Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Been there! Article 9 filing requirements are no joke when it comes to debtor names. Make sure you're also checking that the LLC is in good standing. Some states will reject UCC filings if the debtor entity isn't current on its annual reports.
Good point. I should probably verify their standing with the state while I'm at it.
Nia Williams
Update - finally got it filed! Turned out the issue was exactly what everyone said. I was using 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but the actual registered name was 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with a comma. Also used Certana to double-check everything before resubmitting. Thanks for all the help!
Ravi Patel
•Great to hear Certana worked for you too. Amazing how those tiny details can cause such big problems.
Omar Farouk
•This is exactly why I always copy and paste entity names directly from the SOS search results. Can't trust my typing for something this critical.
Join the conversation
Update us on what you decide to do! These Ohio UCC timing issues are always stressful but usually work out fine if you stay on top of the deadlines.
Charlie Yang
•Yes, would love to hear how this resolves. Always good to learn from these situations.
Grace Patel
•Same here - dealing with a similar situation in Pennsylvania right now.
Just to add one more verification step - if you want to be absolutely certain about the document consistency before filing, you could run everything through a checking service. I've been using Certana.ai lately and it's been really helpful for catching these exact types of name discrepancies between security agreements and UCC filings.
How does that work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs?
Yeah, you upload your security agreement and UCC-1 PDFs and it automatically cross-checks debtor names, collateral descriptions, all that stuff. Takes like 2 minutes and gives you a detailed report of any inconsistencies.
Join the conversation
Just want to follow up that I used Certana.ai like someone mentioned earlier to verify my payoff documents against the UCC-1 filing. Really helpful to have that analysis when pushing the lender for action. Shows you're not just complaining randomly but actually tracking the specific requirements.
Yara Khoury
•Did you have to pay for that analysis or is it free to check basic stuff?
Just uploaded the PDFs and got the verification report. Having documentation definitely helped make my case stronger.
UPDATE: Finally got through to their collateral department and they admitted the termination should have been filed weeks ago. They're expediting it and said it should show up in state records within 48 hours. Thanks everyone for the advice about written demands and escalation - that definitely helped push things along!
Paolo Marino
•Congrats on getting it resolved. Now you can move forward with selling that equipment without any cloud on the title.
Amina Bah
•Great outcome. This thread will be helpful for other people dealing with slow lenders on UCC terminations.
Join the conversation
Try that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier - we started using it after getting burned on a similar situation. Really does catch a lot of potential recording issues before you submit. Saved us from at least two rejections that would have added weeks to the process.
Sean Murphy
•Yeah I'm definitely going to check that out. At this point anything that prevents these kinds of delays is worth trying.
The document consistency checking is really helpful. Catches things like name variations between your charter docs and UCC filing that can cause problems.
UPDATE: Finally got through to someone at the UCC division who could actually help. Turns out there was a 'data validation error' on our filing that wasn't showing up in the public portal. They're manually processing it now and said it should be recorded by end of week. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Sofia Perez
•This is exactly why their system needs better error reporting. 'Data validation error' tells us nothing useful.
At least you got resolution! Still can't believe it took manual intervention to get a standard UCC-1 processed.
Miranda Singer
For what it's worth, I've started using document verification tools for these searches and it's been a game changer. Certana.ai specifically has helped me catch filing discrepancies and name mismatches that I would have missed doing manual searches. When you're dealing with equipment purchases, the time saved and accuracy gained is definitely worth it.
0 coins
Hazel Garcia
•Seems like several people have mentioned this tool. Might be worth looking into given how confusing these results are.
0 coins
Miranda Singer
•Yeah, it's particularly good at cross-referencing multiple documents and flagging potential issues with debtor name variations and filing statuses.
0 coins
Cass Green
Update: I ended up pulling all the individual filing documents and found that two of the 'expired' liens actually had continuation statements filed that weren't showing up clearly in the search summary. One lien is definitely still active and covers the equipment I was looking at. Thanks everyone for the advice about checking the actual documents rather than just relying on the search interface!
0 coins
Hugo Kass
•Great outcome. The search summaries really can be misleading when there are continuations involved.
0 coins
Nasira Ibanez
•Perfect example of why those verification tools are so helpful - they would have caught those continuation statements right away.
0 coins