< Back to UCC Document Community

GalacticGuru

UCC-3 form Pennsylvania filing getting rejected - need help with debtor name format

Been trying to file a UCC-3 amendment in Pennsylvania for three weeks now and keep getting rejections. The original UCC-1 was filed back in 2022 for our equipment financing deal, and now we need to add additional collateral to the filing. Every time I submit through the PA portal, it comes back saying 'debtor name does not match original filing' but I'm copying it exactly from the UCC-1 search results. The debtor is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' and I've tried it with periods, without periods, with commas after 'Solutions' - nothing works. The filing number is correct, I've triple-checked that. Has anyone dealt with this specific issue in Pennsylvania? I'm starting to think there's some hidden formatting requirement they don't tell you about. This is holding up a $2.8M credit facility and my client is getting impatient. Any advice would be appreciated.

PA can be really picky about exact name matches. When you pulled the original UCC-1, did you look at the actual filed document or just the search results? Sometimes the search results truncate or reformat the name differently than what's actually on file.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

I looked at both - the search results show 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but when I click through to view the actual document it shows the same thing. That's what's so frustrating about this.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

Try requesting a certified copy of the original filing. Sometimes there are characters or spacing that don't display properly in the online viewer.

0 coins

I had this exact same problem last month! Turned out the original UCC-1 had an extra space between 'Advanced' and 'Manufacturing' that wasn't visible in the search results. You might want to try using a document comparison tool to catch formatting differences.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

How did you figure out there was an extra space? Did you have to call the Pennsylvania Department of State directly?

0 coins

Actually I used this service called Certana.ai that lets you upload both documents and it highlights any inconsistencies. Just drag and drop your UCC-1 and UCC-3 PDFs and it shows exactly where the names don't match. Saved me hours of manual comparison.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Never heard of Certana but that sounds useful. Is it free or do you have to pay?

0 coins

Pennsylvania is notorious for this stuff. I've seen rejections for things like 'Inc.' vs 'Inc' or even different capitalization. The system is super literal about exact matches.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is why I hate electronic filing sometimes. The old paper system was more forgiving about minor variations.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Are you kidding? Paper filing took forever and you never knew if it was received. At least with electronic you get immediate feedback.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

Check if there are any non-printable characters in the debtor name from the original filing. Sometimes when names get copied from articles of incorporation there can be hidden formatting codes that mess things up.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

How would I check for that? I'm just copying and pasting from the PA UCC search results.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

Try typing the name out manually instead of copy/paste. Or paste it into a plain text editor first to strip any hidden formatting.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Good advice. I always paste into Notepad first before putting it into the UCC form fields.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

Have you tried calling the PA Bureau of Corporations? They can sometimes tell you exactly how the debtor name appears in their system vs what shows up online.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

I called yesterday and they said they can't help with UCC issues over the phone, only in writing. Might have to submit a formal inquiry.

0 coins

That's typical. PA customer service is pretty limited for UCC stuff. They make you jump through hoops for everything.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

Just went through this nightmare myself. What worked for me was getting the original UCC-1 filer to provide the exact text they used. Turns out our corporate secretary had used a slightly different version of the company name than what was in our charter documents.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

That's a good point. The original filing was done by our previous law firm so I'll reach out to them for the source documents.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

Law firms usually keep good records of exactly what they filed. They should be able to send you the original submission.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

Make sure you get the actual filing document, not just their work papers. Sometimes lawyers make last-minute changes before submitting.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Is the LLC still active and in good standing? Sometimes if there's been a name change or dissolution that affects UCC filings.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Yes, I checked the entity status and it's active and current. No name changes or amendments to the charter.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Good thinking though. I've seen cases where companies changed their name and forgot to file UCC amendments.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Try using the Certana document checker that someone mentioned earlier. I used it last week when I had similar issues with a UCC-3 continuation in Ohio. It immediately flagged that my debtor name had 'Corp' instead of 'Corporation' - saved me from another rejection.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

I'll definitely try that. At this point I'm willing to try anything to get this filing through.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

The turnaround time with electronic rejections is killing these deals. Used to be you could fix minor issues with a phone call.

0 coins

At least now you know right away instead of waiting weeks to find out there was a problem.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

UPDATE: Finally got it resolved! Turns out the original UCC-1 had 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with a comma before LLC, but the search results displayed it without the comma. Thanks to everyone who suggested the document comparison approach - that's what caught it.

0 coins

Glad you got it sorted! Those tiny punctuation differences are so frustrating but the system is very literal about exact matches.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

This is exactly why I always download and review the original filing documents before doing any amendments. Can't trust the search display formatting.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Lesson learned for sure. The document comparison tool made all the difference - would have taken me forever to spot that comma manually.

0 coins

Great outcome! For anyone else reading this thread, Pennsylvania is particularly strict about punctuation in entity names. Always verify against the actual filed documents, not just search results.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

This thread should be pinned or something. Name matching issues are probably the most common cause of UCC-3 rejections.

0 coins

Agreed. The number of times I've seen filings rejected for minor formatting differences is ridiculous.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today