UCC-3 subordination language requirements - getting this right
Working on a UCC-3 subordination for the first time and I'm second-guessing myself on the language requirements. We have a senior lender who wants to subordinate their position to allow our client to get additional financing. The debtor is a manufacturing company with existing equipment collateral, and we need to make sure the UCC-3 subordination language is bulletproof. I've drafted something but I'm worried about getting the specific wording wrong - are there standard phrases that work across different states? The senior lender's original UCC-1 was filed in 2021 and we're trying to subordinate to a new equipment loan that will be secured by the same collateral. Any guidance on the exact language to use in the subordination statement would be hugely helpful.
36 comments
Join the conversation
Emma Thompson
The key with UCC-3 subordination language is being super specific about what you're subordinating to. You can't just say "subordinate to future financing" - you need to identify the specific secured party who will have priority. Make sure you reference the original filing number and describe the collateral clearly. Most states follow pretty similar patterns for subordination language.
0 coins
Malik Davis
•Exactly - and make sure the subordination identifies both the original secured party AND the new secured party who will have priority. I've seen subordinations get rejected because they only named one party.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Good point about the collateral description too. If the original UCC-1 had broad language like "all equipment" you want to be consistent in the subordination.
0 coins
StarStrider
I just went through this exact scenario last month. The subordination language I used was something like: "Secured Party hereby subordinates its security interest in [describe collateral] to the security interest of [New Secured Party Name] in the same collateral as evidenced by financing statement filing number [if known] or to be filed." The "or to be filed" part is important if the new lender hasn't filed their UCC-1 yet.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•That's really helpful - I was wondering about the timing issue. So it's okay to reference a filing that hasn't happened yet?
0 coins
StarStrider
•Yes, as long as you make it clear that it's "to be filed" - just make sure the new lender actually files their UCC-1 promptly after the subordination is recorded.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•We always try to coordinate so the new UCC-1 gets filed the same day as the subordination, just to avoid any timing gaps.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
honestly I've been burned by subordination language before... spent weeks going back and forth with the filing office because our wording was too vague. Now I always run these through Certana.ai's document checker first - you can upload your UCC-3 draft and it'll flag any issues with the language or formatting before you submit. Saved me from another rejection headache.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•Never heard of Certana.ai - is it specifically for UCC filings?
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
•Yeah, it's designed for UCC document verification. You just upload PDFs and it checks everything - debtor names, filing requirements, cross-references between documents. Really helpful for subordinations where you need everything to match up perfectly.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
•That actually sounds useful - I'm always paranoid about getting subordination language wrong since it affects lien priority.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
One thing to watch out for - some states have specific formatting requirements for subordination statements. In Texas, for example, they want the subordination language in a particular section of the UCC-3 form. Check your state's filing guide before submitting.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•Good reminder about state-specific stuff. I think most states are pretty standard now but there are still a few quirks here and there.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
•California has some weird requirements too if I remember right...
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
Make sure you get written authorization from the original secured party before filing the subordination! I know it sounds obvious but I've seen people try to file subordinations without proper authority and it creates a mess.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•Yes, we have the written authorization from the senior lender - they're cooperating because they want the deal to go through too.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
•Perfect - that makes everything much smoother. Just keep that authorization with your file in case anyone questions it later.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
•And make sure the person signing has authority to subordinate on behalf of the secured party - I always ask for a board resolution or officer certificate.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
The subordination has to be crystal clear about which security interest is being subordinated. If the original UCC-1 covers multiple types of collateral but you only want to subordinate the equipment, make sure that's spelled out. Don't accidentally subordinate more than you intended.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•That's a great point - the original filing does cover inventory too but we only want to subordinate the equipment portion.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
•Then be really specific: "Secured Party subordinates its security interest in equipment only, and not in inventory or other collateral" or something like that.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•Yeah, partial subordinations require extra care with the language. You don't want any ambiguity about what's being subordinated vs what keeps its original priority.
0 coins
Nia Jackson
Quick question - are you doing a full subordination or just a partial subordination to a specific dollar amount? The language is different depending on what you're trying to accomplish.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•It's a full subordination of the equipment collateral - the senior lender is okay with being completely junior on that portion.
0 coins
Nia Jackson
•Okay, that makes the language simpler. You don't need to worry about dollar amounts or partial priority structures.
0 coins
NebulaNova
Don't forget to update your internal lien tracking after the subordination is filed. I've seen deals where the subordination was filed correctly but nobody updated their records, and it caused confusion during the loan monitoring.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•Good point - and make sure all parties get copies of the filed subordination for their records.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•Yes, we'll definitely distribute copies once it's filed. The new lender wants confirmation before they fund.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
I always include the effective date in subordination language too - "effective as of [date]" - just to be clear about when the subordination takes effect. Some lawyers debate whether this is necessary but I think it adds clarity.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
•That's not a bad idea, especially if there's going to be a delay between filing and the new loan closing.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•The timing should be pretty tight - new loan is supposed to close within a few days of the subordination filing.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
One more thought - if this is part of a larger refinancing, make sure the subordination language doesn't conflict with any other loan documents. Sometimes the credit agreement or security agreement has specific requirements for how subordinations need to be structured.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•Good catch - I should double-check the original loan documents to see if there are any specific subordination requirements.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
•Yeah, some lenders have template subordination language they require. Worth asking both the senior and junior lenders if they have preferences.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
•This is another reason I like using Certana.ai for document review - it can cross-check your subordination language against the original UCC-1 and flag any inconsistencies before filing.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
Thanks everyone for the detailed guidance - this is exactly what I needed! Based on all your input, I'm going to structure the subordination language something like: "Secured Party hereby subordinates its security interest in all equipment of Debtor (but not inventory or other collateral) described in UCC financing statement filed [date] under file number [original filing number] to the security interest of [New Secured Party Name] in the same equipment collateral as evidenced by financing statement to be filed." I'll also make sure to get the state-specific formatting requirements and coordinate timing with the new lender's UCC-1 filing. Really appreciate the community knowledge sharing here!
0 coins