UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Confused about mortgage on building vs UCC filing requirements - help?
I'm working on a commercial deal where we're financing some manufacturing equipment that's going to be installed in a building the borrower owns. The equipment will be bolted down but could theoretically be removed. Our loan committee is split on whether we need a mortgage on the building or if a UCC-1 fixture filing is sufficient. The equipment is worth about $850K and includes some heavy machinery that will require concrete footings. I've seen deals go both ways but want to make sure we're not missing something critical here. The borrower already has an existing mortgage on the property with another lender. What's the standard approach for this type of collateral - mortgage on building vs UCC filing? Any guidance would be appreciated.
Join the conversation
UCC 1-405 filing got rejected twice - debtor name format issue
Been pulling my hair out over this UCC 1-405 situation. Filed twice now and both times got kicked back by the SOS office. The rejection notice keeps saying 'debtor name does not match registered entity name' but I'm copying it exactly from the Secretary of State corporate search. This is for a $180K equipment loan and my borrower is getting antsy about the delay. The company name is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' on their articles of incorporation, that's exactly how I'm putting it on the UCC-1. Anyone else run into this with 1-405 filings? Starting to wonder if there's some formatting trick I'm missing. The collateral description is solid - 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired' - so it's definitely the debtor name causing the problem. Really need to get this perfected before the loan closes next week.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Used the Certana document checker and found the problem! There was an invisible character between 'Advanced' and 'Manufacturing' that got copied from the SOS website. The tool showed me exactly where it was and I was able to clean up the name. Refiled today and it went through without any issues. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Awesome! Those invisible characters are such a pain. Glad the tool caught it for you.
Great to hear it worked out! That's exactly the kind of hidden formatting issue that drives everyone crazy.
This is such a common headache with UCC filings! I've been burned by these invisible character issues before too. For anyone else dealing with similar problems, I've found it's worth doing a quick sanity check by pasting the entity name into a plain text editor like Notepad - sometimes you can spot extra spaces or weird characters that way. The Certana tool sounds like a game-changer though - definitely adding that to my workflow for future filings. Nothing worse than having a loan closing delayed because of a formatting glitch that's impossible to see with the naked eye.
New York UCC 11 Search - Getting Confusing Results Back
Running into some weird issues with my New York UCC 11 search results and wondering if anyone else has dealt with this. I'm trying to verify some existing liens on equipment financing deals and the search results I'm getting back seem inconsistent. Sometimes the same debtor name pulls up different filing numbers, and other times I know there should be active UCC-1s but nothing shows up in the search. Is there something specific about how the New York system handles the UCC 11 search function that I'm missing? The portal seems to be really finicky about exact name matches and I'm worried I'm missing critical filings that could affect our lending decisions.
Join the conversation
For lending decisions, are you also checking federal tax liens and other encumbrances beyond just UCC filings? Sometimes the complete picture requires multiple searches.
Definitely. UCC filings are just one piece of the collateral picture. Federal and state tax liens can take priority over UCC-1 filings in some cases.
This is why automated tools that check multiple databases simultaneously are so helpful. Manual searching across different systems is time-consuming and error-prone.
Update: Tried some of the suggestions here and found several filings I missed in my initial searches. The name variation issue was definitely part of the problem. Thanks for the help everyone.
Definitely going to look into more reliable search methods after this experience. Can't afford to miss liens in our underwriting process.
Same here - I've been dealing with NY UCC search inconsistencies for months and it's becoming a real liability issue. The manual process is just too unreliable when you're making lending decisions based on collateral positions. Definitely need to explore some of the automated solutions mentioned in this thread.
What exactly is a UCC account definition when setting up secured transactions?
I'm working on a commercial loan package and keep seeing references to 'UCC account definition' in our collateral documentation. Our borrower has multiple business accounts and I need to make sure we're properly defining which accounts are covered by our UCC-1 filing. The loan officer mentioned something about needing specific account identifiers but I'm not clear on whether this means account numbers, bank routing info, or something else entirely. We're securing against all deposit accounts at First National but want to avoid any gaps that could cause perfection issues later. Has anyone dealt with defining UCC account coverage in their filings? I don't want to mess this up since it's a $2.8M credit facility.
Join the conversation
going through something similar with a restaurant chain that has accounts at 6 different banks... nightmare to track but we ended up with 'all deposit accounts maintained by debtor at any financial institution' - broad but effective
This thread has been incredibly helpful. Sounds like I need to focus more on the control agreements than perfecting my UCC collateral description.
Exactly right. The UCC filing establishes priority, but control is what actually secures your interest in deposit accounts. Get both pieces right and you'll be in good shape.
As someone relatively new to UCC filings, this discussion has been eye-opening! I've been handling mostly equipment financing where filing alone does the trick, so the deposit account control requirement is news to me. @Henry Delgado - for your $2.8M facility, I'd definitely recommend getting those control agreements in place with First National ASAP if you haven't already. The UCC description can be broad like others suggested ("all deposit accounts maintained with First National Bank"), but without control, you won't have perfected security regardless of how perfect your filing language is. This thread is going in my reference folder for sure!
UCC-3 instructions confusing me - amendment vs continuation forms
I'm trying to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct a debtor name error on our original UCC-1 but the state portal instructions are incredibly confusing. The form asks whether I'm doing an amendment, continuation, or termination but doesn't clearly explain what qualifies as each type. Our original filing had the debtor listed as 'ABC Manufacturing Inc' but it should be 'ABC Manufacturing, Inc.' (missing comma). The loan officer said this could invalidate our security interest if we don't fix it before the next audit. Has anyone dealt with similar UCC-3 instructions that were this unclear? I don't want to select the wrong option and mess up our perfected lien.
Join the conversation
Thanks for this thread! I've been putting off filing a UCC-3 amendment because the instructions were so confusing, but now I feel confident about selecting the amendment option and describing the change properly.
Glad it helped! I'm feeling much more confident about my filing too after all this guidance.
Don't put it off too long - name discrepancies can create real problems if they're discovered during audits or when you need to enforce your security interest.
As someone new to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm dealing with a potential similar issue where our original UCC-1 has the debtor address listed with an old suite number. The business moved within the same building but to a different suite about 6 months ago. Should I be filing a UCC-3 amendment to update this address change, or is a suite number difference not significant enough to worry about? I want to make sure our security interest remains properly perfected.
Levi Parker
Based on everything discussed here, I'd probably go with the UCC-1 fixture filing approach but also get a subordination agreement from the existing mortgage holder if possible. That gives you the best protection without the complexity of a new mortgage.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
AuthorThat sounds like a reasonable compromise. I'll talk to our counsel about drafting the subordination request.
0 coins
Libby Hassan
Make sure your counsel reviews the existing mortgage documents first. Sometimes the subordination language is already built in for purchase money security interests.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
This is a great discussion. One thing I'd add is to consider getting an equipment appraisal that specifically addresses whether the machinery can be removed without material damage to the building structure. That documentation could be really valuable if you ever need to defend your filing strategy in court. Also, make sure your loan agreement clearly states your position on whether the equipment is fixtures or personal property - that intent language can be crucial for the fixture analysis.
0 coins