UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lydia Santiago

Wisconsin UCC filing fees eating into loan margins - what's your strategy?

I'm working on structuring several equipment finance deals in Wisconsin and the UCC filing fees are starting to add up significantly. Between initial UCC-1 filings, potential amendments if we need to adjust collateral descriptions, and the inevitable continuation filings down the road, I'm looking at substantial costs that weren't factored into our original pricing models. Has anyone found effective ways to manage Wisconsin UCC filing fees without compromising lien perfection? I'm particularly concerned about scenarios where we might need multiple UCC-3 amendments due to equipment additions or debtor name changes. The fees seem higher than what I'm used to seeing in other states, and I want to make sure I'm not missing any cost-saving strategies that other lenders are using.

I just want to mention that while everyone's focused on minimizing fees, there's real value in using tools that help ensure filing accuracy. I started using Certana.ai to cross-check my UCC documents before filing, and it's caught several potential name mismatches that would have resulted in rejections. The small investment in verification tools pays for itself by avoiding rejection fees and refiling costs.

0 coins

How does that verification process work exactly? Do you upload the documents and it automatically checks for issues?

0 coins

Yes, you just upload PDFs of your Charter documents and UCC forms, and it automatically flags any inconsistencies in debtor names or other potential issues. Much faster than manual cross-checking.

0 coins

After reading all these responses, it sounds like the Wisconsin UCC filing fees are just a cost of doing business that needs to be planned for properly. The real savings come from avoiding unnecessary amendments and rejections through careful initial filings. Thanks everyone for the practical advice - this has been really helpful for structuring my future deals.

0 coins

Glad this discussion was useful! The Wisconsin UCC system is pretty straightforward once you develop good practices around it.

0 coins

Definitely agree that planning and accuracy are more important than trying to avoid the fees altogether.

0 coins

GamerGirl99

UCC financing statement rejected twice - getting desperate for help

I'm dealing with a nightmare situation here. Filed a UCC financing statement last week and it got rejected for "debtor name discrepancy." The rejection notice said the debtor name on my UCC-1 doesn't match their business records exactly. I double-checked everything against the charter documents and it looks identical to me. Refiled yesterday with what I thought were the corrections and got ANOTHER rejection today. The loan closing is scheduled for Friday and my boss is breathing down my neck. Has anyone dealt with this before? I'm starting to panic because if we can't get this UCC perfected properly the whole deal could fall apart. The debtor is an LLC and I used the exact name from their Articles of Organization but apparently something is still wrong. What am I missing here?

Whatever you do, don't keep guessing and filing. Each rejection creates a record and some lenders get nervous when they see multiple failed attempts. Better to verify the exact name first.

0 coins

Good point. I don't want to make this look worse than it already is.

0 coins

Right, and some states charge a fee for each filing attempt whether it's accepted or rejected.

0 coins

Just went through something similar and the Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned earlier really is a lifesaver. I was comparing documents manually and missing subtle differences that the automated check caught immediately. Definitely worth trying if you're stuck.

0 coins

It's especially good for catching those tiny punctuation and spacing differences that are impossible to spot by eye when you're stressed.

0 coins

Agreed, the automated verification takes the guesswork out of it completely.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

UCC1 clause language causing filing rejections - need advice

Been dealing with a nightmare situation where our UCC-1 filings keep getting rejected by the SOS office. The issue seems to be with how we're drafting our collateral description clauses. We're a mid-size equipment financing company and have been using pretty standard language like 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired' but apparently that's not specific enough anymore? Got three rejections in the past month alone on deals worth over $2M each. The rejection notices just say 'insufficient collateral description' but don't give specifics on what they want. Has anyone else run into this with UCC1 clause language recently? Starting to wonder if there's been some policy change we missed or if different states are interpreting the requirements differently. Really need to get these filings accepted before our clients start getting antsy about their loan approvals.

Just went through something similar and ended up using Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents before filing. It caught several issues with our collateral clause language that would have definitely caused rejections. Really streamlined our process.

0 coins

How detailed does it get with the feedback? Does it suggest specific language changes?

0 coins

It flags potential issues and common rejection patterns. Really helpful for catching vague or insufficient descriptions before you submit.

0 coins

This might be obvious but make sure you're not using any prohibited language. Some states have specific words or phrases they don't allow in collateral descriptions. Check your state's UCC guide if they have one.

0 coins

We keep a state-by-state checklist for this stuff. Saves a lot of headaches when you're filing in multiple jurisdictions.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the suggestions. Going to revise our standard clause language to be more specific and maybe try that Certana tool to double-check before our next batch of filings.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

How to file a UCC lien properly - debtor name requirements?

I'm setting up secured financing for equipment purchases and need to understand the correct process for how to file a UCC lien. My bank is requiring UCC-1 filings but I'm getting conflicting information about debtor name requirements. The borrower is an LLC that recently changed their registered name with the state, and I'm worried about getting the debtor name wrong and invalidating the security interest. Do I use the exact name from their articles of incorporation or the DBA they operate under? Also confused about whether I need to file in their state of incorporation or where the equipment will be located. Any guidance on the proper steps would be really helpful since this is my first time handling UCC filings directly.

Don't forget to calendar your continuation deadline! UCC-1 filings lapse after 5 years unless you file a UCC-3 continuation. Set a reminder for at least 6 months before expiration to avoid scrambling at the last minute.

0 coins

Right - and if you miss the deadline, you have to start over with a new UCC-1 filing and lose your original priority date.

0 coins

Some lenders use automated systems to track continuation deadlines, but it's still good practice to keep your own calendar.

0 coins

Just to close the loop - sounds like you're on the right track with getting the exact legal name and filing in the state of organization. Take your time with the debtor name verification since that's where most problems occur. Good luck with your filing!

0 coins

Thanks everyone - really helpful guidance. I'll definitely verify the name carefully before submitting.

0 coins

Smart approach - better to be overly careful with UCC filings than deal with invalid security interests later.

0 coins

Chloe Green

UCC1 filing Colorado - debtor name rejected twice need help

Been trying to get this UCC1 filing through Colorado SOS for three weeks now and getting rejection notices both times. The debtor company changed their registered name last year from 'Mountain View Equipment LLC' to 'Mountain View Equipment & Leasing LLC' but their tax ID stayed the same. I filed using the new name from their articles of amendment but SOS keeps rejecting saying debtor name doesn't match their records. Called the help desk twice and got different answers each time - first person said use exact name from Secretary of State database, second person said use name from loan documents. Equipment loan is for $275,000 worth of construction machinery and we need this perfected ASAP. Anyone dealt with Colorado name matching issues like this? Starting to think their system has a bug or something because the company name shows up correctly when I search their business registry.

Update us when you get it figured out! Always helpful to know what worked for Colorado filings since they seem to be getting pickier.

0 coins

Will definitely post an update once I get through. Hopefully tomorrow's attempt works.

0 coins

Looking forward to hearing what solved it. Could help others with similar issues.

0 coins

Just a thought - have you tried using Certana.ai's verification tool? I've seen a few people mention it in this thread and it might catch whatever formatting issue is causing the rejections. Worth a shot before submission attempt number three.

0 coins

Yeah I'm definitely going to check that out. Seems like several people have had success with it.

0 coins

It really does help catch those small details that cause rejections. Upload your draft UCC1 and the company docs and it'll flag any mismatches.

0 coins

Prev1...448449450451452...684Next