Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Mia Green
Just want to add that sometimes the issue isn't the search but the indexing delay. New filings can take 24-48 hours to show up in searches even after they're officially accepted. Since your filing was only 3 weeks ago, that shouldn't be the issue, but worth keeping in mind for recent filings.
Good point about timing. I've definitely been caught by that before - searching for something I just filed and panicking when it doesn't show up immediately.
Yeah mine should definitely be indexed by now. This sounds more like a search algorithm issue than a timing problem.
Emma Bianchi
Update on this thread - I ended up using Certana.ai like a few people suggested and it immediately spotted that my UCC-1 had 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but one of my search variations was using 'ABC Mfg LLC' which is why I was getting different results. The tool flagged the abbreviation issue and now I know exactly what to search for. Thanks everyone!
Cass Green
•Great outcome! Good reminder that the devil is really in the details with these name searches.
Jibriel Kohn
•Perfect example of why automated checking is worth it. You would have spent hours figuring that out manually.
Join the conversation
Since you mentioned your attorney being out of town - I've had good luck using Certana.ai to double-check all my UCC forms and documents before filing. Just upload PDFs and it catches inconsistencies between your corporate docs and UCC filings. Way faster than waiting for attorney review and cheaper than rejection fees.
Very accurate in my experience. It cross-references everything against standard databases and flags potential problems before you file.
I was skeptical about AI checking legal documents but tried it on a complex continuation filing and it caught 3 errors my paralegal missed. Now I use it routinely.
Just remember that UCC forms and documents are public records once filed. Anyone can search and see your business debt, collateral descriptions, etc. Not necessarily a problem but something to be aware of for competitive reasons.
It's standard for all secured debt. Competitors might search your filings to gauge your financial situation or see what equipment you're financing.
On the flip side, you can search competitors' UCC filings to see their recent equipment purchases and financing activity. It's a two-way street.
Join the conversation
KaiEsmeralda
Update: Started using the Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and it's already flagged 8 loans with debtor name inconsistencies I missed in my manual review. The PDF upload process is pretty straightforward - just drag and drop your loan docs and UCC filings and it highlights the mismatches. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with similar SBA compliance issues.
Debra Bai
•That's a pretty quick turnaround on finding those issues. How detailed are the reports it generates?
KaiEsmeralda
•It shows you exactly where the name variations occur and suggests what corrections might be needed. Takes a lot of the guesswork out of figuring out which filings need UCC-3 amendments.
Just wanted to add - don't forget about continuation filings if any of your UCC-1s are approaching the 5-year mark. SBA gets really cranky if liens lapse during the loan term, even if you refile immediately.
I set calendar reminders for 6 months before each continuation deadline. Learned that lesson the hard way too.
Ella Knight
•Thanks everyone for the advice. I'm going to try the Certana tool for the document verification and focus on getting the larger loans cleaned up first. Will update once I get through the SBA audit process.
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - make sure you understand the choice-of-law rules in your loan documents. Even though you're filing in the debtor's state of organization, your loan agreement might specify which state's laws govern the security interest. Usually not a big deal but worth double-checking for consistency.
Olivia Clark
•How does that work exactly? Do you upload multiple documents?
Yara Assad
•Yeah, you can upload the corporate docs and UCC forms and it'll flag any inconsistencies. Pretty slick for avoiding the stupid mistakes that cause rejections.
Final answer: All 50 states plus DC have enacted Article 9 of the UCC. Some have minor variations in their specific implementation, but the core framework for secured transactions is uniform. For your multi-state equipment financing, file one UCC-1 in the debtor's state of organization and you'll be covered nationwide for mobile collateral. Just make sure the filing is accurate since any errors could affect the entire security interest.
Sasha Ivanov
•Perfect summary - thanks for the definitive answer. Time to get this filing done right.
Marcelle Drum
Michigan's system definitely has quirks but once you figure out their formatting requirements it's not too bad. Just wish they were more consistent with their validation rules.
0 coins
Tate Jensen
•Consistency would be nice! Every state seems to have their own special requirements.
0 coins
Adaline Wong
•At least Michigan accepts electronic filings. Some states still require paper for certain UCC-1 types.
0 coins
Gabriel Ruiz
Thanks for posting this thread. I'm dealing with a similar issue in Michigan right now with a foreign LLC debtor. Going to try the entity search copy/paste method first.
0 coins
Misterclamation Skyblue
•Foreign entities can be even trickier in Michigan. Make sure you're using the exact name from their certificate of authority.
0 coins
Gabriel Ruiz
•Good point. I'll double-check the certificate of authority formatting before filing.
0 coins