


Ask the community...
UPDATE: I ended up using Certana.ai to verify my UCC-1 before submitting and it caught two issues - a slight variation in our company name and a collateral description that was too vague. Fixed both problems and the filing was accepted without any issues. Thanks everyone for the help!
Great to see this thread worked out well for everyone! As someone who's been through the Ohio UCC filing process multiple times, I can confirm that the standard UCC-1 form really does cover most equipment financing situations. The key lessons here seem to be: 1) Use your exact legal entity name from corporate records, 2) Be specific but not overly detailed in collateral descriptions, 3) Confirm who should be listed as the secured party with your lender, and 4) Don't hesitate to use verification tools like Certana.ai if you're unsure about the details. It's much better to catch errors before filing than deal with rejections and delays. Ohio SOS has gotten faster with processing times lately, which is a nice improvement from a few years ago.
For completeness: they can also just keep the collateral in satisfaction of the debt under UCC 9-620, but they need to give proper notice and no one can object. Called 'strict foreclosure.' Not common but it's an option.
Exactly right. UCC 9-620(e) requires sale in that situation to protect consumers from losing valuable collateral.
This is really helpful context! I didn't even know about strict foreclosure as an option. So they have three main remedies: sue for the debt, repossess and sell, or just keep the collateral (with restrictions). Thanks for explaining the consumer goods protection too - that 60% rule is something I need to remember for the exam.
As someone new to UCC law, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm studying for my business law finals and the distinction between self-help repossession and judicial remedies was really confusing me. The key takeaway seems to be that while secured parties can repossess without court orders, they're limited by the "breach of peace" standard and various notice requirements. I'm particularly interested in how the definition of "breach of peace" varies by jurisdiction - are there any landmark cases that help define this standard more clearly? Also, the mention of documentation tools like Certana.ai is intriguing - it sounds like even small errors in UCC filings can have major consequences for enforcement rights.
Welcome to the community! You're absolutely right about the importance of proper documentation - I've seen cases fall apart over seemingly minor filing errors. For breach of peace cases, I'd recommend looking at Williams v. Ford Motor Credit (repo agent couldn't enter locked garage) and Chrysler Credit v. Koontz (physical confrontation made repo unlawful). The standards do vary significantly by state, but generally any use of force, breaking and entering, or continuing after the debtor objects will constitute breach of peace. It's fascinating how much the UCC tries to balance creditor rights with debtor protections!
Just a heads up on timing - Florida's electronic UCC system typically processes filings and sends confirmations within a few hours during business days, but I've seen it take up to 24 hours occasionally. Since you mentioned a 10-day lender deadline, filing tomorrow should give you plenty of buffer. Also, one small detail others haven't mentioned - when you're entering the collateral description, the system has a character limit so keep your description concise but comprehensive. Something like "Construction equipment including but not limited to excavators and bulldozers, serial numbers [list them], and all attachments, parts, and accessories thereto" usually works well and stays within limits.
That's a great point about the character limit - I hadn't thought about that! The collateral description format you suggested looks perfect and comprehensive without being too wordy. Really appreciate the heads up about the processing time variability too. With everyone's advice here, I'm feeling much more prepared for this filing. This community has been incredibly valuable for a newcomer like me navigating Florida's system for the first time.
As someone who's been handling UCC filings across multiple states for several years, I wanted to chime in with a couple additional Florida-specific tips that might help. First, Florida's sunbiz.org system has a really helpful "preview" feature before you submit - use it! It shows exactly how your filing will look and catches formatting issues. Second, if you're dealing with a debtor that has multiple legal entities or subsidiaries, double-check you're filing against the correct entity that actually owns or will own the equipment. I've seen deals where the parent company signed the financing docs but a subsidiary actually took title to the equipment. Florida is strict about getting the exact debtor entity right. Finally, consider setting up a sunbiz.org account if you plan to do more Florida filings - it saves your information and makes repeat filings much faster. Good luck with your filing!
