< Back to Texas Unemployment

Paolo Esposito

TWC denied medical-related separation - appeal hearing affirmed prior ruling despite employer contradictions

I'm at my wit's end with this TWC appeal process. I was initially denied benefits because TWC determined I 'voluntarily quit due to health concerns' but that's completely misrepresenting what happened.\n\nBasically, I had a serious eye infection that required surgery (had to remove a cyst). The day I left work, I was experiencing complications - literally could feel blood on my face from the surgical site. My manager knew about my condition and upcoming follow-up surgery. When I said I needed to leave due to medical issues, they immediately cut off my email access that SAME DAY.\n\nTo me, cutting off access = termination. The owner even asked for his key back and reminded me about my NDA in writing. How is that not being fired?\n\nAt my appeal hearing, the employer completely changed their story! First they claimed I quit, then when questioned by the hearing officer, they switched to saying I 'abandoned my job' by not showing up the next day. How could I show up when they'd already cut my access?\n\nThe hearing officer even directly asked my employer if they had reason to think I would be fired, and they said no - contradicting their own actions of cutting access immediately.\n\nThe strangest part? The day after my hearing, my TWC portal just says 'affirm prior ruling' with zero explanation. All the evidence points to wrongful termination, not quitting.\n\nThe employer even falsified a write-up to please a client (which they denied during the hearing). I have recordings of conversations and emails proving my side.\n\nDoes anyone know an employment attorney in DFW who handles TWC appeals? Can I request a new hearing based on the employer's contradictions? I'm really struggling financially and this denial feels completely unjust.

omg they can't just change their story during the hearing!!! that should be illegal. when i had my twc hearing the officer was super strict about sticking to the facts that were already submitted. did u tell the hearing officer right then that they were changing their story??

0 coins

Yes! I tried pointing it out but the hearing officer kept moving on. It felt like they were more interested in getting through all the questions than actually listening to the inconsistencies. The most frustrating part was watching my employer contradict themselves in real time while I had evidence proving otherwise.

0 coins

The TWC appeals process can be incredibly frustrating. Based on your situation, it sounds like you have a good case for a Commission Appeal, which is the next level after the Appeal Tribunal. You have 14 calendar days from the date the Appeal Tribunal decision was mailed to file this appeal. \n\nYou should definitely highlight the employer's contradictory statements and the fact that they revoked your access immediately, which supports your claim of termination rather than voluntary separation. Make sure to emphasize the medical necessity of your departure that day, and that they were fully aware of your condition.\n\nAlso, if your employer changed their reason during the hearing, that's important to note in your Commission Appeal. When I was going through this, I couldn't get anyone on the phone at TWC to save my life. I finally tried Claimyr (claimyr.com) and got through to a TWC agent in about 20 minutes who helped me understand the Commission Appeal process. You can see how it works in their video demo: https://youtu.be/V-IMvH88P1U?si=kNxmh025COIlIzKh \n\nFor legal help, Legal Aid of Northwest Texas might be able to assist with your unemployment case without charge if you qualify financially.

0 coins

This is excellent advice about filing a Commission Appeal. I would add that it's critical to explicitly state that the employer changed their reason for separation during the hearing, which demonstrates inconsistency in their position. While pursuing this appeal, make sure to keep requesting payment (if you're still within your benefit year) and completing work search activities as required.

0 coins

Thank you both for the advice. I didn't realize I could appeal to the Commission level. I'll definitely look into that Claimyr service - I've been trying for days to get someone on the phone with no luck. Do you know if I need to submit any additional evidence with the Commission Appeal or just reference what was already presented in the hearing?

0 coins

my cousin had somthing like this happen she got fired for being sick and they said she quit. TWC always sides with the employers its rigged!!! she never got her benefits after 3 appeals so dont waste ur time

0 coins

This is not accurate. TWC does not automatically side with employers. I've represented both claimants and employers in TWC hearings, and the outcome depends entirely on the evidence presented and the specific circumstances of each case. Many claimants win their appeals when they have proper documentation and can demonstrate they were terminated without misconduct or had good cause to leave employment.

0 coins

well my cousin had doctor notes and everything and still lost so idk what ur talking about

0 coins

wait did they fire you before or after your surgery? i'm confused about the timeline. also did you request FMLA protection before your surgery? that would have changed everything

0 coins

Sorry if it wasn't clear. I had initial surgery to remove the eye cyst, then went back to work, but was still having complications (bleeding) when this incident happened. I was scheduled for follow-up surgery later that month. I didn't request FMLA because I'd only been with the company for 10 months - you need 12 months to qualify for FMLA protection.

