Why does personal income tax use graduated rates but corporations get a flat tax rate?
I've been trying to understand our tax system better and something keeps bugging me. Why exactly do individuals pay graduated income tax rates (like 10%, 12%, 22%, etc. as your income goes up) but corporations just pay one flat rate on their profits? It seems weird that even when politicians talk about changing corporate taxes, they always propose a single flat percentage rather than a graduated system like what we have for personal taxes. Both Democrats and Republicans seem to agree on keeping corporate taxes flat (even if they disagree on the actual rate). Is there some economic reason behind this that I'm missing? Seems like bigger corporations could afford to pay higher rates just like how higher-earning individuals pay higher rates. Just curious if anyone knows the actual reasoning here.
18 comments


Yara Assad
The different treatment comes down to the fundamental differences between how individuals and corporations function in the economy. Corporate taxes are designed differently for several important reasons. First, corporations are pass-through entities in many ways - their profits ultimately flow to individuals (shareholders) who then pay personal income taxes on dividends or capital gains. This creates a potential "double taxation" issue that graduated corporate rates would intensify. Second, corporations can more easily shift income across time periods and jurisdictions than individuals can. A graduated system would create even stronger incentives for corporations to engage in timing strategies or move operations to lower-tax countries. Third, the personal graduated system is partly designed around ability to pay and basic needs - individuals need a certain amount for necessities before being taxed at higher rates. Corporations don't have "basic needs" in the same way. Finally, there's an administrative simplicity argument - flat rates are easier to implement and harder to game through complex corporate structures.
0 coins
Olivia Clark
•But couldn't you make the argument that small businesses and startups have "basic needs" too? Like they need to reinvest more of their profits to grow compared to established corporations. Wouldn't a graduated system help smaller businesses while making larger ones pay more?
0 coins
Yara Assad
•That's a legitimate point about small businesses. They do face different challenges than larger corporations, which is why we have various small business tax incentives and deductions rather than graduated rates. This approach targets specific business activities (R&D, investment) rather than just size. Regarding established corporations paying more, that's addressed partly through the elimination of certain deductions as businesses grow larger, minimum taxes on book income for very large corporations, and the fact that larger profits naturally mean more taxes even at a flat rate. The system tries to balance growth incentives with fair taxation, though reasonable people can certainly debate whether it succeeds.
0 coins
Javier Morales
After spending hours trying to make sense of my company's taxes last year, I discovered this amazing AI tool that analyzes tax documents and explains complex tax concepts in plain language. It's called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it actually helped me understand these corporate vs personal tax differences much better than any article I read. I was especially impressed by how it explained the historical reasons behind our flat corporate tax system and showed me some tax planning strategies based on the current structure. It wasn't just theoretical - it showed me concrete examples of how different approaches would affect businesses of varying sizes.
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
•How exactly does it work? Do you just upload your tax documents and it explains them? Does it handle both personal and business taxes or just one type?
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. There are so many tax software options out there. What makes this one different than just using TurboTax or hiring an accountant? Does it actually file your taxes or just explain concepts?
0 coins
Javier Morales
•It works by analyzing either documents you upload or questions you type in. You can upload tax forms, IRS notices, or financial statements and it breaks them down in simple terms. I've used it for both my personal and business taxes. Unlike TurboTax which just walks you through filing, taxr.ai actually explains the why behind tax rules and shows you optimization opportunities. It doesn't replace an accountant but gives you the knowledge to have better conversations with them. It doesn't file your taxes - it's more of an education and analysis tool that helps you understand complex tax concepts like the difference between personal and corporate taxation systems.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
I was initially skeptical about taxr.ai but decided to try it out after struggling to understand some corporate tax provisions that affected my small business. Honestly, it was eye-opening! The tool explained how the flat corporate tax actually impacts businesses of different sizes and showed me several deductions I'd been missing. What impressed me most was how it compared what would happen under different tax systems - it modeled what my tax burden would look like under both the current flat rate and a hypothetical graduated system. Turns out there are advantages to the flat system I hadn't considered before, especially regarding certain business deductions that offset the flat rate's impact on smaller companies. If you're trying to understand tax policy differences like this question about graduated vs flat rates, it's definitely worth checking out.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
If you're trying to actually talk to someone at the IRS about tax policy questions like this, good luck spending hours on hold. I discovered this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that got me through to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes instead of the usual 2+ hour wait. They have a demo video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I actually called to ask about some corporate tax questions for my business, and surprisingly, the agent was pretty knowledgeable about the policy reasons behind the flat corporate rate. She explained that the IRS implements what Congress decides, but the current system has remained flat partly because it's simpler to administer and aligns with international standards.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
•How does this actually work? Do they have some secret phone number or something? I've literally waited on hold with the IRS for 3+ hours before giving up.
