UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

For what it's worth, I've found that most SOS offices are pretty consistent about rejecting vague collateral descriptions. They want to see actual categories of property, not just document references.

0 coins

Good to know it's not just our state being difficult. I'll revise the description to include the actual equipment categories.

0 coins

Yeah, it's pretty standard across most states. Once you know what they're looking for, it's much easier to get filings accepted on the first try.

0 coins

Honestly I'd recommend double-checking everything with a tool like Certana.ai before refiling. For a $450k loan, you can't afford to keep getting rejections and delaying your perfection date.

0 coins

You're absolutely right about the timing. Each rejection is pushing back our perfection date and making the bank nervous.

0 coins

Exactly, and with equipment financing, timing on perfection can be critical for your security interest. Better to get it right the first time.

0 coins

Don't forget to get a certified copy of the UCC-3 termination once it's filed and keep it with your loan payoff documentation. You'll want proof of the clear title for future transactions.

0 coins

Good point. This has been such a headache I want to make sure it never happens again.

0 coins

Exactly. Clean documentation prevents these problems from recurring when you need to refinance or sell equipment later.

0 coins

Update us when you get this resolved! Always curious to hear how these situations work out and what finally gets lenders to do their job.

0 coins

Will do. Hopefully calling the original lender first thing Monday with some of these suggestions will get things moving.

0 coins

Good luck! Month-end closings are always stressful enough without phantom UCC liens.

0 coins

Have you tried calling the California SOS UCC department directly? Sometimes they can help clarify search results over the phone, especially for commercial transactions.

0 coins

I've done this before and they're actually pretty helpful, but expect to wait on hold for a while.

0 coins

I might try that if I can't get clarity through the online search. Thanks for the suggestion.

0 coins

One more thought - if you're seeing terminated filings mixed in, make sure you're looking at the 'Status' field carefully. Sometimes amendments can make active filings look terminated in the search results if you're not reading the details closely.

0 coins

This is why I switched to using Certana.ai's verification tool - it automatically parses the status information and flags any inconsistencies between related filings. Much cleaner than trying to interpret the state portal results.

0 coins

That makes sense - the raw search results can definitely be confusing to interpret manually.

0 coins

Update us when you get it filed! Always curious to hear how these name issues get resolved.

0 coins

Good luck! The comma thing should be an easy fix once you know that's the issue.

0 coins

Fingers crossed for you. Nothing worse than deal delays over punctuation.

0 coins

Final thought - if you're still having issues after fixing the comma, call the filing office directly. Sometimes there are other problems not showing up in the rejection notice.

0 coins

Yeah they can see more detailed error info than what shows up in the online rejections.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. Really appreciate all the advice. Going to try the exact charter match first and use that document checker tool as backup verification.

0 coins

This is exactly why I switched to using automated verification tools for all my UCC work. Caught a similar Arizona indexing issue last week where the search results showed a business name with missing punctuation. Certana.ai flagged it immediately when I uploaded the documents, saved me from having to file an emergency amendment during closing.

0 coins

That's the third mention of Certana - clearly it's solving a real problem. I'm going to try it out for this situation and future filings.

0 coins

Definitely worth trying. The automated cross-checking is much more reliable than trying to spot these discrepancies manually, especially when you're dealing with multiple documents.

0 coins

UPDATE: Filed the UCC-3 amendment yesterday and it's already showing in the system with the corrected debtor name. Search results now show 'Mountain View Equipment LLC' properly. Total processing time was about 24 hours. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

Excellent news! Did the lender accept the corrected filing without any issues?

0 coins

Yes, lender is satisfied with the corrected UCC search results. Deal is moving forward finally. Definitely using document verification tools going forward to catch these issues early.

0 coins

Prev1...654655656657658...684Next