Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - if you file as fixtures, make sure your loan documents are consistent with that classification. The security agreement should specifically grant a security interest in fixtures, not just equipment. Mismatched loan docs can create perfection issues even if the UCC filing is correct.
Good point. I'll make sure our credit team reviews the security agreement language to match whatever classification we go with. Thanks for all the input everyone - this has been incredibly helpful.
Zara Mirza
•Glad it helped! These solar deals are becoming more common so it's good to build up the collective knowledge on how to handle the tricky classification issues.
Summer Green
As someone new to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm working on my first solar financing deal and was completely unaware of the fixture vs equipment classification nuances. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like the physical attachment method (ballasted vs penetrating) matters less than the intended permanence and integration with the building systems. Would it be fair to say that most commercial solar installations should default to fixture classification unless there's a specific reason to treat them as removable equipment? Also, for those mentioning Certana.ai - does anyone know if they have resources specifically for newcomers to understand these classification rules before using their verification tools?
Jacinda Yu
•Welcome to the UCC filing world! You're right that intended permanence typically trumps the physical attachment method. For commercial solar, I'd generally agree with defaulting to fixture classification - these systems are usually designed to be permanent parts of the building's energy infrastructure even when they're ballasted. The key factors are: (1) physical attachment to real property, (2) adaptation to the building's use, and (3) intent of permanence. Most commercial installations meet all three. As for newcomer resources, I'd suggest starting with your state's UCC filing guide and maybe consulting with experienced counsel on your first few deals before relying on automated tools. The classification rules can be state-specific and the stakes are too high to learn by trial and error.
Salim Nasir
•Great question! You're absolutely on the right track with that thinking. Commercial solar installations do typically lean toward fixture classification, but I'd add one important caveat - always check if there are any specific lease provisions or financing structures that might affect the classification. For example, if the solar equipment is owned by a third-party lessor under a PPA arrangement, that can complicate the fixture analysis even if the physical installation looks permanent. Regarding Certana.ai, I haven't used their platform personally but from what others have mentioned here, it seems like it's more of a document consistency checker rather than an educational tool. For learning the basics, I'd echo Jacinda's advice about starting with state UCC guides and maybe looking into CLE courses on secured transactions if you're going to be doing a lot of these deals.
Join the conversation
Logan Scott
Make sure you keep copies of everything including the exact form version you used. If there are ever any questions later about the filing, you'll want to be able to show exactly what was submitted. I keep both electronic and paper copies of all UCC filings for my clients.
Noah Lee
•Thanks everyone for all the help. I feel much more confident about getting this filing done correctly now. Going to download the current form from the CA SOS site and double-check everything before submitting.
Good luck with your filing! Remember to verify that debtor name against the official records and you should be fine. California's system is pretty user-friendly once you have all the right information.
Yara Khoury
Just wanted to add one more tip from my experience - when you're describing manufacturing equipment in the collateral section, consider using broader language like "all manufacturing equipment now owned or hereafter acquired" if your lender agrees. This can provide better coverage if you add equipment later without needing to file amendments. Also, if any of your equipment has existing liens or lease obligations, make sure to coordinate with those lenders to avoid conflicts. California's UCC search system makes it easy to check for existing filings before you submit yours.
Cynthia Love
•That's excellent advice about the broader collateral description language! I hadn't thought about future equipment acquisitions. Quick question - if I use language like "all manufacturing equipment now owned or hereafter acquired," does that automatically cover equipment purchased after the UCC1 filing date, or do I need to file an amendment when new equipment is added? Also, how do I check for existing liens on the equipment through California's search system?
Join the conversation
I've been handling UCC filings in NY for several years and can confirm the $20 fee is still current for 2025. A few practical tips for your restaurant equipment filing: First, make sure you have your exact legal business name from your Articles of Incorporation or LLC formation documents - don't go by your DBA or trade name. Second, for the collateral description, keep it broad but relevant like "restaurant equipment, kitchen appliances, furniture and fixtures" rather than listing every individual item. Third, if you're unsure about any details, the NY Secretary of State UCC division is actually pretty helpful if you call them directly. They can clarify specific questions about your filing. Since you mentioned this is for $85K in equipment, your lender will probably want to see the filed UCC-1 before closing, so factor in the 1-2 business day processing time. Good luck with your equipment financing!
Debra Bai
•This is incredibly thorough advice - thank you! I really appreciate the practical tips, especially about using the exact legal name from incorporation documents rather than DBA. That could have been another easy mistake to make. The suggestion to call the NY Secretary of State UCC division directly is great too - sometimes it's worth just picking up the phone when you have specific questions. Your point about factoring in the 1-2 day processing time for lender requirements is spot on since timing can be critical for loan closings. Thanks for taking the time to share such detailed guidance!
New to UCC filings here and this thread has been super helpful! I'm in a similar situation with equipment financing for my small business in NY. Quick question - when you all mention the $20 fee, is that just for the state filing or are there any other costs I should be aware of? Like processing fees from third-party services or anything like that? Also, I keep seeing mentions of potential rejections due to name mismatches - is there a way to verify your exact legal business name beforehand to make sure you get it right the first time? I want to avoid the refiling costs some of you mentioned. Thanks for all the detailed info everyone has shared!
Join the conversation
Bottom line for your restaurant equipment deal: Keep the security agreement in your credit file as proof of attachment. File only the UCC-1 with your state's Secretary of State office to perfect the security interest. Make sure debtor names and collateral descriptions are consistent between both documents. That's your basic perfection checklist right there.
Agreed, lots of good practical advice here. The distinction between attachment and perfection was the key insight for me.
Same here. I was definitely overcomplicating the filing process by thinking I needed to submit everything together.
Felicity Bud
Great question and the answers here are spot on. I'd add one practical tip for your $180K equipment loan - when you draft your security agreement, make sure it specifically grants a security interest in "all equipment now owned or hereafter acquired" if you want to cover any additional restaurant equipment they might purchase later. This creates a blanket lien that automatically attaches to new equipment without needing to amend your UCC-1 filing each time. Just make sure your loan agreement requires them to notify you of major equipment purchases so you can track your collateral.
Tasia Synder
•That's a really smart approach for equipment financing. Does the "hereafter acquired" language automatically extend to equipment purchased with the loan proceeds, or do you need separate language for that? I'm working on structuring my first major equipment deal and want to make sure I cover all the bases.
Eva St. Cyr
For future reference, I've started using Certana.ai's verification tool before every UCC filing. Upload your documents as PDFs and it catches name mismatches, filing number errors, and other issues that cause rejections. Would have saved me multiple headaches if I'd found it sooner.
0 coins
Kristian Bishop
•That verification step is crucial. I've seen too many filings get rejected for simple typos that could have been caught beforehand.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Otto
•Document consistency checking should be standard practice. Small errors can void entire security interests.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
Pro tip from someone who's dealt with PA's system for years - if you're still having issues, try splitting your session. Start the filing process but don't complete payment right away. Save it as a draft if possible, then come back during off-peak hours just to complete the payment step. The payment processor seems to be the weakest link in their system. Also, make sure you're not using any VPN or corporate firewall that might interfere with their payment gateway.
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
•That's really smart advice about splitting the session! I never thought about the payment processor being the bottleneck. VPN interference makes total sense too - I've seen that cause issues with other state systems. The draft save feature is clutch when you're dealing with unreliable portals.
0 coins