0 coins

Based on what you've described, you have strong grounds for a Commission Appeal. Here's what you should focus on:\n\n1. The employer's inconsistent reasons for separation (first claiming you quit, then claiming job abandonment)\n\n2. The immediate revocation of your email access the same day you left for medical reasons (this strongly suggests termination rather than voluntary separation)\n\n3. The request for the return of company property (keys) and the NDA reminder (again, actions consistent with termination)\n\n4. Your documented medical condition as the reason for leaving that day\n\nFor your Commission Appeal, you should:\n\n- File within the 14-day deadline (critical)\n- Clearly outline the contradictions in the employer's testimony\n- Attach copies of the emails showing they requested keys and mentioned the NDA\n- Include any medical documentation supporting your condition\n- Request a new hearing based on the inconsistencies\n\nCommission Appeals can overturn the Appeal Tribunal decisions, especially when there are procedural issues or contradictory evidence. I've seen several cases where the Commission ruled differently than the initial appeal hearing.

0 coins

Thank you so much for the detailed information. This is exactly what I needed. I'm gathering all my documentation now. Quick question - should I submit the audio recording I have of the conversation when I left that day? It clearly shows I was leaving due to medical issues, not quitting permanently.

0 coins

Yes, you can submit the audio recording as additional evidence for your Commission Appeal, but there are some important considerations:\n\n1. You must disclose that you have this recording in your appeal\n2. Texas is a one-party consent state for recordings, so it's legal if you were part of the conversation\n3. The Commission may or may not consider new evidence that wasn't presented at the Appeal Tribunal hearing\n4. You should provide a written transcript of the relevant portions of the recording\n\nHaving handled many TWC appeals, I've found that the Commission is particularly interested in cases where the employer's story changed during the hearing. This indicates potential credibility issues with their testimony.\n\nAlso, ensure you're continuing to request payment every two weeks and documenting your three work search activities per week while your appeal is pending. If the Commission rules in your favor, you'll receive all back payments for the weeks you properly requested payment.

0 coins

I had a similar case last year and the recording made ALL the difference! My employer was saying one thing to TWC and another thing to me. Once I submitted the recording transcript they completely changed their decision. Definitely include it!!!

0 coins

this is SO frustrating!!! i hate how TWC just says 'affirm prior ruling' with no explanation. like HOW are we supposed to know what to appeal if they don't tell us why they decided that way?? do u think the hearing officer just didn't believe u or something?

0 coins

That's exactly what I'm struggling with! Without knowing their reasoning, it's hard to address specific points in my Commission Appeal. It feels like they completely ignored the fact that my access was cut off immediately, which clearly shows I was terminated. I thought the hearing went well aside from the employer's contradictions, so the decision really blindsided me.

0 coins

Not to get off topic but this is exactly why I record EVERY conversation with my boss. Texas is a one-party consent state which means as long as YOU know its being recorded its legal. Saved my butt when I got fired last year and my boss tried to claim misconduct. I also screenshot EVERYTHING. Can't trust these companies AT ALL.

0 coins

Very good point about Texas being a one-party consent state for recordings. Documentation is absolutely critical in these cases. I always recommend keeping a work journal with dates, times, and summaries of important conversations, along with any emails or written communications. For the OP, having that recording and email evidence puts you in a much better position than many appellants.

0 coins

I'm glad I kept everything. The emails asking for the key return and mentioning the NDA are dated the same day I left work. I also have screenshots showing my email access was revoked within hours. I'm hoping all this evidence will make a difference at the Commission level.

0 coins

what about those fake write-ups you mentioned?? can you prove they were fake?? that seems like a big deal

0 coins

The fake write-up situation is complicated. They claimed during the hearing that I was never written up, but I have an email where my manager forwarded me a write-up and explicitly said \

