Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - make sure you're using the correct filing number from the original UCC-1 on your termination. I've seen cases where people get the debtor name right but use an incorrect or partial filing number, which also causes rejections. The filing number has to match exactly, including any leading zeros or specific formatting that the state requires.
Good point about the filing number formatting. Some states are really picky about that.
I double-checked the filing number and it looks correct, but I'll verify the formatting requirements for my state.
Update us on what works! I have a similar situation coming up next month with a client whose corporate name changed after their original UCC-1 filing. Would love to know which approach is most successful.
Will do! I'm going to try filing with the original debtor name format first and include a cover letter as suggested.
That's probably your best bet. Keep us posted on how it goes.
Join the conversation
For a loan officer, I'd focus on three key Article 9 concepts: 1) Attachment (your security interest becomes enforceable) 2) Perfection (you get priority over other creditors) 3) Priority rules (who gets paid first in bankruptcy). Master those and you'll handle 90% of your secured lending issues.
Attachment requires: signed security agreement, value given, and debtor has rights in the collateral. Usually happens at closing but can be delayed if collateral is acquired later.
And perfection is typically your UCC-1 filing, though some collateral types require possession or control instead of filing.
Just want to add that Article 9 interacts with federal law in some areas - aircraft liens under FAA regulations, ship mortgages, some intellectual property. Don't assume Article 9 always governs just because you're dealing with personal property.
Good to know. We don't do aircraft or ship financing but I could see IP issues coming up with some of our tech company borrowers.
Copyright and trademark security interests can be tricky - federal registration systems sometimes preempt Article 9 filing requirements.
Join the conversation
Look I'm not trying to hijack the thread but this whole situation reminds me of when I was dealing with a general security agreement for a restaurant chain and the entity had like 4 different name variations across different documents. The GSA used one name, the loan docs used another, the state filings used a third... it was a nightmare to sort out which name to use for the UCC filing.
That sounds like a mess! Multiple name variations always complicate things.
It was! Took three attempts to get the UCC filing accepted. Now I always verify the exact legal entity name first thing, no matter what the general security agreement says.
Update us when you get it sorted out! This thread has been really helpful for understanding the relationship between general security agreement terms and UCC filing requirements.
Will do! Going to pull the exact entity name from state records and refile tomorrow. Thanks everyone for the advice.
Good luck! The debtor name issue trips up a lot of people.
Join the conversation
One more thing - security agreements don't typically include dispute resolution procedures like arbitration clauses or forum selection. Those usually go in the main loan agreement. The security agreement should focus on the collateral and the secured party's rights in that collateral.
Though some security agreements do include enforcement procedures like self-help repossession rights or notice requirements for Article 9 sales.
True, but those are specifically about exercising rights in the collateral after default. Different from general contract dispute resolution.
Thanks everyone, this really helps clarify the boundaries. It sounds like the main things NOT in security agreements are: UCC filing administrative details, loan payment terms, other creditor information, regulatory compliance matters, and general contract dispute procedures. The security agreement should focus on creating the security interest, describing collateral, and defining secured party rights in that collateral.
Exactly. Document consistency is crucial for perfection. I'd recommend using automated verification tools like Certana.ai mentioned earlier to catch discrepancies before they become problems.
Perfect, I'll use this to build our compliance checklist. Really appreciate everyone's input on this!
Gabrielle Dubois
For future reference, New York also requires the organizational ID number for LLCs. Make sure you include that in your UCC-1 - it's in addition to getting the name right. The state's pretty good about rejecting filings that are missing required info.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
•Good reminder about the org ID. That's caught me before - filed everything perfectly except forgot that one field.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
•New York's rejection notices are usually pretty clear about what's missing, but it's better to get it right the first time.
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
One more thing to consider - if you're doing a lot of New York filings, it's worth getting familiar with their electronic filing system. It's actually pretty user-friendly once you learn the quirks. And they process electronic filings faster than paper ones.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•Electronic filing also gives you immediate confirmation, which is nice when you're dealing with tight deadlines.
0 coins
Raj Gupta
•Plus electronic filings are cheaper. Every little bit helps when you're doing multiple filings.
0 coins