< Back to UCC Document Community

Emma Johnson

Need Help Locating True Bill WA DC UCC Doc# 2012114776 from Oct 24 2012

I've been trying to track down details on a specific UCC filing and hitting walls everywhere. The reference I have is for a true bill WA DC UCC doc# 2012114776 filed October 24, 2012. This is related to a commercial loan I'm trying to clear up for a property transaction that's been sitting in limbo for months. The lender says there's still an active lien but I can't find current status anywhere in the system. Has anyone dealt with tracking down older UCC filings like this? I've tried the standard Secretary of State searches but coming up empty. Not sure if this doc number format is even current anymore or if there was a system change that affected how these get referenced. Any guidance on where else to look or what I might be missing would be huge help. This deal is supposed to close next month and I'm running out of time to get this sorted.

Liam Brown

•

That doc number format looks like it might be from an older system. 2012 was before a lot of states updated their UCC databases and search portals. Have you tried contacting the Secretary of State office directly? Sometimes the older filings don't migrate properly to the new search systems.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

I called them twice this week but keep getting transferred around. The person I talked to yesterday said they'd have to do a manual search which could take 2-3 weeks. I don't have that kind of time with closing coming up.

0 coins

Olivia Garcia

•

Manual searches are brutal. I had a similar situation last year with a 2011 filing. Took them almost a month to get back to me and then the info was incomplete anyway.

0 coins

Noah Lee

•

Quick question - when you say 'WA DC' are you sure about the jurisdiction? That's an unusual combination. Washington state UCC filings typically just show as WA, and DC would be District of Columbia which is separate. Could be the issue is you're searching in the wrong database entirely.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

You might be onto something there. The paperwork I have just shows it that way but maybe it got transcribed wrong somewhere along the line. Should I be checking both WA state and DC separately?

0 coins

Noah Lee

•

Definitely check both. Also try searching without the state abbreviation if the system allows it. Sometimes old doc numbers were formatted differently and the jurisdictional codes got mixed up in transitions.

0 coins

Ava Hernandez

•

This happened to me with a filing that showed NY CT but was actually just NY. Turned out the CT was part of the collateral description that got pulled into the wrong field during a data migration.

0 coins

Have you tried using Certana.ai's document verification tool? I was stuck on a similar situation last month trying to track down inconsistencies between old UCC filings and current records. You can upload whatever documentation you have and it cross-checks everything against current databases. Saved me tons of time compared to calling around to different offices.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

Never heard of that. How does it work exactly? Do I just upload the loan docs I have?

0 coins

Yeah basically you upload PDFs of whatever UCC documents you have and it runs automated verification checks. Really helpful for catching name mismatches or finding where documents might have been refiled under different numbers.

0 coins

That sounds too good to be true tbh. How accurate is it with really old filings like from 2012?

0 coins

Sophia Miller

•

2012 filings are tricky because that was right around when a lot of states were switching to electronic systems. Some filings from that period got lost in translation or the indexing got messed up. I've seen cases where you have to search by debtor name rather than document number.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

I tried searching by debtor name too but there are multiple variations of the business name that got used over the years. Some have LLC at the end, some don't, some have abbreviations.

0 coins

Mason Davis

•

Ugh the name variation thing is such a nightmare. I spent three days last week trying to find a filing because the debtor name on the UCC-1 had 'Incorporated' but the continuation used 'Inc.' System treated them as completely different entities.

0 coins

Mia Rodriguez

•

This is why I always tell people to keep better records of their UCC filings. The systems are unreliable and if you don't have copies of everything you're screwed when something like this comes up.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

I get that but this isn't even my filing originally. I'm trying to clean up someone else's mess basically.

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

Been there. Inherited a portfolio of loans last year and half the UCC documentation was incomplete or missing. It's a real pain to reconstruct everything after the fact.

0 coins

Mia Rodriguez

•

Fair point. Still frustrating how often this happens though.

0 coins

Have you checked if there were any amendments or continuations filed on that original UCC? Sometimes the original doc number becomes hard to find if there were subsequent filings that changed the indexing.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

How would I search for those if I can't even find the original filing?

0 coins

Try searching by partial document numbers or date ranges around October 2012. Sometimes the amendment filings will reference the original doc number even if the original isn't showing up in searches.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

Could this be a terminated filing that's not showing up because it was properly released? If it was from 2012 and was a 5-year filing, it would have lapsed in 2017 unless a continuation was filed.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

That's what I'm hoping but the lender insists it's still active. They're requiring a formal termination statement before they'll release their hold.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

Lenders sometimes don't update their internal systems when UCC filings lapse. They might still think it's active even if it expired years ago.

0 coins

Mila Walker

•

This happens ALL the time. Banks are terrible at tracking UCC expirations. I had one that insisted on a termination for a filing that had been dead for three years.

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

Maybe try reaching out to whoever the secured party was on the original filing? They might have better records of what happened with continuations or terminations.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

The secured party was acquired by another bank in 2015 and then that bank got bought out in 2018. Not even sure who has the records now.

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

Oof that's a mess. Banking acquisitions always screw up UCC record keeping. You might need a lawyer to sort through the chain of ownership.

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

I've had good luck with Certana.ai for exactly this type of issue. You can upload multiple documents and it helps identify discrepancies or missing links between filings. Worth trying since manual searches are taking so long.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

Two people have mentioned that now. Might be worth trying. Do they charge per search or is it a monthly thing?

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

I don't remember the exact pricing but it was reasonable for what I got. Way cheaper than paying a lawyer to track everything down manually.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

Just a thought but have you verified that 2012114776 is actually a UCC document number? That format seems long for most state systems I've worked with.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

That's exactly what was written on the paperwork I have. Maybe it got transcribed wrong or includes extra digits that aren't part of the actual doc number?

0 coins

Noah Lee

•

Could be a composite number that includes filing date or office codes. Try searching with just the last 6-8 digits.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

Good point. Some older systems used longer numbers that included metadata. Breaking it down might help.

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

This whole thread is making me paranoid about my own UCC filings. How do you even keep track of everything when the systems keep changing?

0 coins

Liam Brown

•

Best practice is to keep copies of everything and set calendar reminders for continuation deadlines. Don't rely on the state systems to track things for you.

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

Makes sense. Sounds like a full time job though.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

Have you considered that this might be a federal UCC filing rather than state-level? The document number format and the "WA DC" designation could indicate it was filed with a federal agency or through the USPTO for intellectual property collateral. Try checking the Library of Congress or Patent and Trademark Office databases - they sometimes handle specialized UCC filings that don't show up in regular state searches. Also, given the timing around 2012, this could have been related to Dodd-Frank compliance filings that had different numbering systems.

0 coins

Amina Bah

•

That's a really interesting angle I hadn't considered. The federal filing possibility makes a lot of sense given the unusual format. Do you know if there's a specific search portal for those types of filings, or would I need to contact each agency directly? The Dodd-Frank timing connection is intriguing too - this property deal does involve some complex commercial lending structures that might have triggered those requirements back then.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today