Why would a company request a W-9 form for a travel reimbursement under $600?
Title: Why would a company request a W-9 form for a travel reimbursement under $600? 1 My wife is an orthopedic surgeon who got invited to attend a medical conference by one of the vendors she uses for implant devices. They told her they would cover her travel expenses, but asked her to book her own flight and they'd reimburse her afterward. So she paid about $485 for the round-trip flight out of pocket. Now the weird part - after she submitted her receipt for reimbursement, they're asking her to fill out a W-9 form before they'll process it. This seems really strange to me since it's just a reimbursement for actual expenses, not income. The flight was definitely under $600, and she doesn't have any business entity - she's just an employee at her hospital. I was under the impression W-9 forms were for independent contractors or businesses providing services. Shouldn't they just be able to reimburse her directly without tax paperwork? Is this some new IRS requirement I'm not aware of, or is the company just being overly cautious with their accounting?
34 comments


Roger Romero
12 This is a common point of confusion. Companies often have blanket policies requiring W-9s for any payment they make to individuals, even when it's technically just a reimbursement. While not strictly necessary for pure expense reimbursements under $600, many businesses do this as a standard practice for their accounting department. The company is likely being cautious for a few reasons: 1) They want documentation in case they're audited, 2) Their accounting system might flag all payments as requiring tax documentation, or 3) They may be considering the reimbursement as part of a broader relationship where your wife received something of value (the conference invitation itself could be considered a benefit).
0 coins
Roger Romero
•7 Thanks for explaining! So if my husband fills out the W-9, does that mean this reimbursement will show up as income on a 1099 at the end of the year? That doesn't seem right since it's just paying him back for an expense, not actual income.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•12 Great question. If they're handling it properly, they shouldn't issue a 1099 for a true expense reimbursement. The W-9 just gives them your tax information in their system. However, some companies do mistakenly issue 1099s for reimbursements. If that happens, you would need to report it as income on your tax return, but then deduct the same amount as a business expense if it was business-related, essentially canceling it out. If it's a personal expense reimbursement, you might want to contact their accounting department to clarify their intentions before year-end to avoid this issue.
0 coins
Roger Romero
18 After reading about your W-9 situation, I wanted to share something that might help. I had a similar issue last year with conference reimbursements and started using taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) to keep track of all my potential 1099 income versus actual reimbursements. The system automatically categorizes everything and flags potential issues like reimbursements being incorrectly reported as income. I used to struggle with tracking all these random reimbursements until I had the system analyze my documentation. It even generates a letter you can send to vendors who incorrectly issue 1099s for reimbursements explaining why it shouldn't be reported as income. Saved me from having to pay taxes on money that was just passing through my account!
0 coins
Roger Romero
•5 Does taxr.ai handle situations where you're not self-employed? My husband gets these random reimbursements maybe once a year from vendors, but he's a full-time employee, not a contractor or business owner.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•9 I'm a bit skeptical about using another tax service. Does it actually communicate with the IRS or just generate documents? Because getting the company to correct a 1099 they've already issued can be a nightmare.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•18 Yes, it absolutely handles employee situations too! The system is designed for anyone who receives payments that might be misclassified, regardless of employment status. Many hospital physicians deal with this exact scenario where they're employees but occasionally get reimbursements or speaking fees that vendors mishandle. It doesn't directly communicate with the IRS, but it generates documentation that makes resolving incorrect 1099s much easier. The system creates a proper paper trail showing why the payment was a reimbursement, not income, which is exactly what you need if you're ever questioned about it. I used to spend hours dealing with these issues manually before finding this tool.
0 coins
Roger Romero
5 Just wanted to update everyone - I tried taxr.ai after posting my question here and it was incredibly helpful! I uploaded the conference invitation email, receipt, and reimbursement request, and it immediately categorized it properly as a non-taxable reimbursement. What I really appreciated was that it explained exactly what language to use with the vendor to make sure they understand why a W-9 might be requested but shouldn't result in a 1099 for pure reimbursements. I'm much more confident now about dealing with this situation, and I've started cataloging all my husband's professional expenses with it just to be safe.
