UCC 9-103 Law of Jurisdiction Question - Multi-State Filing Confusion
I'm dealing with a complex multi-state secured transaction and I'm completely lost on UCC 9-103 jurisdiction rules. We have a debtor corporation incorporated in Delaware, with its chief executive office in Texas, but the collateral (heavy machinery) is located in Louisiana. The original loan was made by a California bank. I filed the UCC-1 in Delaware initially because that's where the debtor is incorporated, but now I'm second-guessing myself after reading UCC 9-103. The equipment has been moved twice since the original filing - first from Louisiana to Mississippi, then to Alabama. I'm worried our security interest isn't properly perfected and we might lose priority if there's a default. The loan amount is $2.8 million so this isn't small potatoes. Can someone explain how UCC 9-103 actually works in practice? Do I need to file in multiple states? What happens when collateral moves across state lines? I've been doing commercial lending for 8 years but this multi-jurisdiction stuff still trips me up.
37 comments
Join the conversation
Max Reyes
UCC 9-103 can be tricky but here's the basic rule - for corporate debtors, you file where the debtor is organized (incorporated), which would be Delaware in your case. The location of the collateral doesn't matter for most types of collateral under the current UCC. However, when collateral moves to another state, you typically have 4 months to file in the new state if you want to maintain continuous perfection.
0 coins
Mikayla Davison
•Wait, I thought equipment was governed by where it's located? I've been filing UCC-1s in whatever state the machinery is physically located. Are you saying that's wrong?
0 coins
Max Reyes
•No, under revised Article 9, most collateral is governed by the debtor's location, not the collateral's location. There are exceptions like timber and fixtures, but general equipment follows the debtor's location rule.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
You're right to be concerned about the moves. When collateral moves from one state to another, your Delaware filing might not protect you in Alabama where the equipment currently sits. UCC 9-103 gives you a grace period but you need to act fast. I had a similar situation last year with construction equipment.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
•How long is the grace period exactly? And do I need to file a new UCC-1 in Alabama or can I just file a copy of the Delaware filing?
0 coins
Adrian Connor
•It's 4 months from when the collateral entered Alabama. You'll need to file a new UCC-1 in Alabama, not just a copy. The financing statement needs to be filed in Alabama's UCC system.
0 coins
Aisha Jackson
•Actually, let me jump in here because I've been using Certana.ai's document verification tool for exactly these kinds of multi-state filings. You can upload your Delaware UCC-1 and it will instantly flag any inconsistencies before you file in Alabama. It caught a debtor name variation in my last filing that would have caused a rejection. Really helpful for making sure everything aligns across states.
0 coins
Ryder Everingham
OH MY GOD this is exactly what happened to me!!! Except my collateral went from Nevada to Arizona and I completely missed the 4-month window. The debtor filed bankruptcy and I found out my lien wasn't perfected in Arizona. Lost a $1.2M claim. UCC 9-103 is a nightmare and the rules are so confusing. Why can't they just make it simple - file everywhere the collateral might go!
0 coins
Lilly Curtis
•That's awful. Did you try to argue that the original Nevada filing should still be valid? I've heard some courts are more lenient on the timing requirements.
0 coins
Ryder Everingham
•Tried everything. The trustee in bankruptcy was ruthless and the judge said the 4-month rule is absolute. No exceptions. Now I double-file everywhere just to be safe, even though it costs more.
0 coins
Leo Simmons
The key thing about UCC 9-103 is understanding that it's about choice of law, not just where to file. Delaware law will govern the perfection and priority of your security interest, even though the collateral is in Alabama. But you still need to file in Alabama to maintain perfection. It's confusing because the law that applies and the place you file can be different states.
0 coins
Lindsey Fry
•This is where I get lost. If Delaware law governs, why do I have to file in Alabama at all? Shouldn't the Delaware filing be enough?
0 coins
Leo Simmons
•Because when collateral moves, the new state's filing system is where creditors and other parties will look for liens. It's about notice to third parties. The Delaware filing won't show up in Alabama searches.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•Exactly right. I learned this the hard way when a debtor's equipment was repossessed and the repo company didn't find our lien because they only searched in the state where the equipment was located. We had to fight to get paid.
0 coins
Kayla Morgan
For $2.8 million, I'd definitely file in Alabama ASAP. Don't risk it. The filing fee is maybe $40 compared to potentially losing your entire security interest. I always tell my clients to err on the side of over-filing rather than under-filing when it comes to UCC 9-103 situations.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
•You're absolutely right. The risk isn't worth the small savings. I'm going to file in Alabama this week. Do I need to worry about the Mississippi filing too, since the equipment was there temporarily?
