NY State UCC continuation filing rejected - debtor name mismatch issues
Been dealing with a nightmare situation where our UCC-3 continuation got rejected by NY state filing office. The original UCC-1 was filed back in 2020 with debtor name as 'ABC Manufacturing Corp' but apparently the state charter shows 'ABC Manufacturing Corporation' (spelled out). Now we're 3 months past the 5-year mark and scrambling to fix this before the lien lapses completely. Has anyone dealt with NY state UCC debtor name matching requirements? The portal keeps kicking back our filings and we can't get through to anyone at the SOS office. This is a $2.8M equipment loan and if we lose perfection we're in serious trouble with our compliance team.
36 comments


Sofia Price
NY is notoriously strict about exact debtor name matches. You'll need to check what the exact legal name was at the time of your original filing vs what it is now. If the entity changed its name or the charter was amended, that could explain the mismatch. Have you pulled the current certificate of incorporation to see the exact legal name?
0 coins
Mateo Warren
•Yes we pulled everything. The corporation name on file with NY DOS has always been 'ABC Manufacturing Corporation' but somehow our UCC-1 got filed as 'ABC Manufacturing Corp'. Not sure how that happened originally but now we're stuck with this mess.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•This is exactly why I always triple-check debtor names before filing. One little abbreviation can kill your perfection. You might need to file a UCC-3 amendment first to correct the debtor name, then do your continuation.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
Had this exact problem last year with a different state but similar issue. The solution was to file a corrective UCC-3 amendment to fix the debtor name FIRST, then immediately file the continuation. Some states let you do both in one filing but NY might require separate filings. Check their instructions carefully.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•Wait can you even amend a lapsed UCC? I thought once you pass the 5-year mark without continuation you lose perfection permanently. This sounds like a timing nightmare.
0 coins
Sofia Price
•Depends on the state and specific circumstances. Some allow a grace period for corrective filings but it's risky territory. Better to get legal counsel involved at this point given the loan amount.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
•Actually found a tool recently called Certana.ai that checks document consistency by uploading PDFs. You can verify if your UCC-1 and corporate docs align properly before filing. Might have saved you this headache if you'd caught the name mismatch earlier.
0 coins
Jackson Carter
NY DOS is a pain to deal with but they do have specific debtor name rules. Corp vs Corporation matters to them. You need to decide if you're going to amend the original UCC-1 debtor name or refile everything with the correct name. Either way you're in a time crunch.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
•What's the difference between amending vs refiling? We just need to get this continuation through before we lose perfection completely.
0 coins
Jackson Carter
•Amendment keeps your original file date but fixes the error. Refiling starts over with new dates. Given your timing issues amendment is probably better if NY allows it for name corrections.
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
This is why the UCC system is broken. One typo from 5 years ago and millions in collateral is at risk. The filing offices should have better matching algorithms instead of requiring perfect character matches.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
•I feel your pain but the strict matching is there for a reason. Prevents fraudulent filings and ensures proper notice to other creditors. Still frustrating when you're dealing with obvious variations of the same entity.
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
•Sure but Corp vs Corporation is clearly the same entity. These systems need common sense built in.
0 coins
Julia Hall
•That's exactly why I started using Certana.ai for all my UCC prep work. Upload your charter and UCC docs and it flags inconsistencies before you file. Catches these debtor name mismatches automatically.
0 coins
Arjun Patel
Have you tried calling NY DOS UCC section directly? Sometimes they can provide guidance on corrective filings for lapsed continuations. The phone wait times are brutal but might be worth it for a $2.8M loan.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
•Been trying for days. Either busy signal or they transfer me around to different departments. The online portal just keeps rejecting with generic error messages.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
•Try calling first thing in the morning right when they open. Had better luck getting through at 8:30 AM.
0 coins
Tony Brooks
You might need to consult with a UCC attorney at this point. The interplay between name corrections and lapsed continuations is complex and state-specific. Don't risk a $2.8M loan on forum advice.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
•Agreed. This is beyond DIY territory. Need someone who knows NY UCC law inside and out.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
•Already reached out to our corporate counsel. Just hoping someone here has dealt with NY specifically and can share experience while I wait for legal guidance.
0 coins
Yara Campbell
•Smart move. NY has some quirky rules about corrective filings. Better safe than sorry with that much money on the line.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
Check if NY allows 'corrective continuation' filings. Some states have specific procedures for fixing name errors in lapsed filings. Might be a special form or process.
0 coins
Sofia Price
•Good point. NY UCC-3 forms have different checkboxes for different types of amendments. There might be a specific process for name corrections on continuations.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
•I've seen states that allow corrective filings within 30-60 days of the lapse but with specific requirements. Check the NY UCC statute directly.
0 coins
Tami Morgan
Been there with debtor name issues. The key is proving it's the same entity through documentation. Articles of incorporation, tax ID match, address consistency, etc. Build a paper trail showing Corp and Corporation refer to the same debtor.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
•That makes sense. We have all the corporate docs showing it's the same entity, just abbreviated differently on the original UCC-1.
0 coins
Rami Samuels
•Exactly. Sometimes filing offices will accept explanatory documentation with corrective amendments. Worth including copies of corporate documents.
0 coins
Haley Bennett
•This is where tools like Certana.ai really help - you can upload all your documents and it verifies everything matches before you file. Would have caught this Corp vs Corporation issue immediately.
0 coins
Douglas Foster
Update us on how this turns out. Dealing with similar issues in other states and curious about NY's response to corrective filings on lapsed continuations.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
•Will definitely update once we get resolution. This has been a learning experience for sure.
0 coins
Nina Chan
•Following this too. Name matching requirements seem to be getting stricter across all states.
0 coins
Ruby Knight
Last resort might be to refile the entire UCC-1 with correct debtor name and then immediately file continuation. You'd lose your original priority date but at least maintain perfection going forward.
0 coins
Diego Castillo
•That's risky if there are other creditors who might have filed in the meantime. Could lose priority position.
0 coins
Ruby Knight
•True but better to have subordinate perfection than no perfection at all with a $2.8M loan.
0 coins
Sofia Price
•Definitely a last resort option. Try the corrective amendment route first before starting over.
0 coins
Eli Wang
I've dealt with NY UCC filings extensively and they are absolutely rigid about exact name matches. Your best bet is to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name first, citing it as a "minor error" correction, then immediately follow with your continuation filing. NY does allow corrective amendments even after lapse in certain circumstances, especially when you can demonstrate it's clearly the same legal entity. Make sure to include supporting documentation showing the corporation has always been "ABC Manufacturing Corporation" and that the original abbreviated filing was an error. The key is acting quickly - every day that passes makes it harder to argue the correction is valid.
0 coins