0 coins
Roger Romero
14 I see a lot of good advice here, but if your wife is still having trouble getting the company to process the reimbursement correctly, I'd recommend using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to get direct help from the IRS on this issue. I recently had a similar problem where a company insisted on issuing a 1099 for a reimbursement under $600, and I couldn't get a straight answer from their accounting department. I was stuck in endless hold cycles trying to call the IRS directly, but Claimyr got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes instead of the 2+ hours I was facing. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The agent was able to explain exactly what documentation I needed to prevent the payment from being incorrectly reported as income.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•23 How does this service actually work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS without waiting for hours.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•9 Yeah right. I've tried everything to get through to the IRS and nothing works. I find it hard to believe any service could actually get you through that quickly when their phone lines are constantly jammed.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•14 It uses a system that monitors IRS phone line capacity and calls at precisely the right moment when lines open up. Think of it like having someone continuously redial for you, but with sophisticated timing based on call volume patterns. When a line becomes available, it immediately connects you - no more waiting on hold for hours. They've figured out the exact calling patterns and timing that maximize your chances of getting through. I was skeptical too until I tried it. I'd spent three days trying to get through on my own with no luck, then got connected in minutes. The IRS agent I spoke with clarified that while companies often request W-9s for their records, they should not issue 1099s for straight expense reimbursements when they're just returning your money.
0 coins
Roger Romero
9 I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr! After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway since I had some unrelated tax questions about my hobby income. Got connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes (way better than the 3+ hours I'd waited previously and still got disconnected). The agent was super helpful and explained that companies request W-9s for ANY payment as a standard procedure, but confirmed that true expense reimbursements should NOT generate a 1099-MISC or 1099-NEC even if they have your W-9 on file. This is especially true for amounts under $600 that wouldn't trigger a 1099 requirement anyway. Worth the peace of mind to get the official answer!
0 coins
Roger Romero
3 Just a practical tip from someone who deals with this regularly: When your wife fills out the W-9, she could attach a short note stating "This form is being provided solely for a flight expense reimbursement of $485, which is not reportable income." I've found that specifically noting this helps prevent accounting departments from automatically generating a 1099 at year-end.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•22 Would that actually work? I've had companies tell me they have to follow their system's automated procedures regardless of notes.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•3 It doesn't work 100% of the time, but it creates a paper trail showing you clearly communicated the nature of the payment. Many accounting departments do review notes before issuing 1099s, especially for unusual or one-time payments. I've found the success rate is about 75% when you clearly mark both the W-9 form and any accompanying email with "FOR EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT ONLY - NOT REPORTABLE INCOME." For the companies that still issue an incorrect 1099, having this documentation makes it much easier to request a correction or justify your tax treatment if questioned.
0 coins
Roger Romero
15 Has anyone had experience with these medical device companies actually issuing 1099s for these types of reimbursements? I'm wondering if they're just collecting W-9s as a procedural thing but don't actually plan to issue any tax forms for small reimbursements.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•6 In my experience working with several orthopedic surgeons, it varies by company. The larger corporations almost never issue 1099s for pure travel reimbursements, even when they collect W-9s. The smaller companies are less consistent - sometimes their accounting departments don't distinguish between types of payments and just 1099 everything. It really depends on how sophisticated their financial department is.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
I work in medical device compliance and can shed some light on why companies do this. Most medical device manufacturers have strict policies requiring W-9s for ANY payment to healthcare professionals, regardless of amount, due to the Physician Payments Sunshine Act reporting requirements. Even though your wife's reimbursement likely won't need to be reported to CMS, the companies often use blanket policies to ensure they capture all necessary tax information upfront. The good news is that legitimate expense reimbursements under $600 should NOT result in a 1099 being issued to your wife. However, I'd recommend she keep detailed records of the conference invitation, receipts, and correspondence just in case the company's accounting department makes an error. If they do mistakenly issue a 1099, having this documentation will make it much easier to request a correction.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•This is really helpful context about the Sunshine Act requirements! I had no idea that medical device companies had such strict documentation policies for healthcare professionals. That definitely explains why they're requesting the W-9 even for a simple travel reimbursement. It's reassuring to hear from someone in the industry that this is standard practice and that it shouldn't result in a 1099 for legitimate expense reimbursements. I'll make sure to keep all the documentation you mentioned - the conference invitation, receipts, and email correspondence - just in case we need to prove it was a reimbursement and not income later on. Thanks for taking the time to explain the compliance side of things!
