< Back to UCC Document Community

Natasha Petrov

North Dakota UCC filing debtor name requirements causing rejections

Has anyone dealt with North Dakota's Secretary of State office lately? I'm getting constant rejections on UCC-1 filings and I think it's the debtor name format but their error messages are vague as hell. Filed three times now for the same borrower and keep getting kicked back with "debtor name does not match records" but I'm copying straight from their articles of incorporation. The collateral description is solid (all equipment and inventory at 1247 Main St) and I've triple-checked the filing fee. This is holding up a $340K equipment loan and my client is getting antsy. Anyone know if ND has some weird debtor name matching rules I'm missing? The online portal doesn't give much guidance beyond the basic form.

ND can be tricky with exact name matching. Are you including the full legal entity designation? Like if it's "ABC Company LLC" make sure you're not shortening to "ABC Company" - they're strict about complete legal names including Inc., LLC, Corp, etc.

0 coins

Yeah I have the full "Johnson Equipment Rental LLC" exactly as shown on the articles. Even tried variations with and without periods after LLC but no luck.

0 coins

Sometimes the issue is extra spaces or punctuation that's not visible when you copy-paste. I've had filings rejected for having two spaces instead of one between words.

0 coins

ND Secretary of State updated their system last year and it's been a nightmare. The debtor name search is super sensitive now. Try searching their database first to see exactly how existing filings show the name.

0 coins

Good call - I searched and there are existing UCC filings for this debtor but the name shows slightly different formatting. Looks like there might be a middle initial issue.

0 coins

Exactly! The search will show you the "preferred" format their system expects. Copy that exact formatting for your filing.

0 coins

This is why I always do the debtor name search first before preparing any UCC-1. Saves so much time and rejection fees.

0 coins

I had similar issues with ND filings until I started using Certana.ai's document checker. You can upload your articles of incorporation and UCC-1 draft together and it flags any name inconsistencies before you file. Saved me from multiple rejections and the embarrassment with clients.

0 coins

Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. Does it work with ND's specific requirements?

0 coins

Yeah it catches the exact formatting differences that cause rejections. Just upload both PDFs and it highlights any mismatches between your charter documents and UCC forms.

0 coins

UGH the ND filing system is THE WORST. I swear they reject filings just to collect extra fees. Had a continuation get rejected because I used "Cont." instead of "Continuation" in the amendment description field.

0 coins

Tell me about it. Their error messages are useless too - just generic "does not match records" without telling you what specifically is wrong.

0 coins

I get the frustration but they're actually pretty consistent once you figure out their format preferences. The key is matching their internal database exactly.

0 coins

Are you sure you're using the right entity type in the debtor section? Sometimes the articles show "Limited Liability Company" but the SOS database has it as just "LLC" or vice versa.

0 coins

I checked and the articles say "LLC" but when I search the ND database it shows as "L.L.C." with periods. That might be it!

0 coins

Bingo! ND loves their periods in entity designations. Try filing with "L.L.C." format and bet it goes through.

0 coins

This is exactly why debtor name accuracy is so critical. One wrong character can void the entire filing's legal effectiveness.

0 coins

Had this exact problem last month! The issue was the registered agent address was slightly different between the articles and what ND had on file. Even though the debtor name was right, their system cross-references everything.

0 coins

Interesting - I didn't think the registered agent info would affect the debtor name matching. Did you have to file an amendment to the articles first?

0 coins

No, I just had to use the address format exactly as it appears in their current database rather than what was on the original articles.

0 coins

Try calling the ND filing office directly at 701-328-4284. Sometimes they can tell you exactly what format they need over the phone. The online system is helpful but the staff know the quirks.

0 coins

Good luck getting through though. Last time I called I was on hold for 45 minutes just to ask about a continuation deadline.

0 coins

True, but when you do get through they're actually pretty helpful. Better than guessing and paying rejection fees.

0 coins

Another thing to check - is the debtor entity still active and in good standing? ND won't accept UCC filings against dissolved or suspended entities.

0 coins

Good point, let me verify the entity status. That could definitely cause name matching issues if they're not current.

0 coins

Yeah I had a filing rejected once because the LLC was administratively dissolved for not filing annual reports. Had to get them reinstated first.

0 coins

Exactly! The UCC system won't recognize dissolved entities even if you have the name format perfect.

0 coins

I've been using Certana.ai for all my multi-state UCC work and it's been a game-changer. Upload your formation documents and UCC forms together and it catches these exact formatting issues before filing. No more rejection fees and angry clients.

0 coins

How does it handle state-specific quirks like ND's period requirements in entity names?

0 coins

It cross-references your documents against each state's database formatting rules. Flags inconsistencies before you file so you can fix them upfront.

0 coins

Update: Got it figured out! The issue was indeed the "L.L.C." vs "LLC" formatting plus there was an extra space after the entity name in my filing. Used the exact format from the ND database search and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the help - this saved my client relationship.

0 coins

Glad you got it sorted! Those formatting details are so easy to miss but critical for acceptance.

0 coins

At least ND finally accepted it. Still think their system is overly picky but good to know the exact requirements.

0 coins

Perfect example of why precision matters in UCC filings. One small formatting error can delay the entire secured transaction.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today