures for their lien claim. Did they provide proper notice to all parties with security interests in the stored goods?
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•They sent us a notice about 3 weeks ago, but it was pretty generic. Just said they had a lien for storage fees and intended to exercise their rights. Didn't really detail the statutory procedures they were following.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
•The notice requirements vary by state but usually they need to be pretty specific about amounts owed, sale dates, and your rights to pay and retrieve the goods.
0 coins
James Johnson
Warehouse liens are statutory liens that typically do get priority over Article 9 security interests under most state laws. BUT - and this is important - they have to follow the exact procedures in the statute or they lose that priority. Check if they complied with notice requirements, sale procedures, and timing rules.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•Exactly right about the procedures. I've seen warehouse operators lose their priority because they rushed the sale process or didn't give proper notice periods.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•So even though our UCC-1 was filed months before their lien arose, they still get priority if they follow the statute correctly?
0 coins
James Johnson
•Unfortunately yes in most states. Statutory liens like warehouseman's liens, mechanic's liens, etc. often get super-priority over perfected security interests. It's one of those quirks in the system.
0 coins
Mia Green
Had a similar nightmare last year with a storage facility claiming priority over our UCC filing. What saved us was finding inconsistencies between their original storage agreement and their lien procedures. We ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to cross-check all the paperwork - uploaded the storage contract, their lien notices, and our UCC-1 filing. The system caught several discrepancies in how they described the collateral versus our UCC description that helped us negotiate a settlement.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•That's interesting about the collateral description differences. What kind of discrepancies did you find?
0 coins
Mia Green
•They were claiming a lien on equipment that didn't match what was actually stored there, and their notices used different serial numbers than what was in our UCC filing. The automated verification caught stuff we would have missed manually reviewing everything.
0 coins
Emma Bianchi
This is why I HATE dealing with borrowers who store equipment off-site. Warehouse liens, landlord liens, mechanic's liens - they all seem to pop up at the worst possible times and claim priority over properly perfected security interests. The whole system is stacked against secured lenders.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
•I feel your pain. Had three deals go sideways this year because of various statutory liens that took priority over our UCC filings.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
•It's frustrating but that's why we have to do better due diligence on where collateral is located and what agreements borrowers have with storage facilities.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
Check your state's version of UCC 9-333 which deals with priority of possessory liens. Most states give warehouse operators priority for storage and handling charges, but only if they comply with the statutory requirements. Also look at whether their lien covers the full value of the goods or just the storage fees.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•Good point about UCC 9-333. I'll pull that section for our state. The warehouse is claiming priority for the full equipment value, not just their $18k in fees.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
•That seems excessive. Usually warehouse liens are limited to the actual storage costs and expenses, not the full value of the stored goods.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
•Depends on the state statute and their storage agreement terms. Some allow for attorney fees and sale costs too.
0 coins
Charlie Yang
ugh this exact thing happened to me 6 months ago and it was a complete disaster! warehouse claimed they could sell $200k worth of manufacturing equipment for $15k in storage fees. took forever to sort out and cost us way more in legal fees than just paying the storage bill would have
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•How did you end up resolving it? Did you have to pay the storage fees to get the equipment released?
0 coins
Charlie Yang
•we ended up paying the fees plus their legal costs to avoid the sale. then had to modify our loan docs and UCC filings because the borrower moved the equipment again. what a mess
0 coins
Grace Patel
The timing of when the warehouse lien attached versus when your UCC-1 was filed might matter depending on your state's laws. Some states have specific rules about when warehouse liens become effective - usually when the goods are first stored or when storage fees become delinquent.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•The equipment went into storage in late September and our UCC-1 was filed in March, so we definitely have priority by time. But sounds like that doesn't matter with statutory liens.
0 coins
James Johnson
•Right, time of filing usually doesn't help against statutory liens. They get their priority from the statute, not from when they're created or filed.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
Before you assume they have valid priority, make sure they actually qualify as a 'warehouseman' under your state's definition. Some storage facilities try to claim warehouse lien rights when they're really just landlords or bailees without the proper licensing or statutory authority.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•That's a great point I hadn't considered. How do I verify if they're a licensed warehouseman versus just a storage facility?
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•Check with your state's department of agriculture or commerce - they usually regulate warehouse operators. Also look at their storage agreement terms to see if they're operating as a true warehouseman.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
•Good catch. I've seen facilities try to claim warehouseman's lien rights when they were really just providing space rental without the proper warehouse operations.
0 coins
ApolloJackson
Whatever you do, don't let them sell the equipment without exhausting all your options first. Once it's sold to a bona fide purchaser, your security interest is pretty much toast even if their lien procedures were defective.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•They gave us 30 days notice and we're about halfway through that period. Should I be filing something to stop the sale or just negotiating with them directly?
0 coins
ApolloJackson
•I'd consult with counsel about getting a TRO if you think their lien claim is invalid. But if it's only $18k versus a $340k loan balance, might be cheaper to just pay it and move on.
