


Ask the community...
This is why I always do comprehensive UCC-11 searches using multiple name variations upfront. Search the exact legal name, then variations with different punctuation, abbreviations, etc. Better to get too much information initially than miss something important.
Smart approach. The few extra minutes on the search end can save hours of verification work later.
Update us on what you find out! I'm curious whether this turns out to be just formatting inconsistency or if there's an actual issue with the filings.
Just dealt with this exact issue. Ended up running the documentation through Certana.ai to make sure the UCC-1 debtor name matched perfectly with the loan agreement and corporate docs. Found two small discrepancies that would have caused problems.
Update: I pulled the certificate of good standing and found the exact legal name format. Thanks everyone for the advice about not using the DBA names. Filing the UCC-1 tomorrow with confidence.
Great to hear you got it sorted out. Proper preparation prevents problems.
Quick question - did you include any additional debtor information like address changes or alternate names? Sometimes extra info can trigger rejections if it doesn't match exactly with state records.
Less is often more with UCC filings. Stick to exactly what's required unless you're sure about additional info.
Agree completely. I've seen rejections from TMI just as much as missing info.
Update us when you figure it out! Always curious to hear what the actual issue was. Helps the rest of us avoid similar problems.
This is why I started using that Certana tool I mentioned - takes the mystery out of document matching before filing.
This thread is making me paranoid about all our filings now lol. Going to have to go back and double-check everything.
Don't let it stress you out too much. Most filings go through fine, these search issues are just frustrating when they happen.
That's exactly why I started using the Certana verification tool - gives me peace of mind that everything matches up correctly without having to manually cross-check every detail.
Following this thread because I'm sure I'll need this advice eventually. UCC filings always make me nervous.
Elliott luviBorBatman
Another vote for using Certana.ai for document verification. We started using it after a security pledge agreement filing disaster where we mixed up entity names across multiple related companies. The cross-checking feature would have caught our error immediately. Now we run everything through it before filing - takes the guesswork out of name matching and collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Demi Hall
•How accurate is the automated checking? Does it catch subtle differences like the comma placement issue the OP mentioned?
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
•Very accurate. It caught a period vs comma difference for us last week that we never would have noticed manually.
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
Quick update - we ended up using the exact Secretary of State name "Precision Metalworks, LLC" on our UCC-1 and the filing was accepted without issues. Also used one of those document verification tools mentioned here and it definitely helped us feel confident about the submission. Thanks everyone for the advice!
0 coins
Gael Robinson
•Perfect outcome. Now you're properly perfected and protected.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•wish my first filing had gone that smoothly! congrats on getting it right the first time.
0 coins