UCC-3 Amendment rejected - written security agreement clause causing debtor name mismatch
Has anyone dealt with a UCC-3 amendment getting rejected because the debtor name on your written security agreement doesn't exactly match what's on file? We're trying to amend our collateral description for a $2.8M equipment loan but the SOS keeps bouncing it back. Our original UCC-1 from 2019 has the debtor listed as "ABC Manufacturing LLC" but our written security agreement shows "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (with the comma). The loan documents all reference the written security agreement version with the comma, but now we can't get our amendment through. This is holding up a major refinancing and I'm not sure if we need to file a whole new UCC-1 or if there's a way to fix this through the amendment process. The lender is getting antsy about the lien perfection gap.
39 comments


Andre Laurent
Ugh this is exactly the kind of bureaucratic nightmare that makes UCC filings so stressful. One tiny punctuation mark and suddenly your entire security interest is in jeopardy. I've seen deals fall through over less.
0 coins
Zoe Papadopoulos
•It's frustrating but there's actually good reasons for the strict name matching requirements. The UCC search logic depends on exact matches to protect both secured parties and potential creditors.
0 coins
Jamal Washington
•Yeah but common sense should apply somewhere right? A comma shouldn't invalidate a $2.8M security interest
0 coins
Mei Wong
You need to check your state's debtor name rules first. Some states are more forgiving about punctuation in LLC names than others. What state are you filing in? That makes a huge difference in how they handle the written security agreement vs UCC-1 name matching issue.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•We're in Ohio. I thought they were pretty standard but maybe there's specific guidance on punctuation?
0 coins
Mei Wong
•Ohio follows the "seriously misleading" standard. A comma in an LLC name might not be seriously misleading, but you'd need to research their specific interpretations.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•I had this exact same issue in Ohio last year! The SOS office told me punctuation matters for search purposes even if it seems minor.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
Before you do anything drastic like filing a new UCC-1, I'd suggest using a document verification tool to make sure you're not missing other inconsistencies. I recently discovered Certana.ai's UCC document checker - you just upload your written security agreement and UCC-1 PDFs and it instantly flags any name mismatches or other discrepancies between documents. Saved me from making a bigger mess when I found out my collateral descriptions were also slightly different between docs.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•That sounds helpful - does it check more than just debtor names? We have multiple documents in this package.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
•Yeah it cross-checks everything - debtor names, secured party info, collateral descriptions, filing numbers. Really thorough compared to trying to manually compare multiple PDFs.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
•How much does something like that cost? We're already over budget on legal fees for this refinancing.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
•It's actually pretty reasonable - way less than having to refile or deal with perfection gaps. The peace of mind alone was worth it for me.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
Wait, are you sure the amendment is the right approach here? If your written security agreement has the comma version and that's what the loan docs reference, you might need to file a UCC-3 correction to fix the original UCC-1 first, then do your collateral amendment.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•I was hoping to avoid multiple filings but you might be right. Would a correction reset our priority date though?
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•No, corrections don't affect your original filing date as long as you're fixing an error, not changing substantive information.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
•Be careful about the correction vs amendment distinction. Some states are picky about which form to use for name changes.
0 coins
Dylan Evans
This is why I always triple-check the exact legal name from the Secretary of State records before filing anything. The written security agreement should match the official entity name exactly, not some shortened version.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Easier said than done when you're dealing with multiple entities and tight deadlines
0 coins
Dylan Evans
•True, but a few extra minutes of verification beats having to refile everything later.
0 coins
StormChaser
I ran into something similar with an equipment financing deal. The key is figuring out which version of the name is actually correct according to the state filing records. If the LLC was officially formed with the comma, then your UCC-1 might be wrong, not your written security agreement.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•Good point - I should pull their Articles of Organization to see the official formation name.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•Articles might be different from current good standing certificate too. Entities sometimes file name changes.
0 coins
StormChaser
•Exactly why it's worth checking both formation docs and current status reports.
0 coins
Ava Williams
THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN!!! I spent 3 hours on the phone with Ohio SOS last month over a similar issue and they basically said "that's just how it works." Meanwhile my client's closing is delayed and everyone's pointing fingers. These database search algorithms need to be smarter about obvious variations.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•I feel your pain but at least Ohio takes phone calls. Try dealing with an all-electronic state with no human support.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•True, though sometimes I wonder if talking to a human actually helps or just adds more confusion to the process.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
Update on the Certana tool I mentioned - just used it again on another deal and it caught a debtor address mismatch between our UCC-1 and the loan agreement that I totally missed. The tool flagged it immediately when I uploaded both PDFs. Really wish I'd known about this verification process years ago.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•That's actually pretty cool. Does it work with older PDF formats or just newer documents?
0 coins
PixelWarrior
•Worked fine with some older scanned docs I tested. The OCR seems pretty robust.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
For what it's worth, I ended up having to file a UCC-3 correction for the name issue, then a separate UCC-3 amendment for the collateral change. Two separate filings but it worked cleanly and preserved our priority. The alternative was starting over with a new UCC-1 and losing our 2019 priority date.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•That's probably what we'll end up doing. Did you get any pushback from the lender about the gap between filings?
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•No issues as long as I could show the correction related back to the original filing date. Documentation is key.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Smart approach. Better to be overly careful with lien perfection than risk a gap.
0 coins
LunarEclipse
Just want to echo what others said about checking the official entity records first. I made the mistake once of using the name from a contract instead of the Secretary of State database and it caused a huge mess. Now I always verify against official records before drafting any written security agreement.
0 coins
Yara Khalil
•Good reminder. The contracts team doesn't always use the exact legal entity name.
0 coins
LunarEclipse
•Exactly - they use whatever sounds better or fits on the signature line, but that's not always the legal name for UCC purposes.
0 coins
Keisha Brown
Hope this works out for you! Refinancing delays over UCC technicalities are the worst. Keep us posted on whether the correction approach works.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•Will do - this thread has been super helpful. At least I know I'm not the only one dealing with these name matching headaches.
0 coins
Paolo Esposito
•definitely not alone - seems like every other deal has some version of this issue
0 coins