Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Update us when you get it figured out! Always curious to hear how these installment contract name issues get resolved.
Malik Thomas
•Will do! Going to re-file with the exact SOS registered name and revise the collateral description to be more specific. Hopefully third time's the charm.
Jamal Carter
•Good luck! These installment contract UCCs can be frustrating but you'll get it sorted.
Just wanted to chime in that I had a similar installment contract situation last week and the Certana document verification caught a subtle name issue I would have missed. Saved me from another rejection cycle. Worth trying if you're still having problems.
Mei Liu
•These document verification tools are becoming essential for installment contract work. Too easy to miss small details manually.
Agreed. The old way of manually comparing contracts to UCC forms is too error-prone, especially with complex installment agreements.
Join the conversation
I'm dealing with something similar in Virginia right now. The frustrating part is that their online portal should be smart enough to catch obvious variations but it's not. Makes me wonder how many liens are effectively 'hidden' due to name formatting differences.
Eva St. Cyr
•That's a scary thought for lenders. How do you have confidence that your search was comprehensive enough?
Honestly, I don't always have that confidence. That's why I started using document verification tools to double-check my work.
Update: I finally got this resolved by doing searches under every conceivable name variation and then cross-referencing the results. Turns out there were actually 5 different filings under slightly different name formats. Thank goodness I caught them all before filing my UCC-1.
Axel Far
•This is why I always recommend using verification tools like Certana.ai for complex searches. Would have saved you hours of manual work.
You're probably right. I'll look into that for next time. The manual process was exhausting and I'm not 100% confident I would catch everything on my own again.
Join the conversation
Don't forget about the 20-year rule for fixture filings. If the fixture filing is approaching its 20-year limit, the priority could shift even if the UCC-1 continuation is properly maintained. This might not be relevant for your 2021 fixture filing, but it's something to keep in mind for long-term planning.
Ava Martinez
•I didn't even know there was a 20-year rule for fixture filings. Is that universal or state-specific?
It's in the UCC, so it's generally universal, but some states might have variations. Always check your local law to be sure.
Ravi Kapoor
This thread is making me paranoid about our own UCC filings. We have several equipment loans with UCC-1 filings that are coming up for continuation in the next year. Should I be worried about priority issues if we're not in bankruptcy?
If you're not in bankruptcy, standard UCC priority rules apply. Just make sure your continuations are filed on time and with accurate information. The key is maintaining the chain of perfection.
Set up calendar reminders for continuation deadlines. Missing a continuation filing is one of the easiest ways to lose secured status.
Join the conversation
Jayden Reed
One more thing to consider - check if your state has any specific rules about LLC name variations. Some states are more forgiving about punctuation in LLC names than others. But honestly, just file the amendment. It's not worth the research time when the fix is so simple.
Nora Brooks
•Good point about state variations. The UCC rules are generally uniform but some states have quirky interpretations.
Eli Wang
•Exactly. And even if your state is forgiving, you never know if the loan might get sold to someone in a stricter jurisdiction.
Update for everyone following this thread - I filed the UCC-3 amendment this morning and it was accepted within 2 hours. The corrected UCC filing records now show the proper debtor name with the comma. Thanks everyone for the advice! This could have been a major problem if we hadn't caught it. Definitely going to implement better name-checking procedures going forward.
Awesome that you got it resolved so quickly. Electronic UCC-3 filing is definitely the way to go for corrections.
Ethan Scott
•Smart move fixing it immediately. Now you can sleep soundly knowing your security interest is properly perfected!
Kaitlyn Jenkins
Just want to add that if this is for equipment financing, make sure your collateral description is solid too. I've seen perfect debtor names get invalidated because the collateral description was too vague. 'All equipment' doesn't cut it anymore in most jurisdictions.
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
•Good reminder. I think our collateral description is detailed enough but I should double-check that too.
0 coins
Caleb Bell
•Yeah collateral descriptions are getting stricter. Had a filing rejected last month because 'office equipment' was deemed too broad.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
Update on this if you figure it out! I have a similar situation coming up next week and would love to know how you resolve the name discrepancy issue.
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
•Will do. Planning to get this sorted out early next week. Thanks everyone for the advice - this is exactly the kind of insight I was hoping for.
0 coins