Can I take reduced SS at 62 then switch to my deceased disabled husband's benefits at FRA?
I'm dealing with a complicated situation and need advice before heading to my local SSA office. My spouse received SSDI from 2020-2024 after becoming disabled at 61, then passed away. My daughter (now 22) became disabled at 17 and currently receives benefits on my late husband's record. My husband's earnings were substantially higher than mine throughout our careers. I'm turning 60 next month and trying to plan my next steps. I'm considering taking my own retirement benefits at 62 (I understand they'll be reduced) and then switching to survivor benefits at my full retirement age (67). My questions are: 1. Is this strategy of taking my own reduced benefit first, then switching to survivor benefits at FRA even allowed? 2. Will my survivor benefit amount be reduced because my husband was on disability when he died? I've tried calling SSA multiple times but keep getting disconnected, and the online system keeps locking me out. I want to be fully informed before visiting an office since I've heard conflicting information from different SSA representatives in the past. Any insights from those who've navigated similar situations would be incredibly helpful!
23 comments
Sean O'Donnell
I was in a somewhat similar situation last year. Yes, you absolutely CAN take your own reduced benefit at 62 and then switch to the survivor benefit at your FRA - this is one of the few remaining "switching strategies" that still works after the 2015 law changes. I used Claimyr (claimyr.com) to finally get through to SSA after weeks of trying. They got me connected to a live agent in under 20 minutes! They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. The agent confirmed this strategy was valid for my situation.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Thank you for confirming this! Did your spouse also receive SSDI before passing? I'm wondering specifically if that affects the survivor benefit amount I'll get at FRA.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
To directly answer your questions: 1) Yes, you can take your own reduced retirement benefit at 62 and then switch to survivor benefits at your full retirement age. This is a completely legitimate strategy. 2) Your survivor benefit will NOT be reduced because your husband was receiving disability. SSDI payments are essentially the same as what your husband would have received at his full retirement age. The survivor benefit is based on what he was receiving or would have received, so it doesn't matter that he was on disability. One thing to consider: if your survivor benefit would be higher than your own retirement benefit (likely given what you've shared about earnings), you might want to consider taking the survivor benefit at 60 (reduced for early claiming) and then switching to your own retirement benefit at 70 (maximized with delayed retirement credits). Run the numbers both ways to see which gives you more lifetime benefits based on your life expectancy.
0 coins
StarStrider
•I think this advice is backwards? I thought you want to take the smaller benefit first and save the bigger one for later so it can grow? Survivor benefits don't grow after FRA but your own benefit does until 70.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
@user8 - You're absolutely right about the maximization strategy, thank you for the correction. Since survivor benefits don't grow after FRA, while your own retirement benefit can grow until 70, the optimal strategy is often: * If your own benefit at 70 will be higher than survivor benefit: Take reduced survivor benefits as early as 60, then switch to your own maximized benefit at 70. * If your survivor benefit will always be higher: Take your own reduced retirement benefit at 62, then switch to survivor benefit at FRA. This is why personalized calculations are so important - the best strategy depends on the specific benefit amounts in each case. I apologize for my earlier confusion.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•This is really helpful, thank you both! I'll need to find out exact benefit amounts to decide which path makes more sense. Do you know if the SSA office can provide these estimates for both scenarios?
0 coins
Luca Esposito
they SHOULD be able to tell u the amounts but DONT just take whatever 1st person tells u!!! my mom got told 3 DIFFERENT amounts by 3 DIFFERENT ppl at SSA!!! the first lady was WRONG and would have cost mom $430/month FOREVER!! make them SHOW u the actual calculation on their screen!
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•This happened to my sister too. The first SSA rep told her she couldn't claim on her ex-husband's record because she had remarried, but that was incorrect since her second marriage was after age 60. Always ask them to cite the specific rule or regulation they're basing their decision on. And if possible, get the information in writing.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
Just wanted to mention that your daughter's benefits should continue even after you start claiming, since she was disabled before age 22. These are called Childhood Disability Benefits (CDB) or sometimes "Disabled Adult Child" benefits. Has SSA confirmed she'll keep receiving these?
