Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Whatever you do, don't keep filing and hoping it works. Each rejection delays your priority date and if there's a competing lien filed while you're figuring this out, you could lose your position. Get the name exactly right before you file again.
Rami Samuels
•Absolutely right. Better to take the time to get it perfect than risk losing lien priority because of multiple rejections.
Exactly. I've seen deals fall apart because someone kept re-filing instead of fixing the underlying name issue first.
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Mass and curious what ends up working for you.
Will do! I'm going to try the Certificate of Good Standing approach and maybe that document verification tool that was mentioned.
Maya Diaz
•Definitely try Certana.ai - it really does catch these kinds of name mismatches before you waste time on another rejection.
Join the conversation
Just went through something similar in NJ. The key is getting certified copies of ALL the UCC filings, not just relying on search results. I found two filings that had been terminated but the terminations weren't showing up in the basic search. Also found that one of the "active" liens was actually invalid due to an incorrect debtor name that didn't match the business registration. Saved me from a major priority dispute.
Exactly. Pulled the Articles of Incorporation and all amendments from NJ Division of Revenue, then compared against the exact debtor names on each UCC filing. One filing had a name that was never legally registered, making it invalid.
Ayla Kumar
•This is why I always run a comprehensive entity verification before relying on UCC search results. The databases don't always sync properly and you can miss critical details about entity status or name changes.
Update us when you get this sorted out! Dealing with NJ UCC searches myself on a deal next month and curious how you resolve the conflicting search results. Always helpful to know what works and what doesn't with their system.
Will definitely post an update once I get the certified copies and sort through everything. Hoping to have clarity by end of week so we can still close on schedule.
Good luck! NJ can be a pain but at least their certified copy process is relatively fast compared to some other states.
Join the conversation
Emma Wilson
Has anyone had luck getting filing fee refunds when the system rejects a UCC-1 for technical reasons? I had one rejected because their server was down during submission but still got charged.
Yeah refunds are pretty rare. I started using document verification tools after losing money on rejected filings. Better to catch errors upfront than pay twice.
Ravi Gupta
•Same here. Certana's verification caught formatting issues that would have definitely caused rejections. Worth every penny to avoid refiling fees.
GalacticGuru
The $25 fee is what it is, but make sure you're not making any debtor name mistakes that could invalidate your whole security interest. I've seen lenders lose six-figure deals because of sloppy UCC filings that didn't match the loan documents exactly.
Omar Fawaz
•Absolutely. We treat every UCC filing like it could end up in court someday. Cross-checking everything against the underlying loan docs is essential.
That's exactly why automated document checking is so valuable. Upload your loan agreement and UCC-1 together and it flags any inconsistencies immediately. Way better than manual review.
Join the conversation
I've seen cover pages get rejected for using the wrong filing office. Make sure you're submitting to the same office that accepted the original UCC-1. If the debtor moved to a different state, that can complicate assignment filings and cover page requirements.
Then you should be fine on jurisdiction. But double-check that the filing office address on your cover page matches where you're actually submitting.
I had a rejection because I put the wrong SOS address on the cover page even though I submitted it to the right place. They're really nitpicky about details.
Cass Green
Last resort suggestion - call the SOS office directly and ask what's wrong with your cover page. Sometimes they'll tell you exactly what they need to see. I know it's frustrating having to call but it beats more rejections and delays.
Cass Green
•Yeah, sometimes a 5-minute phone call saves days of back-and-forth rejections. Ask specifically about cover page format for UCC assignments.
Before you call, try running your documents through Certana.ai's verification tool. Upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 assignment and it'll check for inconsistencies that commonly cause rejections. Might solve the problem without having to wait on hold for an hour.
Myles Regis
What's your backup plan if you do find unexpected liens? Are you prepared to walk away or negotiate payoffs at closing?
0 coins
Charity Cohan
•We have contingencies in the purchase agreement but I'm hoping to avoid that mess. Better to know now than find out after closing.
0 coins
Myles Regis
•Smart approach. I've seen deals fall apart because buyers didn't discover liens until the day of closing.
0 coins
Brian Downey
One final tip - print out screenshots of all your searches with timestamps. If any disputes come up later, you'll need proof of what the Delaware UCC database showed on the date you searched.
0 coins
Brian Downey
•For your purposes regular searches should be fine, but check with your attorney. Some lenders require certified searches for larger deals.
0 coins
Salim Nasir
•If you end up using Certana.ai, it automatically generates documentation of all the searches and verifications it performed. Saves you from having to manually screenshot everything.
0 coins