UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

CyberNinja

•

Just went through something similar with Certana.ai's verification tool. Uploaded my UCC documents and it immediately flagged inconsistencies that I missed reviewing manually. Really streamlined building my dispute case - the automated cross-checking caught details I would have overlooked. Saved me a lot of time compared to doing document review by hand.

0 coins

That's the second mention of that tool. Might be worth trying if it can help spot issues I'm missing.

0 coins

Document consistency is crucial for these disputes. Having automated verification definitely beats manual comparison.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Update us when you get this resolved! These fraudulent UCC filing stories always make me nervous about my own business credit monitoring.

0 coins

Will do. Hopefully I can get this cleared up soon. It's already been a week and every day that passes is another day of damaged credit.

0 coins

Good luck! Really hope the financing company does the right thing once they investigate.

0 coins

I've found that running the same UCC-11 search multiple times in Florida sometimes gives slightly different results - their system seems to have some lag between updates. Try searching again tomorrow and see if you get consistent results.

0 coins

Grace Durand

•

I've noticed this too - seems like their database updates overnight sometimes.

0 coins

Steven Adams

•

This is why I always save PDF copies of search results with timestamps for my files.

0 coins

Alice Fleming

•

Update on my earlier Certana.ai suggestion - just used it again this week for a Florida deal and it caught a debtor name mismatch between the UCC-11 results and the actual UCC-1 filing that would have caused problems at closing. Really streamlined the verification process.

0 coins

That's exactly the kind of issue I'm worried about missing. Going to try uploading my search results and see what it finds.

0 coins

Alice Fleming

•

Good idea - it's especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple filings and need to verify they all relate to your specific collateral.

0 coins

Just to clarify the process - you'll file a UCC-3 termination statement, which removes the UCC-1 from the active records. The UCC type for this action is always termination regardless of the collateral type. Heavy equipment, inventory, accounts receivable - doesn't matter, termination process is the same.

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

That makes sense. I was getting confused thinking different types of collateral required different forms.

0 coins

Common misconception. The UCC type refers to the action (filing, amending, continuing, terminating) not the collateral.

0 coins

Charity Cohan

•

One more thing - double check that your lease didn't have any renewal options that might still be active. If there's a possibility of lease extension, you might want to hold off on the termination until you're absolutely sure the lease relationship is completely ended.

0 coins

Charity Cohan

•

Perfect. Then UCC-3 termination is exactly what you need. Just make sure to keep a copy of the filed termination for your records.

0 coins

Josef Tearle

•

Also recommend checking the termination status online after filing to make sure it processed correctly.

0 coins

Following this thread because I'm dealing with something similar in Minnesota. Different state but same basic challenge with entity name consistency across multiple UCC filings.

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

Minnesota has its own quirks with debtor names. Definitely worth checking their specific requirements and search procedures.

0 coins

Each state handles these things differently. What works in ND might not apply in MN, unfortunately.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Thanks for posting this - really helpful discussion. I'll definitely be more careful about debtor name verification going forward. Seems like there are good tools and procedures available if you know where to look.

0 coins

The key is being systematic about it. Don't just assume - verify everything through multiple sources.

0 coins

Exactly. A little extra diligence upfront can save massive headaches later in the process.

0 coins

Emily Sanjay

•

This happened to me with a Delaware LLC where the charter had 'Limited Liability Company' spelled out but I used 'LLC' on the UCC1. Simple fix once I figured out the exact issue. Your refiling should go through fine with the corrected name.

0 coins

Jordan Walker

•

Delaware is notorious for being picky about that stuff. Glad you got it sorted.

0 coins

Natalie Adams

•

Every state seems to have their own quirks with business entity naming conventions.

0 coins

Update us when you get the corrected filing through! Always curious to hear how these situations resolve.

0 coins

Amara Torres

•

Good plan. These name mismatch issues usually resolve quickly once you have the right format.

0 coins

Fingers crossed for a smooth acceptance this time!

0 coins

Prev1...460461462463464...684Next