0 coins

This sounds like a really strong case for a Commission Appeal! The fact that they immediately cut your email access and asked for keys back the SAME DAY you left for medical reasons is huge evidence of termination, not quitting. Plus their story changing during the hearing from "quit" to "job abandonment" should definitely work in your favor. I went through something similar and what helped me was organizing all the evidence chronologically - like showing the timeline of events (medical issue → leaving work → immediate access revocation → key request) to prove it was clearly a termination. The Commission tends to look more carefully at cases where employers contradict themselves. Also, since you mentioned having recordings and emails, make sure to include transcripts of the key parts. That email about the NDA and key return is golden evidence! Don't lose hope - the Commission Appeal process is your chance to get this overturned with all the documentation you have.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about organizing everything chronologically! I hadn't thought about presenting it that way but you're absolutely right - the timeline clearly shows termination. Medical issue happens → I leave for medical reasons → they immediately cut access and ask for keys = termination, not quitting. I'm definitely going to use this approach in my Commission Appeal. The fact that all of this happened on the SAME DAY should make it pretty obvious what really occurred. Thanks for the encouragement - I was starting to lose hope but reading everyone's advice here is giving me confidence that I have a solid case.

0 coins

Wow, reading through all this has me fired up on your behalf! The employer's story changing mid-hearing from "quit" to "job abandonment" is absolutely ridiculous - how does a hearing officer not catch that as a major red flag?? Your timeline is crystal clear: you had a legitimate medical emergency (bleeding from surgical site), told them you needed to leave for medical reasons, and they IMMEDIATELY cut your access and demanded company property back. That's textbook termination, not quitting! I've been through the TWC appeals process twice and the Commission Appeal is definitely your best shot. They tend to be more thorough than the initial hearing officers. Make sure you emphasize in your appeal that the employer's contradictory testimony shows they're not being truthful about the circumstances. The fact that you have recordings, emails about the NDA/keys, and proof of access revocation puts you in a much stronger position than most people. Don't let this employer get away with changing their story just to avoid paying unemployment benefits. Fight this all the way - you've got the evidence to win!

0 coins

I completely agree - this case has so many red flags it's infuriating! The immediate access revocation is the smoking gun here. What employer cuts off email access for someone who "voluntarily quit"? That's literally standard termination procedure. @1d7e1b2e59d8 you're absolutely right about fighting this all the way. Paolo, I've seen cases where the Commission has specifically called out employers for changing their testimony during hearings. The fact that they went from "quit" to "job abandonment" shows they're scrambling to find ANY reason to deny benefits. One thing I'd add - when you file your Commission Appeal, specifically request that they review the hearing transcript for the employer's contradictory statements. Sometimes hearing officers miss these things in real time, but the Commission reviewers catch them when reading the full transcript. Your medical documentation combined with their immediate termination actions (access cut, keys requested, NDA mentioned) creates an ironclad timeline. This employer is going to have a very hard time explaining why they took immediate termination steps if you supposedly "quit." Keep pushing forward!

0 coins

This whole situation is absolutely maddening! I've been following TWC cases for years and what you're describing - the employer changing their story mid-hearing from "quit" to "job abandonment" - should have been a huge red flag to the hearing officer. The timeline you've laid out is textbook wrongful termination disguised as voluntary separation. You left for a legitimate medical emergency (bleeding from your surgical site!), and they IMMEDIATELY revoked your email access and demanded company property back. No employer does that for someone who "voluntarily quit" - that's standard termination protocol. I really hope you file that Commission Appeal within the 14-day window. The Commission reviewers are typically more thorough than the initial hearing officers and they specifically look for inconsistencies in employer testimony. Make sure to emphasize how the employer's story completely changed during the hearing - that's going to be a major credibility issue for them. Your evidence sounds rock solid - the emails about keys/NDA, proof of immediate access revocation, medical documentation, and especially that recording. The Commission needs to see this case because it's exactly the type of situation where an employer is trying to manipulate the system to avoid paying rightful benefits. Don't give up - you've got a strong case and the documentation to back it up!

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! You're absolutely right about the timeline being textbook wrongful termination. I keep going back to that moment when they cut my email access - like you said, what employer does that for someone who "quit"? It was clearly retaliation for my medical emergency. @618db9ad3f82 your point about the Commission reviewers being more thorough gives me hope. The hearing officer seemed to rush through everything and completely missed how my employer contradicted themselves right there in real time. Going from "quit" to "job abandonment" in the same hearing should have been a massive credibility red flag. I'm definitely filing the Commission Appeal this week. Reading all these responses has really helped me organize my thoughts and evidence. The fact that multiple people here are seeing the same obvious issues with my case makes me feel like I'm not crazy for thinking this decision was completely wrong. Thank you for the encouragement - I was honestly starting to doubt myself after that "affirm prior ruling" with zero explanation. Time to fight back with everything I've got!

0 coins

Texas Unemployment AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,080 users helped today