Social Security WEP reduction percentage - 60% vs 40% withholding confusion
I'm completely lost trying to understand my reduced Social Security payment due to the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). My benefit was reduced because I receive a pension from non-covered employment (taught at a private school for 22 years), but I can't figure out if they withheld 60% or 40% of my SS benefit. My statement shows I should get around $1,875 monthly without WEP, but I'm only getting $1,125. Is that a 40% reduction or a 60% reduction? And does it depend on my years of substantial earnings under Social Security? I had about 18 years where I paid into SS at different jobs. The SSA rep I talked to mentioned something about a guarantee that WEP can't reduce more than half my pension amount, but then got interrupted and never finished explaining. Can someone help me understand this math?
16 comments
Join the conversation
Liam McGuire
The WEP reduction is capped at 50% of your non-covered pension, but that's not the same as taking a straight percentage of your Social Security benefit. The WEP reduction works by modifying the formula used to calculate your PIA (Primary Insurance Amount). Normally, SSA gives you 90% of your first tier of AIME (Average Indexed Monthly Earnings), but with WEP, that first tier percentage drops to as low as 40% - meaning a maximum reduction of 50% on that first tier only. Based on your numbers, you're seeing a $750 reduction ($1,875 - $1,125), which is 40% of your full benefit amount. This means you're keeping 60% of your original benefit. With 18 years of substantial earnings, you're getting a slight break on the WEP reduction. The full WEP impact is softened once you have more than 20 years of substantial earnings and eliminated at 30+ years.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Oh I see! So when they say WEP reduces by "up to 50%," they're talking about reducing that first calculation bracket from 90% down to 40% (a 50% reduction of that bracket), NOT taking 50% of my total benefit. That makes more sense with the numbers I'm seeing. So I'm actually keeping 60% of what I would've gotten without WEP. And if I had worked 2 more years under Social Security (for 20 years total), I would've started getting a break on that reduction?
0 coins
Amara Eze
i got hit with this wep thing too last year...govt is basically stealing our ss that we paid into!! my friend said its not legal but nobody fights it
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•WEP isn't theft - it's actually correcting an unintended windfall. The SS benefit formula is weighted to give lower-wage workers a higher percentage of their pre-retirement earnings. Without WEP, people who worked in jobs not covered by SS would appear to have lower lifetime earnings than they actually had, giving them this extra boost inappropriately. It's perfectly legal, though many affected workers do find it frustrating. The law has been in place since 1983.
0 coins
Giovanni Greco
Are you sure you have 18 years of substantial earnings? The threshold changes each year - for 2025 it's around $31,275. You might have fewer qualifying years than you think. Check your earnings record on the MySocialSecurity portal to be sure.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•That's a good point - I just checked my earnings record and there were 2 years where I thought I'd made enough but actually fell just short of the threshold for those years. So I really only have 16 years of substantial earnings. That probably explains the full WEP reduction I'm seeing.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
I spent 2 hours on hold with SSA trying to get WEP explained to me last month!!! Nobody picked up and call kept dropping. I finally found a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me through to an agent in 20 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent explained that WEP reduces the 90% factor in the first bend point to 40% (a 50% reduction of that factor). But the actual impact on your total benefit depends on your earnings history. For me it worked out to about a 35% reduction of my total benefit.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Thanks for the tip about getting through to SSA! Their phone lines are impossible. I'll check out that service. It sounds like everyone's WEP reduction percentage is different based on their specific earnings history, but mine is about 40% of the total benefit.
0 coins
Dylan Wright
The WEP formula is incredibly confusing! To directly answer your question: the math shows you're keeping 60% of your benefit (or having 40% withheld). The WEP reduction is applied to only PART of your benefit calculation, but results in about 40% total reduction in your case. For 2025, with 16-17 years of substantial earnings, your first bend point factor would be 40% instead of 90%. With 18-19 years, you'd get a slightly modified factor of 45%. At 20 years, it jumps to 50%, and increases 5% per year until it reaches 90% at 30 years. The guarantee you mentioned means the reduction can never be more than half of your non-covered pension amount.
0 coins
Amara Eze
•my brother says theres a bill in congress to fix this wep thing. anyone heard about that? will we get our money back????
0 coins
Dylan Wright
•Yes, there have been several bills proposed to reform WEP over the years, including the Social Security Fairness Act and various WEP reform bills. However, none have passed yet due to the high cost of implementation. The proposals typically don't provide retroactive payments, but instead would modify the formula going forward. The latest versions I've seen would give long-term WEP-affected beneficiaries an extra $150/month and create a new proportional formula for future retirees.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
wait is WEP the same as GPO? my wife gets a teacher pension and her SS widow benefits got cut by 2/3rds they said it was government pension offset
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•No, they're different but related provisions. WEP affects your own Social Security retirement benefit if you have a pension from non-covered work. GPO affects spousal or survivor benefits if you have a government pension. GPO typically reduces spousal/survivor benefits by 2/3 of your government pension amount, which can often eliminate the benefit entirely. Your wife is affected by GPO, not WEP.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
I had this EXACT situation last year - retired teacher with SS from other jobs. You've lost 40% of your benefit (keeping 60%). The formula is complex, but here's what happens: 1. Normal SS formula uses 90% of first chunk of your earnings in calculation 2. WEP reduces that 90% to 40% (a 50% reduction) 3. This doesn't mean 50% of your TOTAL benefit, just 50% of that first calculation tier 4. Result is usually a 30-40% reduction of total benefit With 18 qualified years, you should be getting a slight break on the full WEP penalty. Did you verify all 18 years meet the substantial earnings threshold? Each year has a different dollar amount.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Thank you for the clear explanation! I just double-checked my earnings record and realized I only have 16 valid substantial earnings years, not 18. Two of my years fell just short of the threshold. That explains why I'm getting the full WEP reduction without any break. So frustrating!
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
•That explains it! The threshold increases every year with inflation. For 2025, you need at least $31,275 in SS-covered earnings to count as a year of substantial earnings. If you're still working, even part-time in covered employment, you might consider trying to earn enough to meet the threshold for a few more years. Each additional year over 20 will increase your benefit by 5% of the original WEP reduction.
0 coins