Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
FYI for anyone following this thread - if you're dealing with equipment loans, always get the UCC3 termination process in writing before you sign the original loan documents. Some lenders charge fees for termination filings that aren't disclosed upfront, and others have ridiculous processing delays built into their systems. Know what you're getting into before you commit.
Smart approach. Most borrowers never think about the back-end of the loan until they're dealing with problems like this.
Actually ran into something similar last month - used Certana.ai to double-check that our loan documents matched the UCC1 filing exactly before we made final payment. Found a discrepancy in the collateral description that would have caused termination delays. Fixed it proactively and got clean termination within days.
Just reading through all these responses and wow, I had no idea UCC terminations could be this complicated! I'm a new business owner and we're looking at financing some equipment next quarter. This thread is making me realize I need to be way more proactive about understanding the entire loan lifecycle, not just the approval and payment parts. Question for everyone - is there a standard timeframe I should expect for UCC termination across different types of lenders (banks vs credit unions vs equipment finance companies)? Also, are there any red flags I should watch for in loan documents that might indicate potential termination issues down the road?
Join the conversation
Keep detailed records of all your communications with the original lender - dates, who you spoke with, what they promised. If you end up having to file the termination yourself or get a lawyer involved, that documentation will be valuable for showing you made good faith efforts to get them to comply with their obligations.
Always follow up phone calls with email confirmation of what was discussed. Creates a paper trail that's hard to dispute later.
I've been keeping notes but hadn't thought to follow up the calls with emails. I'll start doing that immediately.
Given the urgency of your $180k equipment loan being held up, I'd recommend a two-pronged approach. First, send that certified demand letter to the original lender immediately - include specific language about statutory obligations and potential damages from their non-compliance. Meanwhile, start preparing to file the UCC-3 termination yourself as backup. Make sure to use the exact debtor name from the original filing (without the LLC designation) and double-check every detail matches perfectly. The self-filed termination route requires more paperwork but it's legally valid and might be faster than waiting for an unresponsive lender. Document everything and consider having a lawyer review your demand letter to add more legal weight - the cost will be minimal compared to losing that equipment financing.
Join the conversation
Just want to echo what others have said about being extra careful with debtor names and addresses. I've been filing UCCs in Texas for about 8 years now and the rejection rate for name/address errors seems to have gotten stricter lately. The $15 fee is definitely still current - I filed three UCC-1s last week and all were $15 each. One tip I'd add is to always double-check that your debtor's legal name exactly matches what's on their articles of incorporation or organization. Even something like "Inc." vs "Incorporated" can cause a rejection. Good luck with your filing!
Thanks for that insight about Texas getting stricter on name/address rejections lately! As someone new to UCC filings, I really appreciate the tip about matching exactly with incorporation documents. It sounds like even small formatting differences can be costly. The 8 years of experience definitely shows - I'll make sure to be extra meticulous with the debtor information before submitting.
As a newcomer to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly informative! I'm planning my first Texas UCC-1 filing next month and had no idea about some of these potential pitfalls. The $15 fee seems very reasonable compared to what I've heard about other states. I'm definitely going to take everyone's advice about being extra careful with debtor names and building in buffer time for processing. Quick question - for someone doing their first filing, would you recommend having an experienced attorney review the UCC-1 before submission, or is the online portal pretty straightforward once you have all the correct information?
Welcome to UCC filings! The Texas portal is actually pretty user-friendly once you get the hang of it. For your first filing, I'd say it depends on the complexity of your transaction and your comfort level. If it's a straightforward equipment loan with a standard debtor name and clear collateral description, the portal walks you through each step pretty well. But if there are any complexities - like multiple debtors, unusual collateral, or you're unsure about the legal entity name - having an attorney review it first could save you the $15 rejection fee and potential delays. Many of us here learned through trial and error, but there's definitely value in getting it right the first time!
Join the conversation
Final thought - whatever description you use, make sure you keep good records of what equipment was actually included at the time of filing. I've seen situations where people had to reconstruct the collateral coverage years later and it was a nightmare without proper documentation.
Good advice - I'll make sure to document everything clearly in the file. Thanks everyone for all the helpful input on this!
You're welcome! These collateral description questions come up all the time, so you're definitely not alone in wrestling with the details.
Really appreciate all the detailed responses here! I'm leaning toward the hybrid approach several of you mentioned - being specific on the 6 major pieces of equipment (with make/model/serial numbers) and then using broader language like "and all other manufacturing equipment, machinery, tools, and fixtures, whether now owned or hereafter acquired" to cover everything else. This seems like it gives the best of both worlds - clear identification of the valuable items while maintaining broad coverage for future acquisitions. Going to review my security agreement language one more time to make sure everything aligns before filing. Thanks for helping me think through this!
Chloe Martin
Think I can clarify this - a 'UCC claim' is really just shorthand for having a secured position under the Uniform Commercial Code. You establish this by filing UCC-1 financing statements that put the world on notice of your security interest. When the debtor defaults, you 'claim' or assert those rights. The filing creates the claim, enforcement realizes the value.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Pretty much! The UCC-1 filing creates your secured claim. 'Claiming' or enforcing happens when you exercise those rights during default or bankruptcy.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•This thread has been super helpful. I was confused about the same terminology in my compliance training.
0 coins
Leeann Blackstein
This has been really educational! I work in credit management and see UCC filings all the time but never fully understood the enforcement side. One thing I'm curious about - when you have a UCC-1 on file and the customer defaults, do you have to give them notice before repossessing collateral? Or can you just show up and take the equipment? I assume there are some procedural requirements to protect debtors' rights, but I've never seen the actual enforcement process play out.
0 coins