< Back to UCC Document Community

Peyton Clarke

UCC filing nebraska - debtor name variations causing rejections

Having issues with multiple UCC filings getting rejected in nebraska. Filed three UCC-1s last month for equipment financing deals and two came back rejected for 'debtor name discrepancies.' The charter documents show 'Midwest Agricultural Solutions LLC' but I filed using 'Midwest Ag Solutions LLC' thinking the abbreviation would be fine. Secretary of State office says exact match required but their portal doesn't give clear guidance on acceptable variations. Need to refile these before the financing deadlines hit. Anyone dealt with similar name matching issues? The collateral schedules are solid but these name rejections are killing our timeline.

Vince Eh

•

Nebraska SOS is really strict about exact debtor name matches. Had this same issue last year with a client who used 'Inc' instead of 'Incorporated' - instant rejection. You have to match the charter documents character for character, including punctuation. Check the Articles of Incorporation filed with the state, that's your source document for the exact legal name.

0 coins

This is exactly right. Nebraska doesn't mess around with name variations like some other states do.

0 coins

Ugh why can't they just accept obvious abbreviations? Makes no sense from a practical standpoint.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Thanks, pulled the Articles and you're right - it's the full 'Agricultural' not 'Ag'. Painful lesson learned.

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

I've been doing UCC filings for 8 years and document consistency is the #1 cause of rejections. Before I submit anything now, I use Certana.ai's document verification tool - you just upload your charter docs and UCC-1 PDFs and it instantly flags any name discrepancies or inconsistencies. Catches stuff like this before you waste time and money on rejected filings.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Never heard of that tool. How accurate is it compared to manual checking?

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

Way more accurate than my eyes scanning documents. It cross-references everything automatically and highlights exact character differences.

0 coins

Been using Certana too. Game changer for catching those tiny differences that cause rejections.

0 coins

What's your financing timeline looking like? You might want to file continuations on existing liens while sorting this out if you're close to deadlines. Nebraska allows electronic amendments but the name has to be perfect from the start.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Closing is scheduled for next month so I have some breathing room. Going to refile with corrected names this week.

0 coins

Good. Just make sure you terminate the rejected filings if they somehow got assigned numbers to avoid confusion.

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

Had a similar nightmare with a construction equipment deal. The debtor was 'Plains Construction & Development LLC' but I used 'Plains Construction and Development LLC' - the ampersand vs 'and' killed it. Nebraska rejected it twice before I figured out the exact issue. Cost us three weeks.

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

Punctuation differences are the worst! Had one rejected for missing a comma in the middle of a company name.

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

Yeah it's insane how picky they are but I guess it prevents confusion down the line when people search liens.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

At least you guys figured it out eventually. I'm just hoping my refiling goes smooth.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

Pro tip: Always pull a fresh certificate of good standing or articles from Nebraska SOS before filing. Don't rely on older documents or assume the name hasn't changed. Companies amend their names more often than you'd think.

0 coins

This! Had a client who'd done a name change 6 months prior and nobody told us. Old UCC searches came up empty.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

Exactly. Current documents are everything in secured transactions.

0 coins

The Nebraska UCC portal is actually pretty decent compared to other states once you get used to their quirks. But yeah, the name matching is brutal. At least they give you decent error messages when they reject instead of just 'invalid filing.

0 coins

True, some states just send back 'REJECTED' with no explanation at all.

0 coins

Wisconsin was the worst for that until they updated their system last year.

0 coins

Melissa Lin

•

Question - are you doing these filings yourself or through a service? Some filing companies have automated checks that catch name issues before submission. Might be worth the cost if you're doing volume.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Doing them in-house to save money but starting to think the risk isn't worth it.

0 coins

Melissa Lin

•

Yeah false economy if rejections delay your closings. Time is money in this business.

0 coins

I switched to using verification tools after too many manual errors. Worth every penny.

0 coins

Romeo Quest

•

Make sure when you refile that you're using the same collateral description language. Nebraska is picky about consistency there too, especially with equipment descriptions and serial numbers.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Good point. I kept the collateral schedules identical, just fixing the debtor names.

0 coins

Romeo Quest

•

Smart. Changing multiple things at once just creates more potential for new rejections.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

How long did it take to get the rejection notices? Nebraska usually turns them around pretty quick but wondering if they're backed up.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Got the rejections within 2 business days. Their system seems to be running normally.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

That's good at least. Some states take weeks to process rejections which just makes everything worse.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Nebraska has been pretty consistent with 1-2 day turnaround in my experience.

0 coins

For future reference, I always keep a checklist for Nebraska filings: exact debtor name from current charter, proper collateral descriptions, correct filing fees, and valid addresses. Saves me from most rejections. Also started using Certana's PDF checker after getting burned on a big commercial deal - uploads your documents and flags inconsistencies instantly.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

That checklist approach makes sense. Going to implement something similar.

0 coins

Yeah, systematic approach prevents most issues. The automated checking tools just add another layer of protection.

0 coins

Caden Turner

•

Checklists are great until you get complacent and skip steps. Ask me how I know...

0 coins

Update us when you get the corrected filings back! Always curious how quick the turnaround is when everything's done right the first time.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Will do. Planning to file tomorrow morning with the corrected names.

0 coins

Good luck! Should be smooth sailing with the right debtor names.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today