UCC search Nebraska filing shows debtor name mismatch - rejected twice
Been dealing with a nightmare UCC situation and need some guidance. We're trying to file a UCC-1 for equipment financing on a grain elevator operation, but the Nebraska SOS portal keeps rejecting our filings due to debtor name issues. The borrower's legal name on their articles of incorporation shows 'Prairie Wind Agricultural LLC' but their tax filings and bank docs all use 'Prarie Wind Ag, LLC' (notice the spelling difference). We've now had two UCC-1 filings rejected and our lender is getting impatient. The collateral description is straightforward - grain handling equipment and fixtures - but we can't get past this name verification step. Has anyone dealt with similar debtor name matching issues in Nebraska's UCC search system? The portal seems really strict about exact name matches and I'm worried we're missing something basic. Our continuation deadline is approaching on an existing UCC-3 for related equipment, so we need to get this sorted quickly. Any advice on how Nebraska handles these corporate name variations would be huge.
35 comments


Emma Davis
Oh man, I feel your pain on this one. Nebraska's UCC search system is notoriously picky about exact debtor name matches. I had a similar issue last year with a farming operation where the legal name had one spelling but everything else used a shortened version. The key is you absolutely HAVE to use the exact legal name as it appears on the Secretary of State business records. Go to the Nebraska SOS website and do a business entity search first - that will show you the precise legal name format they have on file. Even minor spelling differences like 'Prarie' vs 'Prairie' will cause automatic rejections.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•This is spot on advice. Nebraska doesn't mess around with name variations. I always tell clients to pull the official business registration certificate before filing any UCC documents.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
•Yeah but what if the business name was registered wrong in the first place? We had that happen once where the articles had a typo.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•If there's actually an error in the state business records, you'd need to file a correction with the Secretary of State first, then proceed with your UCC filing. It's a pain but necessary.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
Before you file again, double-check the Nebraska business entity database. Search for both versions of the name to see which one is officially registered. Sometimes companies register under one name but operate under a DBA, and the UCC system only recognizes the legal registered name. Also make sure you're including any required designators like 'LLC' exactly as they appear in the state records.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•I did search both versions and found that 'Prairie Wind Agricultural LLC' is the official registration, but all their banking and operational documents use the shortened 'Prarie Wind Ag, LLC' version. So frustrating.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•You definitely need to use the official registered name for the UCC filing, even if it's different from what they use day-to-day. The lien won't be properly perfected otherwise.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
I ran into something similar recently with document inconsistencies causing filing headaches. Have you tried using Certana.ai's document verification tool? You can upload your articles of incorporation and draft UCC-1 as PDFs and it instantly flags any name mismatches or inconsistencies between documents. It would have caught that Prairie/Prarie spelling difference right away. Really handy for avoiding these rejection cycles - just upload the docs and it cross-checks everything automatically.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. These manual document comparisons are where mistakes always happen.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Interesting, I'll look into that. Anything to avoid another rejection at this point.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
Make sure you're also checking the collateral description format. Nebraska has specific requirements for how equipment and fixtures need to be described in UCC filings. 'Grain handling equipment and fixtures' might be too broad - they usually want more specific categories or model information.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Good point. Our description was pretty generic. Should I be listing specific equipment types or can I use broader categories for this type of agricultural operation?
0 coins
CosmicCadet
•For grain elevators, I usually recommend something like 'grain storage bins, conveyor systems, cleaning equipment, scales, and related fixtures and attachments.' More specific but still comprehensive.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Just make sure whatever description you use covers all the equipment you need to secure without being so broad it's meaningless.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
ugh why is every state different with this stuff?? I swear Nebraska's system is the pickiest I've dealt with. Had three rejections last month on what should have been straightforward filings. The name matching algorithm seems way too strict compared to other states.
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
•Tell me about it. I've had filings accepted in other states that would never pass Nebraska's system. Very frustrating when you're working with tight deadlines.
0 coins
Anastasia Popova
•At least they give you clear rejection reasons. Some states just say 'rejected' with no explanation.
0 coins
Sean Flanagan
For your continuation deadline issue - make sure you file that UCC-3 continuation at least 6 months before the original UCC-1 expires but not more than 6 months early. Nebraska is pretty strict about the timing window. You can't let that lapse while you're dealing with the new filing issues.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Thanks for the reminder. The original UCC expires in about 8 months so I have some breathing room, but definitely don't want to let it slide.
0 coins
Zara Shah
•Good thinking. I've seen too many lenders lose their security interest because someone forgot about continuation deadlines while dealing with other filing problems.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
Have you confirmed the debtor's address information is also correct? Sometimes the name is right but the address doesn't match what's in the state business records, which can also cause rejections in Nebraska.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Address should be fine - we used the registered office address from their articles. But I'll double-check that too.
0 coins
Luca Ferrari
•Smart move. Nebraska cross-references multiple data points, not just the name.
0 coins
Nia Wilson
•Yeah, I learned that the hard way. Had a filing rejected because the ZIP+4 code was wrong even though the street address was perfect.
0 coins
Mateo Martinez
Quick question - are you filing this as a fixture filing since you mentioned grain elevator equipment? That might require additional steps in Nebraska if any of the equipment is considered real estate fixtures.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Some of it probably qualifies as fixtures - the permanent installation stuff like storage bins. Should I be doing a separate fixture filing or can it all go on one UCC-1?
0 coins
Mateo Martinez
•You'll probably want to separate them. File one UCC-1 for the moveable equipment and a separate fixture filing for anything permanently attached to the real estate. Nebraska requires fixture filings to be recorded in the real estate records too.
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
•This is getting complicated. Might be worth consulting with a local attorney who knows Nebraska UCC procedures.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
I actually had success with Certana.ai's verification tool on a similar multi-document filing mess. Uploaded my charter documents, draft UCC forms, and loan agreements - it flagged three name inconsistencies I missed doing manual comparisons. Really streamlined the whole process and avoided multiple rejection cycles.
0 coins
StarStrider
•How thorough is their checking? Does it catch address format issues too or just names?
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•It's pretty comprehensive - catches name variations, address formatting, missing fields, that kind of thing. Basically anything that could cause a filing to be rejected.
0 coins
Yuki Sato
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm curious which approach ends up working. These Nebraska name matching issues seem to be getting more common lately.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Will do. Planning to re-file early next week with the exact registered name format. Hopefully third time's the charm.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•Good luck! Those grain elevator deals can be tricky with all the different equipment types and fixture issues.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•Definitely keep us posted. These state-specific quirks are always good to document for future reference.
0 coins