Will ex-spouse lose Social Security spousal benefits after remarrying? How does SSA know?

Yes, your mother will lose her ex-spousal benefits when she remarries. Social Security regulations are very clear on this - once you remarry, you can no longer collect on an ex-spouse's record except in survivor benefit situations (which don't apply here since your father is still living). Her benefit will revert to her own retirement benefit amount only. As for reporting, yes, she is legally required to report the marriage to SSA. They may eventually find out through marriage records or tax filings, but she should proactively report it to avoid potential overpayments that she'd have to pay back. Has she considered what the financial impact will be switching to just her own benefit?

my frend didnt report her remarriage for almost 2 years and then got hit with a HUGE overpayment notice!!! had to pay back like 20k to SSA. they found out when she filed taxes jointly with new husband. very messy situation dont recommend!!!

Wait a second - what if your mom's new husband has a higher benefit than her ex? Would she be eligible to claim spousal benefits on HIS record after they marry? That might offset some of the loss, right? Worth looking into before they make any decisions.

I went through EXACTLY this when I remarried at 66!!! The SSA office told me I had to report within 10 days of the marriage ceremony. They gave me a form to fill out (can't remember the number) and my benefit dropped the following month. It was AWFUL going from $2340 to just $1625. My husband and I should have just lived in sin LOL!!!

I'd recommend your mother book an appointment at her local Social Security office or call them directly to discuss her specific situation before the wedding. The rules around marriage and benefits can be complicated, and there might be aspects of her situation we're missing. One thing to note is that the Social Security Administration doesn't automatically get notified of marriages. They rely on self-reporting and periodic information exchanges with other agencies. But failing to report is considered fraud and can result in penalties beyond just repaying benefits. Your mother should weigh her options carefully. Some couples in this situation choose to have a commitment ceremony without legally marrying specifically to preserve benefits. Others determine that marriage is worth the financial impact.

I was in this EXACT situation and couldn't get through to ANYONE at Social Security for WEEKS!!! Finally found this service called Claimyr that got me through to an agent in under 10 minutes. It was amazing after all the frustration. You can check them out at claimyr.com - they have a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Seriously saved my sanity when I needed to figure out how remarriage would affect my benefits.

While everyone is focused on whether she should marry or not, there's another angle here. If her boyfriend has a higher benefit amount than her ex-husband, she should absolutely get married because then she could claim the higher spousal benefit on his record instead! But if his benefit is lower than her ex's, then yes, financially it makes more sense not to legally marry. The SSA doesn't care about relationship status - only legal marriage.

dont forget taxes!!! might change her tax situation too if they get married vs just living together

To summarize what everyone has said: 1. Yes, remarriage will terminate her ex-spousal benefits 2. She is legally required to report the marriage to SSA 3. Her benefit would revert to her own retirement amount 4. After marriage, she may be eligible for spousal benefits on her new husband's record 5. If she doesn't report the marriage and SSA discovers it later, she'll face overpayment recovery 6. Some couples choose not to legally marry to preserve benefits This is ultimately a personal decision balancing financial and emotional factors. Whatever she decides, make sure she understands all implications and reports any changes appropriately to avoid future complications.