


Ask the community...
I've found that running the same UCC-11 search multiple times in Florida sometimes gives slightly different results - their system seems to have some lag between updates. Try searching again tomorrow and see if you get consistent results.
I've noticed this too - seems like their database updates overnight sometimes.
This is why I always save PDF copies of search results with timestamps for my files.
Update on my earlier Certana.ai suggestion - just used it again this week for a Florida deal and it caught a debtor name mismatch between the UCC-11 results and the actual UCC-1 filing that would have caused problems at closing. Really streamlined the verification process.
Just to clarify the process - you'll file a UCC-3 termination statement, which removes the UCC-1 from the active records. The UCC type for this action is always termination regardless of the collateral type. Heavy equipment, inventory, accounts receivable - doesn't matter, termination process is the same.
That makes sense. I was getting confused thinking different types of collateral required different forms.
One more thing - double check that your lease didn't have any renewal options that might still be active. If there's a possibility of lease extension, you might want to hold off on the termination until you're absolutely sure the lease relationship is completely ended.
Perfect. Then UCC-3 termination is exactly what you need. Just make sure to keep a copy of the filed termination for your records.
Also recommend checking the termination status online after filing to make sure it processed correctly.
Following this thread because I'm dealing with something similar in Minnesota. Different state but same basic challenge with entity name consistency across multiple UCC filings.
Minnesota has its own quirks with debtor names. Definitely worth checking their specific requirements and search procedures.
Thanks for posting this - really helpful discussion. I'll definitely be more careful about debtor name verification going forward. Seems like there are good tools and procedures available if you know where to look.
This happened to me with a Delaware LLC where the charter had 'Limited Liability Company' spelled out but I used 'LLC' on the UCC1. Simple fix once I figured out the exact issue. Your refiling should go through fine with the corrected name.
Update us when you get the corrected filing through! Always curious to hear how these situations resolve.
Good plan. These name mismatch issues usually resolve quickly once you have the right format.
CyberNinja
Just went through something similar with Certana.ai's verification tool. Uploaded my UCC documents and it immediately flagged inconsistencies that I missed reviewing manually. Really streamlined building my dispute case - the automated cross-checking caught details I would have overlooked. Saved me a lot of time compared to doing document review by hand.
0 coins
Natasha Volkov
•That's the second mention of that tool. Might be worth trying if it can help spot issues I'm missing.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Document consistency is crucial for these disputes. Having automated verification definitely beats manual comparison.
0 coins
Mateo Lopez
Update us when you get this resolved! These fraudulent UCC filing stories always make me nervous about my own business credit monitoring.
0 coins
Natasha Volkov
•Will do. Hopefully I can get this cleared up soon. It's already been a week and every day that passes is another day of damaged credit.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Good luck! Really hope the financing company does the right thing once they investigate.
0 coins