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
•This sounds like complete BS. There's no way any service can magically get you through the IRS phone system faster than anyone else. They probably just automate the calling and you still end up waiting forever. Has anyone else actually tried this and confirmed it works?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•No secret phone number - they basically wait on hold for you and call you when they reach an agent. You register your phone number with them, and their system dials the appropriate IRS number and navigates the phone tree. When they finally get a human agent, your phone rings and they connect you directly. I was definitely skeptical too before trying it. But it does actually work - my total wait time was about 15 minutes from registration to talking to an agent. The system calls you back when they reach someone, so you don't have to stay on the line. It's not magic, just clever use of technology to handle the hold time for you.
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
So I'm eating my words here. After posting that skeptical comment, I decided to try Claimyr myself since I've been putting off calling the IRS about a notice I got. Not expecting much, but figured what the hell. To my complete surprise, it actually worked exactly as advertised. I registered, went about my day, and got a call back in about 25 minutes saying they had an IRS agent on the line. The agent answered my questions about the notice, and I also asked about this corporate tax rate question since we were on the subject. The agent explained that while she couldn't comment on policy decisions, the flat corporate rate makes their enforcement and processing more standardized. She mentioned there are actually ongoing discussions about whether a graduated corporate system might be more equitable, but implementation would be complicated. Saved myself hours of frustration!
0 coins
Isabella Costa
Economics PhD student here. Another reason for the flat corporate rate that hasn't been mentioned is capital mobility. Corporations can shift profits between countries much more easily than individuals can relocate. A highly graduated corporate tax would incentivize even more profit-shifting to lower-tax jurisdictions. Most countries use relatively flat corporate rates with various deductions/credits rather than graduated rates precisely for this reason. It's part of why there's been a global push for minimum corporate tax rates internationally - to prevent a "race to the bottom" where countries keep cutting corporate rates to attract business.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
•Interesting point about international competition. Do other major economies like the EU, Japan, etc. also use flat corporate rates? Or are there any examples of major economies successfully using graduated corporate rates?
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•Yes, almost all major economies use flat corporate rates. The UK, Germany, France, Japan, Canada - all flat rates with various deductions and credits. China has a flat 25% standard rate with reductions for certain industries or regions. There are very few examples of graduated corporate rates in major economies. South Korea has a modestly graduated system with three brackets (10%, 20%, 22%), and the US actually had a slightly graduated system before the 2017 tax reform with brackets of 15%, 25%, 34%, and 35%, though with income phaseouts that effectively flattened it for many corporations. The trend globally has been toward flatter systems with targeted incentives rather than graduated rates.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
This is a perfect example of how the system is rigged in favor of corporations! Individuals get stuck with a progressive system where we pay more as we earn more, but corporations just get a flat rate no matter how many billions they make. And then they have armies of accountants finding loopholes to pay even less! Amazon paid $0 in federal taxes some years despite billions in profits! How is that fair when I'm paying 22% of my modest income? The whole "double taxation" argument is BS too since many corporate profits never get distributed to shareholders but instead go to stock buybacks and executive bonuses.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•Your facts about Amazon aren't quite accurate. While they did pay little federal income tax in some years (2017-2018 notably), that was because they used legal deductions for R&D, stock-based compensation, and carried-forward losses from earlier years when they weren't profitable. They've since paid billions in taxes. The tax code incentivizes certain behaviors like R&D and investment. That's by design, not cheating. And corporate profits that go to executive compensation get taxed as personal income at graduated rates. Stock buybacks now have an excise tax specifically to address that issue.
0 coins