UCC 9-307(h) jurisdiction question - multi-state entity filing confusion
Hey everyone, I'm dealing with a tricky situation involving UCC 9-307(h) and need some guidance. We have a registered organization that was formed in Delaware but has its chief executive office in Texas. The debtor moved their primary operations to Colorado last year but kept the Delaware registration active. Now I'm trying to figure out which state's law governs the perfection of our security interest under 9-307(h). The collateral is equipment located in multiple states including the Colorado facility. I've read through the statute but honestly the multi-jurisdictional aspects are confusing me. Has anyone dealt with similar 9-307(h) situations where the debtor's location changed after formation? I want to make sure we file our UCC-1 in the correct jurisdiction to avoid any perfection issues down the road.
35 comments


Margot Quinn
This is actually more straightforward than it seems. Under UCC 9-307(h), the law of the jurisdiction where the debtor is located governs perfection. For registered organizations like your Delaware entity, the debtor is located in the state where it's organized - so Delaware in your case. The physical location of the chief executive office or operations doesn't change this rule.
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
•Wait, are you sure about that? I thought 9-307(h) had exceptions for when the registration becomes ineffective or something changes with the organizational status.
0 coins
Margot Quinn
•You're thinking of subsection (f) which deals with changes in organizational status. But for basic registered organizations that remain validly organized, it's the state of organization that controls under 9-307(e), not (h) specifically.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
•Thanks for clarifying that distinction. So as long as the Delaware registration stays active, I should file the UCC-1 in Delaware regardless of where they moved operations?
0 coins
Diego Fisher
I had a similar multi-state mess last year and honestly spent way too much time trying to parse through the 9-307 subsections manually. Eventually found this tool called Certana.ai that analyzes UCC documents and can flag jurisdiction issues by comparing your entity formation docs with your UCC filings. You just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Saved me from filing in the wrong state which would have been a disaster for our client.
0 coins
Henrietta Beasley
•Never heard of that service but sounds useful. Did it help with the 9-307 analysis specifically or just general document checking?
0 coins
Diego Fisher
•Both actually. It flagged that my debtor entity formation document showed Delaware incorporation but I was about to file the UCC-1 in Texas based on the business address. Really helped avoid that mistake.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
UGH this jurisdictional stuff drives me crazy!! Why can't they just make it simple - file where the business actually operates? The whole registered organization vs unregistered organization distinction is unnecessarily complicated. I've seen too many filings get messed up because someone assumed wrong about which subsection applies.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
•I feel your frustration but the rules exist for good reasons. Having a clear jurisdictional hierarchy prevents forum shopping and provides certainty for searchers.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
•Yeah I get the policy reasons but when you're dealing with LLCs that operate in 5 states it gets messy fast. At least corporations are usually clearer about state of incorporation.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•tell me about it, spent 3 hours last week trying to figure out where an LLC was actually organized because their operating agreement was vague
0 coins
Liam Brown
One thing to watch out for - make sure you're looking at the current version of 9-307. Some states adopted non-uniform amendments that could affect the analysis. Also, if there's any chance the Delaware registration could lapse or be revoked, you might want to consider the fall-back rules in case the entity becomes unregistered.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
•Good point about non-uniform amendments. Do you know if Delaware has any variations from the standard 9-307 text?
0 coins
Liam Brown
•Delaware generally follows the uniform text pretty closely for 9-307, but always worth checking the current statute. The bigger issue is usually making sure your debtor name matches exactly what's on the organizational documents.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
Been filing UCCs for 15 years and the 9-307 jurisdiction rules still trip people up regularly. The key is always start with whether it's a registered organization or not. If registered and still in good standing - state of organization governs. If not registered or registration lapses - then you look at chief executive office location. Your Delaware corp sounds like a clear registered organization case.
0 coins
Noah Lee
•What happens if they let the Delaware registration lapse after you file the UCC-1 there? Does the filing become ineffective?
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•That's covered in 9-316. You generally get a grace period to refile in the new jurisdiction, but the timing rules are strict. Usually 4 months after the change or one year after the original filing date, whichever is earlier.
0 coins
Margot Quinn
•And that's exactly why monitoring organizational status is so important for secured parties. A lapsed registration can really mess up your perfection chain if you don't catch it quickly.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
ok this might be a dumb question but how do you actually verify that a Delaware corp is still in good standing? their SOS website?
0 coins
Liam Brown
•Delaware Division of Corporations website has a search function where you can look up entity status by name or file number. Most states have similar online databases now.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•thanks! probably should have known that already lol
0 coins
Isabella Martin
I'm curious about the equipment being in multiple states. Even though Delaware law governs the perfection, you might need to consider fixture filing issues if any of the equipment is attached to real estate. That could require additional filings in the states where the real property is located.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
•It's mostly manufacturing equipment that's bolted down but probably not fixtures in the legal sense. Though I should double-check the lease agreements to see what they say about removability.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
•Definitely worth reviewing. The fixture vs equipment distinction can be tricky and varies by state law. When in doubt, dual filing might be worth the extra cost for the additional protection.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
Just went through something similar with a client who had a Nevada LLC operating in California. We used that Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned earlier and it was actually pretty helpful for making sure our entity docs matched our UCC filing details. The document consistency check caught a minor discrepancy in how we had the debtor name formatted.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•Was it worth the cost? I'm always looking for tools that can help catch these kinds of errors before they cause problems.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
•Yeah definitely worth it for complex multi-state situations. Much faster than manually comparing all the documents and gives you confidence you didn't miss anything important.
0 coins
Mason Davis
This whole thread is making me realize I need to brush up on my 9-307 knowledge. The jurisdictional stuff always makes my head spin but I can't avoid it in this line of work.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
•The ALI has some good practice materials on UCC Article 9 geography rules if you want a deeper dive. Also recommend the Permanent Editorial Board commentaries.
0 coins
Mason Davis
•Thanks for the recommendations! Always looking for good reference materials.
0 coins
Mia Rodriguez
Bottom line for your situation - Delaware UCC-1 filing should be correct since that's where the debtor is organized and remains registered. Just make sure you monitor their organizational status going forward and have a plan if anything changes with their Delaware registration.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
•That seems to be the consensus from everyone here. Really appreciate all the input - makes me feel much more confident about proceeding with the Delaware filing.
0 coins
Margot Quinn
•Good luck with the filing! These multi-state situations always seem more complicated at first but usually have straightforward answers once you work through the 9-307 analysis systematically.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•I'm new to UCC filings and this discussion has been incredibly helpful! Just to make sure I understand correctly - even though the debtor moved their operations to Colorado, we ignore that completely for filing purposes as long as they maintain their Delaware corporate registration? The physical location of business activities doesn't matter at all under 9-307?
0 coins
Layla Mendes
•That's exactly right! For registered organizations (like corporations and LLCs), the physical location of operations is irrelevant under UCC 9-307(e). The law of the state where the debtor is "located" governs perfection, and registered organizations are located in their state of organization - period. The only time you'd look at physical locations like chief executive office is for unregistered organizations under 9-307(f), or in the rare case where a registered organization's status becomes questionable. So yes, Colorado operations = irrelevant for your Delaware corp filing decision.
0 coins