Will my Social Security be reduced at FRA because my husband took benefits early?
I'm turning 67 (my Full Retirement Age) in March 2025 and planning to file for my Social Security benefits then. My husband has been collecting his retirement benefits since he was 62 (about 5 years ago). Yesterday, my neighbor (who works part-time at H&R Block) told me that I won't get my full FRA benefit amount because my husband took his benefits early and we're married. She said something about 'household maximums' affecting what I can receive. We've been married for 32 years, both worked our entire lives, and I always assumed I'd get my own full benefit at FRA. Is there any truth to this 'married penalty' thing? I've tried reading the SSA website but there's so much information I'm getting confused. Has anyone dealt with this situation?
18 comments
Savanna Franklin
Your neighbor is mixing up several different Social Security concepts. There is NO penalty or reduction to your own retirement benefit just because your husband took his benefits early. You'll receive 100% of your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) at your FRA. What she might be confusing this with: 1. The Family Maximum (which limits total benefits paid on one worker's record) 2. The fact that spousal benefits can be reduced if taken early 3. Government Pension Offset (GPO) which can reduce spousal benefits if you have a pension But none of these apply to YOUR OWN retirement benefits based on YOUR work record. Your benefit amount is based solely on your own work history and when you claim.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•Thank you so much for this clear explanation! So my neighbor was definitely confused. I've worked my whole life so I'm claiming on my own record, not as a spouse. One more question - does this mean I should ignore what she said about 'household maximums' too?
0 coins
Juan Moreno
my cousin had the EXACT same thing happen!!!! she got told she would get less but when she actuly filed they gave her the full amount at FRA. don't worry about what random people say, only trust ssa
0 coins
Amy Fleming
•This is correct. The Family Maximum applies to benefits paid from ONE person's record - like when someone has multiple dependents or survivors. It doesn't reduce benefits when both spouses are claiming on their own records.
0 coins
Alice Pierce
The SSA rep I spoke with last month actually explained this very thing to me. Each person's retirement benefit is calculated independently based on their own work record. Your husband's decision to file early has absolutely zero impact on your own retirement benefit amount. What DOES get complicated is if you were planning to take a SPOUSAL benefit based on his record instead of your own retirement benefit. But from what you described, your own benefit is probably higher than half of your husband's anyway, so that wouldn't apply to you. I had a terrible time reaching someone at SSA though - took 7 calls over 3 days. I finally used this service called Claimyr that connected me right away (claimyr.com). They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Saved me hours of frustration.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•Thank you for confirming this! You're right, my own benefit will be significantly higher than half of my husband's, so I'm definitely claiming on my own record. I appreciate the tip about Claimyr too - I've been thinking I should verify all this with SSA directly before I file next year.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
WRONG INFORMATION is everywhere about Social Security!!! I've been dealing with this for years and the misinformation drives me CRAZY. Let me tell you something - NOBODY at H&R Block knows the details of Social Security rules. They know TAX rules. Your own retirement benefit is YOUR OWN. Period. What your husband did has ZERO impact on your retirement benefit amount. The only time this would matter is if you were taking a SPOUSAL benefit based on his record. And even then, YOU taking it at YOUR FRA would give you the maximum spousal benefit possible (50% of his PIA), regardless of when HE took his benefits. Don't listen to neighbors or tax preparers about Social Security. Only trust SSA or financial advisors who specialize in Social Security.
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
•my tax guy told me the same thing last year and I believed him until I checked with ssa. wish people would stop spreading false info
0 coins
Elin Robinson
when i filed for my ss last year i was so confused about this too. the family maximum thing is real but it only matters if like 3 or more people are claiming on ONE persons record. like if someone has minor kids or something. since your claiming your own benefit and hubby is claiming his own you both get what youve earned.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•That makes so much more sense now! Thank you for explaining it in simple terms. I definitely don't have anyone else claiming on my record, so sounds like I'll get my full benefit.
0 coins
Amy Fleming
To add some technical clarity here: 1. Each worker's Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) is calculated based solely on their own earnings record 2. The Family Maximum Formula (FMF) only limits the total benefits payable on ONE person's earnings record when multiple beneficiaries are involved 3. When both spouses claim on their own records, each gets their own PIA (reduced or increased based on claiming age) In your case, you'll get 100% of your PIA at your FRA. Your husband gets a permanently reduced benefit (approximately 75% of his PIA) because he claimed at 62. The only other consideration is whether a spousal benefit might be higher for either of you. You'd be eligible for up to 50% of your husband's PIA (not his reduced benefit amount), but only if that exceeds your own benefit. Given that you worked your whole life, your own benefit is likely higher.
0 coins
Savanna Franklin
•Excellent explanation. I'd also add that if the OP wanted to explore maximizing their household benefits, they could look into restricted applications or filing strategies, but those options are limited for most people born after 1954 due to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 changes.
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
i think your neighbor got confused with the spousal benefit thing. thats completely different from your own retirement. my wife gets both - her own small retirement and a spousal topup because half of mine is more than her full benefit. but neither affects the other person's amount.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•That's interesting about the spousal top-up. I didn't realize you could get both! My benefit will be higher than half of his though, so I think just claiming my own is best for me.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
this reminds me when I filed the ssa office gave me wrong info too said i couldnt get widows benefits till 60 but turns out i could get them at 50 because im disabled! dont even trust the ssa people sometimes they make mistakes
0 coins
Esteban Tate
•THIS!!! Even SSA employees make mistakes. Always ask for a technical expert if you get conflicting information. And get everything in writing when possible.
0 coins
Savanna Franklin
Since we're clarifying misconceptions, let me address the part about being "married way over 20 years" - that duration only matters for divorced spouse benefits (which require a 10-year marriage). For currently married couples, there's no marriage duration requirement for spousal benefits except that you must be currently married. To summarize your situation: 1. You'll get 100% of your own benefit at FRA in March 2025 2. Your husband's early filing has no impact on your benefit amount 3. You'll get either your own benefit OR a spousal benefit (whichever is higher), not both 4. Since you worked your entire life, your own benefit is likely higher than any spousal benefit If you want to verify all this, call SSA at 1-800-772-1213 and request a benefit verification or speak with a claims specialist.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•Thank you for the detailed explanation! I'm relieved to hear I'll get my full benefit regardless of what my husband did. I'll definitely call SSA to verify everything before I file next year.
0 coins