Need to requalify for ESD - is it 6x previous weekly benefit amount?
I exhausted my unemployment benefits a few months ago and now I'm back working part-time. My hours just got cut again (retail industry is brutal right now), and I'm wondering if I'll qualify for a new claim. I vaguely remember reading somewhere that you need to earn 6 times your previous weekly benefit amount before you can establish a new claim after your benefit year expires. My previous weekly amount was $487. Does that mean I need to have earned around $2,922 since my last claim expired to be eligible again? Can anyone confirm if that's the correct requirement or am I misremembering? The ESD website is so confusing to navigate.
14 comments


Zoe Dimitriou
You're partially right, but it's actually 6 times your weekly benefit amount AND you need to have worked at least 680 hours in your base year. The 6x rule applies when you're trying to open a new claim after your benefit year ends. ESD uses this to make sure you actually returned to work for a meaningful period before collecting benefits again. So yes, if your weekly benefit was $487, you'd need to have earned at least $2,922 since your last claim ended, plus meet that 680 hour requirement during your new base year (which is the first 4 of the last 5 completed calendar quarters before you file).
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•Thank you! So it's both the 6x earnings AND the 680 hours? That makes sense. I've been working about 25 hours a week for 4 months, so I'm probably not at 680 hours yet. Guess I need to keep working a bit longer before I can file again. Really appreciate the clarification!
0 coins
QuantumQuest
i think ur getting the rules mixed up? tha 6x thing is for when u have a break in ur claim not a whole new benefit year. when ur benefit year ends u just need the 680 hours in ur base year which is different. i filed a new claim last month and didnt have to prove the 6x thing just the hours. maybe call and check?
0 coins
Zoe Dimitriou
•Actually, both requirements apply for a new benefit year. The 680 hours is the standard qualification for any UI claim, but the 6x rule specifically applies when someone has collected benefits in a previous claim. It's to prevent people from working just a week or two and then going right back on unemployment. If OP has been working part-time for 4 months, they're probably fine on the earnings part but might still need more hours.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
I just went through this exact situation in January 2025. The 6x rule is definitely correct, but there's another requirement most people forget about - you also need to have worked AND earned wages in at least two quarters of your base year. So even if you meet the 680 hours and the 6x your previous weekly benefit amount, if all that work was in just one calendar quarter, you'd still be denied. You should also know that if your hours were "cut" rather than you being fully laid off, you might qualify for partial unemployment even if you don't meet the requirements for a whole new claim. The partial unemployment rules are different.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•That's really helpful information about needing wages in at least two quarters! I hadn't heard about that before. My work has been spread across multiple quarters so I should be okay there. For the partial unemployment - my hours were cut from 35/week to about 15/week. Would that potentially qualify? I'll definitely look into that option too.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
THE ESD SYSTEM IS GARBAGE!!! I met all those requirements last year - the 6x thing, the 680 hours, everything - and they STILL denied my claim saying I "voluntarily quit" when I was CLEARLY laid off!!! Had to wait 10 WEEKS for an appeal hearing only for them to finally admit they were wrong. By then I was already behind on rent and had to move in with my parents. Don't count on getting benefits even if you qualify!!!
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•That sounds frustrating but has nothing to do with the specific question being asked? OP is asking about requalification requirements, not about adjudication issues or appeals. Let's try to stay on topic and be helpful.
0 coins
Amara Eze
Have you tried calling ESD directly to confirm? I know it can be nearly impossible to get through to them, but I recently had success using Claimyr (claimyr.com). They have a system that holds your place in line and calls you when an ESD agent is available. Saved me hours of redial frustration. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ?si=26TzE_zGms-DODN3 Regarding your question - yes, the 6x rule is correct but as others mentioned, you also need the 680 hours in your base year. When I called, the agent was able to look at my work history and tell me exactly when I'd be eligible to file again.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•Thanks for the recommendation! I've been avoiding calling because last time I spent 3 hours on hold and then got disconnected. I'll check out that service - at this point I just need a definitive answer about my specific situation.
0 coins
Giovanni Ricci
My sister works for ESD (not speaking officially obvs) and she says ppl get confused about this all the time. The 6x rule is real but its actually about "requalifying" after you've already received benefits in your benefit year and had a break in your claim. For a totally new benefit year after your old one expired, its all about the 680 hrs in your base year. Also if your hours got reduced, def look into partial unemployment! You can sometimes get benefits if you're working part time depending on how much you earn compared to your weekly benefit amount.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•This isn't quite accurate. The 6x rule specifically applies when you're filing a completely new claim after having received benefits on a prior claim. It's in RCW 50.04.030. Here's what it says: "An individual who has received benefits under the unemployment compensation laws of any state during a benefit year shall not be eligible for benefits in a subsequent benefit year unless, subsequent to the beginning of the prior benefit year, they performed service and earned remuneration of not less than six times the weekly benefit amount determined for their new benefit year." So it does apply to the OP's situation of filing after a benefit year expiration.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
Thanks everyone for the responses! Just to update - I called ESD (used that Claimyr service someone mentioned and got through in about 35 minutes). The agent confirmed I need BOTH the 680 hours AND earnings of at least 6x my previous weekly benefit amount. She checked my records and said I've earned enough to meet the 6x requirement but I'm still about 120 hours short of the 680 hours. So I'll need to keep working for another month or so before I can file a new claim. She also said I might qualify for partial unemployment now since my hours were cut significantly, but I'd need to file a new claim to find out for sure. I'm going to stick it out a bit longer to hit that 680 hour mark first.
0 coins
Zoe Dimitriou
•Glad you got a clear answer! Keep in mind that when you do file, your benefit amount will be based on your highest-earning quarters in your base year. So if you were earning less at this part-time job than you were before, your weekly benefit amount might be lower than your previous claim. Just something to prepare for.
0 coins