Consignment UCC filing rejected - debtor name issues with retail partner
Been dealing with a nightmare situation for the past month. We have a consignment arrangement with a major retail chain for our handmade furniture line, and our bank requires UCC-1 filings to secure our interest in the consigned goods. Filed the UCC-1 three weeks ago listing the retailer as debtor, but it got rejected by the SOS office for 'debtor name discrepancy.' Turns out the retailer's legal name on their articles of incorporation has some LLC designation that doesn't match what they use on their business license. Now our 90-day consignment period is almost up and we still don't have proper perfection. The retailer's legal department is being slow to respond with the exact entity name format. Has anyone dealt with consignment UCC filings where the consignee's business name varies across different state records? Really worried about losing our secured interest if we can't get this sorted before the goods start selling.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Lena Müller
Ugh, debtor name issues are the WORST part of UCC filings! I've been burned by this exact scenario before. You absolutely need to nail down the exact registered entity name from their state of incorporation records, not what they use on business licenses or DBA filings. Even a missing comma or abbreviation difference (like Co. vs Company) can cause rejections.
0 coins
TechNinja
•This is so true. We had a filing rejected because we used 'Corp' instead of 'Corporation' in the debtor name. Such a small detail but it voided our entire filing attempt.
0 coins
Keisha Thompson
•The state databases are super picky about exact matches. I always pull the articles of incorporation directly from the Secretary of State website now before filing any UCC-1.
0 coins
Paolo Bianchi
For consignment arrangements, timing is critical since you're essentially racing against the sale of goods. Here's what I'd recommend: First, search the SOS database yourself for your retailer's exact registered name - don't wait for their legal team. Second, consider filing a UCC-3 amendment immediately once you get the correct name rather than starting over with a new UCC-1. The amendment can correct the debtor name and relate back to your original filing date if done properly.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•Can you really use a UCC-3 amendment to fix a rejected filing? I thought amendments only worked for accepted filings that needed corrections later.
0 coins
Paolo Bianchi
•You're right - if the original filing was rejected, you can't amend it. You'll need to file a fresh UCC-1 with the correct debtor name. My mistake on that detail.
0 coins
Yara Assad
•Yeah amendments only work on accepted filings. But the good news is most states process electronic UCC-1 filings within 24-48 hours if everything is correct.
0 coins
Olivia Clark
Had a similar headache last year with a consignment deal. Spent weeks going back and forth with debtor name variations until someone mentioned using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your retailer's articles of incorporation and your draft UCC-1 form, and it automatically cross-checks the entity names to catch discrepancies before filing. Saved me from multiple rejection cycles and got my consignment UCC perfected on the first try.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•Never heard of that service - does it actually work for consignment scenarios? My situation is pretty specific with the retail partner's complex corporate structure.
0 coins
Olivia Clark
•It works for any UCC filing where you need to verify debtor name consistency. Just upload PDFs of the corporate docs and your UCC form - it flags any name mismatches instantly. Really helpful for complex entity structures.
0 coins
Javier Morales
consignment filings are tricky because you're essentially claiming a security interest in someone else's inventory. Make sure your consignment agreement clearly establishes that the retailer holds the goods as your agent, not as purchaser. Otherwise the UCC filing might not even be the right approach for protecting your interests.
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
•Good point about the consignment structure. The UCC-1 only works if it's a true consignment where title remains with the consignor until sale.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•Our agreement definitely keeps title with us until point of sale. The retailer just holds and displays the furniture as our agent. But yeah, getting the UCC filed correctly is crucial for perfection.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
This is exactly why I hate consignment deals! The paperwork is a nightmare and the timing pressure is insane. Why can't retailers just keep consistent business names across all their filings?? Last time I dealt with this, the company had three different legal names depending on which state database you looked at.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Tell me about it. Corporate name games are the bane of UCC filing. Especially with big retail chains that have holding companies and subsidiary structures.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
•At least most states have searchable databases now. Remember when you had to call the SOS office and wait on hold for hours just to verify an entity name?
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Those were dark times! Though honestly sometimes the phone reps were more helpful than these automated systems that reject everything for minor formatting issues.
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
Quick question - are you filing in the state where the retailer is incorporated or where the consigned goods are located? For consignment UCC-1 filings, you typically need to file where the debtor (retailer) is organized, not where the collateral sits.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•We filed in their state of incorporation (Delaware) since that's where their main corporate entity is registered. The goods are actually in stores across multiple states but Delaware should be the right jurisdiction.
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
•Delaware is correct for the entity filing. Just make sure you don't need any local fixture filings if the furniture becomes attached to the retail space in any way.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
Have you tried searching variations of their name in the UCC database to see if they have existing filings? Sometimes you can figure out the exact name format from looking at how other creditors have filed against them.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•That's actually brilliant - I didn't think to check existing UCC filings against them. Let me search their name variations and see what other lenders have used successfully.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
•Great tip! The UCC search results usually show the exact debtor name that was accepted by the filing office. Much easier than parsing through corporate documents.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
Whatever you do, don't let this drag on much longer. If your consignment goods start selling before you get proper perfection, you could lose your secured interest to the retailer's other creditors. The 90-day window you mentioned is critical for maintaining your consignment protection.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•Yeah that's exactly what I'm worried about. We have about $50k worth of furniture pieces in their showroom and I really can't afford to lose that security if they have financial problems.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•Definitely prioritize getting this filed ASAP. Consignment arrangements can be vulnerable if not properly documented and perfected through UCC filings.
0 coins
Leila Haddad
I actually discovered Certana.ai recently when dealing with a similar multi-entity filing nightmare. Their PDF upload system caught a mismatch between my debtor's charter and the name I was planning to use on the UCC-1. Saved me from what would have been my third rejection. Super easy to use - just upload your documents and it highlights any inconsistencies.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•How detailed does their name checking get? Does it catch things like punctuation differences and abbreviation mismatches?
0 coins
Leila Haddad
•Yeah it's pretty thorough. Flags differences in commas, periods, abbreviations like LLC vs L.L.C., and even spacing issues. Basically anything that could cause a filing rejection.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
Quick update question - did you include a proper collateral description for the consigned furniture? The description needs to be specific enough to identify your goods but not so narrow that it excludes items. Something like 'furniture and home furnishings held on consignment' might work better than listing specific pieces.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•I used 'handmade furniture pieces held pursuant to consignment agreement dated [date]' - think that's specific enough? Don't want to be too broad but also don't want to exclude pieces we add later.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•That sounds reasonable. The key is making sure other creditors can identify what you're claiming without being overly restrictive. Your description should work fine.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•Just make sure your consignment agreement is referenced clearly in the UCC-1. That helps establish the relationship between you and the collateral.
0 coins