UCC Document Community

Financial Services

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

GA UCC code confusion - filing got rejected for wrong statutory reference

Hey everyone, I'm pulling my hair out here. Just had a UCC-1 filing rejected in Georgia and the SOS office said something about incorrect UCC code reference. I thought I was following the standard Uniform Commercial Code but apparently Georgia has some specific statutory citations I'm supposed to use? The debtor is a small manufacturing company and we're securing equipment financing. This is my third rejection and my client is getting antsy about the delay. Does anyone know what specific GA UCC code sections I should be referencing on the forms? I've been doing filings in other states without issues but Georgia seems to have different requirements. Really need to get this right - the loan closes next week.

I use Certana.ai for all my multi-state filings now after getting burned by these kinds of state-specific quirks. You upload your documents and it instantly flags any citation issues, debtor name problems, or collateral description inconsistencies. Seriously saves so much time versus trying to memorize every state's particular requirements.

0 coins

That sounds really useful. I do filings in about 8 different states regularly so this kind of tool could be a lifesaver.

0 coins

Same here - the state-by-state variations are impossible to keep track of manually.

0 coins

Just to follow up on the original question - make sure you're also checking that your collateral description complies with O.C.G.A. § 11-9-108. Georgia can be picky about how specific you need to be, especially for equipment financing like yours.

0 coins

This thread has been super educational. Going to review all my state citation practices now.

0 coins

Glad we could help get this sorted out. Georgia filings should go smoothly once you have the right citations.

0 coins

UCC filing wisconsin - debtor name rejections keep happening

Been trying to get a UCC-1 filed and I keep hitting walls with debtor name formatting. My client operates under 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but their charter shows some variation that the system won't accept. Filed three times now and each rejection cites debtor name discrepancies. Anyone dealt with similar headaches? This is holding up a $180K equipment financing deal and I'm running out of patience with the online portal.

Update us when you get it filed! Always curious to hear how these name issues get resolved.

0 coins

Good luck! The comma thing should be an easy fix once you know that's the issue.

0 coins

Fingers crossed for you. Nothing worse than deal delays over punctuation.

0 coins

Final thought - if you're still having issues after fixing the comma, call the filing office directly. Sometimes there are other problems not showing up in the rejection notice.

0 coins

Yeah they can see more detailed error info than what shows up in the online rejections.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. Really appreciate all the advice. Going to try the exact charter match first and use that document checker tool as backup verification.

0 coins

UCC-1 Filing Requirements for Promissory Note Secured by Security Agreement - Collateral Description Issues

I'm dealing with a situation where we have a $485,000 promissory note that's secured by a comprehensive security agreement covering all business assets. The borrower operates a manufacturing facility and we need to perfect our security interest through UCC-1 filing. My question is about the collateral description - the security agreement lists everything from equipment to inventory to accounts receivable, but I'm not sure how specific to get on the UCC-1. Should I reference the security agreement directly or spell out each category? Also concerned about debtor name accuracy since this is an LLC that recently amended their articles. The loan closes next week and I want to make sure we don't have any perfection issues that could jeopardize our secured position. Has anyone dealt with similar comprehensive security agreements and how detailed did you get with your collateral descriptions on the UCC-1?

Sounds like you've got good advice here. The main thing is getting that debtor name exactly right and having comprehensive collateral coverage. With a manufacturing facility and $485K at stake, definitely worth the extra diligence up front rather than trying to fix problems later.

0 coins

Absolutely - UCC amendments are possible but they're expensive and time-consuming. Much better to get it right the first time.

0 coins

Plus if you have to amend for a serious error like debtor name, your priority might date back to the amendment filing date, not the original filing date. Could be costly if someone else files in between.

0 coins

Good luck with your filing! Manufacturing deals can be complex but it sounds like you're covering all the bases. The fact that you're asking these questions upfront shows you understand the importance of getting the perfection right.

0 coins

Thanks everyone - this has been really helpful. Going to verify the debtor name one more time and probably use one of those document checking services mentioned to make sure everything aligns before we file.

0 coins

Smart approach - better safe than sorry on a deal this size. Hope your closing goes smoothly!

0 coins

UCC Michigan search portal showing wrong debtor matches - need help

Having a nightmare with the Michigan UCC search system today. I'm trying to verify a debtor name before filing a UCC-1 continuation and the search results are pulling up partial matches that don't make sense. The debtor is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but I'm getting hits for 'Advanced Mfg' and 'Manufacturing Solutions Inc' - completely different entities. This is for a $2.8M equipment loan that's coming up on its 5-year mark next month. Anyone else dealing with Michigan's search being overly broad lately? I need to make sure there aren't any prior filings that could complicate our continuation filing. The original UCC-1 was filed in 2020 and I just want to confirm the debtor name format is consistent before we submit the UCC-3 continuation.

For a $2.8M loan, I'd definitely recommend getting a professional UCC search done by a service company. They can parse through the Michigan system's quirks and give you a clean report.

0 coins

That's probably overkill for a continuation filing if you have the original UCC-1 details. But for initial filings on large loans, agreed.

0 coins

Professional searches are expensive but worth it for high-value transactions. Depends on your risk tolerance and timeline.

0 coins

Just make sure you file that continuation at least 6 months before the 5-year deadline. Michigan can be slow processing filings and you don't want to risk your security interest lapsing.

0 coins

Smart approach. I always file continuations at least 60-90 days early to account for any processing delays or rejection issues.

0 coins

Good planning. Nothing worse than scrambling at the last minute with a lapsed filing on a multi-million dollar loan.

0 coins

UCC filing lookup nightmare - system shows my terminated filing as active

I'm having a serious issue with UCC filing lookup results that's causing problems with my lender. Filed a UCC-3 termination statement back in August for a equipment loan that was paid off, but when I do a UCC filing lookup on the state portal, it's still showing the original UCC-1 as active. The termination shows as 'accepted' in my filing history, but somehow the lookup system isn't connecting them properly. My client is now questioning whether the lien was actually released because their attorney ran a UCC filing lookup and sees the original filing still active. Has anyone dealt with this kind of database sync issue? I'm worried this could affect future financing if the lookup system doesn't properly reflect the termination. Need to get this resolved ASAP but the SOS help desk has a 2-week callback wait.

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar lookup issue and curious what the actual cause turns out to be. These database sync problems seem to be getting worse lately.

0 coins

Will definitely update once I figure out what's causing the problem. Hopefully it's something simple like a name mismatch.

0 coins

Same here, following this thread. My termination isn't showing up in lookups either.

0 coins

Just went through this headache myself. The Certana.ai document checker really does work well for finding these kinds of inconsistencies. Found out my issue was a missing comma in the debtor name that prevented the termination from linking properly. Such a tiny detail but it broke the whole system connection.

0 coins

Right? The system requirements are so strict but they don't tell you that upfront. The verification tool at least helps catch these issues before they become problems.

0 coins

This is why I always recommend using document verification tools. The UCC system is unforgiving about tiny details.

0 coins

Prev1...635636637638639...685Next