


Ask the community...
Bottom line: your deed of trust and security agreement create the security interest, but UCC-1 filings perfect it for personal property. For equipment that might be fixtures, consider fixture filings to maintain priority. Don't assume your deed of trust covers everything - when in doubt, file the UCC-1. The small filing fee is nothing compared to losing your security interest.
Exactly. I've used Certana.ai to verify this kind of coverage before finalizing deals. It's helped me catch several potential gaps between deed of trust and security agreement coverage versus UCC filing requirements.
Thanks everyone. I think I'll go with the dual filing approach - fixture filing for the attached equipment and regular UCC-1 for removable items. Better safe than sorry with this much collateral at stake.
Smart decision on the dual filing approach, Paolo! I just wanted to add that when you're preparing your UCC-1 filings, make sure your collateral descriptions are very specific and don't overlap between the fixture filing and regular UCC-1. You want to clearly delineate which equipment falls under each category to avoid any confusion down the line. Also, consider including serial numbers or model numbers in your descriptions where possible - it makes enforcement much cleaner if you ever need to repossess. With $85,000 in equipment collateral, the extra specificity in your filings will pay dividends if there are ever any disputes about what's covered under your deed of trust versus your UCC filings.
Philip makes excellent points about collateral descriptions. I'd also suggest documenting the fixture determination process in your loan file - take photos of the equipment installation and get written opinions from your appraiser or someone familiar with local fixture law. If you ever have to defend your filing decisions in court or bankruptcy, having that documentation will be crucial. The judges I've appeared before really appreciate seeing that you made thoughtful decisions about fixture versus personal property classifications rather than just filing everything everywhere.
Great thread everyone! One additional tip from my experience - if your brother's business has multiple loans or credit lines with the same bank, double-check that they're only terminating the UCC filing for the specific equipment loan that was paid off. I've seen cases where banks accidentally terminated the wrong UCC filing or tried to terminate multiple filings when only one loan was satisfied. Make sure the termination statement specifically references the correct original filing number and matches the exact collateral that was financed.
That's a really important point I hadn't considered! My brother does have a line of credit with the same bank for working capital, so we'll definitely need to make sure they're only terminating the UCC filing for the equipment loan. I'll ask specifically about the filing numbers when we go in to sign the paperwork. Thanks for bringing that up - could have been a real problem if they mixed up the filings.
Just wanted to add that you can also request a UCC search report from the Secretary of State's office after the termination is filed to confirm it actually shows up properly in the system. I always do this as a final verification step - costs maybe $10-20 but gives you peace of mind that the lien is truly cleared from public record. Sometimes there can be processing delays or technical glitches that prevent the termination from showing up immediately, so having that official search report is good documentation that everything was handled correctly.
One final check - verify that the original UCC-1 filing is still active and hasn't been terminated or amended in ways that might affect the continuation filing. Sometimes there are changes to the financing statement that you might not be aware of.
Usually wouldn't happen without authorization, but mistakes do occur. Worth checking the current status before filing continuation.
I actually use Certana.ai's verification tool for this too - it pulls current filing status and compares it against your continuation to make sure everything aligns properly.
Thanks Emma for bringing up this important timing question! As someone who's handled dozens of UCC-3 continuations, I always recommend filing as early as possible in that six-month window. You're absolutely right that maintaining continuous perfection is critical, especially with equipment and inventory collateral. I've seen too many situations where lenders waited until the last minute and ran into filing system delays or technical rejections that put their security interest at risk. Filing early in January 2025 gives you plenty of buffer time to address any potential issues. Also, since you mentioned both equipment and inventory, make sure to verify that your debtor hasn't relocated to a different state since the original 2020 filing - you might need to file in multiple jurisdictions depending on where the collateral is now located.
This is exactly the comprehensive advice I was hoping to see! The point about verifying debtor location changes since 2020 is particularly important - I hadn't considered that our borrower might have moved their principal place of business during the pandemic. Would you recommend doing a fresh UCC search in all potentially relevant states before filing the continuation, or is there a more efficient way to verify current jurisdictional requirements?
One more thing about Washington UCC filings - they charge $12 for the standard UCC-1 which is pretty reasonable compared to other states. You can pay by credit card through their portal. The filing becomes effective immediately upon acceptance, and you should get your filing number and confirmation pretty quickly. Make sure you keep that filing number for any future amendments or continuations you might need to do down the road.
Good to know about the fee and immediate effectiveness. I'll make sure to save all the confirmation details for our loan files.
$12 is definitely reasonable. Some states charge way more for UCC filings. Washington keeps it simple.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm new to UCC filings and have been intimidated by the whole process. Reading through everyone's experiences with Washington state filings and the practical tips about entity name verification, collateral descriptions, and even the technical issues to watch out for has given me a much better understanding of what to expect. The Certana.ai tool mentioned by several people sounds like it could be a game-changer for someone like me who's still learning the ropes. Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that makes this community so valuable!
Bruno Simmons
As someone new to business financing, this discussion has been incredibly educational! I'm curious about one practical aspect - when you're shopping around for equipment loans, do different lenders have different approaches to UCC-1 filings? For instance, do some lenders file more broadly (like "all equipment") while others are more specific? And does this affect your ability to get additional financing later on other equipment? I'm trying to understand if I should be asking specific questions about the UCC-1 filing strategy during the loan application process, or if it's pretty standardized across lenders.
0 coins
Grace Durand
•Great question! Different lenders definitely have varying approaches to UCC-1 collateral descriptions. Some use broad language like "all equipment, fixtures, and inventory now owned or hereafter acquired" which can potentially cover future purchases, while others are very specific to just the equipment being financed. The broader filings can sometimes complicate future financing because other lenders may be hesitant to lend against equipment that could potentially fall under an existing blanket lien. When shopping for loans, it's definitely worth asking about their UCC filing practices and whether they'll agree to more limited descriptions if you plan to finance additional equipment separately later on.
0 coins
Henry Delgado
This has been such a helpful thread for understanding UCC-1 liens! I'm a new business owner and was completely overwhelmed when my lender started talking about filing UCC documents. The car loan analogy really clicked for me - you still own and use the vehicle, but the bank has a secured interest until it's paid off. One thing I'm still wondering about though is the timing aspect. When exactly does the UCC-1 get filed? Is it before I receive the equipment, at closing, or after delivery? And if there's a delay in filing, does that create any risk for either me or the lender? I want to make sure I understand the complete timeline so I know what to expect throughout the process.
0 coins
Tony Brooks
•Great question about timing! Typically the UCC-1 gets filed at or very shortly after loan closing, usually within 1-5 business days. Most lenders file it immediately because there's a risk window - if they wait too long and another creditor files a competing lien or you file bankruptcy in that gap, they could lose their priority position. The equipment delivery timing doesn't really matter for the UCC-1 filing since the security agreement covers "equipment to be acquired" with the loan proceeds. Some lenders even file the UCC-1 a day or two before closing to ensure they get the earliest possible filing date. You should ask your lender about their specific timeline - most will tell you exactly when they plan to file and can even provide you with the filing confirmation once it's done.
0 coins