0 coins
Sunny Wang
As someone who's dealt with similar situations in healthcare consulting, I'd recommend your wife also ask the company upfront whether they plan to issue a 1099 for this reimbursement. Getting their answer in writing (even just an email) can save a lot of headaches later. Most reputable medical device companies understand the distinction between reimbursements and payments for services, but their accounting departments don't always communicate this properly. If they confirm it's just for their records and won't result in a 1099, you'll have peace of mind. If they seem unclear about their own policies, that's a red flag to be extra careful with documentation. Also worth noting - if this is part of a broader consulting or speaking arrangement with the company (even informal), that could change how they classify the payment. But for a simple travel reimbursement to attend a conference they invited her to, it should definitely not be treated as taxable income.
0 coins
Norman Fraser
•This is excellent advice about getting confirmation in writing! I never thought to ask the company directly about their 1099 intentions before submitting the W-9. That's such a simple step that could prevent a lot of confusion down the road. Your point about broader consulting arrangements is really important too. In this case, it sounds like it's truly just a one-time travel reimbursement for a conference invitation, which should be straightforward. But I can see how things could get murky if there were any ongoing relationships or additional compensation involved. I'm going to suggest my wife send a quick email to their accounting department asking for clarification on whether this reimbursement will result in any tax reporting. Having that documentation upfront seems like the smart move here.
0 coins
StarStrider
I'm dealing with a similar situation right now with my employer - they're asking for a W-9 for reimbursing my parking expenses at a work conference. It's frustrating because like everyone mentioned, it's clearly just getting my money back, not income. What I've learned from reading all these responses is that it seems to be more about the company's internal processes than actual IRS requirements. The advice about getting written confirmation that they won't issue a 1099 is gold - I'm definitely going to ask for that upfront. Has anyone here actually received an incorrect 1099 for a reimbursement and had to deal with getting it corrected? I'm curious how difficult that process actually is if a company makes that mistake.
0 coins
Ryder Ross
•I actually went through the incorrect 1099 situation last year with a conference reimbursement! The company issued me a 1099-MISC for what was clearly just paying me back for hotel expenses. Getting it corrected was honestly more frustrating than difficult - it took about 3 months and multiple phone calls to their accounting department. They eventually issued a corrected 1099 showing $0, but by then I'd already filed my taxes and had to include it as income and then deduct it as an unreimbursed business expense. The biggest pain was that their payroll company kept insisting they "had to" issue the 1099 because their system automatically generated it for any payment over $200. It really drove home the importance of getting that written confirmation upfront like others mentioned. Now I always ask companies to confirm in writing how they'll handle reimbursements before submitting any tax forms.
