Will Biden's proposed 401k tax changes impact everyone using retirement accounts?
I've been trying to understand the new proposed changes to 401k taxation under Biden's plan, and I'm confused about how this aligns with his pledge not to raise taxes on people making under $400k. From what I've read, it sounds like these contributions would be taxed more like a Roth plan - taxable in the contribution year but not upon withdrawal. If that's true, wouldn't this affect everyone with a 401k regardless of income level? My situation makes this especially concerning. My employer does an annual profit-sharing contribution to my 401k at the end of each year based on company performance. I have zero control over the amount they contribute. Under this new plan, would I suddenly have to pay taxes on this lump sum when I file just a couple months later? That's money I never actually see or control. Even worse, these employer contributions don't fully vest until I've been with the company for 6 years. What happens if I leave before then? Would I have paid taxes on money I'll never actually receive? This seems like it could create a real financial burden for people in my situation. Has anyone else looked into these proposed changes and how they might impact regular retirement savers? Any clarity would be appreciated!
19 comments


Alejandro Castro
The proposed 401k changes are often misunderstood, so let me help clarify. The plan doesn't actually make all 401k contributions taxable. What's being discussed is changing how tax deductions work for higher-income earners. Under the proposal, instead of getting a tax deduction at your marginal tax rate (which benefits high-income earners more), everyone would get a flat tax credit (like 26%). This would actually benefit many middle and lower-income earners while reducing the tax advantage for those in higher brackets. For your specific employer profit-sharing situation, these contributions would still be treated as they are now if you're not in a high-income bracket. The plan targets those making over $400k, so most average earners wouldn't see negative tax consequences. Regarding vesting concerns, you would only pay taxes on what's actually yours according to the vesting schedule, not on unvested amounts that you might never receive. The proposals are still just that - proposals. They would need to pass through Congress, and the final version could look quite different from what's initially suggested.
0 coins
Monique Byrd
•Thanks for explaining. Do you know if there's a phase-out range for the tax credit, or is it a hard cutoff at $400k? And would this apply to both employee and employer contributions or just employee contributions?
0 coins
Alejandro Castro
•The proposed phase-out details aren't fully finalized, but most policy discussions suggest there would be a gradual phase-out rather than a hard cutoff at $400k. This helps avoid a "tax cliff" where earning $1 more suddenly changes your tax situation dramatically. The changes would likely apply to both employee and employer contributions, as the fundamental change is about how retirement contributions are incentivized through the tax code rather than who makes the contribution. The key is moving from a deduction system (which gives bigger benefits to those in higher tax brackets) to a credit system (which provides the same percentage benefit regardless of tax bracket).
0 coins
Jackie Martinez
I went through something similar trying to understand these proposed changes. After spinning my wheels for hours reading confusing articles, I stumbled across this AI tax assistant at https://taxr.ai that really helped me understand the nuances of the proposal. What I learned is that the proposal isn't about making 401k contributions taxable for everyone - it's about changing the tax incentive structure. Instead of deductions (which are worth more to high-income earners), there would be a flat percentage tax credit (which treats everyone equally regardless of tax bracket). The tool walked me through how this would actually benefit many middle-income folks while only reducing tax advantages for those making well over $400k. It also analyzed my specific situation with employer contributions and explained how the vesting rules would work under the proposal.
0 coins
Lia Quinn
•That sounds helpful, but I'm curious how accurate it could be about proposals that haven't even passed yet. Does it just explain the current proposals or does it actually calculate your potential tax difference under the new system?
0 coins
Haley Stokes
•I'm skeptical about these AI tools. How can it possibly know the details of legislation that hasn't even been finalized? Seems like it might just be giving generic information you could find anywhere.
0 coins
Jackie Martinez
•It both explains the proposals in easy-to-understand language and provides scenario analysis based on your specific situation. The tool is clear that it's working with proposed changes rather than finalized law, but it helps you understand the potential impact. The value I found was that it breaks down complex tax proposals into plain English and then lets you see how they might affect you specifically. It also updates as new information becomes available about the proposals, so you're getting current information rather than outdated news articles.
0 coins
Haley Stokes
Just wanted to follow up about that taxr.ai site someone mentioned earlier. I was honestly skeptical at first (as you could probably tell from my comment), but I decided to try it anyway since I was getting nowhere with all the conflicting articles online. It actually explained things really well! The tool walked me through how the proposed 401k changes would work with my specific salary and contribution amounts. Turns out I'd actually save about $850 annually under the proposed system since I'm in a lower tax bracket. The site explained that because I'm well under the $400k threshold, the flat tax credit would be more valuable to me than my current deduction. The explanations were much clearer than anything I'd found elsewhere, and it helped me stop worrying about a tax increase that wouldn't actually affect me. Really glad I checked it out despite my initial doubts.
