Social Security break-even calculation confusing - zeros on record from govt pension job affecting my SS benefits?
I've been struggling with the break-even calculation for claiming Social Security. I'm turning 67 next month and still haven't filed because I wasn't sure if waiting until 70 makes financial sense. After calculating based on an estimated lifespan of 82, it seems I might actually LOSE money by waiting until 70. My situation is a bit complicated: - Worked in the private sector for 32 years paying into SS - For the last 6 years, I've been at a government job with their own pension system - My current salary is the highest I've ever earned ($87,500/year) - My SS statements show $0.00 earnings for these government job years My questions: 1. Will these zeros on my record lower my monthly SS benefit amount? 2. Since I'm paying into a government pension instead of SS now, will my SS benefit amount ever increase from what it shows now? 3. Should I file for SS now at 67 or still wait until 70? I'm concerned I might be missing something important in my calculations. Has anyone dealt with a similar situation with government pension + Social Security?
18 comments


Amy Fleming
You're dealing with what's called the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) which affects people who worked in jobs that didn't pay into Social Security but had other jobs where they did pay in. This can reduce your Social Security benefit. To answer your questions: 1. The zeros won't lower your benefit because SS uses your highest 35 years of earnings. If you have 32 years of SS-covered work, only 3 zero years would be included in your calculation. 2. Your SS benefit amount is essentially locked in now that you're working in non-covered employment, except for annual COLA increases. 3. The break-even calculation is still valid, but with WEP it's more complicated. Generally, if you don't expect to live past 82-83, claiming before 70 often makes sense. You should request a WEP calculation from SSA to see exactly how your government pension will affect your SS benefits. This is crucial for your decision.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•Thank you for explaining about WEP! I had no idea this even existed. So even though I'm making more money now than ever before, none of it helps my SS benefit? That seems unfair after paying into the system for 32 years. How do I request this WEP calculation? Is that something I can do online through my SSA account or do I need to call/visit an office?
0 coins
Alice Pierce
i had literally the SAME problem last yr!!! worked 28 yrs paying SS then 7 yrs govt job with pension. the zeros dont matter much but the WEP thing KILLED my ss check!!! my pension is only like $1750/month but they still cut my ss by like $450/month because of it!!! its such a ripoff honestly
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•Oh no! That's a huge reduction! Do you think I should file for SS now before my pension starts? I haven't started collecting my government pension yet - I plan to work 2-3 more years. Would it help if I got SS started before the pension?
0 coins
Esteban Tate
Why does the break-even calculation matter? Just enjoy your retirement! My mom waited until 70 and then only lived to 74 - big mistake! Take the money now and enjoy life. Who knows how long we have?
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
•Not everyone can "just enjoy retirement" without maximizing their benefits. Some of us need to stretch every dollar and the difference between filing at FRA vs 70 can be thousands per year. Sorry about your mom though, that's tough.
0 coins
Elin Robinson
The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and potentially the Government Pension Offset (GPO) are definitely relevant to your situation. Here's what you should know: 1. WEP reduces your Social Security benefit if you receive a pension from work not covered by Social Security (like your government job). 2. The WEP reduction is capped based on your years of "substantial earnings" under Social Security. With 32 years of SS-covered work, your WEP reduction would be smaller than someone with fewer years. 3. The zeros won't directly lower your benefit because SS uses your highest 35 years of indexed earnings. Those zeros simply won't help increase your benefit. 4. File for your SS statement with WEP calculation included to see your actual numbers. Regarding your break-even analysis: If your life expectancy is 82 and your calculations show you'd lose money by waiting until 70, then filing now at 67 is mathematically sound. The usual break-even point is around 82-83 years.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•This is very helpful, thank you! I didn't know about the "substantial earnings" part - I believe all my 32 years in the private sector would qualify as substantial earnings based on what I've earned. Do I need to do anything special when I file to make sure the WEP is calculated correctly? I'm worried about getting a surprise reduction later.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
I've been trying to reach SSA for weeks about a similar situation (WEP calculation) and couldn't get through. Finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an agent in about 20 minutes! They have a video demo showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU Worth it to actually speak with someone who could explain my WEP calculation. They told me that my pension won't affect my SS until I actually start receiving it. Also discovered I had 28 years of substantial earnings which limited my WEP reduction. Definitely recommend talking to an actual agent about your specific situation.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•That's interesting about the pension not affecting SS until you actually start receiving it. That might change my strategy completely. I'll check out that service - I've tried calling SSA three times but always get disconnected after waiting over an hour.
0 coins
Beth Ford
just fyi the wep thing is really unfair. theres a bill in congress to get rid of it but its been stuck for years. i worked 22 yrs paying ss then 15 for state govt and my ss check is tiny even tho i paid in all those years!!! total scam!!!!!
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
•I agree it's unfair! Both my parents were teachers who had small SS checks despite working summer jobs for decades that paid into SS. But I don't think Congress will ever fix it - they've been "working on it" for 20+ years.
0 coins
Amy Fleming
One important thing to understand about break-even calculations: they don't account for survivor benefits. If you're married and are the higher earner, waiting until 70 provides your spouse with a larger survivor benefit if you pass away first. This is a form of insurance that pure break-even analysis misses. Also worth noting that if your government pension is small and/or you have close to 30 years of "substantial earnings" under Social Security, the WEP reduction might be minimal. The formula gets complicated, but generally: - With 30+ years of substantial earnings: No WEP reduction - With 21-29 years: Partial WEP reduction - With 20 or fewer years: Full WEP reduction Since you have 32 years of SS-covered work, you might be completely exempt from WEP if all those years had "substantial earnings" as defined by SSA (varies by year but around $25,000+ for recent years).
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•I'm a widow actually, so no spouse to worry about for survivor benefits. That's why I've been so focused on the break-even calculation for just myself. I'm happy to hear I might be exempt from WEP with my 32 years! I definitely earned above the substantial earnings threshold for all those years. Will SSA automatically know this or do I need to prove it somehow when I file?
0 coins
Elin Robinson
Regarding your most recent question: SSA should have all your earnings history in their system. When you apply, make sure to mention you have a government pension (or will have one) AND that you believe you have 30+ years of substantial covered earnings under Social Security. They should calculate everything correctly, but it doesn't hurt to specifically bring it up. Based on everything you've shared: 1. With 32 years of substantial earnings, you might escape WEP reductions entirely 2. Given your break-even calculation and life expectancy estimate of 82, claiming at 67 is reasonable 3. The zeros on your record from recent years won't negatively impact your benefit (they just don't help increase it) I recommend applying soon if you've done your calculations carefully. Each month you wait past FRA increases your benefit by about 0.67%, but if your break-even math shows claiming now makes sense, then follow your analysis.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•Thank you so much for this thorough advice! I think I'm going to go ahead and file next month when I turn 67. I've been so confused about this decision for months, but I feel much more confident now. I'll definitely mention both the government pension and my 32 years of substantial earnings when I apply.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
Don't forget about taxes! If your pension + SS puts you in a higher tax bracket, part of your SS benefits might be taxable. Up to 85% of SS can be taxed depending on your combined income. Did you factor that into your break-even analysis?
0 coins
Alice Pierce
•this is such a good point!! i totally forgot about taxes in my calculations and got a nasty surprise at tax time last year. now i have to make quarterly estimated payments which is a huge pain
0 coins