0 coins
Lena Kowalski
I've been following this discussion and wanted to add my perspective as someone who works in corporate accounting. The W-9 request is actually quite standard for any payment to an individual, even reimbursements, because it helps companies maintain consistent vendor records and ensures they have proper tax documentation if needed. What's key to understand is that requesting a W-9 doesn't automatically mean they'll issue a 1099. For legitimate expense reimbursements like your wife's flight, the company should have internal controls to distinguish between reimbursements and taxable payments. However, as others have mentioned, smaller companies or those with less sophisticated accounting systems sometimes make mistakes. My advice: Fill out the W-9 (it's pretty standard), but definitely follow the suggestions others made about getting written confirmation that this won't result in a 1099. Also keep all your documentation - the conference invitation, receipts, and email correspondence. This creates a clear paper trail showing the business purpose and reimbursement nature of the payment, which is exactly what you'd need if any questions arise later. The medical device industry does tend to be extra cautious with healthcare professional payments due to compliance requirements, so this is likely just their standard procedure rather than anything specific to your situation.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
•This is such a helpful explanation from the accounting perspective! It makes perfect sense that companies would use W-9s as a standard vendor documentation practice, even for reimbursements. I really appreciate you clarifying that the W-9 request itself doesn't automatically trigger a 1099 - that was something I was worried about. Your point about the medical device industry being extra cautious due to compliance requirements really ties together what others have mentioned about the Sunshine Act. It sounds like this is just their standard operating procedure rather than anything unusual about my wife's specific situation. I'm definitely going to follow your advice about getting written confirmation while still completing the W-9. The paper trail approach makes a lot of sense - having the conference invitation, receipts, and email correspondence all documented should provide clear evidence that this was a legitimate business expense reimbursement if any questions come up later. Thanks for the insider perspective on how corporate accounting typically handles these situations!
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
I went through something very similar with a pharmaceutical company last year when they reimbursed me for conference travel expenses. They also requested a W-9 for a reimbursement under $600, which initially confused me too. What I learned is that many healthcare-related companies have blanket policies requiring W-9s for ANY payment to healthcare professionals, regardless of the amount or nature of the payment. This is partly due to compliance requirements and partly because their accounting systems are set up to capture all tax information upfront rather than trying to sort it out later. The key thing is that a W-9 request doesn't automatically mean you'll receive a 1099. For true expense reimbursements like your wife's flight, they should NOT issue any tax forms since they're just returning money she spent on their behalf. However, I'd recommend she specifically ask them in writing whether this reimbursement will result in any tax reporting - having that confirmation can save headaches later. Also keep all documentation (conference invitation, receipt, correspondence) just in case their accounting department makes an error. Most reputable companies handle these correctly, but having a paper trail makes any corrections much easier if needed.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•This is really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same situation! Your experience with the pharmaceutical company requesting a W-9 for conference reimbursements matches what we're dealing with perfectly. It's helpful to know this is just standard practice in the healthcare industry rather than something unusual. I definitely plan to follow your advice about asking for written confirmation that this won't result in tax reporting. That seems to be the consistent recommendation from everyone who's dealt with this before. And keeping all the documentation organized makes total sense - better to be over-prepared than scrambling later if there's any confusion. Thanks for sharing your experience and confirming that reputable companies typically handle these reimbursements correctly. It gives me much more confidence about moving forward with the W-9 while taking the right precautions.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
I'm a tax preparer who works with several healthcare professionals, and I can confirm this is extremely common in the medical device and pharmaceutical industries. The W-9 request is standard procedure for any payment to healthcare providers due to strict compliance requirements, but it doesn't mean your wife will receive a 1099 for a legitimate expense reimbursement. The key distinction is that she paid for the flight herself and is simply being reimbursed - this is not income. However, I've seen companies occasionally make errors and issue 1099s for reimbursements, so I always recommend my clients do two things: 1) Get written confirmation from the company that the reimbursement won't generate a 1099, and 2) Keep detailed records including the conference invitation, receipts, and all correspondence. If they do mistakenly issue a 1099, you'll need those records to request a correction. The good news is that most reputable medical device companies have proper procedures to distinguish between reimbursements and taxable payments. Just fill out the W-9 (it's really just administrative) but get that written confirmation for peace of mind.
0 coins
Ellie Perry
•This is incredibly helpful advice from a professional perspective! As someone new to this type of situation, it's really reassuring to hear from a tax preparer who regularly deals with healthcare professionals and these exact scenarios. Your two-step approach makes perfect sense - getting written confirmation upfront and maintaining detailed records. I hadn't realized how common these W-9 requests are in the medical device industry until reading everyone's responses here. It sounds like it's just part of their standard compliance procedures rather than anything to be concerned about. I really appreciate you emphasizing that this is clearly not income since my wife paid for the flight herself and is just being reimbursed. That distinction seems obvious to me, but it's good to have professional confirmation. I'll definitely make sure we follow your recommendations about documentation and getting that written confirmation before proceeding. Thank you for sharing your professional insights - it's exactly the kind of expert perspective I was hoping to find in this community!