I've been following this thread and wanted to share my experience from filing UCCs in multiple states. California is actually one of the easier ones to work with. A few practical tips that might help: 1) Print out the debtor's Articles of Incorporation and keep it right next to you while filling out the form - this prevents any name discrepancies, 2) For the collateral description, I usually go with something like "all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired by debtor" if you want broad coverage, and 3) Double-check that your loan agreement matches exactly what you're putting in the UCC filing. The California system will email you a filing receipt immediately, so you'll know right away if it went through. Don't overthink it - you've got this!
This is really comprehensive advice! I especially like the tip about keeping the Articles of Incorporation right next to you while filling out the form. That seems like such a simple way to avoid the name mistakes that seem to cause so many rejections. Quick question - when you say "all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired by debtor" - does that broader language create any issues, or is it generally accepted by California SOS?
That broad language is generally fine in California and actually recommended if you want maximum protection. The "now owned or hereafter acquired" part is especially important if the debtor might be purchasing additional equipment during the loan term. California SOS accepts this type of description regularly. Just make sure it reasonably relates to your collateral - if you're only securing against specific restaurant equipment, don't use language that would cover their office computers too. The key is being broad enough to protect your interests but specific enough to be enforceable.
Just want to echo what others have said about being meticulous with the debtor name - I learned this the hard way! One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you can actually call the California Secretary of State UCC division if you get stuck. They're surprisingly helpful and can walk you through any specific questions about your filing. The number is on their website under the UCC section. Also, after you file, I'd recommend doing a test search a few hours later to make sure your filing shows up correctly in their database. It gives you peace of mind and lets you catch any issues early. The $25 online filing fee is definitely worth it compared to the $40 paper option, plus you get that instant confirmation. You're asking all the right questions - that attention to detail will serve you well!
This is such valuable advice, especially about calling the California SOS UCC division directly! I had no idea they offered phone support for questions. That could really help ease my nerves about getting something wrong. The tip about doing a test search afterwards is brilliant too - I would definitely want to confirm everything went through properly. I'm feeling much more confident about tackling this filing now after reading everyone's experiences and suggestions. Thank you all for taking the time to share your knowledge!
I'm also new to UCC filings and this thread has been incredibly helpful! One thing I'm still wondering about - when you mention doing a test search after filing, approximately how long should I wait? I know someone mentioned a few hours, but I'm wondering if there's a more specific timeframe. Also, for the phone support with California SOS, do they have specific hours when the UCC division is available, or is it during regular business hours? I want to make sure I call at the right time if I need help. Thanks for all the great advice everyone - it's making this whole process seem much less intimidating!
Connor Murphy
Thanks everyone for the detailed responses! This has been incredibly helpful. I'm definitely going to file well before closing - sounds like that's the consensus for avoiding priority issues. One follow-up question: for the $180k equipment loan I mentioned, should I be concerned about any UCC search requirements? I know buyers typically do UCC searches during due diligence, but as the lender, do I need to search for existing liens before I file my UCC-1? I want to make sure I understand what liens might already be on this equipment and how that affects my position.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•Absolutely do a UCC search before filing! You need to know what liens already exist and their priority dates. If there are existing equipment liens from other lenders, you might be in second position which affects your risk and loan terms. Most title companies or legal service providers can run comprehensive UCC searches for around $50-100. Also search for tax liens and judgments that could take priority. Better to know the full picture upfront than get surprised later.
0 coins
Eli Wang
Great thread! As someone who's been burned by UCC filing mistakes before, I want to emphasize the importance of timing and coordination with your loan documentation. Make sure your security agreement and UCC-1 collateral descriptions are consistent - I've seen deals where the security agreement described "manufacturing equipment located at [specific address]" but the UCC-1 just said "equipment" which created confusion during enforcement. Also, if you're doing the filing yourself, consider using the state's UCC forms rather than generic ones - some states have specific formatting requirements that aren't obvious. For your LLC debtor name issue, definitely pull the entity info directly from the Secretary of State database the same day you're filing, since business status can change quickly. Good luck with your first UCC filing!
0 coins
Marcus Patterson
•This is excellent advice about consistency between documents! I'm curious - when you mention pulling entity info "the same day you're filing," how often do business statuses actually change? I'm wondering if I should make this part of my standard checklist or if it's more of an occasional concern. Also, do you have a preferred method for documenting that you verified the entity status on the filing date for your loan files?
0 coins