What disqualifies you from Washington ESD unemployment for misconduct?
I just got terminated last week and I'm wondering what exactly counts as misconduct that would disqualify me from getting unemployment benefits through Washington ESD. My manager said I was being insubordinate but I feel like I was just standing up for myself when they kept changing my schedule without notice. I've heard mixed things about what actually disqualifies you - some people say you have to do something really bad like steal or fight someone, others say even being late too much can disqualify you. Can anyone break down what Washington ESD considers misconduct vs just poor performance? I really need these benefits while I look for another job.
38 comments


NeonNova
Misconduct for Washington ESD unemployment disqualification has to be willful and substantial. Poor performance or inability to do the job doesn't count as misconduct. The key things that DO disqualify you are: stealing, violence, harassment, deliberate rule violations, insubordination (but it has to be serious), and criminal activity at work. Being late occasionally or making honest mistakes usually won't disqualify you.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•That's helpful! What about if they say you were being argumentative with management? Is that considered serious insubordination?
0 coins
NeonNova
•It depends on the specifics. Respectfully disagreeing or asking questions isn't misconduct. But repeatedly refusing direct orders or being hostile/disrespectful in a way that disrupts work could be. The employer has to prove it was willful misconduct, not just personality conflicts.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
I went through something similar last year. My boss claimed I was insubordinate too but I got my benefits because I could show I was following company policy and they were asking me to do something unsafe. Washington ESD looks at whether you had good reason for your actions. If you were standing up for legitimate workplace rights, that's usually not misconduct.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•That gives me hope. I was pointing out that the schedule changes violated our employee handbook about advance notice.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
•Keep all documentation about that! Employee handbooks and policies can really help your case if you file an appeal.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
You should definitely apply for benefits even if you're not sure. Let Washington ESD make the determination rather than assuming you're disqualified. I know someone who thought they'd be denied for misconduct but got approved because the employer couldn't prove it was willful. The worst thing that happens is they say no and you can appeal.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•Good point. I was worried about applying and getting in trouble if they think I'm trying to get benefits I don't deserve.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•No trouble for applying! That's literally what the system is for - to determine eligibility. Just be honest about what happened when you file.
0 coins
Emily Jackson
BTW if you do have trouble reaching Washington ESD to ask questions about your claim status, I found this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that helps you get through to agents. They have a video demo at https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ showing how it works. Was super helpful when I needed to talk to someone about my adjudication.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•Thanks for the tip! The phone lines are always busy when I try to call.
0 coins
Liam Mendez
•I used Claimyr too when my claim was stuck in adjudication for weeks. Really saved me a lot of frustration trying to get through myself.
0 coins
Sophia Nguyen
The misconduct bar is actually pretty high in Washington. I've seen people get benefits even after being fired for attendance issues because the employer couldn't prove it was deliberate misconduct vs personal problems. Document everything about your situation - emails, witness statements, company policies, etc.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•I do have some emails where I was asking about the schedule policy. Should I include those when I apply?
0 coins
Sophia Nguyen
•Absolutely! Anything that shows you were trying to follow proper procedures or had legitimate concerns. The more documentation the better.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
•This is why I always keep copies of everything at work. You never know when you'll need to prove your side of the story.
0 coins
Isabella Brown
Just to add to what others said - Washington ESD also looks at whether the misconduct was connected to your work duties. So like if you got arrested for something completely unrelated to work on your day off, that usually won't disqualify you. It has to be work-related misconduct that shows you can't be trusted as an employee.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•That makes sense. My situation was definitely work-related since it was about scheduling and company policies.
0 coins
Maya Patel
•Yeah, and even then they have to show it was severe enough to justify termination AND that you knew it was wrong. Sounds like you have a good case.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
ugh the whole misconduct thing is so subjective. My friend got denied for 'insubordination' because she asked her manager to put a request in writing. Like seriously?? But she appealed and won because the hearing officer said that was reasonable.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•Wow, that's crazy that they initially denied her for that. Good thing she appealed.
0 coins
Emma Garcia
•This is exactly why you shouldn't give up if you get an initial denial. The appeals process is there for a reason and hearing officers often see things differently than the initial determination.
0 coins
Ava Kim
From what I understand, Washington ESD uses a test where they look at: 1) Was it willful (did you do it on purpose)? 2) Was it substantial (serious enough to hurt the employer)? 3) Was it work-related? All three have to be yes for it to be disqualifying misconduct. Sounds like your situation might not meet all three criteria.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•That's a helpful framework. I definitely wasn't trying to hurt the company, just wanted clarity on policies.
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
•Exactly! And standing up for established policies isn't usually considered substantial misconduct. You were trying to help the company follow its own rules.
0 coins
Layla Mendes
One thing to remember is that the burden of proof is on the employer to show misconduct. They can't just say 'they were insubordinate' - they have to provide specific examples and evidence. If they can't prove their case, you should get benefits.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•That's reassuring. I'm not sure how much documentation they have since most of our conversations were verbal.
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
•That actually works in your favor! Without written warnings or documented incidents, it's harder for them to prove willful misconduct.
0 coins
Aria Park
I had a similar experience with schedule changes at my last job. Turned out the manager was violating labor laws by not giving proper notice. When I pointed it out (nicely), they said I was being difficult. Got my unemployment benefits no problem because I was protecting my rights.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•Did you have to provide any special documentation for that?
0 coins
Aria Park
•I included a copy of the employee handbook and the labor law requirements. Showed I wasn't just being difficult but had legitimate concerns.
0 coins
Noah Ali
•Smart move. Always good to show you were acting reasonably based on actual policies or laws.
0 coins
Chloe Boulanger
If you do end up needing to contact Washington ESD about your claim determination, Claimyr really helped me get through when I couldn't reach anyone by phone. Sometimes you need to talk to a real person to explain your situation properly, especially for misconduct determinations.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•I'll definitely keep that in mind. Thanks for all the advice everyone!
0 coins
James Martinez
•Good luck with your claim! Sounds like you have a strong case based on what you've described.
0 coins
Olivia Harris
Just want to echo what others have said - apply for benefits regardless. Washington ESD has to investigate and make a fair determination. Don't let your former employer scare you out of applying for benefits you might be entitled to.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•You're right. I'm going to file my claim today and let them decide.
0 coins
Alexander Zeus
•That's the spirit! You've got nothing to lose by applying and potentially a lot to gain.
0 coins