< Back to Social Security Administration

Can I claim ex-spouse Social Security at FRA then switch to my own at 70 for 24% increase?

I've been divorced for quite a few years now after a 16-year marriage. My ex-husband (born in 1955) started collecting his Social Security retirement benefits when he turned 65. I'll reach my full retirement age (FRA) in August 2025, and I'm trying to figure out the best claiming strategy. I've heard about a strategy where you can collect one benefit first, then switch to another later. Is it possible for me to start collecting ex-spouse benefits when I reach FRA next year, and then switch to my own retirement benefits at age 70 to get that 24% increase for delaying? I'm still single and haven't remarried, if that matters. Would really appreciate insights from anyone who's done this or understands how the ex-spouse benefit rules work with the delayed retirement credits. I don't want to make a mistake that could cost me thousands over my lifetime!

Malik Davis

•

Yes, you can absolutely do this! Since you were married for more than 10 years (16 years in your case) and aren't currently remarried, you qualify for ex-spouse benefits. The strategy you're describing is sometimes called "restricted application" and it was preserved for people born before January 2, 1954. However, based on your FRA being in August 2025, you were born after the cutoff date. People born on or after January 2, 1954 are subject to the "deemed filing" rules, which means when you file for any benefit, you're deemed to have filed for all benefits you're eligible for. So unfortunately, the SSA will automatically pay you whichever is higher - your own benefit or the ex-spouse benefit - but not both, and you can't switch later. If you want to get the 24% increase at 70, your best option is likely to wait until 70 to file for any benefits. But you should definitely check with SSA directly to confirm based on your specific birth date and earning history.

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

Oh no, that's really disappointing! I thought I had this clever strategy all worked out. So if I understand correctly, since I was born after January 1954, I can't do the "file for one benefit now, switch later" approach? That seems so unfair when people just a few years older than me can do it!

0 coins

Isabella Santos

•

the previous person is wrong!! my sister just did this exact thing last year!! she got her ex husbands benefits at her FRA and is waiting till 70 for her own. you definitely CAN do this as long as you wait till your full retirement age to apply. don't let anyone tell you different!!!

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

I think your sister was born before January 2, 1954, which is why she was able to do that. The law changed with the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Those born before the cutoff date can still use restricted application, but those born after cannot. It's not about waiting until FRA - it's about your birth date determining which rules apply to you.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

The deemed filing rules changed with the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. If your FRA is in August 2025, that means you were born in 1959 or 1960, well after the January 2, 1954 cutoff date. I was in a similar situation - divorced after 15 years of marriage and hoping to get ex-spouse benefits while letting my own grow. When I called SSA to discuss this strategy, they explained that because I was born after the cutoff, I couldn't do it. You'll automatically get whichever benefit is higher when you file, and that decision is permanent (with some rare exceptions). I'd recommend calling SSA to discuss your specific situation, but expect hours on hold. I finally got through by using a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that held my place in line and called me when an agent was available. There's a video demo at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU that shows how it works. Saved me literally hours of frustration and I got clear answers about my options.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

Does that service really work? I've been trying to get through to SSA for weeks about my disability review and keep getting disconnected.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Yes, it actually did work for me. I was skeptical at first but was desperate after trying to call for 3 days straight. They called me back in about an hour when they had an agent on the line. Much better than listening to that hold music for hours!

0 coins

Freya Pedersen

•

THIS IS WHY SOCIAL SECURITY IS SO FRUSTRATING!!! They keep changing the rules and nobody can keep track of what applies to who! I spent 20 YEARS planning my retirement based on being able to claim my ex's benefits first and then switch, and then they changed everything with that 2015 law. Now I'm stuck taking reduced benefits because I can't afford to wait until 70. The system is DELIBERATELY CONFUSING so people make mistakes and the government saves money. It's disgusting.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

I feel your pain. Same thing happened to me but with the Windfall Elimination Provision. Worked as a teacher for 25 years not knowing my pension would reduce my SS. Nobody tells you these things until it's too late.

0 coins

Chloe Anderson

•

i helped my mom figure this out recently. if ur FRA is in 2025 ur probably born in 1959 or 1960? if so ur definitely affected by the deemed filing rules that started with people born after jan 1 1954. basically u have 2 options: 1. file at FRA and get whichever is higher (ur benefit or 50% of ex's) 2. wait till 70 to get ur own benefit with the 24% increase no switching allowed anymore for ppl our age :

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

Thanks for breaking it down so clearly. You're right - I was born in 1959. This is really disappointing as I was counting on being able to get some income at my FRA while still letting my own benefit grow. Guess I need to rethink my whole retirement strategy now.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

Wait I'm confused. So can she get 50% of her ex-husband's benefit ever? Or is that completely off the table now with these new rules?

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

She can still get the ex-spouse benefit (which is up to 50% of his PIA), but only if it's HIGHER than her own benefit. Under the deemed filing rules, when she files, she'll automatically receive whichever is higher - her own or the ex-spouse benefit. If her own benefit is higher, she'll never receive the ex-spouse benefit. If the ex-spouse benefit is higher, she'll receive that instead of her own. She can't receive both sequentially like people born before 1954 can.

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

Thank you all for the clarification. I'm definitely disappointed but glad I asked before making a mistake. So if I understand correctly: 1. Because I was born in 1959, I'm subject to the deemed filing rules 2. I can't do the strategy of taking ex-spouse benefits at FRA and then switching to my own at 70 3. When I file (whether at FRA or later), I'll automatically get whichever is higher - my own benefit or 50% of my ex's I need to figure out if my own benefit at 70 (with the 24% increase) would be more than 50% of my ex's benefit. If it would be, then waiting until 70 makes sense. If not, then I should just file at FRA. Does that sound right?

0 coins

Isabella Santos

•

Yes thats it exactly!! You got it! And you can call the SSA and ask them to calculate both numbers for you so you can make the best decision. Just be super patient cuz the wait times are crazy long

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

My neighbor went through something similar with her ex. She ended up just claiming at her FRA because her health wasn't great and she figured the bird in hand was worth two in the bush, if you know what I mean. Sometimes waiting until 70 sounds good on paper but you never know what life will bring. Just something to consider.

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

That's a good point about health considerations. I'm pretty healthy, but you never know. I'll have to weigh the guaranteed income starting sooner against the potentially higher amount if I wait. Decisions, decisions...

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

One more important thing to note: Even though you can't do the restricted application strategy, you should still compare three numbers: 1. Your benefit at FRA 2. Your benefit at age 70 (with the 24% increase) 3. Your ex-spouse benefit (up to 50% of his PIA) Create a breakeven analysis to see how long you'd need to live for waiting until 70 to make financial sense. For most people, if you live past 80-82, waiting until 70 provides more lifetime benefits. You can use the SSA calculator online to get estimates, or schedule an appointment to get precise numbers for your situation.

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

This is incredibly helpful! I'll definitely run those numbers. My family tends to be long-lived (both my parents made it past 90), so waiting might make sense for me if the age 70 benefit is significantly higher. Thank you for the detailed advice!

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,684 users helped today