0 coins
Kayla Morgan
•If it was only temporary and the equipment has moved on, you're probably okay. But if you're really worried, you could file there too. Better safe than sorry with that kind of money at stake.
0 coins
James Maki
I hate UCC 9-103. It's like they designed it to be as confusing as possible. Every time I think I understand it, I read a case that contradicts what I thought I knew. The whole system needs to be simplified.
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•Tell me about it. I've been doing this for 15 years and I still have to look up the rules every time. At least the electronic filing systems make it easier to file in multiple states now.
0 coins
Cole Roush
•The problem is that UCC 9-103 tries to balance too many competing interests. Debtors want certainty about where to file, creditors want maximum protection, and each state wants to maintain its own system. Something's got to give.
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
Quick question - when you say the equipment moved from Louisiana to Mississippi to Alabama, do you know the exact dates? The 4-month clock starts ticking from when the collateral first entered each new state. If you're still within 4 months from when it entered Alabama, you should be fine.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
•The equipment entered Alabama about 6 weeks ago, so I'm still within the 4-month window. That's a relief. I was panicking that I might have already blown it.
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
•Good, you've got time. Just don't delay. I'd recommend filing in Alabama within the next week or two to be safe. You don't want to cut it too close to the 4-month deadline.
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
One more thing to consider - make sure your collateral description in the Alabama filing matches exactly what you have in the Delaware filing. UCC 9-103 doesn't help you if your filings are inconsistent across states. I've seen cases where slight differences in collateral descriptions caused problems.
0 coins
Aisha Jackson
•This is another area where Certana.ai really helps. Their document checker will compare your original UCC-1 with your new filing and flag any discrepancies in debtor names, collateral descriptions, or other critical details. Takes the guesswork out of making sure everything matches.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
•That sounds incredibly useful. I'll definitely check that out. The last thing I want is to file in Alabama but have some minor discrepancy that invalidates the filing.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
Don't forget about continuation filings too. If your Delaware UCC-1 is getting close to its 5-year expiration, you'll need to file continuations in both Delaware and Alabama to maintain your perfected status. UCC 9-103 doesn't change the continuation requirements.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
•The Delaware filing is only 2 years old, so I've got some time on that front. But good point about needing to continue in both states. I'll make a note in my calendar system.
0 coins
Max Reyes
•Yes, and remember that each state has its own continuation requirements and deadlines. Don't assume they're identical just because they're both following the UCC.
0 coins
Rachel Tao
Just to add one more perspective - I recently had a UCC 9-103 issue where the debtor's state of incorporation changed due to a merger. That completely scrambled where we needed to file. The rules for corporate changes are even more complex than the collateral movement rules. Something to keep in mind for future deals.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
•Oh wow, I never thought about what happens with mergers and corporate restructurings. That must be a nightmare to track. How did you handle it?
0 coins
Rachel Tao
•Had to file new UCC-1s in the surviving entity's state of incorporation and amend the original filings. It was a mess and cost way more than it should have. The UCC really doesn't handle corporate changes elegantly.
0 coins
Aisha Jackson
•Corporate changes are exactly why I started using Certana.ai's verification system. When you upload corporate documents alongside UCC filings, it flags potential mismatches in entity names and structures. Would have saved me hours of research on my last merger deal.
0 coins
Derek Olson
Bottom line on UCC 9-103 - when in doubt, file in both states. The cost of dual filings is minimal compared to the risk of losing your security interest. I'd rather explain to a client why we spent an extra $40 on a filing fee than why we lost a $2.8 million secured claim.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
•That's exactly the approach I'm taking. Filing in Alabama this week and I'll probably set up a system to automatically file in any state where our collateral might be moved in the future. Thanks everyone for the advice - this thread has been incredibly helpful.
0 coins
Max Reyes
•Smart approach. UCC 9-103 is one of those areas where being overly cautious is the right strategy. Better to have unnecessary filings than to lose perfection.
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
Great discussion everyone! As someone new to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational. I'm curious about one practical aspect - when you're filing in multiple states like Delaware and Alabama, do you typically use the same secured party information and addresses, or do some states have different requirements for how the secured party should be listed? Also, are there any states that are particularly difficult to work with in terms of their UCC filing systems or rejection rates? I want to make sure I'm prepared for potential complications when I start handling these multi-state transactions.
0 coins