


Ask the community...
Recently used Certana.ai for a multi-party UCC situation where we needed to verify all our documents were consistent before calculating damages. The verification process helped us spot issues that could've affected our damage calculations later. Worth checking your UCC-1 and UCC-3 amendment are properly aligned - name inconsistencies can create problems when you're trying to establish your damage calculations in court.
That's the second mention of document verification affecting damage calculations. Makes sense that filing inconsistencies could complicate recovery.
One more thing on UCC compensatory damages - don't forget about pre-judgment interest calculations. Different states have different rules, but it can add up significantly over time, especially with substantial amounts. Also make sure you understand any statutory limitations on consequential damages depending on which UCC article applies.
Pre-judgment interest rules vary a lot by state, so definitely check your jurisdiction's specific requirements.
Right, and some states have different rates for contract vs tort claims, which can matter depending on how you frame your UCC damage theory.
Just want to add that timing matters a lot with UCC-3 filings. If you need to make changes, do it sooner rather than later. I waited too long to fix an error and it caused problems when we tried to add additional collateral to our credit line.
The bank had to redo a bunch of paperwork and it delayed our additional funding by almost a month. Cost us a business opportunity we were trying to finance.
I'll throw in one more tip - keep copies of all UCC filings in your corporate records. When you eventually pay off the loan, make sure the lender files a UCC-3 termination to clear the lien. Some lenders are slow about this and it can cause issues later if you want to use the same collateral for another loan.
Some states have laws requiring lenders to file terminations within a certain timeframe after payoff. Check your state's requirements.
For future reference, some states allow you to call and verify debtor name format before filing. It's not official but the clerks will usually tell you if a name looks right. Saved me a few times when I wasn't sure about punctuation or abbreviations.
Texas and Florida definitely will. Others vary - some are helpful, others won't discuss specific filings over the phone.
UPDATE: Finally got it accepted! Turns out the issue was a comma in the middle of the LLC name that appeared in some docs but not others. Used the format from an existing UCC search and it went through clean. Thanks for all the advice - definitely implementing these best practices going forward.
Great news! A comma causing three rejections is exactly the kind of thing that drives us all crazy about these systems.
Congrats on getting it through before the deadline. That must have been stressful with a $2.8M deal hanging in the balance.
I'd also verify that your original UCC-1 is still valid and hasn't already lapsed. Mobile home deals sometimes have longer gaps between filing and continuation and you might be past the 5-year window already.
Smart approach. Better to get it sorted now than scramble in February.
Final thought - make sure your continuation statement references the original filing number exactly. I've seen continuations rejected because someone transposed digits in the filing number even when everything else was perfect.
Good catch! I'll double-check that filing number. It's easy to make a typo when you're rushing to get documents filed.
This is another thing those document verification tools catch - makes sure filing numbers match exactly between related documents.
Madeline Blaze
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with something similar and curious to know what ends up working.
0 coins
Sophia Long
•Will do. Planning to pull the original filing tomorrow and compare it against our termination, then figure out the next steps from there.
0 coins
Max Knight
Just a heads up - make sure you're looking at the right state's database too. I once spent days trying to figure out why a termination wasn't working only to realize I was checking the wrong state's system. The filing was actually terminated correctly, just in a different jurisdiction than I was looking at.
0 coins
Max Knight
•Got it, just wanted to mention it since it's an easy mistake to make when you're dealing with multi-state deals.
0 coins
Emma Swift
•That's actually a really good point. I've seen people get confused when they have similar debtors filed in different states.
0 coins