< Back to Social Security Administration

Will government workers finally get full Social Security benefits under new WEP/GPO repeal law?

I've been hearing rumors about a new law that might finally get rid of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) that reduces Social Security benefits for government workers. My brother-in-law works for the county and has been complaining for years about how he'll lose most of his SS benefits from his previous 15 years in construction once he retires from government. Does anyone know if this is actually happening? Is it for ALL government employees or just those who worked in the private sector before government jobs? How much of their full SS amount would they get? Trying to give him accurate info instead of Facebook rumors!

There's been lots of proposed legislation over the years to reform WEP/GPO, but nothing has officially passed yet at the federal level as of early 2025. The Social Security Fairness Act has been introduced again this year (been proposed since like 2001!), which would completely repeal both WEP and GPO. But it hasn't become law despite having bipartisan support. If your brother-in-law has split careers between private sector (paying into SS) and public sector (with pension not paying into SS), he'll still be affected by WEP currently. His SS retirement could be reduced by up to 50% of his government pension amount. You can actually see the estimated reduction on his SS statement. I used Claimyr last month to get through to SSA (claimyr.com) when I needed to discuss a similar situation for my wife. Their service connects you directly to a live agent instead of waiting on hold for hours. There's a great video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. The agent was able to calculate exactly how much her WEP reduction would be - much more accurate than the online estimators.

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

Thanks for the info. Yeah, he's been watching these bills for years and getting his hopes up every time. So frustrating! Is the current talk about reform just another false start or is something actually different this time? I'll check out that Claimyr link - might be useful since he can never get through when he calls SS directly.

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

its not passing. all these bills die in committee. they talk about it every election year and nothing happens. govt workers still get screwed. my wife lost 60% of her SS bcause of WEP even tho she paid in for 22 yrs before teaching!!

0 coins

While there's certainly been frustration with the lack of progress on WEP/GPO reform, there is some movement happening. Several states have implemented their own solutions for certain public employees. For example, some states have modified their pension systems so newer employees can participate in Social Security alongside a modified pension benefit. But your wife's situation highlights exactly why reform is needed. The current WEP formula can be particularly harsh for people who split careers and paid into Social Security for substantial periods. The formula reduces benefits by up to $578 per month in 2025, though the reduction can't exceed half of the non-covered pension amount.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

I think you're confusing a few different pieces of proposed legislation. There's the Social Security Fairness Act (complete repeal) and then there's the WEP/GPO reform act which would just modify the formula to be less punitive. From what I've read neither one has actually passed yet. But I HAVE heard from a friend who works at our state teacher retirement system that something might finally happen this year because they've been given some preliminary guidance about implementation. I'm not getting my hopes up though!!!

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

You're absolutely right about the different legislative approaches. The Social Security Fairness Act would be a complete repeal, while the Public Servants Protection and Fairness Act aims to reform rather than repeal. The reform bill would give people caught in the WEP a monthly rebate of up to $150 and create a new, more proportional formula for future retirees. What's interesting is that the Congressional Budget Office has estimated complete repeal would cost around $183 billion over 10 years, which is why many lawmakers prefer the reform approach rather than full repeal. If your brother-in-law (referring to original poster) worked 15 years in construction paying into Social Security, he should at least qualify for a slightly reduced WEP penalty under the 'substantial earnings' provision. The current WEP reduction is lessened for people with 21+ years of substantial Social Security-covered earnings and eliminated completely at 30+ years.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

OMG I've been dealing with this EXACT SAME ISSUE and it's SO FRUSTRATING!!! My husband worked for 18 years in private sector and then got a job with the state government 9 years ago. We just found out his SS benefits will be cut by almost 40% because of his future pension!!! It's SO unfair - he PAID INTO the system!!! We were counting on that money for retirement. Does anyone know if the new law would be retroactive for people already retired or only for future retirees??? The SSA website is so confusing about this!!!

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

I feel your pain! The whole WEP/GPO thing is a nightmare and most financial advisors don't even understand it properly. My father-in-law got completely blindsided by this when he retired after 22 years teaching + 15 years in manufacturing. The worst part is my mother-in-law got hit with GPO too and lost most of her spousal benefits even though SHE never worked for the government! From what I understand, IF (big if) any reform passes, most proposals have some retroactive provisions for current retirees, but usually with phase-in periods. Nobody wants to tell current retirees they're just out of luck. The public needs to keep pressuring Congress because this affects millions of teachers, firefighters, police officers and other public servants. It's crazy that the people who serve our communities get penalized on retirement!

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

I spent 2+ hours researching this last week for my dad who's retiring from the city next year. The latest bill (S.1302) would create a NEW formula for WEP rather than completely eliminate it. People already affected by WEP would get a $150 monthly payment to offset some of the reduction. Future retirees would have benefits calculated based on their actual work history instead of the current arbitrary formula. The bill also has provisions to protect lower-income workers more than higher earners. From what I understand, your brother-in-law with 15 years paying into SS would see SOME improvement but not get completely full benefits. The calculation is complex because it's based on lifetime earnings patterns. You should tell him to request a benefit calculation from SSA specifically addressing the WEP situation. General SS benefit estimates don't automatically account for WEP reductions.

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

Wow thanks for all that detail! So frustrating that they'd only get $150/month when many people lose way more than that from WEP. I'll definitely tell him to get that specific calculation. Do you happen to know if it's something he can get through his my Social Security account online or does he need to talk to someone directly?

0 coins

To answer your follow-up question - he needs to speak with someone directly. The online benefit calculators don't fully account for WEP/GPO. When he calls, he should specifically ask for a WEP-adjusted benefit estimate and mention that he has a mixed-earnings history with non-covered government employment. If he can't get through on the regular SSA line (which is common), that's where services like Claimyr that I mentioned can help get him connected to an agent who can run these specific calculations.

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

i tried getting wep calculation online and couldnt. had to go in person to ssa office and wait 3 hrs!!! they should make this easier to figure out online

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

Just to add my personal experience - my mom retired from teaching after 24 years, but had worked retail for about 12 years before that. Her Social Security benefit was reduced from about $1100 to around $650 per month because of WEP. She was devastated because she'd been counting on having both income streams. The current system really punishes people who switch careers.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

That's TERRIBLE!!! It's like being punished for changing careers! Did your mom know this would happen before she retired? We're trying to plan now but the calculations are SO confusing and every time I call SS I get different answers! I'm honestly scared we're going to end up in a much worse financial position than we planned for. 😢

0 coins

Something important that hasn't been mentioned yet: The WEP reduction has a maximum cap. For 2025, the maximum WEP reduction is $578 per month (up from $558 in 2024). Additionally, the reduction cannot be more than half of the pension from non-covered employment. Also, if your brother-in-law had years of "substantial earnings" under Social Security, the WEP reduction is gradually lessened. With 21+ years of substantial earnings, the reduction starts decreasing, and at 30+ years of substantial earnings, WEP doesn't apply at all. Regarding recent legislative proposals, some would phase out WEP entirely while others would replace it with a proportional formula that more fairly represents a person's actual earnings history. The most recent serious movement was in the Public Servants Protection and Fairness Act, which would provide relief payments to current retirees affected by WEP and establish a new formula for future retirees.

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

This is really helpful, thank you! I'll let my brother-in-law know about the maximum reduction amount - that might give him some peace of mind at least. Unfortunately he only has 15 years of SS-covered work, so he wouldn't qualify for the reduction in WEP impact. I hope something passes this year to make the system fairer.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
7,115 users helped today