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
I'm an accountant who works with several medical practices, and I can add some additional context to what others have shared. The W-9 request is indeed standard practice for medical device companies, but there's an important nuance worth mentioning. While everyone is correctly noting that legitimate expense reimbursements shouldn't generate a 1099, the classification can sometimes depend on the broader relationship between your wife and the company. If this is truly a one-time reimbursement for travel to a conference they invited her to attend, it should be straightforward. However, if there's any expectation of her providing feedback, participating in surveys, or any other "services" in exchange for the conference invitation and reimbursement, the company might view this differently. I'd recommend your wife clarify with the company whether they consider this a pure expense reimbursement or if they view the conference attendance as providing some value back to them. Most reputable medical device companies are very clear about this distinction, but getting it in writing protects everyone. The documentation trail others mentioned (invitation, receipts, correspondence) is crucial regardless of how they classify it. The good news is that under $600, even if they did consider it taxable, it wouldn't require a 1099 anyway - but better to get clarity upfront than deal with surprises later.
0 coins
Nina Fitzgerald
•This is a really important distinction you've raised about the broader relationship and expectations! I hadn't considered that the company might view conference attendance as providing value back to them, even if it's not explicitly stated. Your point about clarifying whether this is a pure expense reimbursement versus some form of compensation for services (like feedback or surveys) is crucial. That distinction could completely change how the payment should be classified for tax purposes. It's reassuring to know that even if they did consider it taxable, the under $600 amount wouldn't typically require a 1099, but you're absolutely right that getting clarity upfront is the best approach. I'll make sure to suggest that my wife specifically asks the company to confirm in writing that this is being treated as a straightforward expense reimbursement with no expectation of services in return. Thanks for adding this professional perspective - it's exactly the kind of nuanced insight that helps navigate these situations properly!
0 coins
Aisha Ali
I'm a CPA who specializes in healthcare professional taxation, and I see this exact scenario frequently. The W-9 request is absolutely standard practice for medical device companies - they're required to collect this information for any payments to healthcare providers due to compliance regulations, regardless of whether it's income or reimbursement. Here's what you need to know: A legitimate expense reimbursement should NOT result in a 1099, even with a W-9 on file. However, I always advise my clients to take two protective steps: 1) Email the company asking for written confirmation that this reimbursement won't generate any tax forms, and 2) Save everything - the conference invitation, flight receipt, their reimbursement request, and all email correspondence. The reason for the extra caution is that some companies have automated systems that flag any payment for potential 1099 issuance. Having that written confirmation and documentation makes it much easier to request corrections if their accounting department makes an error. In 15 years of practice, I've seen maybe a dozen incorrect 1099s for reimbursements, but they're always correctable with proper documentation. Your wife should feel confident filling out the W-9 - it's just administrative paperwork that allows them to process the reimbursement through their vendor system.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•Thank you so much for this expert perspective! As someone completely new to this situation, it's incredibly reassuring to hear from a CPA who specializes in healthcare professional taxation and sees this scenario regularly. Your confirmation that W-9 requests are standard practice for medical device companies due to compliance regulations really puts this whole situation into context. I really appreciate your two-step protective approach - getting written confirmation and saving all documentation. It sounds like this is just good practice even though incorrect 1099s are relatively rare in your experience. The fact that you've only seen about a dozen incorrect 1099s for reimbursements in 15 years of practice is very encouraging, and knowing they're always correctable with proper documentation gives me confidence. Your point about automated systems potentially flagging payments for 1099 issuance makes perfect sense - better to be proactive than reactive in these situations. I'll definitely suggest my wife follow your recommended steps before submitting the W-9. Thank you for taking the time to share your professional expertise with our community!
0 coins