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Yes, thankfully her benefits are continuing! They did a review last year and determined she still qualifies as she was disabled before 22. I was worried about that at first too.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
I'm a retired financial planner who specialized in Social Security strategies. Here's some additional information that might help you: 1. Since your husband was receiving SSDI, his benefit amount was already calculated as if he had reached his full retirement age, even though he became disabled at 61. This means there's no reduction to worry about. 2. For survivor benefits, the calculation is based on: - 100% of what your husband was receiving if you claim at your FRA - Reduced amount if claimed before your FRA (approximately 71.5% if claimed at age 60) - No increase for delaying past your FRA 3. For your own retirement benefit: - Reduced to about 70% of your PIA if claimed at 62 - 100% at your FRA (67) - Increases by 8% per year until age 70 (to 124% of your PIA) The key is knowing your specific benefit amounts. Ask SSA for your PIA (Primary Insurance Amount) and what your survivor benefit would be at different claiming ages. Only then can you determine which claiming strategy maximizes your lifetime benefits. One additional consideration: If you're still working at 62, the earnings test might reduce your benefits until you reach FRA. This doesn't apply once you reach FRA.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Thank you SO much for this detailed explanation! I hadn't considered the earnings test - I do plan to continue working part-time. Is there a specific income threshold where benefits start getting reduced?
0 coins
Nia Thompson
You're welcome! For 2025, the earnings limit for someone under FRA is $22,750 (it adjusts annually). For every $2 you earn above that limit, your benefit is reduced by $1. In the year you reach FRA, the limit is higher ($60,720 for the months before reaching FRA), and only $1 is deducted for every $3 earned above the limit. Importantly, these aren't permanent reductions. Once you reach FRA, your benefit is recalculated to give credit for months when benefits were reduced or withheld due to the earnings test. With part-time work, you might stay under the threshold, but it's definitely something to calculate when making your decision. The SSA can provide estimates based on your expected earnings.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•Also, keep in mind that any benefits reduced due to the earnings test aren't truly "lost" - they get added back into your calculation when you reach FRA, resulting in a higher monthly benefit from that point forward. Many people misunderstand this and think they permanently lose those benefits.
0 coins
Luca Esposito
my aunt tried 2 do this exact thing but got DENIED for some stupid reason I cant remember!!!! something about how long they were married maybe??? how long were u married to him? I think it matters
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
•Good point. For survivor benefits, you must have been married at least 9 months before your spouse passed away (with some exceptions). For divorced spouse survivor benefits, the marriage must have lasted at least 10 years. It's an important detail that can sometimes be overlooked.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
We were married for 32 years, so thankfully that won't be an issue in my case. I appreciate everyone pointing out these important details though!
0 coins
StarStrider
Something I havent seen mentioned - taxes! If ur still working remember SS can be taxable depending on your other income. My friend takes her survivors benefit but has to pay tax on 85% of it because she still works full time. Just another thing to think about with ur planning.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•That's an excellent point. Up to 85% of Social Security benefits can be taxable if your combined income (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + half of your Social Security benefits) exceeds certain thresholds. For 2025, those thresholds are $25,000 for individuals and $32,000 for couples filing jointly. Tax implications should definitely factor into any claiming strategy.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
I recommend getting a detailed benefit estimate from SSA before making any decisions. When I was getting disconnected repeatedly trying to call them, I found Claimyr (claimyr.com) was worth it to get connected. Their service got me through to an actual person who pulled up all my numbers and walked me through different scenarios. The video on their site shows exactly how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Made a huge difference to have accurate numbers to work with.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•Did you find they gave you different information than what was in your online account? I've been trying to help my brother with his disability application and we can't tell if the estimates online are accurate.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
I'm a retired SSA claims specialist, and I want to clarify something important: Your husband being on SSDI prior to death actually works in your favor. Since SSDI payments are calculated as if the person had reached full retirement age (regardless of actual age), his benefit amount wasn't reduced. This means your survivor benefit will be based on his full SSDI amount. Regarding your strategy - yes, it's perfectly allowable to take your own reduced retirement at 62 and switch to survivor benefits at your FRA. However, based on what you've shared, you should calculate whether taking survivor benefits early (as young as 60) and then switching to your own benefit at 70 might give you more money over your lifetime. This depends on your own earnings record and life expectancy. Also, don't overlook the potential for the Lump Sum Death Payment of $255 if you haven't already claimed it. And be aware that remarriage before age 60 would affect eligibility for survivor benefits. I'd recommend scheduling an appointment with your local office specifically for a WEP/GPO determination to ensure there are no surprises related to pensions that might affect your benefits.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Thank you for this expert insight! I didn't realize my husband's SSDI being calculated at FRA rates would benefit me this way. I'll definitely ask about running calculations for both strategies (my reduced benefit first vs. survivor benefit first) to see which maximizes my lifetime amount. I've already received the lump sum death payment, but I appreciate you mentioning it for others who might be reading this thread.
0 coins