0 coins
Asher Levin
After spending THREE DAYS trying to get through to the IRS about how these potential 401k changes might affect my existing retirement accounts, I finally found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in under 15 minutes! You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent explained that these are just proposals at this stage, and clarified how the changes would likely work if they ever get implemented. For my situation (I make around $85k and have both employer matching and profit sharing), the agent confirmed that the proposed changes would likely benefit me through the tax credit system rather than hurt me. It was such a relief to get official information instead of trying to piece together understanding from random articles and social media posts. Definitely recommend this service if you need to speak with someone at the IRS about your specific situation!
0 coins
Serene Snow
•Wait, how does this actually work? The IRS phone system is notoriously impossible to navigate. Are you saying this service somehow gets you through the phone queue faster?
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
•This sounds too good to be true. The IRS never picks up their phones - I tried calling them 5 times last month about an issue with my refund and couldn't get through. And they gave you specific advice about proposed legislation that hasn't even passed yet? I'm calling BS on this.
0 coins
Asher Levin
•The service works by using their system to navigate the IRS phone menus and wait on hold for you. When they reach an agent, they call you and connect you directly. It bypasses the frustrating part of waiting on hold for hours. Regarding the proposed legislation, I didn't say they gave me definitive answers about things that haven't passed. The agent helped clarify the general direction of the proposals and how the tax credit system would work compared to the current deduction system. They were clear about what's currently in effect versus what's just proposed, but it was still helpful to get information from an official source rather than speculation online.
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
I need to eat my words from my skeptical comment above. After seeing multiple people share positive experiences, I broke down and tried Claimyr during my lunch break today. I've been trying to reach the IRS for WEEKS about how these retirement account changes might affect my self-employed SEP IRA. Got connected in about 12 minutes (still had to verify my identity of course). The agent explained that the current proposals would likely give me a better tax benefit than I currently get since I'm in the 22% bracket and the proposed credit would be 26%. She also clarified how it would work with my variable income from self-employment and when these changes might take effect if passed. Honestly saved me so much stress. The service fee was worth every penny for the time saved and clear information received.
0 coins
Romeo Barrett
Here's something nobody's mentioning: The conversion process from our current system to whatever gets implemented would be a nightmare for record-keeping. I'm an accountant (not giving tax advice, just perspective), and tracking basis across multiple years of different tax treatment would create a logistical headache. Imagine having some contributions that were pre-tax, some that were post-tax, and potentially some under a tax credit system - all within the same account. Then multiply that complexity across millions of Americans with retirement accounts. The implementation would require sophisticated tracking systems that many plan administrators simply don't have currently. The tax benefits debate is important, but the practical implementation challenges shouldn't be overlooked.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•That's a really good point I hadn't considered. Would this create a situation similar to backdoor Roth conversions where we need to track basis meticulously? Could the record-keeping requirements alone kill this proposal?
0 coins
Romeo Barrett
•Yes, it would create tracking challenges very similar to backdoor Roth conversions, but potentially more complicated depending on implementation details. Record-keeping would need to distinguish between contributions made under different tax regimes. The complexity of implementation is definitely a factor that could affect the final form of any proposal. Congressional committees and the Treasury Department are well aware of these challenges, which is why any major retirement system change would likely include transition rules and potentially a phased implementation approach. It's actually one of the reasons why major tax code changes are relatively rare - the devil is always in the implementation details.
0 coins
Justin Trejo
Has anyone seen actual text from the proposal? All I can find are news articles ABOUT the proposal but not the actual details. Would love to read the source document if anyone has it.
0 coins
Alana Willis
•Check the Treasury Green Book - it's where detailed tax proposals from the administration are published. The most recent one should have the retirement account proposals. You can find it on the Treasury Department website.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
I've been following this discussion closely as someone who's also trying to understand these proposed changes. What strikes me is how much misinformation is circulating about this topic. From my research, the key thing people are missing is that this isn't really about "taxing 401k contributions" - it's about changing the tax incentive structure from deductions to credits. Under the current system, if you're in the 32% tax bracket, you save 32 cents per dollar contributed. Under the proposed credit system, everyone would get the same percentage benefit regardless of income level. For most middle-class earners, this would actually be a tax cut, not an increase. The "harm" only comes to high-income earners who currently get outsized tax benefits from retirement contributions. Regarding the original poster's concern about employer profit-sharing contributions - these would still be treated as pre-tax contributions that get taxed upon withdrawal, just like today. The credit system would apply to how much tax benefit you get from making those contributions, not when they're taxed. It's frustrating how complex tax policy gets distorted in the media cycle. The actual proposal is much more nuanced than "Biden wants to tax your 401k.
0 coins