0 coins
Isabella Russo
This whole situation could have been avoided with better document management from the start. I've started using Certana.ai to verify all our UCC filings against loan documents and collateral agreements before deals close. Would have caught any issues with storage arrangements or potential competing liens early in the process.
0 coins
Rajiv Kumar
•How does that help with warehouse liens that arise after your UCC filing though? Those develop after the original transaction.
0 coins
Isabella Russo
•True, but it helps identify when borrowers have existing storage agreements or off-site collateral that could create these issues later. Better to know upfront and structure the deal accordingly.
0 coins
Aria Washington
Just went through something similar and learned that some states allow you to pay the warehouse charges under protest and then challenge the lien validity afterward. Might be worth checking if your state has that option - lets you protect the collateral while you sort out the legal issues.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•That sounds like a good compromise approach. Do you know if paying under protest affects our rights to challenge their priority claim?
0 coins
Aria Washington
•In my state it preserves your right to challenge while preventing the sale. But definitely check with local counsel since these laws vary significantly.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
•Payment under protest is available in most states but the procedures are specific. Usually have to give written notice that you're paying under protest and disputing the lien.
0 coins
Darcy Moore
I'd strongly recommend getting local counsel involved ASAP since you're already halfway through their notice period. In the meantime, document everything - their original storage agreement with your borrower, all notices they've sent, and verify their licensing status as a warehouseman. Also check if your UCC-1 filing covers the equipment "wherever located" which might give you some additional arguments. The $18k versus $340k math makes paying under protest look attractive, but don't let them steamroll you if their procedures aren't proper. I've seen too many warehouse operators get sloppy with statutory requirements and lose their priority as a result.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•This is excellent comprehensive advice. I'm definitely going to check our UCC-1 language about "wherever located" - that's something I hadn't thought about but could be crucial. The documentation point is spot on too - I should gather all their paperwork before we decide on next steps. Really appreciate everyone's insights on this thread, it's given me a much clearer roadmap for handling this situation.
0 coins
Lucas Parker
As a newcomer here, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm dealing with a similar situation where a storage facility is claiming priority over our secured interest, and the insights about verifying their licensing status and proper statutory procedures are exactly what I needed. The point about payment under protest is particularly helpful - it seems like a way to protect the collateral while sorting out the legal challenges. One question I have: when you're reviewing the warehouse's storage agreement with the borrower, what specific language or clauses should I be looking for that might invalidate their lien claim or priority position?
0 coins
Bruno Simmons
•Welcome to the community! Great question about storage agreement language to watch for. Look for clauses that might limit their lien rights - things like waivers of statutory lien rights, requirements for written notice before asserting liens, or provisions that subordinate their interests to existing secured parties. Also check if the agreement specifies they're acting as a bailee rather than a true warehouseman, which could affect their statutory lien priority. Pay attention to any language about lien enforcement procedures too - if they agreed to specific notice periods or sale procedures that they didn't follow, that could invalidate their claim. The licensing verification mentioned earlier is crucial because some facilities operate more like landlords but try to claim warehouseman's lien rights they're not entitled to.
0 coins
Tobias Lancaster
As someone new to this community, I'm finding this discussion incredibly valuable! I'm currently facing a similar warehouse lien situation and wondering about one specific aspect that hasn't been covered yet - what happens if the borrower had multiple UCC-1 filings from different lenders on the same equipment? Does the warehouse lien leap-frog over all secured parties, or do the priority rules between lenders still apply after the warehouse gets paid? Also, has anyone had success challenging these liens based on the warehouse operator's failure to properly identify all secured parties when sending notices? It seems like if they don't notify all UCC filers, that could be grounds to challenge their procedures.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•Great questions! Regarding multiple UCC-1 filings, the warehouse lien typically takes priority over ALL secured parties if properly asserted, regardless of their inter-se priority rankings. So yes, it essentially "leap-frogs" over everyone. However, once the warehouse lien is satisfied, the original priority rules between lenders would apply to any remaining proceeds from a sale. Your point about notification failures is spot-on - many warehouse operators mess this up by only notifying the debtor or doing incomplete UCC searches. If they failed to identify and notify all secured parties with interests in the collateral, that's definitely grounds to challenge their procedures. I'd recommend doing your own UCC search to see what other filings exist and cross-reference that against who they actually notified. The statutory notice requirements are usually pretty strict about notifying "all persons known to claim an interest" in the goods.
0 coins
Oscar Murphy
As a newcomer to this community, this thread has been incredibly enlightening! I'm dealing with my first warehouse lien dispute and the complexity is overwhelming. One aspect I'm curious about that hasn't been fully addressed - what's the typical timeline for warehouse operators to complete their sale process once they've given proper notice? Also, I'm wondering if anyone has experience with situations where the warehouse operator's insurance might come into play if they sell equipment for less than fair market value? In our case, we're looking at potentially high-value specialized equipment that might not sell well at a typical warehouse lien sale, and I'm concerned about the recovery implications for our security interest. The documentation verification tools mentioned earlier (like Certana.ai) sound promising for catching procedural errors - has anyone used automated tools specifically to analyze warehouse lien notices for compliance issues?
0 coins